logo Sign In

Broom Kid

User Group
Members
Join date
3-Sep-2019
Last activity
1-Nov-2025
Posts
946

Post History

Post
#1299361
Topic
Episode IX: The Rise Of Skywalker - Discussion * <strong><em>SPOILER THREAD</em></strong> *
Time

IIRC she said she wanted to be the mo-cap character? I remember her giving an interview before the movie came out where someone basically said the same thing to her and she was like “I wanted to try this type of acting, because it seemed like a rare opportunity, especially for something like Star Wars.” I might be misremembering that, but I do remember thinking something similar before I was told she really wanted to do it, and was surprised.

I guess the current rumors are that Maz helps in the big battle against the Emperor in the third act, shows up to help with a squad of pirate warships or something like that. I don’t know if that would really cheapen anything. Seems like a decent payoff to the First Order wrecking her castle.

Post
#1299078
Topic
Small details that took you <em><strong>FOREVER</strong></em> to notice in the <em>Star Wars</em> films
Time

Mocata said:

It also says the officer who tells Vader about the escape pod has the same voice, which when I think about it is true. Another case of weird dubbing like many of the British actors in the OT.

That’s crazy, isn’t it? All the times I’ve seen this movie and it never occurred to me that the “And no transmissions were made” Imperial at the very beginning has the same voice as the “You’re required to maneuver, straight down this trench” old guy at the very end.

Post
#1299008
Topic
Small details that took you <em><strong>FOREVER</strong></em> to notice in the <em>Star Wars</em> films
Time

I was watching “The Andromeda Strain” tonight, and there was a character in it by the name of General Sparks, played by an actor named Peter Hobbs. The entire time I was thinking “I swear to God I recognize this guy’s voice from somewhere” and after about 20 minutes, I thought I finally placed it: General Dodonna from Star Wars.

But Peter Hobbs was clean shaven, didn’t very much look like General Dodonna, and as it turns out, isn’t the guy who played Dodonna. That guy’s name was Alex McCrindle. So I thought “well, that’s weird, but maybe old officious dudes in the 70’s talked like that frequently, I don’t know. In the 30’s everyone sounded like Cary Grant, maybe it’s one of those types of things.”

But then I looked up a video of Alex McCrindle in a role that WASN’T General Dodonna (he ended up having a role in Richard Marquand’s Eye of the Needle, in fact) and Alex McCrindle sounds NOTHING like General Dodonna. And even if he wanted to pitch his voice down and make it crunchier or more officious, he very likely still wouldn’t sound like General Dodonna. So I started wondering if Peter Hobbs overdubbed Alex McCrindle, and started googling around. There’s no official recognition that I can see, no crediting on imdb, and I couldn’t find anything at the usual wiki places, but when I googled the phrase “Peter Hobbs Voice-Over Star Wars” I found this post from four years ago at filmboards.com

https://filmboards.com/board/p/2370744/

Relevant quote:

“My Dad was Peter Hobbs. Years ago I remember him pointing up to a Star Wars marquee, “I’ve only got one line in that, but it’s a doozy. ‘May the force be with you.’” Not sure if that’s what actually happened, but he definitely did some vo on SW. He died a couple of years ago so I can’t ask him for more details. You guys have incredible ears!”

That’d be a really random thing for someone to just make up, of all the things to make up… so I’m pretty sure Peter Hobbs was the voice of General Dodonna.

Post
#1298964
Topic
Best viewing order to introduce Star Wars to children?
Time

I understand why this question is asked so frequently, but I also think the best answer is to just let them discover it on their own, however it is they discover it - whether that’s hearing about it from a friend, picking it out of a home video library on their own, or stumbling across it on TV (or netflix, or youtube now, I guess? Twitch tv maybe?) I don’t think I missed out or lost anything by not having my dad set me down to watch Star Wars with him after having figured out the optimal viewing order. I became a fan of the original trilogy by myself, and that sense of discovery is a big part of why it stuck with me all this time. There’s a big difference between finding this very cool thing “on your own” vs. having it carefully curated and presented to you like a rite of passage. Kids can and do recognize this, even if they don’t have the words for those concepts yet.

Post
#1298877
Topic
<strong>STAR WARS: REBELS</strong> (animated tv series) - a general discussion thread
Time

CHEWBAKAspelledwrong said:

I think they had to because Fox was not involved in digital distribution.

I understand why they initially pulled the logos - they wanted digital versions up very, very quickly, and hadn’t worked out a better deal with Fox - before buying them outright, that is - what I don’t understand, especially considering their strategy for The Force Awakens and every other movie that followed, is why they thought the Lucasfilm logo needed a fanfare at all, much less the chopped up “Finale” from Empire as that fanfare.

Everything about it just sounded like a thing decided upon, started, and finished in less than an hour before someone hit publish.

Post
#1298802
Topic
<strong>STAR WARS: REBELS</strong> (animated tv series) - a general discussion thread
Time

DavidMDaut said:

EDIT: What I could see, though, is them getting McDiarmid to voice Palpatine for the upcoming final batch of Clone Wars episodes coming to Disney+. If they already got him in the booth for that, it’d be easy enough to have him read this one scene from Rebels.

That’s what I was referencing in my post.

Although honestly, if they were willing to pay him for 2 or 3 days of vocal work, they probably could have retrofitted him into the old Clone Wars episodes too. But I agree with you that such a scenario seems unlikely.

RE: the other examples of tinkering: That decision to re-do the fanfares is so weird, in retrospect. I don’t understand why they even tried it, or further, why they thought that edit was a good idea.

Post
#1298748
Topic
<strong>STAR WARS: REBELS</strong> (animated tv series) - a general discussion thread
Time

This is, I believe, the first time post-release tinkering has happened at Lucasfilm since the purchase. Up until now there’s been no “versions” of anything.

Of course the question now is if his voice work stops at this one scene for Rebels, or if they went ahead and put him in Clone Wars, too.

Post
#1298527
Topic
Star Wars trilogy box sets coming next year?
Time

It’s also weird in that Disney seems to be otherwise forgoing homogeneity in their marketing, going out of their way to use the marketing logos from the time of release in a lot of material. The D23 announcements of material specifically had OT-style logos, PT-style logos, and ST-style logos representing each era. They didn’t “hamburger-logo-generator” every title like they’ve done for these blu-rays.

Post
#1298406
Topic
StarWarsLegacy.com - The Official Thread
Time

If only Bob Iger had gone through with buying Twitter, for no other reason than to have wiped every single tweet from existence, buried all the servers, and glassed the landfill. I would have loved for Twitter to just one day have become the comments section for D23 members and that’s it. That would have been GREAT.

semi-on-topic: This thread is really interesting as a time-capsule starting when trying to upscale and de-noise laserdisc rips was at the forefront of fan-preservation attempts, going all the way through to the “wait, we can scan our own film prints!” revelation that brings us to the here and now.

Post
#1298212
Topic
STAR WARS: EP VI -RETURN OF THE JEDI &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - ** PRODUCTION HAS NOW RESTARTED **
Time

I still think this one actually SOUNDS the best.

https://streamable.com/7ky47

All the further enhancements are increasingly highlighting the time-stretch and reverb processing, and instead of making the performance feel organic and connected, it’s making it stand out more. I don’t know that you even need to slow down ‘Your mother’ so much as you probably need to slightly pitch shift it down a few cents and maybe eq more carefully. As it is, it sounds a little extra-crispy with the time stretch and reverb effects being added to it.

of the variations posted, I honestly believe it’s this first one that sounds the most like James Earl Jones is saying the line as written in the ADR sessions. The others, in an effort to make it “time out” correctly, are calling attention to the fact it’s two takes stitched together. If time stretching has to be employed, I’d suggest only stretching the “err” syllable of your mother.

Post
#1298167
Topic
STAR WARS: EP VI -RETURN OF THE JEDI &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - ** PRODUCTION HAS NOW RESTARTED **
Time

True, but this is some Ant-Man quantum-realm fiddling, haha. But it’s also not like I’m the one in the lab cutting the stuff together either, so my two cents aren’t even worth that, I understand. Just wanted to put it out there that as someone who is very tuned to this sort of thing through consuming untold number of fan-derived projects, the first example posted in here would read as “seamless.”

Post
#1298162
Topic
STAR WARS: EP VI -RETURN OF THE JEDI &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - ** PRODUCTION HAS NOW RESTARTED **
Time

I think this is starting to become an exercise in splitting of the finest of hairs. The first one was more than good enough, and iterations on it have all been minutely incremental improvements at best, if that. The fact it works as well as it does at all is pretty damned cool.

Post
#1298124
Topic
Star Wars trilogy box sets coming next year?
Time

Disney and Lucasfilm haven’t officially announced any new sets for next year, but this repackaging of on-hand stock has almost every time meant a new Disney release is imminent, and that lines up with the (fairly credible) rumors of a “Skywalker Saga” 4K set not just in the works, but ready to go for 2020

The most recent example of this practice was Marvel repackaging all their MCU movies to clear out old stock in advance of the Infinity Saga box set still undated for next year.

Post
#1298122
Topic
The Rise of Skywalker box office results: predictions and expectations
Time

Between Solo’s botched release (largely Iger’s fault) and Iger’s latest strategy of releasing a memoir full of stories where he makes George Lucas feel bad literally one week before the marketing campaign for the end of the Skywalker Saga starts, you have to wonder just how angry Kathleen Kennedy is at her boss right now.

Post
#1297977
Topic
When was the Special Edition first shown on TV?
Time

This might be faulty memory kicking in here, but I’m vaguely remembering that the Sci-Fi Channel (pre-SyFy days, pre-Battlestar Galactica reboot) used to intermittently show the original versions in rare marathons, post Special Editions. I can’t verify that though, and I really might be remembering it incorrectly, but I think it happened?

I also believe the Special Editions were still being shown at some outlets even after the 2004 DVDs had come out. Now, of course, everything is the 2011 blu-ray versions, but for awhile there I vaguely remember it being kind of a crapshoot as to which version you were going to be watching if you caught it on television with the commercial breaks and everything. Was it the SE’s? Was it the DVDs? The only real consistency was that no matter who was showing it, they were definitely cropping it, whether it was to 4x3, or 16x9.

Post
#1297717
Topic
The Phantom Menace - Theatrical version scanned in 4K (a WIP)
Time

2012 is when the Phantom Menace got the 3D re-release. A tomatometer of mid-60s isn’t particularly well liked. It’s not really hated, though, but the argument that people HATE The Phantom Menace has always been a more fan-focused one. General Audiences and critics. may not have liked it a whole bunch, but they didn’t hate it, either.

The audience ratings at rottentomatoes were suspect even BEFORE the act of brigading became common practice in 2016. I wouldn’t give them much credence in any respect, not only because they’re easily (and often) gamed but because the self-selected sample-size is fairly biased towards a specific kind of filmgoer.

Post
#1297716
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time

Again, I appreciated the attempt, but I think it’s really one of those cases where there’s simply not enough unique and interesting footage to make that thing feel faster or more intense with what’s there. It’s the equivalent of trying to re-edit the Tusken attack on Luke to run 30-40 seconds longer, but all you have is five or six swipes and that celebratory stick action to rock back and forth. It’s partially why the Sc. 38 re-do was so exciting, and then so disappointing: The only real solution to updating that scene is to literally re-shoot it. Someone finally did, but they decided to make it look like a Netflix action movie and not like Star Wars.

I think that fight, short of someone coming up with a box full of alternate takes that can be scanned and rotoscoped, or another group of people re-shooting and re-choreographing the fight and using face-replacement and deepfaking for Ben, is probably best left alone. For all the fixes and re-edits in Revisited that are legitimate improvements or “invisible” upgrades, it only makes it all the more apparent when an edit DOESN’T work, and I think Adywan did as well as he could with what’s in the film proper, but I don’t think it actually improves on the Special Edition the way all his other edits do.