logo Sign In

Angel

User Group
Members
Join date
28-May-2008
Last activity
31-May-2022
Posts
3,925
Web Site
http://aggeiw.deviantart.com/

Post History

Post
#365754
Topic
Info & Ideas: ESB and ROTJ Wishlist
Time
Ripplin said:

I think we'd love to see your go at it, too, even if it's just a still shot. I think it might look a bit better with an effect sort of like when the Enterprise goes to warp on ST:TNG; that flash of light that indicates it's powering up a lot. Something like that.

From Prequel radical changes hotpic.

I was wondering if some lasers were visible from star destroyer. So more than one color in one scene.

 

-Angel

Post
#365704
Topic
The Prequel Radical Redux Ideas Thread
Time
mrbenja0618 said:

Nice. Do that in photoshop? Can you tell me how you did it?

I can but id have to kill you after that :)

 

J/K :)

Davnes007 said:

No offense to EyeShotFirst...and to the others that like those color 'corrections'...but those shots are supposed to be redish - They take place late/early in the day**.

Now, I'm not saying it's totally bad...it's just that people are getting kind of over sensitive to the 'redness', and now want it ALL removed...even when it makes sense.

 

** I know the last shot is of the city at night. In that shot, it's supposed to look like Las Vegas...and your 'correction' makes the city look boring.

 

...Now, let the backlash begin!  :P

Yes you are right. but if you see the color sliders you will see that there is no color than red and some yellow.

Even in artistic pictures or fancy sunsets there is always some hidden color.

Either way the scene is bad as it looks. with CGI like a tv series quality and colors like early videogames.

Ripplin said:

Well, except for when the Falcon charges at the Star Destroyer. I've always thought that looks a bit odd.

Yes true. I didnt include it because it looked like painted animation, not like a flame animation.

I think ady can do something :)

 

EDIT: fuck it, i was right. the buildings stays the same only some of the SDs are changing angle when they take off between the shots :O

 

-Angel

Post
#365683
Topic
The Prequel Radical Redux Ideas Thread
Time
Ripplin said:

I agree that there is a bit of washout, but overall, nice choices on the colors themselves. Anything to make them more natural!

No idea what people are talking about as far as black 'blobs.' I can only assume it is now fixed.

Black shits are still there!

here is my try...

there is no flames in the engines in OT!!!

i dont know how ady will manage to eliminate this orange.

probably he will replace this poor Cgi with PROPS!

And i will concur!

EDIT: I was wrong :P

 

-RoboAngel

Post
#365664
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time
oh_riginal said:

Going back to the scene of Luke cutting the hatch open on the AT-AT, does anyone else think the top of the AT-AT leg on the right side of the screen doesn't quite match how it looks and moves in the full shots of the AT-ATs?

 

Yes. Profecor Impfighter gave a lecture on that! I think that he cover all the aspects :)


-Angel

Post
#365411
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time
Bingowings said:
Sevb32 said:

I don't think it would be substantially that much larger than you think. Larger, yes, but not hugely.

That's what she said. Ta dum pish!

I laughed so hard that i throw all the coffee on me.

I will sent you the bill from the dry cleaner Bingo :)

 

-Angel

 

Post
#365270
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time
darthmunky said:

Ady, when Luke jumps off the platform, does he get sucked into that tube or does he purposly land in there? When I was young, I always thought it was just a coinsidence that he landed there. (And it looked so fake) But if it sucked him in, perhaps you should add some sort of vacuum sound effect. and speed it up so it doesnt look so fake when he goes in there.

yes good point.

And some more random camera move because it looks like reversed played footage ;)


-Angel

 

Post
#365266
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time

4 structures mean:

Filled unused space=good.

More logic approach=good.

Add depth to the field=good

Very difficult to apply it in the duel shots=bad (3d projection)

Confusing the focus interest=bad

More complicated camera movements=good and bad

No need at all= neutral (lol)

 

-Angel

Post
#365263
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time

Lol that looks similar to mine... :D some ages ago

yes ady i know and i love your thoughts about models and real life stuff.

But you started to model i think for the shield generator and then for the canyon. The canyon sequence yes it needs an extreme makeover.

But if you dont have plans to use complicated new camera movements to other shots then mattes or 3d are good :)

Just messin

 

-Angel