moviefreakedmind

yhwx said:

The Costume Designers Slept Together

Yeah, that doesn’t translate well into a user name.

his account was created the day GinsaH was band

I haven’t seen this since the theatre and I barely remember any of it. It didn’t go beyond being mildly entertaining for me, and didn’t leave me excited for the sequels. I will see them, but I’m not excited about them.

Huh, I swore it would’ve been for being the schliebert fucker.

Actually, Hansi was never rude at all so maybe that wasn’t him. Idk, I’d still bet my savings that he was Wario64I

I always misspell your name because I can never remember what it is.

SilverWook said:
We don’t see non creepy Palpatine on the prequel side either.

I wouldn’t go so far as to refer to the prequel Palpatine as “non creepy”.

yhwx said:

A name is something that people take very seriously — and yes, that includes online pseudonyms. Names are a part of who you are. And as the internet becomes more and more popular, and as most people are anonymous on the internet, who you are can be defined by a username. Most people wouldn’t just sit passively if their name was mispronounced or misspelled. This is a misspelling, in a sense, and it should be taken seriously.

People abbreviate my username all the time. If you are starting to identify as your username then maybe you’re spending too much time online.

Density said:

Yep, before it was a choice between watching Star Wars in acceptable modern quality on DVD or Blu-ray, or digging out my old VHS tapes. (I wasn’t even aware of the GOUT.) So I would bite the bullet and watch the SE. But in truth for a long time, thanks to my disillusionment with the SE and the prequels, I basically stopped being a Star Wars fan. I wasn’t happy about it, and it wasn’t even something I consciously did, my enthusiasm for the series just kind of faded away. I hadn’t seen the movies in years until TFA and my discovery of this site re-ignited it. The Despecialized Editions were one hell of a treat.

After TFA I pretty much gave up on calling myself a “fan”. I like the first three movies. As a franchise I don’t care.

yhwx said:

I don’t think that’s required.

I don’t think you’ve ever listened to an album. I think that you still consider albums to be a cover image.

Hail is very common in the summer where I live.

yhwx said:

Nope.

I doubt it very seriously because every single time I post something in any given thread at almost any time of day (or night) I see a response from you within a minute or two.

Harmy said:

I agree with Frink - though I must say your guestimate is surprisingly accurate. 😃

So you’re saying that it’ll be done by tomorrow? I need to give it to my dad on his birthday this weekend.

😉

yhwx said:

Doesn’t matter.

Do you refresh originaltrilogy.com every five minutes just to respond to every single post made?

DuracellEnergizer said:

moviefreakedmind said:

Album cover ratings now?

Everyone’s been complaining about album cover art in this thread. I figured why not make light of that in my own unique fashion.

I only count one.

LuckyGungan2001 said:

moviefreakedmind said:

LuckyGungan2001 said:

I really can’t tell if this guy is a troll or not.

LOL! One star for 12 Years a Slave and nine stars for Ghostbusters 2?

Have you read his reviews? They’ve got to be some of the worst written things I’ve ever seen.

No, I’m sure they suck though.

Album cover ratings now?

LuckyGungan2001 said:

I really can’t tell if this guy is a troll or not.

LOL! One star for 12 Years a Slave and nine stars for Ghostbusters 2?

Facebook is annoying but at least you can reconnect with distant relatives and friends that post pictures and updates. There’s a lot of crap on there too but I find it helpful to reconnect with old friends and family. Twitter is absolutely useless on the other hand.

Density said:

…The same reason Blade Runner wasn’t only released as a deluxe box? For the exact reasons that I explained, that some people who would have no interest in buying a deluxe box would buy the OUT? And Disney likes money so they don’t want to limit their target demographics?

That’s not the strategy they used for the mac n cheetos.

Man of Steel came out almost fifty-eight years ago.

On certain TVs, that’s not a surprise.

MalàStrana said:

Frank your Majesty said:

Disney does not handle Star Wars, Lucasfilm does, so Disney’s track record of not releasing original versions is irrelevant here.

Such naivety is charming.

I realize that typing this is a waste of time, but Star Wars is not Song of the South. Also, do you really expect them to not use any CGI?