I know y’all will be annoyed with that article but so be it.
Just because some people are dumbasses and don’t understand the film’s rhetorical approach doesn’t mean the movie is bad.
That’s fine.
I’m not saying it’s a bad movie. I’m saying it has problems.
It does not.
You don’t even see anything wrong about giving that shitbag a cameo where he gets to do a commercial?
I don’t know if it’s wrong or not, but I certainly don’t care.
The Person in Question
I don’t know where you’ve gotten the idea that Duracell has seen TLJ.
He said that it was beyond perfection.
Ah. I took that as sarcasm.
I still do. Could be wrong.
I know y’all will be annoyed with that article but so be it.
Just because some people are dumbasses and don’t understand the film’s rhetorical approach doesn’t mean the movie is bad.
That’s fine.
I’m not saying it’s a bad movie. I’m saying it has problems.
It does not.
You don’t even see anything wrong about giving that shitbag a cameo where he gets to do a commercial?
I don’t know if it’s wrong or not, but I certainly don’t care.
Noted.
I know y’all will be annoyed with that article but so be it.
Just because some people are dumbasses and don’t understand the film’s rhetorical approach doesn’t mean the movie is bad.
That’s fine.
I’m not saying it’s a bad movie. I’m saying it has problems.
It does not.
You don’t even see anything wrong about giving that shitbag a cameo where he gets to do a commercial?
I don’t know if it’s wrong or not, but I certainly don’t care.
Noted.
I mean, really, do you?
The Person in Question
I know y’all will be annoyed with that article but so be it.
Just because some people are dumbasses and don’t understand the film’s rhetorical approach doesn’t mean the movie is bad.
That’s fine.
I’m not saying it’s a bad movie. I’m saying it has problems.
It does not.
You don’t even see anything wrong about giving that shitbag a cameo where he gets to do a commercial?
I don’t know if it’s wrong or not, but I certainly don’t care.
Noted.
I mean, really, do you?
Would I have brought it up otherwise?
Ah. I took that as sarcasm.
I still do. Could be wrong.
I’m 100% certain it was sarcasm. He hates what they did with the characters so he definitely wouldn’t like it if he did see it.
Army of Darkness: The Medieval Deadit | The Terminator - Color Regrade | The Wrong Trousers - Audio Preservation
SONIC RACES THROUGH THE GREEN FIELDS.
THE SUN RACES THROUGH A BLUE SKY FILLED WITH WHITE CLOUDS.
THE WAYS OF HIS HEART ARE MUCH LIKE THE SUN. SONIC RUNS AND RESTS; THE SUN RISES AND SETS.
DON’T GIVE UP ON THE SUN. DON’T MAKE THE SUN LAUGH AT YOU.
Last Jedi’s got some problems. (though I’d argue relatively minor)
I thought you vowed to not see that movie.
I haven’t.
I don’t know where you’ve gotten the idea that Duracell has seen TLJ.
He said that it was beyond perfection.
Ah. I took that as sarcasm.
I still do. Could be wrong.
Ah. I took that as sarcasm.
I still do. Could be wrong.I’m 100% certain it was sarcasm. He hates what they did with the characters so he definitely wouldn’t like it if he did see it.
I was being sarcastic indeed. In fact, I was making fun of people like fmalover, who act like TLJ was handed down from God Themself.
TLJ remains on my anti-watchlist and will remain there, along with The Dark Knight Rises, the Snyderman films, and any other movies presenting unappealing “alternate interpretations” of beloved characters.
Beside the point, but I believe he actually ranked TFA last.
JEDIT: ninjad by an edit
Last Jedi’s got some problems. (though I’d argue relatively minor)
I thought you vowed to not see that movie.
I haven’t.
I don’t know where you’ve gotten the idea that Duracell has seen TLJ.
He said that it was beyond perfection.
Ah. I took that as sarcasm.
I still do. Could be wrong.Ah. I took that as sarcasm.
I still do. Could be wrong.I’m 100% certain it was sarcasm. He hates what they did with the characters so he definitely wouldn’t like it if he did see it.
I was being sarcastic indeed. In fact, I was making fun of people like fmalover, who act like TLJ was handed down from God Themself.
TLJ remains on my anti-watchlist and will remain there, along with The Dark Knight Rises, the Snyderman films, and any other movies which present unappealing “alternative interpretations” of beloved characters.
You have your own kind of ignorant thinking, but at least you have the decency to not watch the movie instead of being a hypocrite.
unappealing “alternate interpretations” of beloved characters.
Lol.
Last Jedi’s got some problems. (though I’d argue relatively minor)
I thought you vowed to not see that movie.
I haven’t.
I don’t know where you’ve gotten the idea that Duracell has seen TLJ.
He said that it was beyond perfection.
Ah. I took that as sarcasm.
I still do. Could be wrong.Ah. I took that as sarcasm.
I still do. Could be wrong.I’m 100% certain it was sarcasm. He hates what they did with the characters so he definitely wouldn’t like it if he did see it.
I was being sarcastic indeed. In fact, I was making fun of people like fmalover, who act like TLJ was handed down from God Themself.
TLJ remains on my anti-watchlist and will remain there, along with The Dark Knight Rises, the Snyderman films, and any other movies which present unappealing “alternative interpretations” of beloved characters.
You have your own kind of ignorant thinking
Good.
unappealing “alternate interpretations” of beloved characters.
Lol.
Not as LOL-worthy as hating a director after having seen a single one of his films, I’d wager.
Last Jedi’s got some problems. (though I’d argue relatively minor)
I thought you vowed to not see that movie.
I haven’t.
I don’t know where you’ve gotten the idea that Duracell has seen TLJ.
He said that it was beyond perfection.
Ah. I took that as sarcasm.
I still do. Could be wrong.Ah. I took that as sarcasm.
I still do. Could be wrong.I’m 100% certain it was sarcasm. He hates what they did with the characters so he definitely wouldn’t like it if he did see it.
I was being sarcastic indeed. In fact, I was making fun of people like fmalover, who act like TLJ was handed down from God Themself.
TLJ remains on my anti-watchlist and will remain there, along with The Dark Knight Rises, the Snyderman films, and any other movies which present unappealing “alternative interpretations” of beloved characters.
You have your own kind of ignorant thinking
Good.
unappealing “alternate interpretations” of beloved characters.
Lol.
Not as LOL-worthy as hating a director after having seen a single one of his films, I’d wager.
Assuming you’re talking about David Lynch, one film is more than zero.
I thought it was two but it turns out he didn’t do Naked Lunch. :p
Last Jedi’s got some problems. (though I’d argue relatively minor)
I thought you vowed to not see that movie.
I haven’t.
I don’t know where you’ve gotten the idea that Duracell has seen TLJ.
He said that it was beyond perfection.
Ah. I took that as sarcasm.
I still do. Could be wrong.Ah. I took that as sarcasm.
I still do. Could be wrong.I’m 100% certain it was sarcasm. He hates what they did with the characters so he definitely wouldn’t like it if he did see it.
I was being sarcastic indeed. In fact, I was making fun of people like fmalover, who act like TLJ was handed down from God Themself.
TLJ remains on my anti-watchlist and will remain there, along with The Dark Knight Rises, the Snyderman films, and any other movies which present unappealing “alternative interpretations” of beloved characters.
You have your own kind of ignorant thinking
Good.
unappealing “alternate interpretations” of beloved characters.
Lol.
Not as LOL-worthy as hating a director after having seen a single one of his films, I’d wager.
Assuming you’re talking about David Lynch, one film is more than zero.
I thought it was two but it turns out he didn’t do Naked Lunch. :p
I believe you have to watch at least four of a filmmaker’s films before drawing a conclusion on his work as a whole, but that’s just me.
Last Jedi’s got some problems. (though I’d argue relatively minor)
I thought you vowed to not see that movie.
I haven’t.
I don’t know where you’ve gotten the idea that Duracell has seen TLJ.
He said that it was beyond perfection.
Ah. I took that as sarcasm.
I still do. Could be wrong.Ah. I took that as sarcasm.
I still do. Could be wrong.I’m 100% certain it was sarcasm. He hates what they did with the characters so he definitely wouldn’t like it if he did see it.
I was being sarcastic indeed. In fact, I was making fun of people like fmalover, who act like TLJ was handed down from God Themself.
TLJ remains on my anti-watchlist and will remain there, along with The Dark Knight Rises, the Snyderman films, and any other movies which present unappealing “alternative interpretations” of beloved characters.
You have your own kind of ignorant thinking
Good.
unappealing “alternate interpretations” of beloved characters.
Lol.
Not as LOL-worthy as hating a director after having seen a single one of his films, I’d wager.
Assuming you’re talking about David Lynch, one film is more than zero.
I thought it was two but it turns out he didn’t do Naked Lunch. :p
I believe you have to watch at least four of a filmmaker’s films before drawing a conclusion on his work as a whole, but that’s just me.
I believe you have to watch a single movie before drawing a conclusion on that movie, but that’s just me.
I know y’all will be annoyed with that article but so be it.
Just because some people are dumbasses and don’t understand the film’s rhetorical approach doesn’t mean the movie is bad.
That’s fine.
I’m not saying it’s a bad movie. I’m saying it has problems.
It does not.
You don’t even see anything wrong about giving that shitbag a cameo where he gets to do a commercial?
I don’t know if it’s wrong or not, but I certainly don’t care.
Noted.
I mean, really, do you?
Would I have brought it up otherwise?
I guess probably not, but I find it quite shocking that anyone on earth cares. It’s not like they gave Alex Jones a cameo.
The Person in Question
Last Jedi’s got some problems. (though I’d argue relatively minor)
I thought you vowed to not see that movie.
I haven’t.
I don’t know where you’ve gotten the idea that Duracell has seen TLJ.
He said that it was beyond perfection.
Ah. I took that as sarcasm.
I still do. Could be wrong.Ah. I took that as sarcasm.
I still do. Could be wrong.I’m 100% certain it was sarcasm. He hates what they did with the characters so he definitely wouldn’t like it if he did see it.
I was being sarcastic indeed. In fact, I was making fun of people like fmalover, who act like TLJ was handed down from God Themself.
TLJ remains on my anti-watchlist and will remain there, along with The Dark Knight Rises, the Snyderman films, and any other movies which present unappealing “alternative interpretations” of beloved characters.
You have your own kind of ignorant thinking
Good.
unappealing “alternate interpretations” of beloved characters.
Lol.
Not as LOL-worthy as hating a director after having seen a single one of his films, I’d wager.
Assuming you’re talking about David Lynch, one film is more than zero.
I thought it was two but it turns out he didn’t do Naked Lunch. :p
I believe you have to watch at least four of a filmmaker’s films before drawing a conclusion on his work as a whole, but that’s just me.
I believe you have to watch a single movie before drawing a conclusion on that movie, but that’s just me.
I haven’t drawn any conclusion on TLJ beyond that the story holds no appeal for me. If you want to go ahead and interpret that as meaning “TLJ is shit, Rian Johnson’s a hack asshole, etc.”, by all means do so, but it isn’t an accurate representation of my thoughts at all.
Last Jedi’s got some problems. (though I’d argue relatively minor)
I thought you vowed to not see that movie.
I haven’t.
I don’t know where you’ve gotten the idea that Duracell has seen TLJ.
He said that it was beyond perfection.
Ah. I took that as sarcasm.
I still do. Could be wrong.Ah. I took that as sarcasm.
I still do. Could be wrong.I’m 100% certain it was sarcasm. He hates what they did with the characters so he definitely wouldn’t like it if he did see it.
I was being sarcastic indeed. In fact, I was making fun of people like fmalover, who act like TLJ was handed down from God Themself.
TLJ remains on my anti-watchlist and will remain there, along with The Dark Knight Rises, the Snyderman films, and any other movies which present unappealing “alternative interpretations” of beloved characters.
You have your own kind of ignorant thinking
Good.
unappealing “alternate interpretations” of beloved characters.
Lol.
Not as LOL-worthy as hating a director after having seen a single one of his films, I’d wager.
Assuming you’re talking about David Lynch, one film is more than zero.
I thought it was two but it turns out he didn’t do Naked Lunch. :p
I believe you have to watch at least four of a filmmaker’s films before drawing a conclusion on his work as a whole, but that’s just me.
I believe you have to watch a single movie before drawing a conclusion on that movie, but that’s just me.
I haven’t drawn any conclusion on TLJ beyond that the story holds no appeal for me. If you want to go ahead and interpret that as meaning “TLJ is shit, Rian Johnson’s an asshole, etc.”, by all means do so, but it isn’t an accurate representation of my thoughts at all.
You haven’t seen the movie and yet you’re bitching at how a “beloved character was interpreted.”
So, sure, why not.
Last Jedi’s got some problems. (though I’d argue relatively minor)
I thought you vowed to not see that movie.
I haven’t.
I don’t know where you’ve gotten the idea that Duracell has seen TLJ.
He said that it was beyond perfection.
Ah. I took that as sarcasm.
I still do. Could be wrong.Ah. I took that as sarcasm.
I still do. Could be wrong.I’m 100% certain it was sarcasm. He hates what they did with the characters so he definitely wouldn’t like it if he did see it.
I was being sarcastic indeed. In fact, I was making fun of people like fmalover, who act like TLJ was handed down from God Themself.
TLJ remains on my anti-watchlist and will remain there, along with The Dark Knight Rises, the Snyderman films, and any other movies which present unappealing “alternative interpretations” of beloved characters.
You have your own kind of ignorant thinking
Good.
unappealing “alternate interpretations” of beloved characters.
Lol.
Not as LOL-worthy as hating a director after having seen a single one of his films, I’d wager.
Assuming you’re talking about David Lynch, one film is more than zero.
I thought it was two but it turns out he didn’t do Naked Lunch. :p
I believe you have to watch at least four of a filmmaker’s films before drawing a conclusion on his work as a whole, but that’s just me.
I believe you have to watch a single movie before drawing a conclusion on that movie, but that’s just me.
I haven’t drawn any conclusion on TLJ beyond that the story holds no appeal for me. If you want to go ahead and interpret that as meaning “TLJ is shit, Rian Johnson’s an asshole, etc.”, by all means do so, but it isn’t an accurate representation of my thoughts at all.
You haven’t seen the movie and yet you’re bitching at how a “beloved character was interpreted.”
So, sure, why not.
I don’t need to see Man of Steel to know that Jonathan Kent tells Clark that it’s alright to let people die if it’s in Clark’s best interests. That version of Jonathan is wholly unlike the Jonathan Kent I’ve come to know in both the comics, prior movies, and TV shows, the Jonathan who taught Clark to do his very best to help humanity. That bit of characterization, combined with other elements of the movie I’ve been exposed to through trailers/screencaps/reviews/etc., have left me with the impression that MOS isn’t a movie I want to see. Does that mean I believe it’s automatically a bad film? No. But it’s not a film that I, as a Superman fan, influenced by older Superman stories with an opposing aesthetic and ethic, have any interest in seeing.
Last Jedi’s got some problems. (though I’d argue relatively minor)
I thought you vowed to not see that movie.
I haven’t.
I don’t know where you’ve gotten the idea that Duracell has seen TLJ.
He said that it was beyond perfection.
Ah. I took that as sarcasm.
I still do. Could be wrong.Ah. I took that as sarcasm.
I still do. Could be wrong.I’m 100% certain it was sarcasm. He hates what they did with the characters so he definitely wouldn’t like it if he did see it.
I was being sarcastic indeed. In fact, I was making fun of people like fmalover, who act like TLJ was handed down from God Themself.
TLJ remains on my anti-watchlist and will remain there, along with The Dark Knight Rises, the Snyderman films, and any other movies which present unappealing “alternative interpretations” of beloved characters.
You have your own kind of ignorant thinking
Good.
unappealing “alternate interpretations” of beloved characters.
Lol.
Not as LOL-worthy as hating a director after having seen a single one of his films, I’d wager.
Assuming you’re talking about David Lynch, one film is more than zero.
I thought it was two but it turns out he didn’t do Naked Lunch. :p
I believe you have to watch at least four of a filmmaker’s films before drawing a conclusion on his work as a whole, but that’s just me.
I believe you have to watch a single movie before drawing a conclusion on that movie, but that’s just me.
I haven’t drawn any conclusion on TLJ beyond that the story holds no appeal for me. If you want to go ahead and interpret that as meaning “TLJ is shit, Rian Johnson’s an asshole, etc.”, by all means do so, but it isn’t an accurate representation of my thoughts at all.
You haven’t seen the movie and yet you’re bitching at how a “beloved character was interpreted.”
So, sure, why not.
I don’t need to see Man of Steel to know that Jonathan Kent tells Clark that it’s alright to let people die if it’s in Clark’s best interests. That version of Jonathan is wholly unlike the Jonathan Kent I’ve come to know in both the comics, prior movies, and TV shows, the Jonathan who taught Clark to do his very best to help humanity. That bit of characterization, combined with other elements of the movie I’ve been exposed to through trailers/screencaps/reviews/etc., have left me with the impression that MOS isn’t a movie I want to see. Does that mean I believe it’s automatically a bad film? No. But it’s not a film that I, as a Superman fan, influenced by Superman stories with an opposing aesthetic and message, have any interest in seeing.
Hey asshole, knock it off. Man of Steel is my favorite movie and if you don’t like it, then you just need to get silenced by force in my opinion.
The Person in Question
Except people who say that TLJ provides a radical new interpretation of Luke are wrong. Luke has plenty moments of skepticism in the OT. He’s also 35 years older than when we last saw him, and he’s seen a lot. It’s reasonable that a character could develop during that time.
In fact, if Luke were precisely as we left him in ROTJ, that would be less believable.
Also, given the plot of TFA, how did people not see this coming? Why is it suddenly shocking with TLJ that Luke isn’t a gun-ho optimist let’s fight the FO! Infinite Jedi!
I would put this in my sig if I weren’t so lazy.
Honestly, no point badgering DE over it, considering he isn’t going to watch and pretty much never talks about it. Lot less annoying than if he was posting everyday about how Rian Johnson shat on his childhood and murdered Luke’s characterization and ate a baby and wore a lobster sweater once and how it’s clear that Mark Hamill hates him for that or whatever the shit.
Honestly, no point badgering DE over it, considering he isn’t going to watch and pretty much never talks about it. Lot less annoying than if he was posting everyday about how Rian Johnson shat on his childhood and murdered Luke’s characterization and ate a baby and wore a lobster sweater once and how it’s clear that Mark Hamill hates him for that or whatever the shit.
Did that stuff happen in the movie?
If it did then I need to go grab a BD copy and give it a watch.
The Person in Question
Except people who say that TLJ provides a radical new interpretation of Luke are wrong. Luke has plenty moments of skepticism in the OT. He’s also 35 years older than when we last saw him, and he’s seen a lot. It’s reasonable that a character could develop during that time.
In fact, if Luke were precisely as we left him in ROTJ, that would be less believable.
I didn’t want Luke to be precisely were he was in ROTJ. I wanted him to have successfully established a new, undogmatic Jedi Order, gotten married, and had a ton of sons and daughters (none of whom died or turned to the dark side).
Now maybe that’s the EU’s fault, having planted most (but not all) of those elements in my mind. If I’d never followed post-ROTJ EU Luke, perhaps I’d be more accepting of post-ROTJ Disney Luke. I’ll never know.
Also, given the plot of TFA, how did people not see this coming? Why is it suddenly shocking with TLJ that Luke isn’t a gun-ho optimist let’s fight the FO! Infinite Jedi!
I don’t care much for TFA, either.
Honestly, no point badgering DE over it, considering he isn’t going to watch and pretty much never talks about it. Lot less annoying than if he was posting everyday about how Rian Johnson shat on his childhood and murdered Luke’s characterization and ate a baby and wore a lobster sweater once and how it’s clear that Mark Hamill hates him for that or whatever the shit.
Did that stuff happen in the movie?
If it did then I need to go grab a BD copy and give it a watch.
No, sorry for the confusion, Rian was the one who ate a baby and wore a lobster sweater.