logo Sign In

greenpenguino

User Group
Members
Join date
18-Feb-2011
Last activity
22-Aug-2021
Posts
2,985

Post History

Post
#490754
Topic
Starwars.com closes its forums
Time

adywan said:

Edit: found a video of it on youtube @ approx 2:20

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G87jhIeTk0w&feature=related

Plus there is a deleted scene from ESB where Luke and Leia move in for a kiss in the medical bay. If she was indeed intended to be his sister all along then George is one twisted guy ;)

Well, George did want Indiana jones to have slept with a 12 year old Marion when he and steven speilberg made 'raiders' so.....maybe.....

 

 

 

Also: Wow! Harrison Ford is happy and cheery in that interview! We rarely see him like that anymore.

 

 

Post
#490748
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

ibleedspeed said:

david bowie is a washed up 80s wannabe rocker that never knew how to play an instrument. also hes so gay he makes fabio look manly. and furthermore the eagle was a good film. just because there were no gay rockers does not make it suck. but you know what does suck a chode? the fact that david bowie was allowed on a stage ever...... bowie vs the eagle= bowie 1 point for being good at stealing other rockers ideas. the eagle 10 points for using good dialogue and storytelling in a world full of fresh faced teen actors and remakes after more remakes. and oh yeah i love the jane fonda mullet bowie is sporting in that avatar. and so did his boyfriend. """"burn"""""

You are looking for a Bowie-Ban if you're not careful.

Post
#490642
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

TV's Frink said:

Ziggy Stardust said:

TV's Frink said:

BloodnoseThePirate said:

28 weeks later. To my surprise I enjoyed it more than the first. And it has one of the most bad ass scenes I've ever seen an a film. The helicopter scene.

Really? I thought it was meh.  But the opening was really cool, I'll admit.

Yeah, you also said that Bowie was "meh", so I don't think I can trust your opinions anymore. ;-)

I'm sorry, I was mistaken.  Bowie sux.

WHAT???

 

Post
#490604
Topic
ignore
Time

 

TV's Frink said:

greenpenguino said:

 

p { margin-bottom: 0.21cm; }

PERMA-BANNED!!!!!

TV's Frink said:

 

I don't even.

p { margin-bottom: 0.21cm; }

PERMA-BANNED!!!!!

p { margin-bottom: 0.21cm; }

PERMA-BANNED!!!!!

 

 

Now I really don't even.

p { margin-bottom: 0.21cm; }

PERMA-BANNED!!!!! p { margin-bottom: 0.21cm; }

PERMA-BANNED!!!!! p { margin-bottom: 0.21cm; }

PERMA-BANNED!!!!! p { margin-bottom: 0.21cm; }

PERMANENTLY-BANNED!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111!!!!1!!!11!!!!!!!!!1!!!!




 

 

 

 

Post
#490579
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

Ziggy Stardust said:

ibleedspeed said:

"the eagle"  i was very impressed with this movie. rarely do we get movies anymore not laden with cgi and fresh out of acting school teens who would not know shit about character involvement.

A few posts ago I did a mini-review of this film.

 

It sucked.

Well, don't beat yourself up about it. I'm sure your review wasn't THAT bad.

Post
#490549
Topic
Random Thoughts
Time

One thing that irks me is when people say the terminology

'I could care less'

 

The correct terminology is

'I couldn't care less'

 

'I could care less' just makes no sense. If you could care less about something, then all you're telling us is that you do care, at least a little bit. Because you COULD care less. But if you couldn't care less means you don't care at all and if you wanted to care any less about it you couldn't because it's out of your 'caring spectrum.' You are so low on the caring bar-chart, as it were that you could not care less. If your caring is at 0%, then you couldn't care less.

 

Thank you for your time.