Jeebus said:
DominicCobb said:
Collipso said:
I personally think it’s bullshit to say Ahsoka and/or Ezra survived because even though “I’m no Jedi” for the former, Ezra IS a Jedi. And that kind of destroys the idea that Luke is the Last Jedi. But I think it was bold enough already to kill two (one for sure) of the main characters.
Well we know Ezra is alive (based on Filoni statements, also so is Thrawn) but no idea what state he’s in. I’m imagining he’s sort of been out of commission in some way otherwise he’d have tried to make it back himself.
I definitely think there needs to be some explanation of what Ashoka was up to (and why, I suppose, Yoda felt they couldn’t rely on her).
I agree with this. I don’t care that she’s not technically a Jedi, she’s still a decently powerful light-side oriented force user that could have conceivably helped Luke and the rest of the OT rebels. I think that warrants an explanation.
When the Jedi needed her the most (ROTS), she abandoned the order. For all we know, she is trapped on Malacor for 10 years. She had no ship.
I like the feeling Rogue One and Rebels have given to the OT that the Rebel Alliance is only victorious because of a confluence of events. Now, the Empire fails at Yavin because Ezra took out Thrawn and Rogue One took out Krennic. Shortly after, the lose Tarkin. The upper levels of leadership are being thinned leaving Vader somewhat undermanned. The Emperor during this time is distracted with finding the Jedi temple/artifacts.
I’d look at Luke/Yoda during ESB in the light of all this new material as: Yoda is clinging to the dogma of the Jedi Order and Luke is the last hope of bringing it back. Also, they put additional importance on the son of Skywalker killing his father. Ahsoka had her chance at defeating Vader and failed.
It is easy to live with Ahsoka not helping Luke when you realize two in-their-prime Jedi masters refused to team up and hunt down Vader in the 20+ years before ESB.