chyron8472

dahmage said:

chyron8472 said:

ZigZig said:

chyron8472 said:

God literally created time and space. There was no “beginning” before the beginning because before the beginning there was no time. As our universe expands, so does the boundaries of the space-time continuum. God created it. Therefore, he does not have to exist within it.

And therefore, because he created time itself and space itself, he is omnipotent and omnipresent because he is capable of being everywhere all the time.

 
Also, people who discount the existence of angels have never considered the concept of extradimensional planes of existence on which other beings may exist and be capable of some level of interaction with this one.

Apparently, you take everything literally as undeniable facts that must be read in the first degree without thinking nor smiling: the Bible as much as Frink’s posts …

Regarding Frink: “Out of the overflow of the heart, the mouth speaks.”

reported for being a self righteous ass

Pot, meet kettle.

ZigZig said:

chyron8472 said:

God literally created time and space. There was no “beginning” before the beginning because before the beginning there was no time. As our universe expands, so does the boundaries of the space-time continuum. God created it. Therefore, he does not have to exist within it.

And therefore, because he created time itself and space itself, he is omnipotent and omnipresent because he is capable of being everywhere all the time.

 
Also, people who discount the existence of angels have never considered the concept of extradimensional planes of existence on which other beings may exist and be capable of some level of interaction with this one.

Apparently, you take everything literally as undeniable facts that must be read in the first degree without thinking nor smiling: the Bible as much as Frink’s posts …

Regarding Frink: “Out of the overflow of the heart, the mouth speaks.”

Regarding the Bible: I did not say my understanding of God creating time and space is fact. It is my understanding. You, conversely, because you do not agree with me assert what I said as though I think it scientifically provable. I never said that it was. Just just because it isn’t scientifically provable doesn’t mean it isn’t so.

dahmage said:

chyron8472 said:

Frank your Majesty said:

chyron8472 said:

Frank your Majesty said:

chyron8472 said:

God literally created time and space.

Citation needed.

Now really. How would he have explained the space-time continuum to people who lived thousands of years ago? And when such an explanation would have been beside the point?

I didn’t ask for a citation on how he created it, I asked for a citation on that he created it.

As opposed to it happening spontaneously?

you act like you just made an irrefutable point

No.

Frank your Majesty said:

chyron8472 said:

Frank your Majesty said:

chyron8472 said:

God literally created time and space.

Citation needed.

Now really. How would he have explained the space-time continuum to people who lived thousands of years ago? And when such an explanation would have been beside the point?

I didn’t ask for a citation on how he created it, I asked for a citation on that he created it.

As opposed to it happening spontaneously?

moviefreakedmind said:

Then the right is the problem. They must be defeated.

This. Also, the NRA. Or money in politics.

greenpenguino said:

The bible (don’t bother with that last one. It’s long, boring and not worth the effort 😛)

First, it’s not a novel, nor was it meant to be, so I don’t know what you expected. Second, I’m not sure why you would bother if you’re not interested in its purpose.

dahmage said:

chyron8472 said:

Frank your Majesty said:

chyron8472 said:

God literally created time and space.

Citation needed.

Now really. How would he have explained the space-time continuum to people who lived thousands of years ago? And when such an explanation would have been beside the point?

bookmarking this for when I need a citation for missing the point.

I did not miss the point. It is not explicitly written. But for it to be written would mean it was explained to or understood by those who wrote it. But how could ancient Isrealites (or anyone from the ancient world, really) have possibly understood physics even as we currently know it? How would they comprehend the concept that the universe is over 13 billion years old, or the creation of stars from nebulae?

And as I said, for them to know such things is not the point when it comes to having a relationship with God. Summarizing events into “days” is easier to comprehend. Not that a 24-hour day makes literal sense as a reference when this planet and our local star didn’t even exist yet.

chyron8472 said:

Currently reading Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House

The book was high Bannon-centric. Many events that happened in the book were told in a manner from Bannon’s perspective. Also, the book seems to say that Trump fired Comey in part because Kushner and Ivanka were continually pressing him to do so.

 
I then switched to

It’s interesting so far. The novel is broken up into 15 “books”, so I might consider taking the whole thing in small chunks.

Frank your Majesty said:

chyron8472 said:

God literally created time and space.

Citation needed.

Now really. How would he have explained the space-time continuum to people who lived thousands of years ago? And when such an explanation would have been beside the point?

TV’s Frink said:

I’m done talking about ender.

TV’s Frink said:

I’m tired of listening to you.

I thought that’s already long since been the case.

SilverWook said:

So, it’s okay to publicly like Voyager now? 😛

Is it really so important that other people approve of you for what TV shows you like?

Also, I’d wager many people who hate Voyager haven’t really seen much of it. It might have issues, but if you’re willing to overlook them, it’s pretty good.

TV’s Frink said:

This is ridiculous however.

I still don’t think this is helping. He seemed to think his choice to leave was valid, and you won’t bring him back by calling him childish.

There might be more to it that he’s also not saying.

TV’s Frink said:

Trump’s support of anything means less than nothing.

This.

DominicCobb said:

chyron8472 said:

DominicCobb said:

Chyron = 39 (going on 12 😉)

Yes.

I’m sure you’re saying I’m immature, but I don’t care.

Wait, Marks gets a smiley emoji and I get this?

One person saying it is cute. Two people saying it is suspicious.
Also, gender inequality and all that. Maybe.

But again, I don’t really care. I’m terrible at going out of my way to live up to perceived expectations—especially my own, so I’m just going to be me. If I’m immature for it, then so be it.

dahmage said:

DominicCobb said:

chyron8472 said:

DominicCobb said:

Chyron = 39 (going on 12 😉)

Yes.

I’m sure you’re saying I’m immature, but I don’t care.

Wait, Marks gets a smiley emoji and I get this?

I think that is just Chryon holding grudges about perceived slights.

No.

which seems to be his standard operating procedure.

You’re coloring my opinion with your own. No, I do not hold grudges.

If I recently mentioned the argument I once had with Frink about MLP and whatnot, I only mentioned it in a relevant context. I did not complain. And mentioning it does not mean I’m holding a grudge or am bitter about it.

God literally created time and space. There was no “beginning” before the beginning because before the beginning there was no time. As our universe expands, so does the boundaries of the space-time continuum. God created it. Therefore, he does not have to exist within it.

And therefore, because he created time itself and space itself, he is omnipotent and omnipresent because he is capable of being everywhere all the time.

 
Also, people who discount the existence of angels have never considered the concept of extradimensional planes of existence on which other beings may exist and be capable of some level of interaction with this one.

moviefreakedmind said:

Warbler said:

Possessed said:

You take everything on this forum way too seriously.

maybe, but maybe some don’t take it seriously enough.

Nope.

TV’s Frink said:

This.

Case in point.

Warbler said:

Possessed said:

You take everything on this forum way too seriously.

maybe, but maybe some don’t take it seriously enough.

Haha. Touche. 😃

Warbler said:

chyron8472 said:

You should sigh more often again. No sarcasm intended.

I thought it was amusing.

more disliked my sighing than liked it.

Possessed said:

You take everything on this forum way too seriously.

…I’m not sure they did. Maybe a few didn’t like it, but I think maybe they were reacting more strongly (in jest) than what they genuinely felt and you didn’t catch it?

Maybe?

yhwx said:

chyron8472 said:

TV’s Frink said:

chyron8472 said:

TV’s Frink said:

I mean seriously, get over this, get over me, and get over yourself. There’s more to this site than fixing whatever you think is wrong with me.

Frink, if you really think _ender has to be the kind of friend you want him to be, you might want to rein it in there.

That makes zero sense.

To you. Hence the problem.

But he isn’t requesting that _ender change himself. Neither am I. So it doesn’t make sense if you think about it that way.

It does make sense. _ender wanted to have friends. People he could communicate with that actually gave a shit about his opinion, and he theirs. You guys are saying “It’s the internet. Who gives a shit what anyone thinks?” and that’s not what he wants. What you want from him is not what he wants from you. So either you need to care or he needs to stop, but either way, someone needs to change and it’s not necessarily all on him to do it.

TV’s Frink said:

chyron8472 said:

TV’s Frink said:

that’s both childish and unnecessary.

Not helping.

But true.

No. Still not helping. And again, demonstrating the problem.

TV’s Frink said:

chyron8472 said:

TV’s Frink said:

I mean seriously, get over this, get over me, and get over yourself. There’s more to this site than fixing whatever you think is wrong with me.

Frink, if you really think _ender has to be the kind of friend you want him to be, you might want to rein it in there.

That makes zero sense.

To you. Hence the problem.

TV’s Frink said:

that’s both childish and unnecessary.

Not helping.

TV’s Frink said:

I mean seriously, get over this, get over me, and get over yourself. There’s more to this site than fixing whatever you think is wrong with me.

Frink, if you really think _ender has to be the kind of friend you want him to be, you might want to rein it in there.

TV’s Frink said:

chyron8472 said:

TV’s Frink said:

chyron8472 said:

TV’s Frink said:

chyron8472 said:

TV’s Frink said:

chyron8472 said:

yhwx said:

chyron8472 said:

TV’s Frink said:

darth_ender said:

TV’s Frink said:

I found the reason I started the thread on page 18!

TV’s Frink said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

darth_ender said:

Past couple of days, yes.

Sorry to say this, but I agree.

Don’t be sorry, I can handle it.

Of course, you would also think a grown man could handle another man who is effeminate and/or gay, or a few internet people who think it’s weird that he likes My Little Pony, especially without having to start daydreaming about ripping those people’s throats out, but you’d be wrong.

I don’t wanna give away who it was about in public, though. PM me if you want to know.

Case in point.

Oooh a gotcha moment. You must feel vindicated.

Thing is I’m not denying anything in this thread. I just don’t really care that much.

You’re pretty good at hiding behind your pain, you know. You say you don’t care, but you do. The reason why you behave the way you do is to try to cover it up.

Thank you for your commentary, Dr. Chyron.

You’re welcome. As someone who has had issues myself, and talked to a professional about it, I’ve been made somewhat aware of general reason why people might display certain behaviors. I’m no psychologist, but one doesn’t have to have a doctorate to make an educated guess.

Psychoanalyzing someone from a distance is a pretty stupid thing to do.

I’m just commenting on the behavior you openly display here.

And for the record, when I said I was imagining ripping your throat out, it was entirely in response to your constant goading and ridicule. The subject matter was irrelevant. And it was only referring to the heat of that moment.

…Also, you didn’t say I was incorrect in my analysis.

You are wildly incorrect in your analysis.

I don’t believe you.

Then “you didn’t say I was incorrect in my analysis” is also a stupid thing to say.

Regardless, believe what you like. I believe you cannot know people well based on what they type on the internet, but obviously you and ender feel otherwise.

“Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.” - Oscar Wilde

That’s ridiculous.

Is it? Is it far-fetched for someone to be more comfortable behind a cloak of anonymity?