logo Sign In

The Empire Strikes Back inducted into the Library of Congress National Film Registry. — Page 2

Author
Time

I posted this in my saveSW thread, but I wrote to Congress to clarify if it was the original, and if it was a new or existing print. Good news. 1) It's the original. 2) It will be a newly struck print.

Michael:  In reference to the question, we always recognize and seek to ensure preservation of the original theatrical release version, per the legislation (which says the Registry version is "the version of a film first published")., though we might also try to obtain other versions as well. This would apply even in cases where we might prefer a different version (i.e. where a studio butchered a director's film before release).

Tho we recognize the original, we have no problem with the filmmaker going back and releasing a modified version (that is their right after all).  We would want to see all versions preserved well.

 

After the recent selection, we will in the near future request that Fox/Lucasfilm strike and send us a new 35mm print of the original 1980 release version.  We do that for all the studio titles, and the studios do cooperate.

 

Best, Steve Leggett

Author
Time

Yes! Good to know.

A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em

Author
Time

This is fantastic news!

I noticed that Electronic Labyrinth, Lucas' student short that became THX 1138, was also inducted this (last) year.

Author
Time

zombie84 said:

I posted this in my saveSW thread, but I wrote to Congress to clarify if it was the original, and if it was a new or existing print. Good news. 1) It's the original. 2) It will be a newly struck print.

[...]

After the recent selection, we will in the near future request that Fox/Lucasfilm strike and send us a new 35mm print of the original 1980 release version.  We do that for all the studio titles, and the studios do cooperate.

Indeed good news, assuming:

1) Fox/Lucasfilm do indeed cooperate

2) Someone at the Registry actually checks to ensure they haven't tried to sneak in an SE print...

Guidelines for post content and general behaviour: read announcement here

Max. allowable image sizes in signatures: reminder here

Author
Time

Print struck from what?

That would be sad if the archived, armageddon-proof version was struck from a rushed, sloppy internegative, in turn transferred from an abused, degraded interpositive.

And if it will be from the O-Neg...that will be a big 'a-ha!-it-does-exist.'

Author
Time

Yeah, I was thinking the same thing, from the way the last interpositives made for the OOT looked when they were transfered to video in 1993, they have to be awful by now...

Author
Time

Moth3r said:

Indeed good news, assuming:

1) Fox/Lucasfilm do indeed cooperate

2) Someone at the Registry actually checks to ensure they haven't tried to sneak in an SE print...

 This is a real test. It's one thing to say "to hell with you" to your fans, but is Lucas so bold as to say to hell with the Library of Congress!!