- Post
- #247237
- Topic
- Raul2106
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/247237/action/topic#247237
- Time
ADigitalMan
- User Group
- Members
- Join date
- 26-Sep-2004
- Last activity
- 7-Nov-2025
- Posts
- 2,947
- Web Site
- https://www.youtube.com/@DigitalMan-jc3xy
Post History
- Post
- #247232
- Topic
- Info Wanted: Chamber of Secrets deleted scene - for an edit
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/247232/action/topic#247232
- Time
- Post
- #246738
- Topic
- 2007 Banner Year for DVDs! GO TIGER!
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/246738/action/topic#246738
- Time
"New ending" meaning "new when compared to the original version of SII."
Plus, Lex and Miss Tessmacher's extra scenes are not being restored. Nor the Arctic Patrol scene not being restored, which could leave the SR sequels open to Zod, powerless but certainly still alive on Earth, waiting to be restored.
I'm gonna be in the editing room on this, I can tell already. Sheesh.
- Post
- #246734
- Topic
- Official Indiana Jones DVD Release
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/246734/action/topic#246734
- Time
Meanwhile, I keep looking both under "I" and under "Y" for "The Young Indiana Jones Chronicles" but nothing. Lucas is sitting on 22 more Indy films (or 45 TV episodes for the purists) and I for one want to see them for the first time. The way I see it, the IJ boxed set is FAR from complete.
Meanwhile, we're twiddling our thumbs waiting for a screenplay for a new Harrison Ford Action Film: Indiana Jones and the Magical Hand of Plot Device.
Edit: Oh, and to actually answer your question, I think the release is stellar. Lowry did a much better job on IJ than on SW. The only bone of contention with some fans that I'm aware of is the digital removal of the cobra's reflection. It doesn't bother me in the slightest. Greedo shooting first, it ain't.
- Post
- #246731
- Topic
- 2007 Banner Year for DVDs! GO TIGER!
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/246731/action/topic#246731
- Time
You know, since they didn't have the "new" ending worked out after moving it to S:TM, I would have liked to see them tie into SR better ... especially given how much Donner loves SR.
Instead, by turning back time we're going to have Lois somehow de-pregnated, and some bully at Rocky's Diner not know why the hell this four-eyed nerd came from out of nowhere to beat him up. Blowing up the fortress will serve no point as it would have been re-built. And, whatever, the villains will have their powers back.
I'm excited as hell about this release, but turning back time at the end of SII to help Lois forget is not a good resolution to the plot.
- Post
- #246730
- Topic
- Proud to be "Gay for Lucas" gushing thread
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/246730/action/topic#246730
- Time
Originally posted by: Stinky-Dinkins
His gobbler follows him everywhere and as far as I know it's queerer than a three dollar bill and hornier than a ten-peckered owl.
His gobbler follows him everywhere and as far as I know it's queerer than a three dollar bill and hornier than a ten-peckered owl.
You're talking about McCallum, right?
- Post
- #246729
- Topic
- Movie Ratings
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/246729/action/topic#246729
- Time
- Post
- #246387
- Topic
- Sean's issues
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/246387/action/topic#246387
- Time
Originally posted by: Yoda Is Your Father
Smoking illegal substances is illegal but bongs themselves are not.
Smoking illegal substances is illegal but bongs themselves are not.
Tell that to Tommy Chong, recently arrested for selling bongs. Drug paraphernalia is certainly illegal in the U.S. Visit the DEA Web Site for details on what is and what isn't illegal.
Edit: Here is the actual US Title Code on the subject
- Post
- #246278
- Topic
- The X-Files - Worth Watching?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/246278/action/topic#246278
- Time
- Post
- #246144
- Topic
- MOVED THREAD
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/246144/action/topic#246144
- Time
There was a great quote on Studio 60 the other night that's somewhat germane to the conversation. "Living where there's free speech means sometimes you get offended." Brilliant writing. I'm glad Aaron Sorkin is back on TV doing what he does best ... writing good stuff like that.
- Post
- #245997
- Topic
- How Do You Tell If the disk is anamorphic? (not what you think)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/245997/action/topic#245997
- Time
Originally posted by: THX-1977
Wow, I didn't think it was possible to be more confused than I was, but I was wrong.
Anyway, the outer box says it's widescreen and letterbox 2:35:1 ratio
Wow, I didn't think it was possible to be more confused than I was, but I was wrong.
Anyway, the outer box says it's widescreen and letterbox 2:35:1 ratio
The 2.35 confuses the issue futher. The anamorphic image continues to be letterboxed, because the actual film was wider than 16x9. 2.35's fractional equivalent is 47x20. Of course, displays are not made in this aspect ratio, so the image is matted and reduced to fit either the anamorphic 16x9 or "full screen" 4x3 displays. There is less letterboxing to make a 16:9 image anamorphic than is required to make a 4:3 image anamorphic, but the end result on a 4:3 display is the same. The desire for anamorphic encoding is to ensure the maximum resolution for a 16x9 display is offered.
If such a 47x20 display did exist, it would look like this (again, for comparison's sake, I've kept the same height of 480):
- Post
- #245989
- Topic
- How Do You Tell If the disk is anamorphic? (not what you think)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/245989/action/topic#245989
- Time
Originally posted by: THX-1977
How can you tell if the dimensions "look" 4:3 or 16:9? What exactly are you looking for?
How can you tell if the dimensions "look" 4:3 or 16:9? What exactly are you looking for?
You'll get used to it with practice, but essentially it's all about recognising the basic geometry of the shape.
4 units wide by 3 units tall is not as wide as 16 units wide by 9 units tall.
Or, you can divide the width by the height and get the numerical ratio:
1.33 is not as big (read: wide) as 1.78.
Here are two images with the same height, but different width.

- Post
- #245974
- Topic
- Seriously, what is so special about PAL? I mean I can only understand if that's the standard where you live, but..
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/245974/action/topic#245974
- Time
Originally posted by: Darth Editous
There's no point crying over spilt milk, especially when you don't know how milk works.
and when all people in there seemed to care about was PAL, I got upset.
There's no point crying over spilt milk, especially when you don't know how milk works.
*snarf*
- Post
- #245819
- Topic
- What is GOUT?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/245819/action/topic#245819
- Time
Pronunciation[duhb-uhl ahn-tahn-druh, -tahnd; Fr. doo-blahn-tahn-druh]
1. a double meaning.
2. a word or expression used in a given context so that it can be understood in two ways, esp. when one meaning is risqué.
[Origin: 1665–75; < obs. F; see double, intend]
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.0.1)
Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006.
- Post
- #245816
- Topic
- .: The XØ Project - Laserdisc on Steroids :. (SEE FIRST POST FOR UPDATES) (* unfinished project *)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/245816/action/topic#245816
- Time
- Post
- #245814
- Topic
- Scruffy, Continuation of Iraq Debate...
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/245814/action/topic#245814
- Time
Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab
Um, no. The deposing of Hussein has opened up the region to a staggering number of new possiblities.
Um, no. The deposing of Hussein has opened up the region to a staggering number of new possiblities.
Especially for Al Qaeda.
- Post
- #245812
- Topic
- Forgotten Films
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/245812/action/topic#245812
- Time
Rented it last year. It wasn't as good as I remember. In fact, it was pretty bad. Then I rented its sequel. It's so bad it's not even so bad it's good -- it's just bad.
- Post
- #245807
- Topic
- MOVED THREAD
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/245807/action/topic#245807
- Time
But that doesn't mean he wasn't right. When your solution to a visual depiction of your prophet results in taking 130 innocent people hostage, clearly your religion is fucked up. When your solution to national independence for your muslim state is to shoot up a school full of children, clearly your religion is fucked up. And when your solution to eradicating the influence of western culture in your geographical area is to sucker-punch 3000 innocent civilians (with the hope of ten times that number) who are just trying to get through their day, clearly your religion is fucked up.
Personally, I've known many muslims over the years. They were all good people in my judgment. But I never heard one of them actually denounce terrorism. Until more muslims start speaking out against the violent extremism with a loud enough microphone that they're heard all the way to Mecca, then they are just being part of the problem and not the solution. When the same kind of violent terror was tearing apart Ireland, at least the Irish people were bold enough to do something about it. And at least the Irish leaders were willing to compromise with the British. We aren't seeing the same thing in the Middle East.
- Post
- #245794
- Topic
- Things that piss me off when opening new DVDs
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/245794/action/topic#245794
- Time
I'm surprised they haven't started packaging DVD cases inside those annoying plastic bubbles that you have to use a box-cutter to get into. You know, the stuff they use to package $5 cables and whatnot ... I'm going to slice my hand opening one of those things one day and then I'll have my day in court.
- Post
- #245791
- Topic
- ***The ADigitalMan non-Star Wars DVD Info and Feedback Thread***
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/245791/action/topic#245791
- Time
- Post
- #245416
- Topic
- How Do You Tell If the disk is anamorphic? (not what you think)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/245416/action/topic#245416
- Time
- Post
- #245414
- Topic
- ***The ADigitalMan non-Star Wars DVD Info and Feedback Thread***
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/245414/action/topic#245414
- Time
- Post
- #245410
- Topic
- Letterboxed to anamorphic video conversion
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/245410/action/topic#245410
- Time
- Post
- #245406
- Topic
- The Trekkies Are Unbelievable
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/245406/action/topic#245406
- Time
- Post
- #245405
- Topic
- Superman - Where Did These Scenes Come From??
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/245405/action/topic#245405
- Time
These scenes were never seen in wide theatrical release, though there have been limited showings of the 2001 Expanded Edition (the official title of the so-called "Director's Cut.")
The so-called KCOP version is the ultimate expanded edition, with the most cut footage restored. It is EXTREMELY hard to come by (I don't have it).