logo Sign In

captainsolo

User Group
Members
Join date
13-Mar-2009
Last activity
28-Apr-2025
Posts
3,017

Post History

Post
#593744
Topic
Harmy's STAR WARS Despecialized Edition HD - V2.7 - MKV (Released)
Time

walking_carpet said:

funny thing i've been thinking about this whole time is I thought I heard that The GodFather Part II was the last movie to use technicolor?  is that incorrect?  or was that something else?

That was the last done by Technicolor in the US. The one for SW were all done at Technicolor London IIRC.

Harmy said:

EXAMS SUCCESSFULLY DONE!!!! I'M FINALLY FREE!!!

Time to start encoding the AVCHD and then working on the BD :-)

Cheers! I know exactly what that feeling is like....an enormous weight off the shoulders.

Post
#593587
Topic
Info: 1992 VHS Set - Star Wars Trilogy Special Letterbox Collector's Edition - any special and/or redeeming qualities?
Time

That's comparing to the color on the Final Cut which had extensive new timing done by Ridley Scott to his personal preference. I think it's a bit too far in some cases, but it works to give the film a much darker feel-and theatrically it was brilliant. Still, a huge difference coming form the old versions!

Post
#593553
Topic
Info: 1992 VHS Set - Star Wars Trilogy Special Letterbox Collector's Edition - any special and/or redeeming qualities?
Time

It's ok. The 1997 BR DVD was print sourced from what appears to be a 70mm blowup print, and also pushed slightly in some of the coloring. You also get nasty blocky artifacts and noise throughout from being an early disc with bad encoding. The LD Director's Cut actually looks a bit more natural. What you're seeing on the later versions of the DC and archival cuts is the intended image. The only thing that may be lost is the timing due to the original print stock utilized etc. The Criterion International cut LD seems to have a bit more saturation as well to my eyes.

On Apocalypse, I agree. I first saw the 1992 VHS which has a distinct color that was all but gone on the Dossier DVDs. It looks fine on the first 1999 DVD I think. However this was color timing done for the home release specifically, I guess to bring out the theatrical colors on CRT screens. It is the same as a 1991 Widescreen Laserdisc. (which is excellent and has the theatrical audio directly ported to PCM ProLogic)

 

Post
#593250
Topic
The Mono Mix Restoration Project (Released)
Time

negative1 said:

here's a preview of reel 2 in nice

low-fidelity mono! ha ha

==============================

http://soundcloud.com/negative1/star-wars-mono-reel-2-raw

 

later

-1

Beautiful. You know, with all of the projects  over the years I think I've been converted to this track. The mono has become my favorite.

That sounds really good for optical from a used print! I guess it has Dolby-A noise reduction for greater clarity.

Post
#593249
Topic
Harmy's STAR WARS Despecialized Edition HD - V2.7 - MKV (Released)
Time

Wow, this is incredible...I got to go up to the tractor beam with my surround engaged, will have to continue tomorrow.

This looks incredible, even the necessary GOUT shots for the most part, and when it gets to the really degraded ones like the Sandcrawler or the speeder force field, I get a knowing smile on my face that this is real and cobbled together by those who care deeply. (BTW that JSC shot of the speeder looks far better than I could have imagined-great job!)

The color timing is really different to experience after all these years of video masters, incorrect timing, SE, non-SE and all of our constant comparisons. I liked everything, but was surprised by the skin tones and texture. The Dune Sea and Ben's appearance was also far whiter than I had ever imagined.

I tried to stick with hh's new 5.1 70mm track but couldn't help it and had to listen to some of the other options as well (thank you so much for including all of them). Some of the lesser known dubs were new to me an very interesting to hear.

Something I did want to point out however. On the DVDTalk forum topic on the DE 2.0 that was posted earlier, this was stated:

I can tell you this, the University of North Carolina School of the Arts has an unfaded Technicolor-process print of Star Wars, and good condition 70mm prints of Empire and Jedi. And that place is full of film students who all undoubtedly loathe what Lucas has done to the films. Get those prints to this mysterious scanner and we'd have HD editions of the original cuts of all three films by the end of the year.

Damn. I sure got screwed on film school.

Post
#592785
Topic
James Bond 007 Thread
Time

http://www.facebook.com/JamesBond007/app_491936157484488

This on the official facebook page uses new HD youtube clips from each film and does indeed utilize the new Blu-ray masters that have been floating around.

The previous released discs are essentially being reissued, with DN, FRWL, GF, TB being colored wrong.

On the new issues: YOLT is desaturated just like the UE. OHMSS has been re-timed but still not correctly, Goldeneye is cropped with the alternate color timing, and the rest virtually resemble their UE editions just in 1080p. Nothing has been altered for these remaining titles save for some tweaks to OHMSS's coloring.

Of course judging by youtube clips isn't the best method, but still it's pretty obvious.

Of the new discs, I think the standouts will be LTK and TND for image quality and probably DAF for sheer image detail. (Though not color)

Post
#592364
Topic
Star Wars Trilogy LP Preservations (Released)
Time

Wow, thank you for dong these 7FN, and in high-resolution to boot! You have done the hard part of obtaining the different pressings, dedicated listening by ear, then doing the conversion with manual click repair which can be darned stubborn at times.

I actually hadn't thought about enlarging spindle holes by hand for off-center pressings. That's fine about the equipment chain, I typically just look at these to see what I could change/improve on my own meager system.

I think I can now safely put away my battered 20th Century LP that sounds as if someone decided to fry bacon with the orchestra. ;)

Post
#591750
Topic
Raiders of The Lost Ark in IMAX!
Time

It's almost certainly the new 35mm print I saw, and the one that is still touring art houses nationwide. Odd that it will still be out at the time of the IMAX release.

Hey, somebody took some video of the presentation I saw...never thought about being able to sneak a camera in there, it's always way too dark to see in front of your face.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dprxDRIq23I

As you can see, this thing is incredibly clean and BRIGHT, BRIGHT, BRIGHT!! It is so bright that at first you have to blink for a minute to adjust. Sound is upfront and generally unimpressive but not bad, just like we've heard on the DVD for years.

I'm still unsure how this will look any better blown up. Even on this you could see some flaws and the work was only 4K anyway.

Post
#591494
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

It's definitely more bearable theatrically. I saw a 35mm screening a few years back that was this way, though 70mm will have the full DTS 70mm 5.0 which is reputed to be mindblowing for the usage of the score's master tapes.

Yeah, I've got to get the old LD just to see the old color but keep in mind these would all likely be based off the 1983 reissue prints which were all deteriorated and themselves not correct.

 

I also hate watching Rear Window on DVD because its so incredibly grainy and this manifests as video noise. The MC and Legacy discs are RH approved as represent their work well, but sometimes I think the smoother and more colored first DVD might be preferable.

I really hope the new Blu-rays can pull these two titles out of the muck and actually present them well on home video, but it's all going to be from the already stuck masters so they'll probably just look more detailed.

Post
#591242
Topic
James Bond 007 Thread
Time

You know, I didn't think they could make the Bond video covers look worse. The ones for the last UE DVD re-hash were used for the Blu-rays and relatively uninspired.

Until now. Here are some of the new singles covers:

Can you say laaame Photoshop?? The rest are up on the digital bits, along with the three Walmart exclusives. The other 6 titles will also be store exclusives, but they won't say where. http://thedigitalbits.com/#mytwocents

Anybody remember these from the early/mid 90's era? They're mostly newly created from different stills, but each one (save for the re-done Golden Gun and Octopussy covers shown here) is rather subdued and classy, not to mention fitting of the film, actor, and limited cover space. And I always loved the new title lettering designs and the way all the spine colors fit together on a shelf. This would be what I change the BD art to.

http://media.007unleashed.com/vhscovers.html

 

But in this era, there's only one cover that would sell...

MGM/Fox proudly presents the: "Yes this is a safari suit, and I'm a badass so deal with it" edition.

Post
#591237
Topic
[hdtv] -> _superwidescreen_phillips_21:9_2:35-1_tv_
Time

Ectually...even 4:3 material is inside a 1.78 16:9 frame nowadays, so everything is optimized for a widescreen tv.

The technology is always there, but what matter is when manufactures will jump on board and push the new materials, and if people will buy.

But scope for everything? Jeez, what's next daily soap operas in 2.35:1 Soapyvision?

The move to 4K and 8K TVs will just about spell doom for theatrical exhibition however. Few screens today boast 4K projection, and just the upgrade costs will be extensive.

Post
#590995
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

The Wrong Man

Essential title, and I forgot just how good this movie is. Basically this is Henry Fonda put through hell in 50's NYC. Hitchcock is playing with location shooting and a more verite style, which was alien to him. The Catholic overtones make it quite apparent why Scorsese references this film consistently. Beautiful cinematography as well. Sets the stage in some ways for Vertigo, and displays what Hitch saw in Vera Miles-and perhaps gives a glimpse of what her Madeline would have been like.

3.5 balls out of 4. Underrated and seldom seen.

 

Vertigo

The film that has haunted me for nearly 15 years. Though I don't believe in ranking films, one of the few that could justfully usurp Kane. One of the few films where I get genuinely emotional, though I really can never explain why. Deeply personal, from a story written expressly for Hitch by the writers of Diabolique. Masterfully directed, shot, staged, performed, and scored. This is beyond art, it gets at the frailty of the human condition and psyche. It is also the culmination of everything Hitchcock had done up to that point, his favorite themes and ideas revisited and reworked, much like North by Northwest, but with no sense of his trademark humor. Here Jimmy Stewart gives no reference to his famous persona, and finally shakes off the remnants of Jeff Smith, fully channeling the dark moments of George Bailey, and the gritty toughness he displayed in Anthony Mann's westerns. It is also a culmination of his previous three Hitchcock roles, here he is fully cracked open and a truly weak man.

It may not have been fully intentional, but no one else could have played this part like Kim Novak at that point in time. She caries this sort of eternal sadness in nearly all of her roles, but this combined with some sort of internal resistance to Hitch's controlling nature really makes the character seem even more fascinatingly distant. Combine this with the otherworldly looking San Francisco, the razor sharp yet soft VistaVision photography, haunting color through almost a ghostly haze, a story so buried in the memories of frail beings, and Bernard Herrmann's most captivating score and you have this film that damn near traumatized me as an 8 year old.

And the story, oh god, the sheer amount of levels it works on; from the spiritual aspects, to the mystery set up, the creepy tone in places, the reversal of standard plot unfolding, the way everything mirrors itself, the fact that it feels like it's from another world, and the fact that Mr. Jimmy Stewart himself, the most overtly "good" seeming actor ever, is so captivated by his dream image of the dead that he tries with feverous zeal to remake the living into the dead.

There is nothing else like it. Hopefully Robert Harris will be able to fully complete his 1998 restoration with modern tools as he has stated would be ideal. And the 5.1 mix is beyond atrocious. Despite the dropouts and hiss, the 5th gen mono track on the MC DVD is essential. i still feel like the restoration has never been ported to disc quite well as it could, and even RH has admitted they did the best they could with the color but it isn't fully accurate.

One of the movies that holds you in the palm of its hand like an insignificant little grain of sand. It looms over you just like one of the giant sequoias. Unforgettable, and with perhaps the finest ending shot ever shot.

Despite knowing Hitch's darkly funny reasoning behind the scene in the empire hotel where Judy goes into the bathroom and emerges...it is still perhaps the most emotional scene in all of American film. Never before or since has anyone dealt with the living and the dead in such fashion. Just look at Jimmy's face welling with tears and try to not do the same. That goes beyond mere acting. Easily the finest screen performance I've ever seen next to O'Toole in Lawrence.

4 balls of course. Beyond essential to see. I can live with people not liking certain films, but this is one of the few that criticism of is like a knife in the heart.

North by Northwest

The follow-up. One of the great running for cover after a string of relative failures that hitch did, and perhaps his finest. It ironically uses several techniques from Vertigo, with the softer VV photography and the blending of many previous themes and motifs into one script. Here it was the intention to make the ultimate crowd pleasing wrong man film, and it succeeded beyond anyone's wildest dreams. Cary Grant wears the indestructible gray suit and does a quasi-throwback to his screwball performances, James Mason is so charming that you don't care if he gets away with it or not, the chase is all important instead of the MacGuffin, and Eva Marie Saint is tantalizing. What's not to love? One of those exceedingly few perfect classics that never ages or tires. Constantly inventive and goes for broke.

That said, I becoming less and less a fan of the new restoration. It has too much darkness and too much of a blue cast. The Blu-ray features some kind of crushing going on, and though possibly accurate to the OCN it isn't what was dis[played in theaters in 1959. All previous editions couldn't utilize the negative due to damage on one of the layers and thus had to use lower generation materials. The previous DVD was a newly struck print that was extremely overscrubbed and overcooked in color by Lowry (of course) and had a pink cast to the film which was not correct. The most accurate to my eyes, and the one I find myself drawn back to is the Criterion laser, despite being a bit washed out. It is print sourced, and like we've reasoned on their Bond transfers likely comes from a studio show print and possibly one that was original or maybe Technicolor. Still need to check out the MGM LD which has a different transfer from an IP.

And the Criterion has the mono! even though the 5.1 new mix has no new effects, it is too artificial sounding with a surround setup, and once you've heard the mono you cannot go back.

4 balls out of 4 stolen Mercedes.

Post
#590625
Topic
Spielberg: "I'm no longer a digital revisionist."
Time

Jaws was saved in the production firstly with all of the script re-writes. Then whether consciously or not, Spielberg played to his strengths which is why if you think about it, the film is like a combination of the best elements from Sugarland Express and Duel. Then the editing could only improve and tighten everything up. Though I still think the added head bit was unnecessary.

I could never agree that Spielberg's modern output is better. To me they're just so damn...boring. If you enjoy or prefer them that's fine, but I could hardly stand some of them and became beyond exasperated with things like The Terminal. I think my primary problem with these films is that I never saw much of a point to making any of them. They seemed to exist only on a single story level and little more, so that virtually anybody could have made them. His boundless creativity for storytelling hasn't been present for me in a looong time.

I guess I stick with EOTS as the breaking point because Last Crusade is undone by its tiredness. (Though I loathed The Color Purple and E.T.) I've realized that I only like five of his anyway. (Duel, Sugarland, Jaws, Raiders, Temple)

Post
#590515
Topic
Spielberg: "I'm no longer a digital revisionist."
Time

Jaws only worries me on the audio. The video portion looks great if not exactly 1975 era coloring. The 7.1 new mix is wholly unnecessary and even in their restoration video you can see the severely clipped audio tracks being used. This film has one of those mono mixes that is so damn well done that I hate to see any kind of remix.

S. Spielberg said:

There’s two fronts, on any successful conversion, to Imax resolution, which is significantly clearer and sharper, with much more depth and fidelity than the movie appeared in theaters in 1981. So the first tier is where you take the DI [digital intermediate] and you enhance the resolution to Imax resolution. The second tier is that the sound is significantly different. They take the [audio] stems that we gave them, and they put them through their 12,000 watts of digital surround sound, and it’s a totally uncompressed experience.

Still it's 4K digitally blown up to IMAX size, so not what it could be, and to top that off, the new restoration loses some of the look of the original photography in my eyes. It's a bit too sharp, too clear, and contrast/color very high. This may be from seeing Raiders on video for too long, but still it shouldn't be that much.

The new mix sounded identical to the DVD mix, but very unimpressive in the theater. (this may have been coming from Dolby Digital off a print) IMAx sound to me is never impressive, being jacked up to be extremely boomy in action sequences and then dropping off to almost nothing for dialogue scenes with little to no surround seperation. TDKR was extremely disappointing on this front. You could hear the projector hum at times louder than the actors. (Not that that's a bad thing.)

BTW on the new 35mm print the snake reflection was gone again, but Marion's still present. Original cliff shot intact, and I'm not sure but the rod/stick thing may be gone from the boulder chase.

What worries me is if this will start a trend towards more releases this way, because I don't look forward to having tickets all costs $18+. Plus I still have serious reservations about the design and structure of the IMAX theater. It feels really awkward.

 

I don't hate on Spielberg, but he hasn't made anything really worthwhile since Empire of the Sun which is sad.

Post
#590509
Topic
Kubrick's The Shining Analysis - What he wanted us to Know
Time

All of these to me are more interesting for the what-if's people come up with than the possibility of it actually occurring.

Silver, even Ray Manzarek wrote a what-if book: http://www.amazon.com/The-Poet-Exile-Ray-Manzarek/dp/1560253592 It's quite silly.

I think Stanley wold have found this supposed hidden meaning hysterical. Then he would have looked over things and gone, "hey they could be on to something here...and I thought it was just a movie."

Post
#590002
Topic
Name three films that should have an IMAX upgrade
Time

Barry Lyndon was shot and composed for 1.66:1 but could be matted up to 1.75:1. The new editions are 1.78 and lose some frame information.

I'm still not sold on the IMAX format for theatrical presentations, even with 70mm prints. The screen is at too forced of a viewing angle and with its curvatures you cannot experience the full image on IMAX sequences. (To me it usually resembles a porthole with foggy edges.) I get a damn neckache on every IMAX movie I see. The sound is almost always too boomy and not very directional if you examine it carefully. The 70mm prints for 35mm scope films have some obvious processing going on, at least TDKR did and that was brand new.

I just don't see the need for blowups of this nature when 35mm gives you more for less. Raiders looked spectacular on 35mm and the process was done at 4K. What more can this print give? The Final Cut of Blade Runner on 35mm is one of the best prints I've ever seen regardless of presentation.

I'd rather see these in 35mm scope on a massive conventional or 70mm screen with top of the line equipment.  Or even conventional equipment at an art house.

The only thing I could possibly see IMAX doing different is maybe running full on 8 perforation VistaVision film prints, since their projectors run the film sideways like VV. But again you run into the aspect issue.