This user has been banned.
The Wise Puppet is some sort of artsy thing. It’s too on the nose to be a bootleg.
The pencil moustache-and-soul-patch combo is suspicious, indeed…
- Don’t fix mistakes like that, it make the resulting conversation more confusing. Just live with it.
- Don’t listen to anything Id says. Ever.
hAHAHA jealous much?
Sorry, Stinkyfink. Yo bitch iz MAHN NAHW!!!
Hey, I have too!
Stay out of this, ywhx and I are having a very important discussion…
You say “very important discussion.”
I say:
CRIPPLE FIGHT!!!
I misread.
Well it’s still not fixed. I see you’ve edited your above post that only says, “I misread,” but your glaring negligence has been left to fester above that, even after the mistake has been shoved in your snout like shit on the living room rug.
Fix. It. Now.
Redundant Post, is Redundant.
No. Necessary YHXW Chastisement, is Necessary.
He’s said it himself a weirdly large number of times: if we don’t meticulously document and deconstruct his errors and foibles, he will never learn. Gotta be mean, too. He craves the rough love of my throbbing pedantry.
Your post? Didn’t even notice it. Boring, unfunny. Fails to assign righteous blame. I mean, wtrf is a farmer framer, anyway? Stupid.
I’m fucking dying here. Fake (double-fake?) or not, these names are classic.
C’mon, buddy. You mistyped it and ruined the joke. “Karate Framer” is nowhere near as funny as the accurate “Karate Farmer,” which is one of the loliest things ever.
You really need to be more careful. I mean, jeez, do I have to do everything???
It’s really a smorgasbord of lurker name suggestions.
“Daft Serious”? Holy shit, is it too late to change my username?
“Wise puppet”? It’s like the mfr saw ESB with no translation at all and just called it like he seed it.
Actually my dad prefers CD’s. Otherwise he wouldn’t have them as he obviously bought the records first.
It’s the fact that everything made for vinyl is mastered in a superior fashion. If CD’s were mastered better then this would be an entirely different discussion. But I don’t like my music brick-walled.
That’s a bit of an overstatement, but I concede it’s essentially true.
My point, though, is that vinyl’s other massively distracting and distorting drawbacks usually make vinyl sound worse, even notwithstanding the more tasteful masters.
BOR-ING!
Well this the only appropriate thread.
Incorrect.
http://originaltrilogy.com/topic/VINYLVINYLVINYL/id/12000
Roll in and make a ruckus, fellow debunketeer!
These are terrible random thoughts.
You’re just jealous of my shocking new bromance with whyx.
Nostalgia of things that came out before I was born? I don’t think so.
Yes. Sounds like it’s your father’s audiopheelie fetishism rubbing off on you, so nostalgia-by-proxy.
I’m saying most vinyls that come out are superior to their CD counterparts.
You are obviously saying that. And you are wrong, objectively and quantifiably. Because your subjective impressions are colored by the placebo effect and expectation-confirmation bias.
There’re a lot of earwigs in the basement, so …
Add a pill bug or two and you’ve got a full course meal. 😉
J-Fo outed as boxtroll.
True. But my dad has a huge vinyl and CD collection. Lots of titles on both. Haven’t encountered a single instance where the vinyl didn’t blow the CD out of the water. Played on the same receiver and speakers. A good turntable and receiver with good receivers is going to sound better, you can quote as many articles if you want but until you’ve heard vinyl on the proper setup you haven’t heard recorded music.
Hahaha no.
The last third of EVERY side of EVERY record suffers from audible Inner Groove Distortion. It is a fundamental, inescapable limitation of the vinyl medium. As a partial ameliorative measure, the cutting engineers painstakingly REMOVE higher frequencies from the waveform gradually as they move into the center of the disc. This is a measurable, audible, undebatable LOSS of information and fidelity. And it HAS to be done on EVERY record.
And it sounds, frankly, like goddamn shit.
I say this as a compulsive vinyl collector.
Then, there is the unmistakable, rhythmic THWIP that happens, to some degree, on a significant minority of records due to minor disc warping, which happens during manufacture. Watch a record. Except for a very few lucky flat pressings, the tonearm will almost always bob up and down to some degree. This causes audible WOW on nearly every disc, and frequently (I’d estimate a quarter of new pressings that I buy) you get that nice THWIP as the tonearm takes a moment too long to dip back down into the groove.
One Last Note on Vinyl
A couple of weeks ago there was a discussion in the Albums forum about vinyl and CD. I forgot to mention a couple of things in more detail, such as the frequency response of vinyl versus CD. Most masters of records used various equalization techniques to alleviate the poor frequency response of vinyl. CD does not have these limitations of frequency response and other issues such as hiss, popping, crackle, and more. So, in general, well mastered tracks will sound better on CD than on vinyl. The problem is that most tracks are mastered worse on CD than vinyl. This is where the misconception starts. Through a game of telephone, the fact that tracks are worse mastered on CD gets bended to the misconception that vinyl is better at reproducing sound than CD. So, while you can say that you like the way that vinyl sounds better than CD and how you like the experience, you have a problem when you start to get into the objective terriorty when you start to say that vinyl is better than CD.
Rant over.
Holy shit…
I un-ironically agree with this wholeheartedly, and even think its clearly stated and not a waste of typing in the least.
And it’s even more or less appropriate for this thread!
WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH THE REAL HXYW?!?!?!?!?!
52 is already covered by 35.
Woulda been funnier, Frinkydink.
Don’t worry, lil’ Sis. The Big Bad Id’ll teach you to snark eventually.
Frink’s such a nobody that he has to remind people to make fun of him just so he can gain some sort of human interaction.
Happy birthday buddy!Doing it right.
Oh…so…very…right!
Point—hell, all points—ray_a.
What do you consider to be a meager existence?
…I’m 21 years old and am merely a construction worker but I aspire to make some type of impact. I don’t know how I’ll do it but if I don’t my life will have been of no consequence.
You mean…other than the buildings you helped build that will remain standing after you’re gone.
See? The ywhx discussion has now taken up unwelcome residence in the now-even-more-vapid-than-usual Politics Thread. Please go there for all your craziness needs!
i support the use of this honeypot thread to contain the crazy.
What about to barely contain copies of all the recent images of domesticated hairy beasts that Frink has used as pictorial aids to achieving autoerotic ejaculation?
Cuz that’s what it’s used for now.
Wrong thread again, Stickyfinky.
Frink once masturbated to a picture of Chuck Norris.
It was only because a dog was visible in the background.
Wrong thread, Frinklestein.
I don’t want this list to be too restrictive.
In other words, you know you’d be the bannable one if Pissed’s rule were enacted.
