Sign In

Anchorhead

User Group
Moderators
Join date
12-Jun-2005
Last activity
26-Apr-2019
Posts
3,327

Post History

Post
#1277651
Topic
The Mandalorian - Star Wars Live action TV series
Time

emanswfan said:

Honestly I’m more excited for this than Episode IX, as I’ve been enjoying the non-main saga stuff more. Bring this on!

Same. Star Wars has needed something other than the Skywalker Saga for decades. These two live action shows may be exactly what the franchise needs in order to start moving away from the shrunken Lucas story.

Post
#1277647
Topic
Han - Solo Movie ** Spoilers **
Time

oojason said:

A sweet 5-minute interview with Enfys Nest actress Erin Kellyman…

‘Erin Kellyman Takes The Stage At SWCC 2019 | The Star Wars Show Live!’:-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ga6Z0Xr-t68
 

I’m SO sorry the film was so poorly received. I would have loved to see her return in a second Solo film. The more time passes, the more I realize she’s my favorite part of the film. Such a great original character.

Post
#1277360
Topic
Your thoughts on the Episode IX title - <strong>'The Rise Of Skywalker'</strong> - a NON-SPOILER thread
Time

joefavs said:

I honestly think this is the only title I actually dislike. A couple of the other ones are kind of bland, but this one really does rub me the wrong way like none of the other ones do. It’s like something some random idiot on Reddit would come up with.

If I had to nitpick, I’d say it has the potential to sound dated several years from now. It’s been trendy to put Rise in the title of films of late and this now joins them.

That said, I’ve never been a big fan of most of them. For me, Star Wars as a title is the gold standard in the genre. I think Rogue One and Solo worked nicely also. They fit their focused stories very well.

Post
#1277268
Topic
Disney+ streaming platform : <strong>Star Wars content</strong> &amp; various info
Time

I’m a bit put off with everything going streaming so that I have to chase down content across platforms, devices, and services, but I understand it’s the way of the future.

That said, I’ll be giving this one a test drive for The Mandalorian and the Rogue One prequel. I’m also interested in the NatGeo content and some Disney classics. Beyond that, I’m not a Marvel guy or a Simpsons watcher, so those are of no interest.

The price, at least at this rollout stage, is very fair. I expect it to go up somewhat quickly after that.

Post
#1277240
Topic
Episode IX: The Rise Of Skywalker - Discussion * <strong><em>SPOILER THREAD</em></strong> *
Time

joefavs said:

Anyway, I hate the title and I’m more confused by the trailer than anything. JJ’s doing his old gleefully cryptic schtick again, and I feel like I still just don’t have enough to go on to make any kind of judgement beyond “nice to see Billy Dee flying the Falcon again” or “Finn’s new costume is cool”. Would it kill Abrams/Kennedy to have given a three-sentence summary at the panel so that I could have some vague idea of what the stakes are here?

I don’t mind the title, but I agree with the rest of this. JJ’s box of whatever he calls it can be exhausting and Schtick is a perfect description.

My first thought at the scene of Rey running and jumping over the ship as it approaches is that it’s probably some sort of training exercise that’s being edited in such a way as to make it look like an Epic battle.

Post
#1276258
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

Loved it, loved it, loved it.

In the interest of disclosure, this is the first story I remember as a child. I was five. I vividly remember getting my Eeyore stuffed animal and I kept him close for years. Weirdly (or not), it’s who I am to this day. No one - no one- would argue that Eeyore is not the mental state of who I am 50 years later. I see the world the way he does and I always have. I wear it proudly (usually) 😉 Sometimes you recognize a kindred spirit. But I digress.

I’ve always loved the story, the book, and the film when I was a small child. I saw this film was a thing and knew I’d be watching it. I liked it much more than I suspected I would. It’s a feel good story for kids, with a few adult situations for those of us who are now grown, and it’s totally predictable. Totally predictable in a way that was fun and heart warming.

Great story, amazing CGI, and a fantastic job of the adults taking a back seat to The Hundred Acre Wood. I’ll watch it again, probably tonight, and purchase. It’s currently on Netflix.

I’m on my iPad, so no photoshopped score tonight, but if I could, I’d give it 5 out of 5 red balloons.

Post
#1274884
Topic
Making The first politics thread visible once more (but still locked)
Time

Jay stated the reason why these threads were moved to a place where they could not be seen at the time in your ‘The deletion of the political threads’ thread in the Feedback Forum…

Jay said:

I haven’t decided whether I’ll restore them or not. The primary reason I moved them is to prevent new visitors from viewing them and search engines from indexing them (they already have, but once they show up as 404 for search spiders, they should get dropped from the index and no longer actively link to them).

I might restore them under a members-only section of the forum, so at least those who are logged in can still read them.

&

Jay said:

Post Praetorian said:

I would also appreciate having them restored…I have often enjoyed participating therein and have a concern that the discussion of politics is at this time more important than ever given the lack of understanding among various factions…

There was little desire for understanding or a genuine exchange of ideas in the politics threads of late, which is why they’re in cold storage for the time being.

Since then, and as indicated to you in your PM query about this just last month, the thread is seemingly unrecoverable. Even if it were not - the primary reasons as to why Jay removed the political threads would still apply.

Also, the Political threads, at times, were a divisive powder keg - and resulted in spats, ill-feeling and a lack of civility being carried over between members into unrelated threads throughout the site.

As Jay stated above, it often seemed there was little desire for understanding or a genuine exchange of ideas (or examination of our own beliefs and that of our political parties we may have voted for or support). This may not have been the case for some of the more thoughtful and insightful members here - yet they were seemingly dismissed or overlooked (or drowned out) for yet another cheap hit or ‘for the lolz’ - which sustained more division amongst members here.

We’re not going to bring that powder keg back (even as a ‘read-only’ locked thread - even if we could).

We are past all that now - and we have moved on. Hopefully for the better.

Post
#1273876
Topic
Current solvency
Time

I’m sure I speak for the other mods when I offer my sincerest thank you to the board for stepping up when we truly needed it. Behind the scenes it wasn’t a given that we would exist beyond January of this year. Fifteen years of incredible knowledge and discussion would be lost. Now, thanks to your generous support, we are in a much better position.

As of today, we have funds enough to keep us up and running until: September 2020.

Post
#1273694
Topic
Rogue One * <em>Spoilers</em> * Thread
Time

I agree, great stuff. For all our years of deep diving the details of the films, we’re still on the outside looking in (for the most part). When I read these types of discussions where they go into crazy detail about how they did things, I realize we’re not the only deep dive nerd. What an amazing and wonderful job those men and women have, to be able to create and work in that world.

Post
#1273202
Topic
Proof of Lucas’ revisionism in Rinzler’s making-of book?
Time

Man, he’s told so many versions of everything through the decades - it would be nearly impossible to gather and quantify them all. He’s been a pathological lia and revisionist almost since the beginning.

One film, nine films, six films, twelve films, six films, twelve films, or nine films.

Claims to have had The Saga (genuflect) all planned out since the early 70s, yet hired two separate authors to write a sequel to the only film - after it became a success.

Vader as father, princess as sister, Midichlorians, Han shot second, etc, etc, etc

Post
#1273132
Topic
General Star Wars Random Thoughts Thread
Time

LordZerome1080 said:

ray_afraid said:

LordZerome1080 said:

Anchorhead said:

LordZerome1080 said:

I would like to see a Sith who had High functioning Autism Spectrum Diagnosis.

You might want to explain that statement before I take it down.

What’s wrong with it?

Without context, that comment could easily sound derogatory.

Also this is a SW random thought thread and you’re not the op.

But he is a moderator, so that doesn’t matter. Why the bad attitude?

He had the bad attitude first.

Your original answer would have sufficed. Editing it to add two lines of snark, then claiming to be a victim - that’s not going to work for you.

Post
#1272994
Topic
Rian Johnson to Head New Star Wars Trilogy
Time

leetwall31 said:

Also,they gave Rian the new trilogy before the movie came out. There were no box office numbers, so I don’t know why you’re brining that up.

Disney changed directors three quarters of the way through the production of Solo. Theyre clearly not afraid to make a course correction when they think it needs to be made. I suspect they’re more than happy with their choice of Rian as director now.

Post
#1272990
Topic
General Star Wars Random Thoughts Thread
Time

SilverWook said:

Hal 9000 said:

Just a quick random thought.
I’ve always had a tulmtous relationship with my Dad, who passed away a few years ago and who I believe to have had a case of high functioning autism. I have felt a great deal of immutable criticism from him and longed for affirmations or validations which were exceedingly rare. It’s been helpful for me to recognize some of the underlying factors and the limitations he was working with all along.
One reason I appreciate the original ‘old man’ ghost of Anakin at the end of ROTJ is because not only do we see Anakin redeemed in the unmasking scene, we even get to see him fully restored into the man he should have been all along. He doesn’t revert to a juvenile state, but is legitimately restored to become what he wasn’t able to be. I know it’s a bit silly, but the image of this sort of restored man smiling back at me speaks to this deep part of me. Able to say those things to me which perhaps he wasn’t before.

Awesome OT.com post of the week!™ 😃

That’s totally how I felt seeing Sebastian Shaw back in 1983. It’s the Anakin that could have/should have been. I couldn’t articulate it at the time, but it resonated. It’s a pity George overlooked the power of that image.

Make that two for Awesome OT.com post of the week!™.

To someone else’s point above; I don’t think Lucas missed the significance of the scene when he was removing it. I don’t think he ever understood the significance. He doesn’t strike me as someone who has a great deal of emotional depth. He’s done an ok job of emulating depth and understanding when it’s suppossed to be in a film, but it seems more from a construction point of view as opposed to emotional. There’s no shortage of interviews and stories of Lucas having weirdly disjointed and broken narratives in American Grafitti and Star Wars until Marcia stepped in to fix them.

Hal’s fantastic explanation of why and how a scene can connect with the audience is exactly why it should be in the film. I can’t imagine there’s anyone who doesn’t really understand why Lucas altered it. No doubt, Lucas made a lot of idiotic and wildly unnecessary changes to the OT, but inserting an actor from a film that came out twenty years later may be the most misguided. He ignored all semblance of depth and instead went with marketing. As he has done for decades, he put his needs ahead of those of the audience.

Post
#1270081
Topic
[fill in the blank] Just Died!
Time

oojason said:

‘Richard Overton, America’s oldest World War II veteran and the oldest man in the US, dies at 112’…

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/12/27/us/richard-overton-oldest-ww-ii-vet-died/index.html

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-46699175

 

He was a very big deal here (Austin). There is a bill filed to rename a major road after him.

https://www.kvue.com/video/news/politics/texas-legislature/bill-filed-to-name-part-of-airport-blvd-after-richard-overton/269-c09ed11e-4d51-4a78-b790-e17aa0a636e7

Post
#1270077
Topic
Han - Solo Movie ** Spoilers **
Time

DominicCobb said:

what potentially really exacerbated that issue was that we just saw Harrison actually play him not three years before. So I’m sure a lot of people didn’t feel the urgency when they just recently got their fix of Han Solo but featuring the genuine article.

I mentioned that very thing a while back. Two versions/castings of the same character so close together is a very tough sell in a fan base as volitile as Star Wars. Particularly when one of them is the iconic original.

Not helping matters at all was it coming only months after what may be the most polarizing film in the franchise. I think there was considerable fan backlash that transferred to a lack of attendance at the box office, possibly in protest. The film’s troubled production didn’t help either and it may have served to further alienate some fans’ anti-Disney thoughts. I think the box office results were a perfect storm of protest, anger, and apathy.

If they had gone with a less is more approach, they may have had a better result. There was too much going on and it almost made Han a secondary character in parts. Ki’ra could have been the McGuffin to get Han invested in bettering himself and one day returning, but without having her being such a main character. He comes back, she’d been killed long ago, or just no longer a part of that world, or she moved on without him. He then continues on in his life of crime, now energized with a fresh dose of pessimism about people in general.

Leave out a big-role Ki’ra, leave out Maul (eye roll), and end the film with a set-up of Han’s meeting and subsequent friendship with Lando as the second film. Leave audiences wanting more, not feeling exhausted from too much.

That was something Nolan did perfectly at the end of Batman Begins. Gordon tells Batman about a criminal who leaves a clue at every crime, hands him a joker playing card in an evidence bag, Batman says “thanks, I’ll check it out”, roll the credits. Simple, but enough to leave the audience speculating and interested in how they’ll meet and interact.