logo Sign In

Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * SPOILER THREAD * — Page 72

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Next trailer to be released with Avengers: Age of Ultron.  The article speculates about possible teasers before then, specifically during the Superbowl.

Author
Time

Tobar said:

Bingowings said:

Tatooine only seems like the middle of nowhere to young Luke because he hasn't been anywhere else. There are probably Coruscant street urchins who dream of the sands of the Dune Sea and Tuskens riding Banthas beneath it's many moons and twin stars.

 

Biggs said:

I tell ya Luke, the Rebellion is a long way from here. This planet? Big hunk of nothing...

Fixer said:

I doubt if the Empire'd even fight to save the system.

 I'm sure kids in Baghdad felt that way in 1977 despite Scherazade and despite all those George Bushes. Besides that scene didn't make the film :-P

Author
Time

Hal 9000 said:

I speculate that Max Von Sydow is playing an elderly, partially robotic Ric Olié.

 After a long, rainy day here this comment really made me laugh :)

Max von Sydow, the great Ming the Merciless, reduced to Mr. Exposition.

Author
Time

It appears that Aayla Secura has not been resurrected, so I have no interest in this film.

“It is only through interaction, through decision and choice, through confrontation, physical or mental, that the Force can grow within you.”
-Kreia, Jedi Master and Sith Lord

Author
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:

^She was barely alive to begin with.

Dem's fightn' words.

“It is only through interaction, through decision and choice, through confrontation, physical or mental, that the Force can grow within you.”
-Kreia, Jedi Master and Sith Lord

Author
Time

Bread Mustache said:

Colbert tackles the new lightsaber controversy and it's hilarious:
http://thecolbertreport.cc.com/videos/umsrnb/lightsaber-controversy

I saw that and was going to post it here. You beat me to it :)

That is frankly the best defense for the contraversial lightsaber I've seen. It makes far more sense now that the blades would originate from one focal point inside the hilt, not from 3 separate emitters. So as he says, even if a blade does cut through a side emitter, the blade itself will still be underneath to deflect it. That's the theory I'm willing to buy ;)

Wishlist Of Ideas/Suggestions For Improving ROTJ

Author
Time

theprequelsrule said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

^She was barely alive to begin with.

Dem's fightn' words.

 

Author
Time

If I were living in that universe, I'd wear a suit made of lightsaber.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Dissapointed the X-wings and  Falcon are cgi but fully expected them to be.

Just like the new Starship Enterprise ILM designed.

All OT ships since 1994 have been digital anway or am i wrong?

With the exception of the documentary special effects anything can happen, they did shoot models for that.

“Always loved Vader’s wordless self sacrifice. Another shitty, clueless, revision like Greedo and young Anakin’s ghost. What a fucking shame.” -Simon Pegg.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

This thread's in danger of growing stale. I'm taking it to strange new places.

 Aur7

"Number Seven"

*snap-hiss*

Aur7

"Number Seven"

*snap-hiss*

Aur7

"Number Seven"

*snap-hiss*

Aur7

"Number Seven"

*snap-hiss*

Aur7

"Number Seven"

*snap-hiss*

Author
Time

NeverarGreat said:

Nobody quote the above please.

 Everyone listen to NeverarGreat please.

Forum Moderator
Author
Time

skyjedi2005 said:

Dissapointed the X-wings and  Falcon are cgi but fully expected them to be.

Just like the new Starship Enterprise ILM designed.

All OT ships since 1994 have been digital anway or am i wrong?

With the exception of the documentary special effects anything can happen, they did shoot models for that.

I really don't get why people put such a priority on non-CGI stuff...

If the storyline and characters are well-written and assuming JJ will not completely screw that up, I couldn't care less if the ships are done with CGI.

真実

Author
Time

imperialscum said:

I really don't get why people put such a priority on non-CGI stuff...

It's called "personal preference". Does that finally answer your often asked question? 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

DuracellEnergizer said:

imperialscum said:

I really don't get why people put such a priority on non-CGI stuff...

It's called "personal preference". Does that finally answer your often asked question? 

Well obviously. My question was more in a sense "why would someone even have such a preference". :)

I mean hypothetically, OT with CGI would still be great while PT with real SFX would still be the same shit. That is my main point.

真実

Author
Time

Bingowings said:

Part of the problem with AOTC is that it has two desert planets (one orange and one red) in the same movie. It would have made for a better narrative if both of those worlds were Tatooine (the droid armies explaining how the Jawas get to sell so many salvaged droids and why the locals don't like drinking with them). in terms of numbers you get two worlds but in terms of the richness of the environments in which the story is told we get short changed.

For this to work, Obi-Wan (and Qui-Gon if he keeps the role that he has in TPM) would have to discover Anakin after being drawn to Tatooine by the war. The army being constructed on the same planet that Anakin was discovered on 9 years earlier is too much of a coincidence.