logo Sign In

ZkinandBonez

User Group
Members
Join date
5-May-2015
Last activity
18-Mar-2024
Posts
2,580

Post History

Post
#879838
Topic
Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * <strong>SPOILER THREAD</strong> *
Time

emanswfan said:

New 30 second TV Spot with more new footage and dialogue from Maz Kanata:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RU-s_HAEwsg

This voice sounds very different though.
I have no doubt that this one is Kanata, but then who’s voice is it we’ve been hearing in the previous trailer?

I also really liked this shot.
(These sparks have a very OT feel to them.)

I also noticed that this shot from the trailer was very similar to the landscape we saw blowing up in the official trailer.
It could even be that they’re trying to outrun some kind of explosion or laser in the Falcon.

Post
#879817
Topic
Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * <strong>SPOILER THREAD</strong> *
Time

SilverWook said:

I’m reading elsewhere that Amazon has let a big spoiler slip. Not sure how, or if it’s accidental, but beware if you use their site!

I read it, and it seems kind of weird to me.
It seemed a bit too obvious, just throwing out a spoiler like that in parenthesis in the middle of a product description.
Probably just someone at Amazon trolling us.

Post
#879613
Topic
Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * <strong>SPOILER THREAD</strong> *
Time

If this shot is representative of TFA’s overall aesthetic then I’m getting even more hyped than I already am.

Also the more I see Kylo’s lightsaber in action, the more I’m warming up to it. I know it’s technically a gimmick, but I like that it’s something completely different from what we’ve seen before. It just seems so vicious, and I like that, it really does seem like something a bad guy would use, and it’s a bit less elegant than Vader’s saber (so him being a copycat is kind of reflected in his weapon.)

Oh, BTW, did anyone else hear the Wilhelm scream at 1:21?

Post
#879254
Topic
Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * <strong>SPOILER THREAD</strong> *
Time

pat man said:

ZkinandBonez said:

SilverWook said:

ZkinandBonez said:

SilverWook said:

Yet another trailer. 😉
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEn5gIeGENU

I seem to recall some old interview where Mark Hamill said that the last SW film would have a weird and 2001-esque ending. So I guess this is appropriate?

(EDIT: Does anyone remember this interview? I tried to google it but couldn’t find anything. Did I just imagine this? This may have been back when Lucas’ was considering making 12 films.)

Maybe it was in a old magazine that has yet to be digitized?

No I’m pretty sure I read it online, and it was only some five-ish years ago, but even then it was a reference to an older interview (I think from the late 80’s or early 90’s).

I seem to remember that being on the 2004 Bonus DVD somewhere (maybe Empire of Dreams), but I could be wrong.

That’s possible. I watched the hell out of that bonus DVD when I was a kid. I might have overheard it there, then re-read it somewhere several years later.

Post
#879230
Topic
Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * <strong>SPOILER THREAD</strong> *
Time

SilverWook said:

ZkinandBonez said:

SilverWook said:

Yet another trailer. 😉
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEn5gIeGENU

I seem to recall some old interview where Mark Hamill said that the last SW film would have a weird and 2001-esque ending. So I guess this is appropriate?

(EDIT: Does anyone remember this interview? I tried to google it but couldn’t find anything. Did I just imagine this? This may have been back when Lucas’ was considering making 12 films.)

Maybe it was in a old magazine that has yet to be digitized?

No I’m pretty sure I read it online, and it was only some five-ish years ago, but even then it was a reference to an older interview (I think from the late 80’s or early 90’s).

Post
#879071
Topic
Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * <strong>SPOILER THREAD</strong> *
Time

SilverWook said:

Yet another trailer. 😉
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEn5gIeGENU

I seem to recall some old interview where Mark Hamill said that the last SW film would have a weird and 2001-esque ending. So I guess this is appropriate?

(EDIT: Does anyone remember this interview? I tried to google it but couldn’t find anything. Did I just imagine this? This may have been back when Lucas’ was considering making 12 films.)

Post
#878547
Topic
What is Luke's goal in ROTJ?
Time

Everyone (except Bingowings) seem to forget that the Death Star was about to blow up.
The entire trilogy is Luke’s “spiritual” journey, and growth as a character. He had to throw his lightsaber away, or else, as many have already pointed out, he would have eventually have been defeated like Anain did year before and turn to the dark side. Being a Jedi isn’t just about killing the bad guys, it’s about a personal spiritual journey, and Luke fulfills that and becomes a Jedi when he “morally” defeats the Emperor. As for the actual literal defeating of the Emperor, well, again the Death Star is literally minutes from blowing up.
(So both goals are being accomplished here.)
Of course Vader eventually does kill Palpatine, but that was to save Luke in the literal sense and himself in the more abstract sense. It makes sense in Vader story arc, and it makes for a more satisfying end than all three of them just blowing up with the Death Star.

All of this is slightly weird if you think about it too hard, but that’s to be expected with a franchise as popular as Star Wars 30 years after it’s release. We must keep in mind that it is after all a film, and a film needs an interesting set of character developments and twists. As long as this doesn’t directly contradict the lore and common sense, but exaggerates it slightly for narrative purposes, then I’d say it’s done a good job at being a good film.

Post
#878522
Topic
Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * <strong>SPOILER THREAD</strong> *
Time

AuggieBenDoggie said:

Sevb32 said:

People complained about Struzan’s work in here, some will never be satisfied.

Yeah, I don’t understand that either. I have been a fan of struzans work for decades. I have never seen him put out a bad piece. The D23 poster is fantastic, even though it’s only a promo poster.

It’s probably because his style reminds a lot of people of the PT films and the SE, and for those with certain purist tendencies he wasn’t part of the “original poster artists.”
Well, he sort of was, but there’s obviously artists like Tom Jung, Kastel and the Hildebrants that made the most famous OT posters.
Of course Struzan have been making SW posters since 1978, and he made the Revenge of the Jedi poster as well, but his work on the SE and PT posters have become some of the most famous (at least withing the SW franchise).
I guess those who’s old enough to have seen the OT when it was new never really saw his posters at the cinemas, and therefore they just don’t associate his work with the films. His SE and PT poster however was the official artwork and you could’t go anywhere without seeing it.

Some of Struzan’s original SW posters.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/20535561/SW poster - Drew Struzan ANH 1978.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/20535561/SW poster - Drew Struzan Revenge of the Jedi.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/20535561/SW poster - Drew Struzan ANH 10th anniversary.jpg

Post
#877854
Topic
Implied starting date of the Empire from OT dialogue
Time

Hal 9000 said:

Interesting that in this ROTJ-era version of the prequels, the twins are hidden from both Vader and the Emperor, if Ben knew Anakin survived the duel. Hiding Leia on Alderaan and Luke with his brother’s family makes sense bset they  nothing to do with Anakin. Hiding Luke with Anakin’s step-brother only makes sense if they take Anakin for dead. It still doesn’t explain who thought it was a good idea to leave his last name.

Of course in the ROTJ-era version Owen was Obi-Wan’s brother rather than Anakin’s half-brother.

Post
#794935
Topic
Implied starting date of the Empire from OT dialogue
Time

darklordoftech said:

ZkinandBonez said: The second quote is quite an interesting addition to what we've read/heard before in the movies and books (as well as the PT for that matter). It's never occurred to me before that he could have been an assassin on behalf of Palpatine before he eventually became Darth Vader and eventually performed the military "purge" that we're more familiar with. I think ROTS would have been a lot more interesting if they had gone for this story, rather than the fairly instant transformation that we did get.  Although this quote mentions Vader and "Annikin" as different people, it could still more or less be attributed to the post 1983, pre-PT canon.

Lucas actually restated the second quote to Kasdan during the writing of ROTJ:

Lucas: "Anakin Skywalker starting hanging out with the Emperor, who at this point nobody knew was that bad, because he was an elected official." 
Kasdan: "Was he a Jedi?" 
Lucas: "No, he was a politician. Richard M. Nixon was his name. He subverted the senate and finally took over and became an imperial guy and he was really evil. But he pretended to be a really nice guy. He sucked Luke's father into the dark side." 
Kasdan: "The Force was available to anyone who could hook into it?" 
Lucas: "Yes, everybody can do it." 
Kasdan: "Not just the Jedi?"
Lucas: "It's just the Jedi who take the time to do it." 
Marquand: "They use it as a technique." 
Lucas: "Like yoga. If you want to take the time to do it, you can do it; but the ones that really want to do it are the ones who are into that kind of thing."
[...]
Lucas: "Well, anyway, Luke's father gets subverted by the Emperor. He gets a little weird at home and his wife begins to figure out that things are going wrong and she confides in Ben, who is his mentor. On his missions through the galaxies, Anakin has been going off doing his Jedi thing and a lot of Jedi have been getting killed — and it's because they turn their back on him and he cuts them down. The president is turning into an Emperor and Luke's mother suspects that something has happened to her husband. She is pregnant. Anakin gets worse and worse, and finally Ben has to fight him and he throws him down into a volcano and Vader is all beat up. Now, when he falls into the pit, his other arm goes and his leg and there is hardly anything left of him by the time the Emperor's troops fish him out of the drink. Then when Ben finds out that Vader has been fished out and is in the hands of the Empire, he is worried about it. He goes back to Vader's wife and explains that Anakin is the bad guy, the one killing all the Jedi. When he goes back his wife, Mrs. Skywalker has had the kids, the twins, so she has these two little babies who are six months old or so. So everybody has to go into hiding. The Skywalker line is very strong with the Force, so Ben says, 'I think we should protect the kids, because they may be able to help us right the wrong that your husband has created in the universe'. And so Ben takes one and gives him to a couple out there on Tatooine and he gets his little hideout in the hills and he watches him grow. Ben can't raise Luke himself, because he's a wanted man. Leia and Luke's mother go to Alderaan and are taken in by the king there, who is a friend of Ben's. She dies shortly thereafter and Leia is brought up by her foster parents. She knows that her real mother died."
Kasdan: "She does know that?" 
Lucas: "Yes, so we can bring that out when Luke is talking to her, she can say that her mother died when 'I was two years old'."

I wonder if Lucas is also implying that Palpatine is self-taught when it comes to using The Force. Maybe that's why Palpatine calls the lightsaber "the weapon of a Jedi."

It's kind of funny how Lucas tells Kasdan that using the force can be learned by anyone, only to shortly after point out how "strong" it is in the Skywalkers.
So I'm guessing that it's more of a second nature to them, while most people have to work really hard on it?

It's hard to tell what Palpatine really is. Every pre-PT text I have read so far has always just referred to his past as a "mystery". I don't really think it matters though. The only thing that that all the texts, and seemingly Lucas (pre-PT anyway) seem to agree on is that he has been evil for a very, very long time. Perhaps he's always been evil. 
Then there's his unnatural age. According to Lucas' timeline he was a "young" politician while Mon Mothma was in office, yet ca. 30-40 (EDIT: this particular detail is from the EU) years later he looks ancient. His age also has a very unnatural look to it as well. He looks almost decayed and his eyes have that unnatural yellow colour. The novelization of ROTJ which was approved by Lucas describes him as having "a face lined by holocaust."
(Heck one EU interpretation of this "Mystery" simply stated that he had had many lives, implying both cloning and somehow resurrecting himself with the Force. He even described himself as more energy than man. I always liked Dark Empire's interpretation, it was weird but it's sits a lot more right with me than the whole Plageuis thing ever did.)
His death in ROTJ is also pretty surreal and weird. Not only is there some kind of energy explosion as he falls down the shaft, if you listen closely the energy cloud has this supernatural wail to it. Of course this is in a universe with Force ghosts, but you get the impression that there was more to Palpatine than being a mere Sith as the PT made him.

But random thoughts on Palpatine aside;
at least we now have an official date of Mrs. Skywalker's death at 16 BBY

Lucas also mentions that Anakin loses his "other arm" in his duel with Obi-Wan, does that mean that he always intended for Anakin to loose his arm in battle like he eventually did in the PT? 

(Btw, where did you get this conversation transcript?)

Post
#794866
Topic
Implied starting date of the Empire from OT dialogue
Time

darklordoftech said:

I got the impression that Tarkin had a major role in the rise of the Empire. I imagine that he helped Palpatine become President of the Senate, helped wipe out the Jedi, etc. I think that the prequels should have shown an escalating rivalry between Bail Organa and Tarkin.

Here's some Lucas quotes from summer 1977:

"[...] One of the Chancellors began subverting the Senate and buying off Senators with the help of some of the large intergalactic trade companies and mining companies and intergalactic power companies. Through their power and money, he bought off enough of the Senate to get himself elected to a second term, because of a crisis. By the time the third term came along, he had corrupted so much of the Senate that they made him Emperor for the rest of his life.
"Giving the Emperor that title for life and doing away with the elective process was all done with a lot of rationalizing. Many in the Senate felt that having elections and changing leaders in the time of an emergency disrupted the bureaucratic system. And the bureaucracy was getting to be so big that changing leaders made it impossible to have any effect on the system and make it work - moreover the bureaucracy was running amok and not paying attention to the rulers. So they reasoned that the Emperor could bring the bureaucracy back in line. So the Emperor took control of the bureaucracy. The Galactic Senate would meet for a period that was similar to a year, but after it became the Imperial Senate, the meetings were less and less frequent until finally the meetings were only once a year, and they were very short.
"With the bureaucracy behind the Emperor, it was impossible and too late for the Senate to do anything. He had slowly manipulated things; in fact, it was he who had let the bureaucracy run amok and therefore had blackmailed the Senate into doing things because he was the only one who really had any power over the bureaucracy. It was so large there was no way to get things done, but he knew the right people; the key people in the bureaucracy were working for him and were paid by the companies."

"Darth Vader is really attached to the Emperor himself, and he was not really part of the Death Star personnel or any of that system. Lord Vader worked directly for the Emperor and was the Emperor's emissary.
[...]
When the Jedi tried to restore order, Darth Vader was still one of the Jedi. What he would do is catch the Jedi off guard and, using his knowledge of the Force, he would kill the Jedi without them realizing what was happening. They trusted him and they didn't realize he was the murderer who was decimating their ranks. At the height of the Jedi, there were sever hundred thousand. At the time of the Rebellion, most of them were killed. The Emperor had some strong forces rally behind him, as well, in terms of the army the Imperial forces that he'd been building up secretly. The Jedi were so outnumbered that they fled and were tracked down. They tried to regroup, but they were eventually massacred by one of the special elite forces led by Darth Vader. Eventually only a few, including Ben and Luke's father, were left. Luke's father is named Annikin."

This is pretty interesting, it gives some details to Palpatine's take-over as Emperor. (It's also very similar to Nazi history isn't it? I don't remember specific political details, but it sounds very similar.) That first quote could fit really well with what we've discussed earlier that Palpatine's New Order probably existed for quite a while before it eventually fully took over in the form of the Empire in 18 BBY.

The second quote is quite an interesting addition to what we've read/heard before in the movies and books (as well as the PT for that matter). It's never occurred to me before that he could have been an assassin on behalf of Palpatine before he eventually became Darth Vader and eventually performed the military "purge" that we're more familiar with.
I think ROTS would have been a lot more interesting if they had gone for this story, rather than the fairly instant transformation that we did get. 
Although this quote mentions Vader and "Annikin" as different people, it could still more or less be attributed to the post 1983, pre-PT canon.

Post
#794722
Topic
Implied starting date of the Empire from OT dialogue
Time

ZkinandBonez said:

Hal 9000 said:

Obi-Wan said he trained Vader in ANH, not Luke's father.

Right, it's so hard to think of them as two different people at this point. But you're right, he only refers to Vader as his pupil and just says that he fought alongside Luke's father in the Clone Wars.

This probably isn't worth much, but I looked through my re-prints of the Marvel SW comics that were published between 1977-1980, and there's an Annual issue that mentions Obi-Wan's two students; Skywalker and Vader. 
I'm wondering if the comic writer simply assumed that they were both Obi-Wan's pupils during the Clone Wars, but it is possible that he had that information from Lucas/Lucasfilm. 

Of course these comics are known for some amusing plot details that quickly became non-canon as the movies were released, but even their weird interpretation of Jabba the Hutt (or "Hut" as they called him) were still based on notes from Lucasfilm. I remeber reading somewhere that the second appearance of Jabba was commissioned by Lucasfilm since they intended to mention him again in ESB. Of course three years later they decided to show him looking completely different anyway.

Post
#794697
Topic
Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * <strong>SPOILER THREAD</strong> *
Time

Lt. Hija said:

Now that someone has mentioned it, can somebody explain to me what work of Vader Kylo intends "to finish"?

Vader's last work - we witnessed - was to get rid of the Emperor and convert back to the bright side of the Force...?!?

 

Well, we witnessed it, all the other characters in the SW galaxy doesn't quite have our benefits though. It's very unlikely that anyone outside of the Rebels, and even then it's just hearsay, would know about it. The Empire would definitely consider it slander and possibly even counter-propaganda. It's possible that Kylo haven't even heard the story, and he definitively wouldn't believe it if he had. As far as he's concerned Vader and the Emperor was killed by Luke and/or got killed by the destruction of the Death Star II. Him looking for Luke could be both to finish the Jedi Purge and to avenge the death of Vader.

Post
#794363
Topic
Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * <strong>SPOILER THREAD</strong> *
Time

bkev said:

I wanted to know more right away.

I can't say that about the last teasers.  They were all good but didn't inspire curiosity. This does. What happened in only 30 years to make the Rebel Alliance and the Force practically myths?  We're going in at the middle of the conflict--just like in Star Wars.

Officially excited. I happen to enjoy Abrams's films, so even if I don't feel the Star Wars fantasy magic, I'll feel his touch. And I'm damn looking forward to it.

Just for the sake of being nit-picky, it has been roughly half a century since the Jedi Knights were vanquished. And already in ANH (ca. 18 years after the purge) they had been mostly forgotten through the help of Imperial propaganda.
 

Post
#794359
Topic
Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * <strong>SPOILER THREAD</strong> *
Time

Alderaan said:

I'm warning you guys, don't get your expectations up. The trailer is a window into the filmmaker's mind and what kind of story they are hoping to tell. All indications are that the story in this film will be poorly fleshed out. The characters will be kind of just there. The movie will be a sleekly produced but vapid Revenge of the Sith meets The Godfather Part 3 meets standard Hollywood blockbuster fare.

I seriously doubt that Abrams had a big say in the making of this trailer. Since when was movie trailer a "window into the filmmaker's mind"? It's almost exclusively been a reflection of current marketing trends. I mean just look at the old SW trailers; they couldn't have been more 70's and 80's. The original ANH trailer was trying to sell the film as some moody space mystery film, because space opera's weren't really a popular thing back then (not yet anyway).
It is a very rare thing to see a trailer made by the filmmaker himself.

Btw, here's the trailer for The Empire Strikes Back. It has zero dialogue from the film in it, no plot is mentioned what so ever other than what the title implies, and it is filled with shots of explosions, spaceships, and aliens.
"A big sprawling new space adventure." 

Post
#794309
Topic
Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * <strong>SPOILER THREAD</strong> *
Time

Alderaan said:

 A trailer should give you a heads up heading into the film about what you are going to see:

1. Who is the protagonist / who are the protagonists?

2. What is the protagonist(s) goal?

3. What villains or obstacles might stand in their way?

For instance, I have seen that new Mars trailer with Matt Damon several times this season. I haven't seen the film, but I know that if I do see it, I will be watching a movie with Matt Damon's character being the main character, and he will be stuck on Mars and people will be trying to rescue him. Whatever else happens in the film, I have no idea, and I have no idea whether he will live or die or whatever larger point there might be to all of it, so it's a nice mix of setting up the audience but not giving away too much.

This Star Wars Trailer on the other hand tells me:

Explosions! Storm Troopers! Lightsabers! Jedi! Harrison Ford is back!

It's Star Wars!

You see how underwhelming that looks to anyone who isn't drunk on kool-aid?

 Well, this was the Monday Night Football trailer after all.

Also, this is a Star Wars movie, it doesn't really need an introduction. The trailer clearly tells us who's the good guys, and who's the bad guys. What's the plot? Same as always really, Rebels vs Empire. 
This is Star Wars after all, and they're probably afraid of backlash if they make too many spoilers. 
And like I said, this is a the trailer for the general public, so it's definitely supposed to be kind of dumbed down and full of action. It's not really made for fans like us who spend our time on SW forums, that's what comic-con panels and BTS videos are for.
The Martian is a terrible example as it's a standalone movie that has to rely entirely on it's story since it's not a franchise with an established world and characters. Plus, it's based on a book so the story is already well known.

Post
#794306
Topic
Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * <strong>SPOILER THREAD</strong> *
Time

pablumatic said:

Didn't Yoda tell Luke to pass on what he learned in Return of the Jedi?

Han talks of the Jedi as if they're regarded as myth in the trailer.

Is this movie really making our heroes as lazy as I fear? 30 years on they're still fight imperial types and Luke has seemingly trained nobody else in the ways of the Force. 

There's most likely going to be a very good explanation as to why Luke has gone into hiding. And if he wen't into hiding shortly after ROTJ then he would really have had the time to train anyone, and Leia didn't exactly know enough to train any herself.

But then again, there could still be a small amount of Jedi. I mean just because a scavenger on an outer-rim desert planet has been affected by Imperial propaganda and hearsay, doesn't mean that no one at all in the galaxy know of the events of the OT or the Jedi and the Old Republic. 
This film, could have chosen a plot-line similar to the EU where the galaxy is split into two factions, one influence by the New Republic and one controls by the New Order. In that case Luke might be a household name on for example; Coruscant, while on Jakku he's a mere legend/myth.

Post
#794284
Topic
Implied starting date of the Empire from OT dialogue
Time

darklordoftech said:

Early ESB drafts suggest that Yoda trained Annikin.

Really? Even though Obi-Wan clearly said that he trained him in ANH?

Which draft is this? Is it the one written before Kasdan got involved.
I seem to remember reading about an early draft where Vader wasn't Anakin, and Luke even meets his father's ghost on Dagobah and they perform some kind of Jedi initiation ritual, or oath, or something like that together.

Post
#794281
Topic
Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * <strong>SPOILER THREAD</strong> *
Time

Crazy thought, but could Starkiller base actually be a super-weapon hidden inside an entire planet?

In this shot from the trailer it looks like the ground is opening up. And on the poster we see a Death Star type of super-weapon that looks like a snowy planet with a slit/crevice in the middle. 

EDIT:
Maybe this shot is inside Starkiller base. Maybe it's the internal reactor or something, perhaps even the inside of that big red "lens" or whatever you'd call it, that we see on the poster. Otherwise why would space be red? Also it would explain that building in the bottom right of the picture.

2nd EDIT:
Yes, apparently it is a planet sized super-weapon.
http://www.starwars.com/databank/starkiller-base

Post
#794260
Topic
Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * <strong>SPOILER THREAD</strong> *
Time

I know I'm repeating myself, but this trailer was not meant for us.

It was made for these guys;


(Probably a different game, but I don't know squat about American football and it illustrates my point well enough.)

The B-roll video was made for us, the Disney and Comic-con panels was made for us. This trailer was made to hype the general public, not the fans. Hence we got a very typical modern day action hype-trailer.