suntech said:
I have it. If one does a search at a site that it's url is like a cat but spelled different it is available under surround test disk.
Where? Am I being dense?
Is there a way to get the colour back from another source?
The problem is not with the teal, but the piss poor way it is implemented.
I am glad Criterion do not have the rights, I don't need another victim of their quality control
fmalover said:
dvdmike said:
Goldeneye is a grainy grainy film, people and Lowry don't like grain.
There is a lovely grain filled 1080p version about but it's the old cropped master.
That's strange, the Connery era movies have lots of grainy frames which haven't been tampered with.
What do you mean?
Can we get that 8mm?!?! I need that scanned and in my life!
dark_jedi said:
Worth it to you, maybe not, for me, HELL YES! we have improved on even the best source and we will have 3 versions and try and have all extras on 1 release, so is this worth it? for us it is a no brainer, our sources are the Happinet, Splendid and color version.
did not mean to make it sound like I am ungrateful, I am very happy you guys are working on it, and have been more than impressed with your releases.
I am just not as sure as the rest of the Internet on the merits of the JP disc.
I am looking forward to seeing your efforts however.
That 8mm looks amazing!
There is no 35mm print in the UK anymore, that makes me sad.
Goldeneye is a grainy grainy film, people and Lowry don't like grain.
There is a lovely grain filled 1080p version about but it's the old cropped master.
AntcuFaalb said:
dvdmike said:
What was the main source for NOTLD 68?
This, perhaps? http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Night-of-the-Living-Dead-Blu-ray/12228/
Maybe this: http://www.diabolikdvd.com/category/Cult-Favorites/Night-of-the-Living-Dead-%2840th-Anniversary-Japanese-Import%29-%28Blu~Ray%29.html
I have the two UK Blu's personally.
Just wondered if the upgrade will be worth it like all the other titles.
Are all the sync'd files available somewhere?
What was the main source for NOTLD 68?
The film can and will look better, well after people on here manage to fix the teal in the new master.
T2 has been done for ages.
The Skynet 100% had a DNR pass, the new disc that came out this week is missing this pass.
The issue with T2 is theEE baked mess of a master they use, its from 2003 and was not well done even then.
The UK optimum disc is still the best looking, but is fromt hat same old tired master.
drngr said:
ilovewaterslides said:
Would love to see how good/bad these HI-Vision LD look for real.
Some anonymous person captured a couple of the shot-on-HD-video MUSE discs. At least one of them can still be found online. Not sure if the image hotlinks will work, but:
http://s43.radikal.ru/i102/0905/aa/b9838ebd2e91.jpg
http://s43.radikal.ru/i100/0905/2b/ff9a41a572eb.jpg
Note all the edge ghosting.
Reportedly, most of these discs looked better than the film transfers.
The quality really varied from disc to disc wildly.
Great news!
Sounds like a good idea
Yep, it's the only version that was
Want would you sync nightmare with?
The LD is unrated
OK, it's on film four right now and checking against movie censorship, it is the cut version :(
The colour is 100% off. It looks nothing like an ENR print.
Not the soundtrack, but it would appear the new Lionsgate release is not a repackage and has less/no DNR
More subtle than the others, but welcome.
It is a shame Alien Resurrection cannot be corrected
Totally disagree, there is no proof for any of your point.
It's all conjecture but since its not my project I will keep it to myself.