logo Sign In

ChainsawAsh

This user has been banned.

User Group
Banned Members
Join date
31-Jul-2004
Last activity
24-Dec-2020
Posts
8,679

Post History

Post
#477145
Topic
.: The XØ Project - Laserdisc on Steroids :. (SEE FIRST POST FOR UPDATES) (* unfinished project *)
Time

The Aluminum Falcon said:

ChainsawAsh said:

It was a timecoded copy, simply meant so all the members could tell each other exactly what they were working on down to each frame.  It was just a reference, it wasn't the actual video they were working with.  I believe it was made from the video they were working with, but it was much lower quality since it was just meant to be a timecode copy.

Ahh... gotcha. How much lower is it? Despite its lower quality, would it still have been better than most laserdisc preservations or the GOUT?

Probably not.  Besides, every frame has timecode burned into it, so unless you like watching digital workprint, I don't see how the timecode copy is useful in any way.

Post
#476842
Topic
THX 1138 "preservations" + the 'THX 1138 Italian Cut' project (Released)
Time

erri_wan said:

Does this line make sense to you

A visual record has being taken and sent to...
...the terminal of our Biology Department

Were computers in the 70's called "terminal" also in English? As I said, I'm trying to stick to the original Italian wording as much as possible.

My original version was "A visual record has been taken and send to our Biology Department" (more plain and simple) but if I have to stick to the Italian version, the first line I posted is practically what they say.

___________________________________

Another question for you English speakers is this: which version of this catchfrase is better "Only in equality one finds happiness" or "Only in equality, happiness is to be found"? (literal translation from Italian would be the second but literal translations are not always correct)

I'd go with "Only in equality is happiness to be found."

Post
#476739
Topic
.: The XØ Project - Laserdisc on Steroids :. (SEE FIRST POST FOR UPDATES) (* unfinished project *)
Time

It was a timecoded copy, simply meant so all the members could tell each other exactly what they were working on down to each frame.  It was just a reference, it wasn't the actual video they were working with.  I believe it was made from the video they were working with, but it was much lower quality since it was just meant to be a timecode copy.

Post
#476696
Topic
MattmanOmega's Rebellion Collection & 720p AVCHD of OT Theatrical Vers. (Released)
Time

Well, when I say inherent to the GOUT, I mean the master used to make the GOUT.  So the Definitive Collection and "Faces" laserdiscs have the smearing, too.

And the 1977 crawl on the GOUT DVD was transferred separately from the rest, so it - and, by extension, the first shot - looks substantially nicer than the rest of the film.

Post
#476621
Topic
5.1 DTS speed change in OS X
Time

The reason is that the director of the film (Into the Void) has said that he would prefer for viewers to see his film at 25fps instead of 24, but all Blu-Ray releases are at 23.976.  I haven't seen the film, but I would like to, and I'd like to see it the way the director intended for me to see it.  That, and it makes the movie about 6-8 minutes shorter, and from what I hear of this movie, it's already too long.

Plus it gives me an excuse to test out my roommate's projector's capabilities, which can apparently display NTSC or PAL at the intended framerate.

I'll try out your method, but I'd really like to keep the DTS encoding if at all possible.

Post
#476603
Topic
Off Topic Discussion About Adywan's Revisited Projects
Time

Behold, a list of all the accounts of one "Ghostbusters":

Moth3r said:

I think you have them all covered already:

BadAssKeith
KillLucas
Janskeet
Janskeet2
Ghostbusters
He's Back!
I'm not a troll

Let me know if you think there are any more.

I'll be referring to him from now on as BadAssLucasKillingGhostSkeetTrollBack2.

Post
#476601
Topic
Return of the Jedi - The Spence Final Cut (Released)
Time

SpenceEdit said:

I'm going to respectfully table the crawl suggestions conversation. I think I've got it where I need it, and I don't want to over-analyze it.

Fair enough.

I hope you don't think we're trying to take over your edit, Spence - I think I speak for everyone here when I say that we just want this to be the best Return of the Jedi it can be, and as insignificant as the crawl may seem, it's the first thing anyone will ever see of your edit, and it needs to grab them and make them want to continue watching.  I don't know how many times I've downloaded a Star Wars fan edit, popped it in, and been immediately disillusioned when the half-assed replacement crawl comes up.  I just don't want that to happen with this edit, since it seems so very promising.

Anyway, that's the last I'll say on the subject of the crawl.