ray_afraid

Yeah. Stranger Things 2 gave her the Ronald McDonnald cut Ripley has in Aliens.

Dude, I thought you were being rude for no reason. That’s all.
Sorry if you find that “inane”.

yhwx said:

ray_afraid said:

yhwx said:

ray_afraid said:

yhwx said:

ray_afraid said:

yhwx said:

Also: y’all should use Macs.

chyron8472 said:

If you’re into graphic design or video editing, sure. I am not.

I’m into graphic design (part of how I make a living), video editing (hobby) and music production (both) and I just don’t get along with Macs.

Good for you.

What’s that supposed to mean?

It means what it says.

To me it says that you are, for some reason, being a snarky little shit.
If that’s not what it is, please explain.

I don’t get the problem here.

“Good for you.” isn’t something anybody typically says when someone else says they prefer a different tool unless it’s sarcasm. It seemed to be a non sequitur to me, so I asked for clarification instead of just assuming.

I told you that it meant what it said. If you were to take it at face value, that comment would not have indicated that I was being a snarky little shit.

I disagree.

I told you that you should not take it like that.

No you didn’t. You said “It means what it says.” which only backs up my “snarky little shit” theory.

I meant what I said. “That’s good for you.”

Ok. Weird, but groovy.

yhwx said:

ray_afraid said:

yhwx said:

ray_afraid said:

yhwx said:

Also: y’all should use Macs.

chyron8472 said:

If you’re into graphic design or video editing, sure. I am not.

I’m into graphic design (part of how I make a living), video editing (hobby) and music production (both) and I just don’t get along with Macs.

Good for you.

What’s that supposed to mean?

It means what it says.

To me it says that you are, for some reason, being a snarky little shit.
If that’s not what it is, please explain.

yhwx said:

ray_afraid said:

yhwx said:

Also: y’all should use Macs.

chyron8472 said:

If you’re into graphic design or video editing, sure. I am not.

I’m into graphic design (part of how I make a living), video editing (hobby) and music production (both) and I just don’t get along with Macs.

Good for you.

What’s that supposed to mean?

Mad Max Rebo. I love it!
I can’t quite put my finger on the crossover with Lando though… And somethin’ tells me I’ll feel silly when it’s pointed out…

If your previous sigh wasn’t out of offense of frustration, then i have no idea why you did it. And if you aren’t gonna make your intentions clear, why do it at all?

moviefreakedmind said:

To be fair to the remake though, other than in the very first chapter, Pennywise the Dancing Clown in the book was never approachable and always obviously evil to the extreme.

But, to me, that’s what normal clown make up represents!
Someone wearing “scary” clown make-up is much more approachable because it’s obviously just a gimmick to freak people out or an outward sign that you like terrible music.
Someone wearing real clown make-up… forget it. That’s an evil sumbitch and I won’t even walk that direction.

I haven’t seen the new film, from the trailers and stills I’ve seen, I think the Pennywise costume looks great, but the make up looks too obviously evil, which works against what makes clowns scary.

oojason said:

This is great!

moviefreakedmind said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

• It (1990) – 6/10

I’ve never understood how anyone can sit through this entire series at once. The first part is okay, although even that is marred by awful and distracting flashbacks, but the second part is almost unwatchable. If Tim Curry weren’t in this, I don’t think anyone would even remember it.

Yup.
At least the original clown looks scary though. The new one does not. Clowns are scary because it’s a grown person going over the top to look “fun for kids!”. The new one is trying to look creepy. It don’t work that way with clowns.

^^(edit took too long)

I don’t know if that explosion is even available in HD.
But I don’t think he wants anything identifiable from anything else. Like the stardestroyers from ESB that were used- it made a cool looking shot, but I knew where those were from and it took me out of the moment and into the creation a bit too much. I’m very excited and interested to see these shots replaced with truly brand new shots of star destroyers, TIEs, ect.

My God is a Zilla, My King is a Kong.

I dunno where some are getting the idea that this will be a “carbon copy” of the first version. Ady’s listed plenty of new changes, fixes and some dialing back of a few things. Also, nothing from the first version can carry over because it’s in SD. Everything will have to be done again, and with his new set of skills, those changes will undoubtedly be different and even better in this new version. No 2D ships copied from other films! No planets and explosions from other films! New stuff! Better methods! Better results! Reasons to be excited!

yhwx said:

Also: y’all should use Macs.

chyron8472 said:

If you’re into graphic design or video editing, sure. I am not.

I’m into graphic design (part of how I make a living), video editing (hobby) and music production (both) and I just don’t get along with Macs.

Quantum is kickin’ ass so far. A couple days with it and couldn’t be happier.

buh.

C’mon man…

Me and Ender.

chyron8472 said:

TV’s Frink said:

Anyone who saw the behind the scenes doc on TPM, watched the three kids they test screened, and then watched them pick the worst one of the three, and still defends how Anakin was portrayed…sorry, no.

If I recall correctly, that doc seemed to have some talking about how Jake looked similar enough to Mark to convincingly be related. Like, literally they held a photo of both up next to each other and remarked about it before they decided.

If he needs to look like anyone, it’s Sebastian Shaw.
Same goes for the recast for Ep. 2 & 3.

I’m glad this isn’t on facebook because, if it was, I wouldn’t know any of you fine folks.
Facebook creeps me out.

Handman said:

I read “Cinemasins” as Cinna-Masons somehow.

When I was a little kid I read the title to the tv show Gunsmoke as Gun’s Moke. Thought a ‘moke’ was part of a gun or something. Never asked about it, just figured I’d lean when I got older. And I did, I guess.

I haven’t seen much of IT Crowd, but have laughed every time. If a rockabilly from southwestern Missouri can love The Office, Spaced and Black Books, I’d say there’s humor there for anybody, though nothing is for everybody.

The bad effects, over use of blue screen and CGI, ect. are not the worst thing about the PT.
If the story and characters were good, I could overlook it’s technical faults. I do the same for plenty of other films.