Quite a riveting game going on in the Chess thread at the moment.
I actually don’t know anything about chess, but what’s going on looks interesting.
I’m just so tired of it all.
https://twitter.com/AP_Politics/status/966444573374472197
I disagree.
72
3
And here I was trying not to pile on the “yhwx is a guy in his early 20s” bandwagon…
Heh.
I disagree.
72
3
My post was not meant to be referring specifically to Graham.
Even if he had, he wasn’t a foaming-at-the-mouth neo-Nazi preaching intolerance and hatred.
That’s not an excuse.
When Al Franken dies, non-religious peeps and liberals will be sad in spite of his hypocrisy.
Source?
But they seem to celebrate the death of a prominent Christian figure who has spent most of his life being a wonderful human because of that “human” part.
Source?
I have 127 browser tabs open.
Inevitably it will crash and all those important tabs full of deep insights you meant to look at again will be lost to history. Or maybe you’re the kind of horrible person who opens new tabs for no reason.
I don’t think yhwx does things for no reason.
No good reason, that’s a different story.
Why are you being like this to me today?
Not sure why we’re celebrating such a morose statement.
I have 127 browser tabs open.
Inevitably it will crash and all those important tabs full of deep insights you meant to look at again will be lost to history.
I had to force quit my browser a few minutes ago and all my tabs are still there.
I have 127 browser tabs open.
Unseasonably warm.
As a college student I fear that I could get killed in a university shooting any day now.
You’re far more likely to choke to death or fall down the stairs or have a cerebral hemorrhage.
Cold comfort.
It’s just that in two instances today, it seems that people thought I was being actually serious when I thought I was being obviously facetious. Frink took my posts in the age thread literally, and both of you seem to take my bit in this thread as literally suggesting that those parents should be barred from voting. I don’t know what’s going on here.
people? frink?
Okay, let’s say it’s Frink. What do you have to say about my post?
Can I answer?
I’m not sure why that’s a question that needs to be asked, but yes, you can answer.
I’ve forgotten the question.
It’s just that in two instances today, it seems that people thought I was being actually serious when I thought I was being obviously facetious. Frink took my posts in the age thread literally, and both of you seem to take my bit in this thread as literally suggesting that those parents should be barred from voting. I don’t know what’s going on here.
people? frink?
Okay, let’s say it’s Frink. What do you have to say about my post?
It’s just that in two instances today, it seems that people thought I was being actually serious when I thought I was being obviously facetious. Frink took my posts in the age thread literally, and both of you seem to take my bit in this thread as literally suggesting that those parents should be barred from voting. I don’t know what’s going on here.
people? frink?
Okay, let’s say it’s Frink. What do you have to say about my post?
Can I answer?
I’m not sure why that’s a question that needs to be asked, but yes, you can answer.
It’s just that in two instances today, it seems that people thought I was being actually serious when I thought I was being obviously facetious. Frink took my posts in the age thread literally, and both of you seem to take my bit in this thread as literally suggesting that those parents should be barred from voting. I don’t know what’s going on here.
people? frink?
Okay, let’s say it’s Frink. What do you have to say about my post?
And now there’s this.
Wait, did y’all take me seriously?
No one has ever done that.
I don’t think I get comments like this said about me often, but I’m seeing them a lot today. What’s going on? Is there something different today? Is it me?
It’s just that in two instances today, it seems that people thought I was being actually serious when I thought I was being obviously facetious. Frink took my posts in the age thread literally, and both of you seem to take my bit in this thread as literally suggesting that those parents should be barred from voting. I don’t know what’s going on here.
Wait, did y’all take me seriously?
OK.
328 girls were named Abcde in the United States between 1990 and 2014. The name was given to 32 newly born girls in the year 2009 alone.
I don’t think these people should be voting, for one.
don’t blame the children. (and i agree that any born after 2000 should not currently be voting)
I meant the parents of those children.
i didn’t realize they were named Abcde as well! that’s insane. I guess you could have Abcde jr, but is it common to give girls a jr suffix?
I don’t think that parents (who may have any name) who name their children “Abcde” should be voting.
328 girls were named Abcde in the United States between 1990 and 2014. The name was given to 32 newly born girls in the year 2009 alone.
I don’t think these people should be voting, for one.
don’t blame the children. (and i agree that any born after 2000 should not currently be voting)
I meant the parents of those children.
328 girls were named Abcde in the United States between 1990 and 2014. The name was given to 32 newly born girls in the year 2009 alone.
I don’t think these people should be voting, for one.
They’re actual students. You don’t need to research it. Any conspiracy this large would require the cooperation of so many parties that it would break down due to its sheer complexity.