logo Sign In

Akwat Kbrana

User Group
Members
Join date
28-Apr-2008
Last activity
16-Jan-2022
Posts
1,402

Post History

Post
#453694
Topic
The Great Frink Assassination Conspiracy Plot Alphabet Game Thread!!!
Time

Recently, Warb proposed that somebody start a new thread "where we plot how to kill Frink." Frink liked the idea, so in response to this overwhelming demand, Akwat Kbrana Inc. proudly presents you with...this thread! The Great Frink Assassination Conspiracy Plot Alphabet Game Thread!!!

Here's how it works: rather than just randomly posting your ideas for Frink assassination, we'll make the process into a game! Each proposal must begin with the letter of the alphabet which follows the first letter of the previous proposal. For example

Flay him alive!

Give him a lethal atomic wedgie!

Heap thirteen tons of curdled tapioca on him!

See how that alphabet thing works? Pretty clever, eh?

It should go without saying that anyone who fails to follow this pre-arranged alphabetic structure, can consider him/herself on PROBATION!!!

I'll start: Asphyxiation!!

 

DISCLAIMER: This thread is not intended to eventuate in any actual Frink assassination, and it should be stressed that Akwat Kbrana Inc. strongly opposed any actual violence. (Except for violence toward zombies, which is a hoot and a half.) The purpose of this thread is merely to postulate how we would assassinate Frink if we were actually going to do so. Which...y'know...we aren't.

(Updated) That being said, anybody who actually assassinates Frink can consider him/herself on TRIPLE SECRET PROBATION and shall thereafter hold the title of PERMANENT ASSHAT. Now, let the comic hilarity ensue.

Post
#453055
Topic
GoldenEye 007 Wii-make (NOW "RELOADED" for 360 and PS3)
Time

This would seriously tempt me to get a wii...if it weren't for the fact that it will feature Daniel Craig's Bond. It's not that I thoroughly dislike DC; I just find him bland, uninteresting, and forgettable. And whatever your opinion of Pierce Brosnan's Bond, clearly Goldeneye belongs to him. So Daniel Craig = major dealbreaker.

Post
#453052
Topic
Article on prequel films. Note: Does not pertain to Godfather II, which isn't a prequel - it's a sequel with extended flashback sequences - or a partial prequel to some.
Time

TV's Frink said:

ChainsawAsh said:

The Eric Bana one ends with Banner hiding from the government in the Amazon, which is where the Ed Norton one begins.  Therefore, sequel.

Cool, now I don't have to watch the Bana one! :p

Man, count yourself lucky. I will never get those 138 minutes of my life back. I think I could actually feel my IQ dropping during the last half hour or so...

Post
#452863
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

I've been watching the Star Wars saga with the Rifftrax commentary appended (the only way I can stomach the PT is when it's being mercilessly mocked).

I've just started Ep. 6. My analysis so far:

1 isn't that great. 5 is ok. 2-4 are absolutely hilarious. Looking forward to the comic hilarity that 6 is sure to bring. (That being said, I'm surprised that, given the popular view that 1 is the worst of the PT, the Rifftrax commentary on that one just didn't measure up to 2-3.)

Post
#449768
Topic
Info Wanted: ANH.....Revisited or Purist???
Time

Crygor64 said:

Akwat Kbrana said:

Crygor64 said:

I am a complete purist. I think the very idea of adding new scenes, new effects, etc makes you just as bad as George Lucas. It also undermines the very reason they created this forum.

*George must sit back and laugh when he sees the most popular topic on this forum isn't the petition, but rather a fan edit that is basically "the extra special edition."

*(assuming he's actually seen this forum)

I was going to give you a detailed explanation as to why the two cases aren't even remotely comparable, but I thought better of it. If you're too dense to figure it out on your own, then why bother?

You were going to, but you couldn't. That's the real truth. I'm sure you're smart enough to understand the irony created by the popularity of the Adywan Fan Edits on this forum.

*sigh* Ok, I'll bite.

The flaw in your reasoning stems from this kind of thinking:

 

The entire point of this web site was to preserve the original trilogy. And that's mainly because most of us were disgusted with the changes made by George Lucas.  Some of us feel art should remain consistent to its original vision. Adding your own changes makes you just as bad as George Lucas, if not worse. (At least he can say "they're my films.") 

 

As it happens, most of us were disgusted with the SE changes, but that's not the main reason this web site was created. This website was created because George Lucas actively buried the theatrical versions, and took measures to revise cultural history by replacing them with his new improved versions. Most of us see that move as disgusting, not the concept of a SE in and of itself (as Chewtobacca aptly stated). Now presumably, if George went ahead and released the OOT in acceptable quality, none of us would give a rat's ass whether or not he continued to sell the SE OT as well. Because nobody would then be foisting the revised versions on us. The SE fans would watch their versions, we would watch our versions, and all would be well.

But whereas the SE's have become the means by which George suppresses the OOT, the same cannot be said of Adywan's Revisited edits. They're just another fun (and more impressively executed) alternative to the SE OT, if one is so inclined to watch something like that. You obviously aren't that kind of person. Ok, so don't download them, don't watch them, and quit whining. No one's forcing you to watch Revisited. Adywan isn't replacing the OOT with his versions as George Lucas has, so the two cases aren't parallel in the least.

Furthermore, Adywan's ESB theatrical reconstruction is the closest facsimile we have of the original film in reasonable quality, so you should be grateful for his efforts if you really care about the plight of the OOT. For my part, I wish him luck with both his Revisited edits as well as his planned ANH reconstruction.

Post
#449711
Topic
Martin Freeman is Bilbo Baggins
Time

Yeah, the fact that this is being shot in 3-d has really dampened my enthusiasm for it. Must everyone jump on the Avatar-3d-gimmick bandwagon? I refused to go see Avatar in 3-d just because I dislike anything faddish. But apparently I was just about the only one who felt that way; after the Avatar hype, I haven't heard of a single major movie on the horizon that isn't being shot in 3-d or, having already been principally shot in 2-d, converted into 3-d prior to premiering. On top of that, old classics like Star Wars and Titanic are being converted into 3-d for another theatre run/mad grab for people's money. Will the 3-d madness never end?

That being said, I do think that Martin Freeman is a superb choice for Bilbo. And I really hope this location situation gets resolved quickly, and filming can commence in New Zealand. It just wouldn't be right if it was shot anywhere else.