hairy_hen said:
These custom 5.1 mixes, however, were encoded with the DRC profile set to 'None', which means that the peak volume will never be reduced regardless of how many speakers the audio system contains. The 70mm mix had a very wide dynamic range, significantly stronger than any other version of the movie--I have done a fairly extensive comparison of it with the 1997 special edition mix, and found the SE to be often lacking in dynamics and power. (Steve Hoffman, the audio mastering legend, reported a similar impression when viewing a privately owned 70mm print a few years ago.) Despite having a somewhat 'smoother' sound, the '97 mix comes off as being a bit tinny to my ear, although compared to the awful 2004 version it is still extremely good. The 35mm versions are less dynamic still, though more satisfying than the SE since they are authentic originals.
The 70mm dynamics include very strong high frequency peaks in some places, which could be part of what you mentioned; and while there was no way for me to know exactly what the bass content would have sounded like originally, I think what I came up with is a pretty close approximation, based on extensive listening tests and everything I could find from people who have actually heard or were involved with the real thing. I guess one way to get another impression would be to take the dvd into a high end home theatre store (assuming there are still any left in business in your area at this point), and ask to demo the mix on a 5.1 system with a lot of amplifier power. Compare that to what you remember of its sound on your own system, and maybe you'll have a better idea of whether it's a preference thing or if your speakers are actually just distorting under the stress. Keep in mind, too, that room acoustics play a large part in determining how sound reaches our ears--bass frequencies in particular are notorious for getting bloated or cancelling each other out depending the the room layout and the placement of the subwoofer itself.
Anyway, I'm quite interested to hear more about this and whether I've properly explained it, or if it's caused by something else entirely. On my system, the mix sounds rather fantastic overall (though I certainly don't have the best equipment ever), but I recognise that not everyone may feel the same way. If you are getting significant distortion, you might be better off playing one of other mixes until you can upgrade your sound system.
I finally got the chance to watch the Star Wars V3 on my LD playback setup. (4 Klipsch KG .5, Klipsch center KV-1, and Klipsch SWV 8" subwoofer all into a Sony STR-DE675 via PS3 optical, 4:3 TV) Two words:
HOLY CRAP!
I have never heard some of the dynamics here. The mix gives everything a good workout but was never to loud for me at any moment. A/B-ing between mixes afterwards shows of the power of the 70mm. What really got me was it's subtlety. Comparing the 70mm mix and the 93 shows that while the 93 is immediately louder and more forceful, the 70mm really trumps it in every way. And all of this comes down to the incredible amount of dynamic range. Incredible for Star Wars. Just freaking incredible.
I've played just about every version of SW on this system: VHS, GOUT, LD and for me this mix has become darn near perfect. It could be definitive if it had a few things from the mono mix. Even so, the range and sound field allows for a real live sound quality. For example, in the control room when 3PO doesn't say the tractor beam line there is a palpable silence in the room as all the characters look at the little monitor with the blueprint maps. You can feel all of the tension in the room now because the low sounds of the Death star operating systems are rumbling in the background.
The mono mix is the definitive mix to me due to all of the final alterations. However, the 70mm should be the reference for all mixes due to it being from the ultimate in film sound quality (6-track magnetic).
I have never heard Star Wars sound this good except for watching the Puggo Grande in my school's screening room (and if some thought the 70mm could be loud-try running the mono through professional amplifiers and then onto a custom JBL system! Every R2 whistle is screeching!) and the 97 re-release.
My favorite has always been the 97 mix because of childhood memories and that it was almost like a compromise between the 70mm and the mono. Now, I don't think that the dynamics could ever touch this. It was mastered in a way for theaters of the time and not for the film itself.
I'm gushing I know, but I can't help it. Fantastic work!
But if you thought Star Wars had a lot of bass in it, just wait until you hear Empire. ;)
Oh my....I will make sure to make my walls shake! :)
One question though: is 448kbp/s the final version, or will there be an higher quality edition for projects such as the V3 Blu? Would love a non-DVD compressed 5.1 track! I ask this because the 97 mix had always sounded better to me as I remembered it theatrically and the 384 kbp/s LD 5.1 wasn't anything as impressive as I remembered. I go the Pro Logic route when I occasionally run the SE LDs.