logo Sign In

lovelikewinter

User Group
Members
Join date
5-May-2014
Last activity
12-Oct-2018
Posts
602

Post History

Post
#1029941
Topic
4K restoration on Star Wars
Time

CHEWBAKAspelledwrong said:

lovelikewinter said:

I was possibly going to get Revenge of the Sith Steelbook, but I put it off. I didn’t want my first Star Wars Blu-Ray to be a Prequel. Oh well.

Still available from best buy… For now

Edit : also,why, lol

Because it doesn’t completely suck ass. I was trying to get it for under $10, but put more time into my BW Classic Doctor Who DVDs.

Post
#1029884
Topic
4K restoration on Star Wars
Time

moviefreakedmind said:

They might’ve been a last minute thing since they couldn’t release what was originally intended for that time.

Maybe.

Hopefully the covers for the 4K OOT will reflect the original poster art and not the horrible steelbook cases. Though I would love a steelbook release to go with my TFA and eventual Rogue One blu-rays. This does leave Phantom Menace as a possible release later on, but Attack of the Clones and Revenge of the Sith will be forever stuck at 1080p and be even more disconnected from the good movies.

Post
#1029855
Topic
General Star Wars <strong>Random Thoughts</strong> Thread
Time

Hardcore Legend said:

I never really thought about the fact that Tarkin knows who Darth Vader actually is and he probably knows that the entire galaxy is run by a Sith Lord.

In the Tarkin book, he has his suspicions about Vader but doesn’t have confirmation.

Apparently in the new canon, very few people know the Emperor is a force user. If he is forced to use his powers- there are no witnesses or survivors.

Post
#1028272
Topic
4K restoration on Star Wars
Time

moviefreakedmind said:

baron_lando said:

lovelikewinter said:

If the SE is a dupe neg and the original is untouched, it has 18-20 more years of degrading that they would have to fix. Or the pieces cut out of the neg to create the SE (even now that sickens me) would probably have needed a lot of work. Empire probably has the same fading issues, and hopefully Jedi was relatively easy.

The good news buried in that Gareth Edwards Rogue One article is that the negative of all the unused negative was just fine, and usable to boot.

The “unused negative”, what do you mean by this?

The camera negatives from the filming of Star Wars still exist, and have not been digitized as of a year or two ago. Gareth Edwards saw them at the Lucasfilm archive.

Post
#1028214
Topic
4K restoration on Star Wars
Time

Fang Zei said:

That dupe neg talk was just speculation on Robert A Harris’ part. I’m pretty sure we know for a fact that George had the changes cut directly into the o-neg. RAH is correct, though, that the o-neg is not needed for an amazing OOT restoration.

Now that it’s Disney’s money to spend on such a project and not GL’s, I’d say the chances are much greater. George even changed his tune from “my original vision” to “it’s too expensive right now” not long before selling the company. I honestly don’t think it would bother him if the remastered original were packaged with a remastered SE.

Nope, lets leave the SE perpetually at 1080p in accordance with Lucas’ “vision.”

Post
#1027875
Topic
Are The Prequels That Bad?
Time

Ryan-SWI said:

I’m not disagreeing, but how is that any different than just about every Marvel movie, or blockbuster in general made in the past five years? If we’re only talking about effects, isn’t it a bit asinine to complain endlessly about Prequel blue screening and then pay it no mind in just about every other modern film? You could argue it looks better now, but if it didn’t look better a decade later I’d be worried.

Plenty of the OT’s effects look rubbish by today’s standards (ROTJ sail barge scene springs to mind), but they’re hardly a case for blue screen being bad, as they shouldn’t be.

The difference is Marvel movies had some great directors and the Prequels had tired sit in a chair and drink coffee Lucas. That and the last two were filmed on primitive camera and will continue to look more and more dated.

Post
#1026778
Topic
Two questions about the Battle of Yavin
Time

Captn_Rektz said:

cap said:

JarHead413 said:

I don’t know how much time the DS needs between shots.  Might be a day to recharge that thing

That certainly was not the case in ROTJ, but who knows, maybe technology advanced in four years from “takes a day to recharge” to “takes moments to recharge even when the darn thing is only halfway built.”  True, this is a universe that had no significant technological development for thousands of years, but you never know.

Death Star 1 took 1 day to recharge Death star II took 3 minutes

Death Star II was also only firing at the Mon Cal Starcruisers. Not as much energy used.