logo Sign In

digitalfreaknyc

User Group
Members
Join date
23-Apr-2004
Last activity
7-Nov-2025
Posts
2,726

Post History

Post
#93200
Topic
Idea: Anakin footage in 16:9 for de-SEing the end of Return Of The Jedi
Time
Originally posted by: JarHead413
Is there a difference between the theatrical TPM pod race and the vhs or DVD versions? I have never heard of this or seen discussion, so the changes aren't to bad i'd guess


The home video version is the extended version of the movie. THere are several changes including an additional lap added to the pod race.
Post
#93151
Topic
Idea: Anakin footage in 16:9 for de-SEing the end of Return Of The Jedi
Time
Originally posted by: SilverWook
When did THX WOW! come out on DVD? People are still shelling out sixty bucks for the laserdisc on Ebay.


It came out about 2-3 years ago. It's been 16x9 and 5.1 enhanced. It also doesn't have the THX logo in the lower right hand corner.

Also, the whole disc has the pod race from TPM from the theatrical version...in DTS as well
Post
#53428
Topic
Info: OT Bootleg DVDs
Time
Fyi...

As I have said before...

I have The making of SW and Empire on DVD-R mastered from the laserdisc...and Classic Creatures on DVD from the VHS. Looks as good as they can get...plus I'd rather NOT have japanese subtitles on them. Kinda ruins any advancement in picture...or sound for that matter. But that shouldn't be of too much concern since they're all in mono.
Post
#53235
Topic
The Original Trilogy - Laser Disc Conversion Thread
Time
Quote

Originally posted by: Rikter
Quote

Originally posted by: digitalfreaknyc
When they become cheaper??

You can get a dual-layer burner right now for $90. How much cheaper do you want them? lol



Where from and how much is the media??


Media is coming out this week or next supposedly. Around $3-5 each.

NEC is making the dual-layer burners. They're $90 all over the web. Just look.

Post
#53183
Topic
Info: OT Bootleg DVDs
Time
Originally posted by: Rikter
Originally posted by: Laserman
I am sure I will be able to find room for a menu


- I have a collection of Original Star Wars Trailers - WAY more than is on the Extras disc - I've been toying with the idea of MAYBE making a Original Trilogy Trailers DVD......

It would be short BUT it would have all the know trailers (we'll all the trailers i've found on the net + the DVD's we've all created )

Rich


There's already a VCD of this and it's VERY comprehensive. True...the quality is questionable...but...just saying. Might be a good "checklist" for you.

Post
#52920
Topic
Info: OT Bootleg DVDs
Time
It's still the same quality as a dvd9, if not the convenience.


Again...what the hell does that mean? What is the same quality of a DVD9? That phrase itself means nothing. Everything depends on the original transfer, bitrate and how much bitspace is used on the disc. A properly formatted dual-layer disc will always be much better than a single layer disc becuase it has DOUBLE the amount of space. You can't say that a single layer disc has the same quality as a dual layer because it doesn't. It's simple numbers. it's impossible. Maybe to your eye, you can't see a difference. But I guarantee you that if you blow that image up and do a comparison, you'll see a difference.
Post
#52874
Topic
Info: OT Bootleg DVDs
Time
Originally posted by: lazysean
An even simpler concept would be how spreading a movie over two discs also gives you double the space, yet you seem to have missed that.



I haven't missed that at all. That's exactly what I'm saying.

It is IMPOSSIBLE to have the same quality on a single layer disc as a dual layer disc.
Post
#52863
Topic
Info: OT Bootleg DVDs
Time
No, you don't have to see it to know that it's not DVD9 quality. It's IMPOSSIBLE to say that it looks like it has double the amount of space available than it has right now. You can say that the quality is fantastic or looks almost like the original but the person selling this already threw his credibility out the window when he said it was uncompressed.

And no, if the guy put his transfer to dual layer, it would NOT be the same as it is now. It would most likely be a helluva lot closer to the actual laserdisc it was copied from. You have double the amount of space to work with. It's a pretty simple concept.