- Post
- #208219
- Topic
- The Official 2006 Discs Will Be No Better Than What We Have!
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/208219/action/topic#208219
- Time
BountyHunter
- User Group
- Members
- Join date
- 19-Nov-2004
- Last activity
- 20-Apr-2014
- Posts
- 93
Post History
- Post
- #208059
- Topic
- The Official 2006 Discs Will Be No Better Than What We Have!
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/208059/action/topic#208059
- Time
(It's strange that every little change between prints is well documented for ANH, but I've really never heard anything about the changes, audio or video, between the 70mm and 35mm print of ESB or RotJ)
- Post
- #208030
- Topic
- Info: The "OFFICIAL" audio mixes of the Original Trilogy - Help needed.
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/208030/action/topic#208030
- Time
Originally posted by: THX
Neil, which is in your opinion the best mix and why?
Neil, which is in your opinion the best mix and why?
Yes I'd also like to hear Neil's opinion.
Also, if the 1993 LD's were the ONLY mix that was based of the original 6 track dolby surround, then what format is it in? Dolby Digital 5.1? Dolby Surround? 4.0, 2.0?
- Post
- #208011
- Topic
- John William's Opinion on the Special Editions
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/208011/action/topic#208011
- Time
- Post
- #207188
- Topic
- ITS HAPPENED-- OOT AVAILABLE FROM LUCASFILM
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/207188/action/topic#207188
- Time
Originally posted by: Knightmessenger
According to a post on the Star Wars board on IMDB, Lucas said this:
It is illegal to profit from Star Wars without having a licensing agreement from Lucasfilm. Obviously, we have a hard time enforcing this overseas with people selling pirated Star Wars DVDs. The reason we had to finally release the old films on DVD was because of all the illegal pirating going on. We were afraid that if we waited any longer the pirates would completely saturate and take the DVD market away from us.
Anyone know if he really said this.
According to a post on the Star Wars board on IMDB, Lucas said this:
It is illegal to profit from Star Wars without having a licensing agreement from Lucasfilm. Obviously, we have a hard time enforcing this overseas with people selling pirated Star Wars DVDs. The reason we had to finally release the old films on DVD was because of all the illegal pirating going on. We were afraid that if we waited any longer the pirates would completely saturate and take the DVD market away from us.
Anyone know if he really said this.
Not sure, but that's the exact same thing GL said in 2004 when people asked him why he was releasing the OT (SE) ahead of schedule. Who ever it was on IMDB might just be reading an interview from 2004...or maybe not.
- Post
- #207184
- Topic
- Was the FULL Biggs/Luke Yavin 4 scene in the 77 TE?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/207184/action/topic#207184
- Time
- Post
- #206891
- Topic
- End of SE ROTJ...
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/206891/action/topic#206891
- Time
Only problem is that Anakin finally attained that "level" as an old man...not when he was a kid, so the presence of Hayden isn't justified under any circumstance.
- Post
- #206844
- Topic
- Soundtrack for Star Wars OOT DVD?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/206844/action/topic#206844
- Time
Originally posted by: GundarkHunter
One word: bitrate. If these discs use the standard 192 kbps rate for Dolby 2.0, it's going to sound anemic in comparison to a 5.1 track (which is the case with the 2004 discs). If they use a 384 kbps rate, the sound will be fuller. Ideally, THX would use a PCM track instead, which has a bitrate of over 1500 kbps, but I doubt they'll do this. I don't see them using a 4.1 track to approximate the 70mm experience.
One word: bitrate. If these discs use the standard 192 kbps rate for Dolby 2.0, it's going to sound anemic in comparison to a 5.1 track (which is the case with the 2004 discs). If they use a 384 kbps rate, the sound will be fuller. Ideally, THX would use a PCM track instead, which has a bitrate of over 1500 kbps, but I doubt they'll do this. I don't see them using a 4.1 track to approximate the 70mm experience.
what was the bitrate for the 04 DVDs?
Furthermore, would the 2.0 decoded into pro-logic sound nearly as good as the 6-track (70mm) audio?
- Post
- #206727
- Topic
- Soundtrack for Star Wars OOT DVD?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/206727/action/topic#206727
- Time
Cause from what I read, "The sound editing and re-recording team began by preparing a four-track master mix (Left-Center-Right-Surround), which would serve as the basis for both the 35mm and 70mm stereo versions. The master mix was dubbed into a matrix-encoded two-track Lt-Rt (Left total-Right total) printmaster for use on the 35mm Dolby Stereo prints. The same four-track master, with some enhancements, was also used to create the six-track version. In comparison to the 35mm Dolby Stereo version, the six-track soundtrack during playback offered discrete channels, greater clarity and dynamic range characteristics, and special low-frequency content (bass extension, or "baby boom")."
So basically, how I understand it is that instead of getting 4 discrete channels(like we would with the 6-track 70mm soundtrack), we are only getting two channels of discrete sound with the 2.0 DVD soundtrack...which won't sound nearly as good.
- Post
- #206426
- Topic
- Star Wars: Where Science Meets Imagenation
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/206426/action/topic#206426
- Time
- Post
- #206373
- Topic
- ORIGINAL STAR WARS TRILOGY OUT 09/2006 BY LUCASFILM
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/206373/action/topic#206373
- Time
Originally posted by: ocpmovie
> I think a lot of people need to take a step back and think about this for a second. A lot of you are asking some very valid questions. A couple of you can't seem to handle the news and have reverted to posting like a 3rd grader on AOL for the first time.
I believe that IS a symptom of stepping back and thinking about this for a second. In all its forms.
I seem to be a form of all three people you referred to there, but I won't take it personally.
Anyway, shit - clearly they DID read this forum. They're stealing our fucking ideas! Original crawl and now this:
http://starwars.com/collecting/shop/shopnews/news20060503.html
WHAT? That's not their shirt! That's an OT shirt! Legacy edition, right?
They should be sued for that ... except they own Han and OT doesn't.
Hm.
Citizen ... Tequila Mockingbird and I are doing something with Howard the Duck probably, a widescreen version of it .... and also an extended pan & scan cut of The Muppet Movie.
Well, er, he's doing em cos he's got em. I'll be ... looking at em. And getting em.
> I think a lot of people need to take a step back and think about this for a second. A lot of you are asking some very valid questions. A couple of you can't seem to handle the news and have reverted to posting like a 3rd grader on AOL for the first time.
I believe that IS a symptom of stepping back and thinking about this for a second. In all its forms.
I seem to be a form of all three people you referred to there, but I won't take it personally.
Anyway, shit - clearly they DID read this forum. They're stealing our fucking ideas! Original crawl and now this:
http://starwars.com/collecting/shop/shopnews/news20060503.html
WHAT? That's not their shirt! That's an OT shirt! Legacy edition, right?
They should be sued for that ... except they own Han and OT doesn't.
Hm.
Citizen ... Tequila Mockingbird and I are doing something with Howard the Duck probably, a widescreen version of it .... and also an extended pan & scan cut of The Muppet Movie.
Well, er, he's doing em cos he's got em. I'll be ... looking at em. And getting em.
ROTFLMAO!!!!!
That shirt is Lucasfilms way of flippin you the bird! You should feel both furious and honored atthe same time.
As far as I'm concerned, that is DEFINITIVE proof that this site made the OOT release happen.
- Post
- #206120
- Topic
- Info: The Future of OT Preservation projects <em>(the 2006 DVDs has been announced)</em>
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/206120/action/topic#206120
- Time
- Post
- #201928
- Topic
- ***The "Darth Editous" Episode IV DVD Info and Feedback Thread*** - a partially "de-specialed" DVD
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/201928/action/topic#201928
- Time
- Post
- #200525
- Topic
- ***The "Darth Editous" Episode IV DVD Info and Feedback Thread*** - a partially "de-specialed" DVD
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/200525/action/topic#200525
- Time
- Post
- #199027
- Topic
- ***The "Darth Editous" Episode IV DVD Info and Feedback Thread*** - a partially "de-specialed" DVD
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/199027/action/topic#199027
- Time
Originally posted by: Yoda Is Your Father
As a huge fan of DE's anh, I can't wait for ESB.
As a huge fan of DE's anh, I can't wait for ESB.
Agreed.
DE:ANH was by FAR the best fan edit ever made. Virtually seamless.
- Post
- #199023
- Topic
- <strong>The "ADigitalMan Special Editions" DVD Info and Feedback Thread</strong> (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/199023/action/topic#199023
- Time
- Post
- #198303
- Topic
- Info: Any Interest In A Corrected 2004 DVD? (“Deliberate Creative Decisions” info)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/198303/action/topic#198303
- Time
If not, how can I get a copy?
(BTW - anything similar for ESB and RotJ?)
- Post
- #197081
- Topic
- Torrents Noob.
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/197081/action/topic#197081
- Time
On my old PC I used to have all the necessary stuff for using bit torrent. Now that I have my notebook, I've forgotten it all. There used to be an excellent guide to BitTorrent at MF.com, but about a year ago, they got real selective and started kicking people off their site (I was one). So now I do not have access to that guide. So now I'm completley lost.
- Post
- #164789
- Topic
- ***The "Darth Editous" Episode IV DVD Info and Feedback Thread*** - a partially "de-specialed" DVD
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/164789/action/topic#164789
- Time
- Post
- #159833
- Topic
- What do you use to d-load music?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/159833/action/topic#159833
- Time
Is it like Kazaa?
- Post
- #159533
- Topic
- Idea & found on ebay: 16mm film SCOPE Star Wars RETURN of THE JEDI MINT LPP
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/159533/action/topic#159533
- Time
- Post
- #159532
- Topic
- What do you use to d-load music?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/159532/action/topic#159532
- Time
- Post
- #159382
- Topic
- What do you use to d-load music?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/159382/action/topic#159382
- Time
- Post
- #156567
- Topic
- ***The "Darth Editous" Episode IV DVD Info and Feedback Thread*** - a partially "de-specialed" DVD
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/156567/action/topic#156567
- Time
A big thanks to all those who paid it foward too.
- Post
- #155215
- Topic
- ***The "Darth Editous" Episode IV DVD Info and Feedback Thread*** - a partially "de-specialed" DVD
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/155215/action/topic#155215
- Time
Lower the brightness so much that most of his face is shadowed, then it will look eerily mysterious and still look the the emperor. Now if you can restore the original dailogue WITH Ian's voice.....