- Post
- #243608
- Topic
- So then, PAL or NTSC GOUT for best quality?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/243608/action/topic#243608
- Time
Originally posted by: boris
Originally posted by: Vigo
LOL! boris, you are truly an unicum here! The first time I heard that NTSC has actually MORE visible scanlines than PAL....
What I mean is the BLACK scanlines, between the lines of picture, will be thicker - and more visible. This is what bothers some people. I thought I what I said was clear the first time? LOL! boris, you are truly an unicum here! The first time I heard that NTSC has actually MORE visible scanlines than PAL....
It made sense to me. He was not saying that NTSC had beteer resolution. He was saying it looked worse, because of the lower resolution you can see blank lines between the real lines. I can see those black lines especially when watching laserdiscs. DVD's aren't so bad. Anamorphic DVD's I don't see them at all, because this Sony Wega has a hardware feature to squeeze an anamorphic picture vertically.
Honestly, why all the Boris bashing? It's almost like you guys are taking your anti-Lucas frustrations out on him. You were definitely not trying to understand his post... you just wanted to flame.