- Post
- #963457
- Topic
- Random Pictures and Gifs (now with winning!) [NSFW]
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/963457/action/topic#963457
- Time
Happy Independence Day everyone.
Happy Independence Day everyone.
It could have.
There are many places where it could have all fallen down.
I’m just amazed it’s lasted 240 years. Barely, but still.
It doesn’t have to be specific.
Why is murder wrong? When is killing right? Are animals entitled to equal rights as people in terms of killing? Are fetuses entitled to equal rights as born humans?
But most important, why?
Murder is a tricky one…killing someone in general with no provocation is the ultimate wrong doing because you’re excreting your will upon that person in the most potent manner. And not only are you ending a person but you are ending what that particular person could have become. But on the flip side I think murder is justified if it’s to save an innocent life or if the law is to inept to put the murderer away.
Is it really wrong? We in the modern world talk as if it is a given, but might not humans be a stronger, better species if we allowed for more natural selection? Survival of the fittest would allow for superior genetics, and we might not be plagued with so many physical and mental illnesses. Humans could utilize their natural aggression to better the species as a whole.
“Superior genetics” is an arbitrary, human-made concept. Genetical diversity is the most important thing to ensure survival of a species. If we thin out our genepool to follow some ideal, we will become more vulnarable to a drastic change in our environment. Therefore, the survival of as many people as possible is desirable, whereas killing people is wrong.
And having “superior genetics” is a bit bigoted. No respect for people with “inferior genetics.”
You keep on misconstruing and misunderstanding. Nobody said that women were weak and fragile, or at least I didn’t hear it.
For once it’s not me.
#HansiLivesMatter
?
“That’s one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind.”
I think it was just him disagreeing with their bizarre viewpoints but as we know in 2016 just disagreeing with someone is tantamount to a personal attack 😄
stop raping me
Not funny.
Frink, I just PMed you the model of the hot dog. Hope you enjoy it.
I can send a 3D model.
Email address?
I thought it was just your style.
Humans are so predictable. I’m sure if you looked back through each of our post history, you would find a lot of similarities in sentence structure, opinions, styles, etc… If you give somebody the same input, they will inevitably produce the same output. Sometimes this can happen across multiple people: Give a couple of people the same input, and they will produce the same output. I’ve seen that before too.
I’m rambling.
Just wanted to know.
Also: A lot of the times your first sentence in a paragraph will not be capitalized, but all sentences after that are capitalized. Why is this?
Did you make a 2015 thread?
I’ve seen all of it. No generalization necessary.
No you have not.
FRINK STALKER CONFIRMED?
Nope.
I’ve seen all of it. No generalization necessary.
No you have not.
Isn’t there another theory where Frink bullied them and then they left?
And what happened to the influx of prequel lovers?
Other countries:
Hey, X years ago today we got founded. Let’s celeberate!America:
AW YES MOTHERFUCKERS THIS IS MY DAY BITCHES WE GOT INDEPENDENT SUCK IT BRITS BWAHA WE GOT CHEESEBURGERS WHATCHA GOT U HEALTH NOPE BWA WE HAVE NO BOUNDS FUCK YOU BRITAIN GUNS GUNS OBAMA BURGERS
Surprisingly cogent.
We went over this before. . . .
Yet you people keep repeating the debate like its a broken vinyl.
Doesn’t this happen with all debates?