logo Sign In

AntcuFaalb

User Group
Members
Join date
8-Jun-2012
Last activity
9-Feb-2025
Posts
4,267
Web Site
https://ssl.reddit.com/r/AMPSdeux

Post History

Post
#621901
Topic
Harmy's STAR WARS Despecialized Edition HD - V2.7 - MKV (Released)
Time

Canuck21 said:

AntcuFaalb said:

I would normally agree with this, but I think it will create more confusion because everyone will be wondering why they have v3.0 of Star Wars, but v2.0 of The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi.

2.1/2.0/2.0 seems less confusing to me than 3.0/2.0/2.0.

Many are confused by the current 2.0/1.0/1.0.

Wait. Are there v2.0 of The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi or are we still with v1.0?

See the emphasized text above.

Post
#621620
Topic
If you need to B*tch about something... this is the place
Time

CP3S said:

Moved into a new apartment with a really cool roommate. Get along really well, have a ton in common, seems like a cool situation. Last night we were watching some TV and he stretched the image out of ratio to fit the screen... Ugh... That is going to be annoying.

Yuck. Yuck. Yuck!

There's a guy on LDDB who does this with LDs on his 16:9 display and frequently posts images of his setup.

You should ask him: Would you vertically stretch a letterboxed video on a CRT TV to fill the screen?

Wait, don't. I don't want to know the answer and I'm pretty sure you don't want to know it either!

Post
#621617
Topic
Disney Acquires LucasFilm for $4.05 billion, Episode 7 in 2015, 8 and 9 to Follow, New Film Every 2-3 Years
Time

georgec said:

Came here to post that.

Remember how awful an idea it was to have young Han Solo in ROTS?

Still an awful idea. Let's take away the mystery and allure of more OT characters.

I'll ruffle some feathers with this, but all I'm seeing from Disney is the same things we saw from Lucas. That is, shrinking the SW universe further and not coming up with anything original.

While many were saying, "Disney can't do worse than Lucas," I was quietly thinking, "Actually, they can."

I'm not writing them off completely, but it appears to me that Kennedy and Disney are just doing what Lucas probably dictated.

Yes, you're probably right.

With that being said, I was more interested in a young Han than a young Darth Vader prior to TPM and, after seeing the PT, I'm still more interested.

What I really don't want to see is a standalone movie about one of the PT-only characters. That would truly suck. Hard.

However, I do have to admit that I would enjoy a comedy movie starring Watto...

Post
#621607
Topic
PS78: Pre-ANH Star Wars Bootleg VHS from 1978 ***"RAW" DVD RELEASED***
Time

SpilkaBilka said:

This is exciting!  Totally unrealistic, but I must admit that I can't help but have a tiny glimmer of hope that the missed grappling toss or the Biggs scenes are in there...

Assuming that it's a very early '77 print telecined in '79, then it might be a possibility.

With that being said, I still think those shots are false memories... ^_^

Post
#621412
Topic
Disney Acquires LucasFilm for $4.05 billion, Episode 7 in 2015, 8 and 9 to Follow, New Film Every 2-3 Years
Time

TheBoost said:

AntcuFaalb said:

 

I think it would be cool if Yoda was larger in his youth; appearing similar to the Namekians in Dragon Ball Z. The writer could write-in that his people naturally shrink with age.

This would allow him to fight with less... jumping. Also, it would illustrate that "size matters not" because the increase in wisdom (and oneness with the force) that comes with age would more than compensate for the decrease in height and brawn.

But he's only 20 years younger. That/s .02% of his lifespan between the PT and the OT. For a human, that'd be like aging about a year.

Ah, good point!

Post
#621375
Topic
Harmy's STAR WARS Despecialized Edition HD - V2.7 - MKV (Released)
Time

Mavimao said:

2.1 fits perfectly. It's tells a person downloading it that it is Harmy's second version revised - and even if in reality it is somewhat heavily modified from 2.0. This helps keep it in line with his 2nd take on ESB and ROTJ.

I would guess that 3.0 would be a 1080p version - perhaps a hybrid of the bluray and the Saving Star Wars project?

I agree that 2.1 is the least confusing.