4 / 2 = 2
Take it to the out of context thread.
Or the irrelevant thread, if you prefer.
How is that irrelevant? Two is exactly, irrefutably half of four.
Has our president said anything in his memory? I’m fearful that he’ll do an imitation of him.
Well, he’s not black or mexican or female, so he’s got that in his favor, but the whole wheelchair thing makes it a 50/50 call I guess.
He’s also smart.
4 / 2 = 2
Yes.
No.
This.
That’s not how this works.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/03/exodus-rex/555473/
Within the hour, the State Department issued a statement insisting that Tillerson “had every intention of remaining” and “did not speak to the President this morning and is unaware of the reason.” CNN reported that Tillerson had received a call from White House Chief of Staff John Kelly on Friday night indicating that he would be replaced that did not specify timing; a senior White House official told the network that it was Trump himself who had suddenly decided to pull the trigger on Tuesday morning. Tillerson learned of his actual firing the same way everybody else did: By reading about it on Twitter shortly after 8:44 a.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, March 13.
A lot turns on that timing. On March 12, Tillerson had backed the British government’s accusation that Russia was culpable for a nerve-agent attack on United Kingdom soil. If Tillerson had been fired March 9, then his words of support for Britain could not explain his firing three days before. But if the White House was lying about the timing, it could be lying about the motive.
And since it now seems all but certain that the White House was lying about the timing, it looks more probable that it was lying about the motive too.
Well, that’s it. Mueller can go home now. There’s no basis to any of it. Cue the pardons!
I have to subscribe to read the full article? Fuck off, WSJ.
WSJ? Who is that? btw, I could not read the whole article, it said something about have to sign in or sign up and I am not going to do that.
Warriors of Social Justice.
Actually, that is how I first read it, but I quickly realized that wasn’t right.
I did an actual, real-life face palm.
Well, that’s it. Mueller can go home now. There’s no basis to any of it. Cue the pardons!
I have to subscribe to read the full article? Fuck off, WSJ.
WSJ? Who is that? btw, I could not read the whole article, it said something about have to sign in or sign up and I am not going to do that.
William Shannon Johnson, one of the guys implicated in the Trump/Russia scandal.
No, White Santa Jesus is more likely.
In blackface, of course.
Well, that’s it. Mueller can go home now. There’s no basis to any of it. Cue the pardons!
I have to subscribe to read the full article? Fuck off, WSJ.
WSJ? Who is that? btw, I could not read the whole article, it said something about have to sign in or sign up and I am not going to do that.
I’m surprised that you don’t know what the Wall Street Journal is.
Well, that’s it. Mueller can go home now. There’s no basis to any of it. Cue the pardons!
I have to subscribe to read the full article?
Well the left leaning bias is on full display here. I have no doubt if a major Republican politician claimed to be part Native American and didn’t look anything like a Native American, people in here would be saying take a DNA test or fess up.
I don’t know if people in here would be saying that but I’m pretty sure there would be plenty of mocking.
On the topic of bias and arguments, this article on “progressive hostility” looks compelling. I’ve only read a little of it but I’ve heard similar complaints from people I know.
When I disagree with a conservative friend or colleague on some political issue, I have no fear of speaking my mind. I talk, they listen, they respond, I talk some more, and at the end of it we get along just as we always have. But I’ve discovered that when a progressive friend says something with which I disagree or that I know to be incorrect, I’m hesitant to point it out.
truth.
Ah yes, only Conservatives are rational. Yay.
that is not what I said.
You quoted an article that said that, and proclaimed it “truth.”
I quoted part of the article and proclaimed it “truth”.
The part I quoted does not say that only Conservatives are rational.
Let’s look back:
When I disagree with a conservative friend or colleague on some political issue, I have no fear of speaking my mind. I talk, they listen, they respond, I talk some more, and at the end of it we get along just as we always have.
In short, Conservatives are rational.
But I’ve discovered that when a progressive friend says something with which I disagree or that I know to be incorrect, I’m hesitant to point it out.
Or; I won’t argue with progressives because I fear they are not rational.
interesting interpretation.
Seems like the only interpretation to me. How did you interpret it?
That some Liberals take disagreement more personally. That some Liberals are more offended by disagreement.
Yeah, whole bunch of snowflakes, amirite or amirite?
oh ffs.
Isn’t that basically what you said?
no.
Tell me how.
taking disagreement more personally and/or being more offended by disagreement does not = being a snowflake. At least not in my book.
In your book, what does being a snowflake mean?
I assumed by snowflake you meant someone who was wimpy and/or cowardly and/or weak and/or something like that, and that is not what I meant by any of my comments.
Alright. The prosecution rests.
For now.
Why do you see yourself as some sort of Prosecutor and me as some sort of Defendant?
Would you have preferred me to be part of the defense?
Why does there need be any defense, why does there need to be any sort of a trial?
A strong and fair court system is a prerequisite to a functioning democracy, like this web forum.
yeah right
You didn’t vote in last year’s moderator election? I certainly did. It was open to all members with an account age of over one year. And you can take any dispute to the forum courts. I’m actually running for judge there in one of the regional circuits.
Well the left leaning bias is on full display here. I have no doubt if a major Republican politician claimed to be part Native American and didn’t look anything like a Native American, people in here would be saying take a DNA test or fess up.
I don’t know if people in here would be saying that but I’m pretty sure there would be plenty of mocking.
On the topic of bias and arguments, this article on “progressive hostility” looks compelling. I’ve only read a little of it but I’ve heard similar complaints from people I know.
When I disagree with a conservative friend or colleague on some political issue, I have no fear of speaking my mind. I talk, they listen, they respond, I talk some more, and at the end of it we get along just as we always have. But I’ve discovered that when a progressive friend says something with which I disagree or that I know to be incorrect, I’m hesitant to point it out.
truth.
Ah yes, only Conservatives are rational. Yay.
that is not what I said.
You quoted an article that said that, and proclaimed it “truth.”
I quoted part of the article and proclaimed it “truth”.
The part I quoted does not say that only Conservatives are rational.
Let’s look back:
When I disagree with a conservative friend or colleague on some political issue, I have no fear of speaking my mind. I talk, they listen, they respond, I talk some more, and at the end of it we get along just as we always have.
In short, Conservatives are rational.
But I’ve discovered that when a progressive friend says something with which I disagree or that I know to be incorrect, I’m hesitant to point it out.
Or; I won’t argue with progressives because I fear they are not rational.
interesting interpretation.
Seems like the only interpretation to me. How did you interpret it?
That some Liberals take disagreement more personally. That some Liberals are more offended by disagreement.
Yeah, whole bunch of snowflakes, amirite or amirite?
oh ffs.
Isn’t that basically what you said?
no.
Tell me how.
taking disagreement more personally and/or being more offended by disagreement does not = being a snowflake. At least not in my book.
In your book, what does being a snowflake mean?
I assumed by snowflake you meant someone who was wimpy and/or cowardly and/or weak and/or something like that, and that is not what I meant by any of my comments.
Alright. The prosecution rests.
For now.
Why do you see yourself as some sort of Prosecutor and me as some sort of Defendant?
Would you have preferred me to be part of the defense?
Why does there need be any defense, why does there need to be any sort of a trial?
A strong and fair court system is a prerequisite to a functioning democracy, like this web forum.
Well the left leaning bias is on full display here. I have no doubt if a major Republican politician claimed to be part Native American and didn’t look anything like a Native American, people in here would be saying take a DNA test or fess up.
I don’t know if people in here would be saying that but I’m pretty sure there would be plenty of mocking.
On the topic of bias and arguments, this article on “progressive hostility” looks compelling. I’ve only read a little of it but I’ve heard similar complaints from people I know.
When I disagree with a conservative friend or colleague on some political issue, I have no fear of speaking my mind. I talk, they listen, they respond, I talk some more, and at the end of it we get along just as we always have. But I’ve discovered that when a progressive friend says something with which I disagree or that I know to be incorrect, I’m hesitant to point it out.
truth.
Ah yes, only Conservatives are rational. Yay.
that is not what I said.
You quoted an article that said that, and proclaimed it “truth.”
I quoted part of the article and proclaimed it “truth”.
The part I quoted does not say that only Conservatives are rational.
Let’s look back:
When I disagree with a conservative friend or colleague on some political issue, I have no fear of speaking my mind. I talk, they listen, they respond, I talk some more, and at the end of it we get along just as we always have.
In short, Conservatives are rational.
But I’ve discovered that when a progressive friend says something with which I disagree or that I know to be incorrect, I’m hesitant to point it out.
Or; I won’t argue with progressives because I fear they are not rational.
interesting interpretation.
Seems like the only interpretation to me. How did you interpret it?
That some Liberals take disagreement more personally. That some Liberals are more offended by disagreement.
Yeah, whole bunch of snowflakes, amirite or amirite?
oh ffs.
Isn’t that basically what you said?
no.
Tell me how.
taking disagreement more personally and/or being more offended by disagreement does not = being a snowflake. At least not in my book.
In your book, what does being a snowflake mean?
I assumed by snowflake you meant someone who was wimpy and/or cowardly and/or weak and/or something like that, and that is not what I meant by any of my comments.
Alright. The prosecution rests.
For now.
Why do you see yourself as some sort of Prosecutor and me as some sort of Defendant?
Would you have preferred me to be part of the defense?
Well the left leaning bias is on full display here. I have no doubt if a major Republican politician claimed to be part Native American and didn’t look anything like a Native American, people in here would be saying take a DNA test or fess up.
I don’t know if people in here would be saying that but I’m pretty sure there would be plenty of mocking.
On the topic of bias and arguments, this article on “progressive hostility” looks compelling. I’ve only read a little of it but I’ve heard similar complaints from people I know.
When I disagree with a conservative friend or colleague on some political issue, I have no fear of speaking my mind. I talk, they listen, they respond, I talk some more, and at the end of it we get along just as we always have. But I’ve discovered that when a progressive friend says something with which I disagree or that I know to be incorrect, I’m hesitant to point it out.
truth.
Ah yes, only Conservatives are rational. Yay.
that is not what I said.
You quoted an article that said that, and proclaimed it “truth.”
I quoted part of the article and proclaimed it “truth”.
The part I quoted does not say that only Conservatives are rational.
Let’s look back:
When I disagree with a conservative friend or colleague on some political issue, I have no fear of speaking my mind. I talk, they listen, they respond, I talk some more, and at the end of it we get along just as we always have.
In short, Conservatives are rational.
But I’ve discovered that when a progressive friend says something with which I disagree or that I know to be incorrect, I’m hesitant to point it out.
Or; I won’t argue with progressives because I fear they are not rational.
interesting interpretation.
Seems like the only interpretation to me. How did you interpret it?
That some Liberals take disagreement more personally. That some Liberals are more offended by disagreement.
Yeah, whole bunch of snowflakes, amirite or amirite?
oh ffs.
Isn’t that basically what you said?
no.
Tell me how.
taking disagreement more personally and/or being more offended by disagreement does not = being a snowflake. At least not in my book.
In your book, what does being a snowflake mean?
I assumed by snowflake you meant someone who was wimpy and/or cowardly and/or weak and/or something like that, and that is not what I meant by any of my comments.
Alright. The prosecution rests.
For now.
Well the left leaning bias is on full display here. I have no doubt if a major Republican politician claimed to be part Native American and didn’t look anything like a Native American, people in here would be saying take a DNA test or fess up.
I don’t know if people in here would be saying that but I’m pretty sure there would be plenty of mocking.
On the topic of bias and arguments, this article on “progressive hostility” looks compelling. I’ve only read a little of it but I’ve heard similar complaints from people I know.
When I disagree with a conservative friend or colleague on some political issue, I have no fear of speaking my mind. I talk, they listen, they respond, I talk some more, and at the end of it we get along just as we always have. But I’ve discovered that when a progressive friend says something with which I disagree or that I know to be incorrect, I’m hesitant to point it out.
truth.
Ah yes, only Conservatives are rational. Yay.
that is not what I said.
You quoted an article that said that, and proclaimed it “truth.”
I quoted part of the article and proclaimed it “truth”.
The part I quoted does not say that only Conservatives are rational.
Let’s look back:
When I disagree with a conservative friend or colleague on some political issue, I have no fear of speaking my mind. I talk, they listen, they respond, I talk some more, and at the end of it we get along just as we always have.
In short, Conservatives are rational.
But I’ve discovered that when a progressive friend says something with which I disagree or that I know to be incorrect, I’m hesitant to point it out.
Or; I won’t argue with progressives because I fear they are not rational.
interesting interpretation.
Seems like the only interpretation to me. How did you interpret it?
That some Liberals take disagreement more personally. That some Liberals are more offended by disagreement.
Yeah, whole bunch of snowflakes, amirite or amirite?
oh ffs.
Isn’t that basically what you said?
no.
Tell me how.
taking disagreement more personally and/or being more offended by disagreement does not = being a snowflake. At least not in my book.
In your book, what does being a snowflake mean?
Well the left leaning bias is on full display here. I have no doubt if a major Republican politician claimed to be part Native American and didn’t look anything like a Native American, people in here would be saying take a DNA test or fess up.
I don’t know if people in here would be saying that but I’m pretty sure there would be plenty of mocking.
On the topic of bias and arguments, this article on “progressive hostility” looks compelling. I’ve only read a little of it but I’ve heard similar complaints from people I know.
When I disagree with a conservative friend or colleague on some political issue, I have no fear of speaking my mind. I talk, they listen, they respond, I talk some more, and at the end of it we get along just as we always have. But I’ve discovered that when a progressive friend says something with which I disagree or that I know to be incorrect, I’m hesitant to point it out.
truth.
Ah yes, only Conservatives are rational. Yay.
that is not what I said.
You quoted an article that said that, and proclaimed it “truth.”
I quoted part of the article and proclaimed it “truth”.
The part I quoted does not say that only Conservatives are rational.
Let’s look back:
When I disagree with a conservative friend or colleague on some political issue, I have no fear of speaking my mind. I talk, they listen, they respond, I talk some more, and at the end of it we get along just as we always have.
In short, Conservatives are rational.
But I’ve discovered that when a progressive friend says something with which I disagree or that I know to be incorrect, I’m hesitant to point it out.
Or; I won’t argue with progressives because I fear they are not rational.
interesting interpretation.
Seems like the only interpretation to me. How did you interpret it?
That some Liberals take disagreement more personally. That some Liberals are more offended by disagreement.
Yeah, whole bunch of snowflakes, amirite or amirite?
oh ffs.
Isn’t that basically what you said?
no.
Tell me how.
Which is fine. My issue is declaring it “truth” like it’s some universal constant.
I read it as Warbler saying it was true for him/his experience, not that it was objective truth.
He’s just mad because I’m always hostile to him.
right now I mad at the constant snide references to the fact that I went private for a bit.
Is it something that you’re ashamed of?
Well the left leaning bias is on full display here. I have no doubt if a major Republican politician claimed to be part Native American and didn’t look anything like a Native American, people in here would be saying take a DNA test or fess up.
I don’t know if people in here would be saying that but I’m pretty sure there would be plenty of mocking.
On the topic of bias and arguments, this article on “progressive hostility” looks compelling. I’ve only read a little of it but I’ve heard similar complaints from people I know.
When I disagree with a conservative friend or colleague on some political issue, I have no fear of speaking my mind. I talk, they listen, they respond, I talk some more, and at the end of it we get along just as we always have. But I’ve discovered that when a progressive friend says something with which I disagree or that I know to be incorrect, I’m hesitant to point it out.
truth.
Ah yes, only Conservatives are rational. Yay.
that is not what I said.
You quoted an article that said that, and proclaimed it “truth.”
I quoted part of the article and proclaimed it “truth”.
The part I quoted does not say that only Conservatives are rational.
Let’s look back:
When I disagree with a conservative friend or colleague on some political issue, I have no fear of speaking my mind. I talk, they listen, they respond, I talk some more, and at the end of it we get along just as we always have.
In short, Conservatives are rational.
But I’ve discovered that when a progressive friend says something with which I disagree or that I know to be incorrect, I’m hesitant to point it out.
Or; I won’t argue with progressives because I fear they are not rational.
interesting interpretation.
Seems like the only interpretation to me. How did you interpret it?
That some Liberals take disagreement more personally. That some Liberals are more offended by disagreement.
Yeah, whole bunch of snowflakes, amirite or amirite?
oh ffs.
Isn’t that basically what you said?
Well the left leaning bias is on full display here. I have no doubt if a major Republican politician claimed to be part Native American and didn’t look anything like a Native American, people in here would be saying take a DNA test or fess up.
I don’t know if people in here would be saying that but I’m pretty sure there would be plenty of mocking.
On the topic of bias and arguments, this article on “progressive hostility” looks compelling. I’ve only read a little of it but I’ve heard similar complaints from people I know.
When I disagree with a conservative friend or colleague on some political issue, I have no fear of speaking my mind. I talk, they listen, they respond, I talk some more, and at the end of it we get along just as we always have. But I’ve discovered that when a progressive friend says something with which I disagree or that I know to be incorrect, I’m hesitant to point it out.
truth.
Ah yes, only Conservatives are rational. Yay.
that is not what I said.
You quoted an article that said that, and proclaimed it “truth.”
I quoted part of the article and proclaimed it “truth”.
The part I quoted does not say that only Conservatives are rational.
Let’s look back:
When I disagree with a conservative friend or colleague on some political issue, I have no fear of speaking my mind. I talk, they listen, they respond, I talk some more, and at the end of it we get along just as we always have.
In short, Conservatives are rational.
But I’ve discovered that when a progressive friend says something with which I disagree or that I know to be incorrect, I’m hesitant to point it out.
Or; I won’t argue with progressives because I fear they are not rational.
interesting interpretation.
Seems like the only interpretation to me. How did you interpret it?
That some Liberals take disagreement more personally. That some Liberals are more offended by disagreement.
Yeah, whole bunch of snowflakes, amirite or amirite?
Deleted. I would hate to send anyone into hiding again due to my meanness.
I wonder what he said.
Why are you speaking of him in the third person?
On the topic of bias and arguments, this article on “progressive hostility” looks compelling.
No.
Well the left leaning bias is on full display here. I have no doubt if a major Republican politician claimed to be part Native American and didn’t look anything like a Native American, people in here would be saying take a DNA test or fess up.
i suppose you can believe whatever you want, despite our saying the opposite?
What people say they’d do in a situation like that is rarely what they actually would do.
Mobile OT only displays old profile pics.
No, it’s just that it’s harder to clear a browser’s cache on a mobile device.
He didn’t mean it seriously.
Bingowings visited the forum today.
Cool beans.
Should I ever fall in love with more than one woman at a time, and should they reciprocate my feelings, I will seek to convince them we should live in a polyamorous arrangement.
Yeah, that’s not gonna happen.
