metall_havy

TServo2049 said:

Wow, this version really IS sped up, at the same percentage as PAL transfers. I put this against an actual PAL version, and the speed/pitch is identical.

I am wondering why this had PAL-style 4% speedup? The movie would have fit on a CLV LD and T-120 VHS regardless, there was no need for speedup shenanigans to fit it to a single tape/disc, like the original VHS of Superman or the original LD/CED of Star Wars.

In the 1950s, the Western European countries commenced planning to introduce colour television, and were faced with the problem that the NTSC standard demonstrated several weaknesses, including colour tone shifting under poor transmission conditions, which became a major issue considering Europe's geographical and weather-related particularities. To overcome NTSC's shortcomings, alternative standards were devised, resulting in the development of the PAL and SECAM standards. The goal was to provide a colour TV standard for the European picture frequency of 50 fields per second (50 hertz), and finding a way to eliminate the problems with NTSC.

PAL was developed by Walter Bruch at Telefunken in Hannover, Germany, with important input from Dr. Kruse and Gerhard Mahler (de). The format was patented by Telefunken in 1962, citing Bruch as inventor, and unveiled to members of the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) on 3 January 1963. The first broadcasts began in the United Kingdom in June 1967, followed by West Germany late that year.^[1] The one BBC channel initially using the broadcast standard was BBC2, which had been the first UK TV service to introduce "625-lines" in 1964. Telefunken PALcolor 708T was the first PAL commercial TV set. It was followed by Loewe-Farbfernseher S 920 & F 900.

Telefunken was later bought by the French electronics manufacturer Thomson. Thomson also bought the Compagnie Générale de Télévision where Henri de France developed SECAM, the first European Standard for colour television. Thomson, now called Technicolor SA, also owns the RCA brand and licenses it to other companies; Radio Corporation of America, the originator of that brand, created the NTSC colour TV standard before Thomson became involved.

The term PAL was often used informally and somewhat imprecisely to refer to the 625-line/50 Hz (576i) television system in general, to differentiate from the 525-line/60 Hz (480i) system generally used with NTSC. Accordingly, DVDs were labelled as PAL or NTSC (referring to the line count and frame rate) even though technically the discs do not carry either PAL or NTSC composite signal. CCIR 625/50 and EIA 525/60 are the proper names for these (line count and field rate) standards; PAL and NTSC are only the method of transmitting color to the TV.

who know?

R2 Japan - (Geneon/Studio Canal - Extreme Edition)

new box set coming

what it? down on page?

http://www.therpf.com/f47/unaltered-original-star-wars-trilogy-blu-ray-235592/index5.html

CatBus said:

I'll do the rest via PM.

 I listened to, it's not from my source here in the opening credits of error 2 signals not synchronously.

CatBus said:

edited speed so that the pitch was correct.

 that's right.Why stereo? there is dual mono. And the cliffs also replaced a stereo?

can look for another source of Soviet dubbing on forum. Maybe someone else has it.

mono or stereo? You edited speed audio?

Feallan said:

metall_havy said:

Guys, it's fine, my  interest in the Soviet dubbing, with the picture in 1977.Get Soviet dubbing was not easy.

I'm pretty sure the Soviet dub is available on rutracker, already synced to 1977 Star Wars, so it should fit with Harmy's version.

Ok, not so sure now. But you can try.

 THERE bad imitation of 5.1, detoned. Improperly made.

Guys, it's fine, my  interest in the Soviet dubbing, with the picture in 1977.Get Soviet dubbing was not easy.

Harmy said:

The man is clearly using Google Translate. Let's not make fun of him for not knowing English. I believe he's trying to say that the dubbing, no matter how shody the quality, holds a big sentimental value.

 You are right. It is.

I do not understand the last message.

such as watching a movie

https://yadi.sk/i/eATL23n9eZseM

It was just compare.

Harmy

has done a great job. Important for every true fan. wants but the similarities and the sound of classical significance for us is dubbing.

it's not me it's Google. I do not know English.but I understand in part.

Ps: this is not addressed to you. I'm not a troll.

You did STAR WARS Despetsialized. Why. Lucas did the same with the normal picture. Your is VO the same. So went to Lucas. Better though.

CatBus said:

If you mean the nasty-ass dub, then yes.  But we also have a decent Russian voiceover.

 Well, you and capricious.it is a transfer in 1980 .It is just as important as the theatrical version .This part of the story.