
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
The Resistance base looked far too much like a set than a real world location, especially compared to Hoth or Yavin.
You do know they used a real RAF military base for that, right?
Yes. & it doesn’t alter the fact it looked like a set. When I say ‘real world’ I mean within the context of the Star Wars universe. It was one step up from Dr Who using English quarries for alien planets in the 70s. The rather pedestrian way those scenes were shot didn’t help either.
Well, a lot of studio lots used to be aircraft hangars, so that does kind of makes sense. And a lot of studio lots are built on the same principle. But I think it would be more correct to say that sets look like hangars, rather than saying that the hangars look like sets.
I didn’t say that: those are your words. Compare Hoth and Yavin, they had a much different sense of scale and other-worldliness. I think the Resistance base could have done with some matt paintings or enhancement of the landscape.
Visually, it wasn’t very interesting. &, as I said, I think that’s partly how it’s shot. It had a very TV movie/series aesthetic.
I thought the base looked like it would be pretty great in the drone/helicopter shots people took during filming. I feel like we didn’t get enough wide or overhead shots (enhanced, as needed) to really show it off in the film.