logo Sign In

Frank your Majesty

User Group
Members
Join date
2-Jan-2015
Last activity
21-Oct-2019
Posts
1,433

Post History

Post
#753479
Topic
General Star Wars <strong>Random Thoughts</strong> Thread
Time

The storylines in Star Wars may have happened a long, long time ago, but the epic battle between the imperialistic Empire and the idealistic rebellious Rebellion is still garnering new fans to this day.

fixed ;-)

Cool stuff, especially the TIE head. The only thing I don't get is who the guy in the bag at 25 is. If I had to guess I'd say Jabba, but why doesn't he have arms?

Post
#753456
Topic
Random Thoughts
Time

Warbler said:

man am I embarrassed.  My 8 year old niece killed me at checkers.   My only defense is that I hadn't played checkers in years.   But it is still humiliating. 

: { 

 Don't worry. When I was about 12 years old, I played morris with my uncle and by the time we had all pieces set, I completely confined him and he couldn't make a single move. At this time I played morris with everyone who didn't run away :D When kids really focus on something it's hard to keep up with them.

Post
#751842
Topic
Religion
Time

imperialscum said:

Frank your Majesty said:

I thought you wanted to say the ten commandments are in contrast to survival of the fittest, or something similar.

Yes that is what I was saying.

Then, you have misread my reply.

imperialscum said:

Frank your Majesty said:

And if you don't belive in religion you must assume that the biblical principles were invented by humans. Humans who were created through evolution, thus making the biblical principles a product of evolution. Therefore, abiding to biblical principles is not against evolution. Or in other words, evolution can lead to principles that contradict your "laws of evolution".

What are you saying is an absurd. It is true that the bible was written by human (who evolved through evolution), but the content of the bible does not describe the evolution. That is like saying every book is about the principles of evolution just because it was written by a human.

From an atheist's point of view, religious rules aren't against the law of evolution because religions are a result of evolution. Rules that prevent the physically strong from killing the weak seem to be against survival of the fittest, but these rules allow us to form societies which are stronger than the individuals in it. The biblical principles were written to enable people to form a society based on their religion and this social behaviour was developed through evolution.

This has nothing to do wether the bible is about evolution or not. The message of the Harry Potter books about friendship and what not are also a result of evolution and these books are also not about evolution.

Frank your Majesty said:

If you don't take the bible literally, you can easily say that God creating earth and life in seven days was a way for people 2500 years ago to imagine how everything started. You can still believe in Heaven and Jesus dying for your sins. That's the essence of not taking something literally.

Of course, evolution is nowhere mentioned in the bible, but neither is electricity and yet, even members of the Westboro Baptist Church use electric light.

Yes I suppose you could twist everything around and fool yourself so that it somehow fits with the modern science. But what would someone then even believe in such nonsense if he accepts science? Why not just take science and forget about the bed-time story level material?

I can't answer this, as I am not religious myself.

I will not partake in some kind of "forum warfare", this is not about "winning", so I stop here. I made my point and if you don't agree, I don't care.

Post
#751819
Topic
Religion
Time

I thought you wanted to say the ten commandments are in contrast to survival of the fittest, or something similar.

If you don't take the bible literally, you can easily say that God creating earth and life in seven days was a way for people 2500 years ago to imagine how everything started. You can still believe in Heaven and Jesus dying for your sins. That's the essence of not taking something literally.

Of course, evolution is nowhere mentioned in the bible, but neither is electricity and yet, even members of the Westboro Baptist Church use electric light.

Post
#751808
Topic
Religion
Time

You know, not all Christians interpret the bible literally. And if you don't belive in religion you must assume that the biblical principles were invented by humans. Humans who were created through evolution, thus making the biblical principles a product of evolution. Therefore, abiding to biblical principles is not against evolution. Or in other words, evolution can lead to principles that contradict your "laws of evolution".

Post
#751798
Topic
Religion
Time

Well, if it didn't happen we wouldn't be here and wonder how it happend, but that's not the reason of my reply.

I don't see how evolution and religion should be mutually exclusive. An all-knowing god could have created the universe in a way that one day intelligent life developed through evolution. He doesn't have to build it himself when he can write a "program".

Post
#751677
Topic
Random Thoughts
Time

darth_ender said:

Frank your Majesty said:

darth_ender said:

Frank your Majesty said:

darth_ender said:

Sexual frivolity, infidelity, teen pregnancy, abortions, and the like are certainly much more prevalent than before.  To what can we attribute this rise?  Largely the media portrayal and acceptance of such behavior.

 Or does the media portray this behavior because it is already accepted? I don't think the influence of books, movies and TV is that great, simply because most people wouldn't watch a movie or read a book if they are strongly opposed to its topic. The media mainly reflects the behaviour of the society, which is much more formed by social factors.

 You are right.  The media has no effect on public opinion.

 No need to be sarcastic. Of course there is some effect, that's why I said mainly, but if something is massively overhyped it's because these people just waited for it to happen. There are erotic fan fictions on the internet for years, 50 Shades Of Grey is just the first one to be published as a book and therefore more easily accessible to these frustrated 50 year old housewifes that are now running to the cinemas.

Anyways, I understand that you have no interset in continuing this discussion since you have been personally attacked. I just wanted to let you know that I didn't mean to belittle or mock you or your beliefs and I hope you don't think I wanted to do such a thing.

 I can get quite sarcastic, and I admit I've been a bit grumpier than usual lately, so I apologize for my tone, but not for the ultimate message.  Let's examine your first quote where you say, "...the behavior of the society...is much more formed by social factors."  Now let's consider a number of facts: the media is a social factor.  In fact, one could say it is the dominant social factor.  While we commonly refer to media as singular, it is actual plural for medium.  A medium is a means of communication.  And all social interaction is based on communication.

Now let's consider obvious facts connected with the media.  There's social media, a form of media where socializing influences people.  Then there are commercials, a format wherein companies influence people to purchase their products.  There are political campaigns, wherein politicians influence voters to see things their way and vote for them.  There is the news, where a persona watching Fox News and reading the Drudge Report will come away with a different view of the state of current affairs from a person watching MSNBC and reading the Huffington Post, and both will definitely see things differently from the Al-Jazeera viewer.  Women viewing ads of skinny females develop conditions like anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa.  

There is a user here named Nanner Split who helped devise the Slender Man character.  There are those who have used Slender Man as an inspiration for crimes they have committed.  People have cited death metal as motivations for suicidal attempts.  The clothes you wore today were probably at least somewhat fashionable.  Those fashion trends are not just naturally ebbing and flowing, but are in fact based on conscious decisions by clothing designers and the models who show them off.  Why don't you dress like you're in the 80's?  Because such is not fashionable anymore, because the media has influenced our sense of fashion.

While people are ultimately responsible for their own decisions, to say the media has no effect is wrong, utterly wrong.  It is through the media that society changes most.  And with the rise of the Internet, those changes have only increased in pace.  Marilyn Manson and Rob Zombie do actually influence people to make bad decisions, even if they didn't make those decisions for them.  Movies like 50 Shades of Grey do in fact make sex cheaper than I personally feel it should be treated.  It's not just because everyone's buddies started having premarital sex that it became commonplace.  It's because it was actually portrayed more often in media than in reality, until it became a reality.  Again, I don't wish to sound judgmental.  One hundred years ago, such behavior was utterly disgraceful.  Today it's expected.

There are articles upon articles about this.  I have a BA in psychology and have taken classes on this material.  I'm not making this up.

http://influence.bafree.net/negative-influences-of-media-on-the-society.php

Thank you for your lenghty reply, I'm glad you're still around here. Of course there's no need to apologize for your message and you didn't sound judgmental to me.

As you said, "the media" is all forms of communication, so ultimately, it's people communicating with each other and exchanging their opinions that changes society. Strictly speaking, there is no influence of the media itself, there's an influence of what people say through various media. I have to admit, that I didn't think of it this way when I made my first comment and you have opened my eyes to it. Nevertheless, these influences are small and only change one's mindset a bit. It's not one book, one movie or one song that's responsible for the whole "depravation" of society. Thus, changing society is a very slow process involving all existing media and I don't think you can fully seperate cause and effect of showing acceptance for something in the media and the society accepting it.

Especially movies, books and music only made for entertainment are aimed to appeal to many people, so they are likely to follow existing trends, 50 Shades Of Grey is no exception. No publisher would release such a poorly written book if he wasn't sure he could sell it. And he can sell it because a certain acceptance for sex in general and BDSM in particular was already prevalent.

(When I talked about social factors I was more talking about "people getting poorer leads to them commiting crimes which is followed by violence that's then shown by the media..." I should have made this clearer but I was short on time and couldn't think it through.)

Post
#751503
Topic
Random Thoughts
Time

darth_ender said:

Frank your Majesty said:

darth_ender said:

Sexual frivolity, infidelity, teen pregnancy, abortions, and the like are certainly much more prevalent than before.  To what can we attribute this rise?  Largely the media portrayal and acceptance of such behavior.

 Or does the media portray this behavior because it is already accepted? I don't think the influence of books, movies and TV is that great, simply because most people wouldn't watch a movie or read a book if they are strongly opposed to its topic. The media mainly reflects the behaviour of the society, which is much more formed by social factors.

 You are right.  The media has no effect on public opinion.

 No need to be sarcastic. Of course there is some effect, that's why I said mainly, but if something is massively overhyped it's because these people just waited for it to happen. There are erotic fan fictions on the internet for years, 50 Shades Of Grey is just the first one to be published as a book and therefore more easily accessible to these frustrated 50 year old housewifes that are now running to the cinemas.

Anyways, I understand that you have no interset in continuing this discussion since you have been personally attacked. I just wanted to let you know that I didn't mean to belittle or mock you or your beliefs and I hope you don't think I wanted to do such a thing.

Post
#751285
Topic
Random Thoughts
Time

darth_ender said:

Sexual frivolity, infidelity, teen pregnancy, abortions, and the like are certainly much more prevalent than before.  To what can we attribute this rise?  Largely the media portrayal and acceptance of such behavior.

 Or does the media portray this behavior because it is already accepted? I don't think the influence of books, movies and TV is that great, simply because most people wouldn't watch a movie or read a book if they are strongly opposed to its topic. The media mainly reflects the behaviour of the society, which is much more formed by social factors.

Post
#749651
Topic
&quot;Die dunkle Bedrohung&quot; better than &quot;The Phantom Menace&quot;?
Time

Kabal said:


As for Episode I: No, the German dubbing doesn't make it any better... unless you consider being punched in the balls repeatedly by a German person to be a better thing than getting your balls busted by an American guy.

 Well, "less bad" is still some form of "better". And I didn't say it's less bad because the people speak german, but because the dub dimished the effects of some of the bad dialog. It would still be a better version if the german dub was retranslated in english, it wouldn't make the story less boring, but it would still be a slight improvement. After watching the Plinkett reviews multiple times, I was actually a bit disappointed not to hear things like "I wish I could just wish away my feelings".

Post
#749385
Topic
Is the Hobbit prequel trilogy suffering the same problems as the Star Wars prequel Trilogy?
Time

Well, I think, when you described it, it didn't sound as goofy as it turned out to be in the movie. The fletching would have decapitated his son and there's no way to ram the broken bow this far into the wood that it would withstand the enormous pulling force. It was just very very silly.

Post
#749198
Topic
Your Favorite type of space battle...
Time

While I liked the space fight in ST Nemesis, I would not want this type of battle in Star Wars. The dogfights in Star Wars are so iconic, that they can't simply abandon them.

I think ROTJ showed really good how this type of space battle works. The capital ships fight each other, while the rebels' fighters slip through a star destroyer's defense and attack critical systems like the shield generator. I don't see why this tactic should be obsolete by the time of VII.

Also, I don't want to see another secret super weapon right after the second death star, so no flagship, please.

That being said, I think your idea fits quite well in the Star Trek multiverse, but be careful not to overdo it on these "super ships", as the effect wears off pretty fast. "If every ship is super, noone will be."

Post
#748875
Topic
What's in your Google search bar right....................NOW!!!
Time

gi direct google image search

Becasue this

RicOlie_2 said:

I just discovered that typing "GI" in my Google Search bar before my search searches Google Images directly. Interesting.

 didn't work.

Or did you write "I just discovered that typing "GI" in my Google Search bar before my search searches Google Images directly. Interesting." in the search bar?