logo Sign In

Warbler

This user has been banned.

User Group
Banned Members
Join date
7-May-2003
Last activity
28-May-2021
Posts
18,708

Post History

Post
#132712
Topic
Brosnan is no longer Bond, Daniel Craig is now Bond.
Time
Quote

Originally posted by: Bossk


Don't worry, you're not the only one who has been misspelling it. I've been using the "S-E" spelling each time I've typed it so far. Guess I'd better change.


except I havn't been mispelling it. Atleast not according to my spell checker. But if the offical tittle uses a misspelled work, so be it.

Oh, let correct somthing for you:


Worst. Bond. Ever. (imho)

If you ask me the best bond ever was Goldfinger, followed in a close 2nd by Dr. No. (imho)

Mark me, to change bond into an ordinary dark action flick and remove all the classic bond stuff would be a big mistake. If they do it, it will be the final death blow to the Bond movies.

Post
#132702
Topic
Brosnan is no longer Bond, Daniel Craig is now Bond.
Time
Quote

Originally posted by: Bossk


Yeah, you can only do that so many times. I really think that's why the series has failed lately. It has become stale. They need something new. Maybe a dark Bond would do that. This is a day and age when dark action is not a bad thing and many recognize that the series is bottoming out. Back when the Dalton Bonds came out, people were still accustomed to the softer Bond that Warbler likes. It was before the series hit the skids. Now that it's firmly entrenched on the skids, I think they can get away with making a change of this magnitude.

Change is good.


But I say the series has hit the skids because they are not sticking to the formula. Change is not always good. Oh, and ADigitalMan, according to my spellchecker, license is spelled l-i-c-e-n-s-e.

Post
#132480
Topic
MANGLER BROS., INC. IS NOW CLOSED HERE
Time
Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab
If you haven't noticed... You're in the thread too.

I guess you didn't read my post carefully enough. A very important part is now highlighted and underlined.

Originally posted by: Warbler
*......meanwhile without anyone noticing, Warbler places explosives around the thread, sneaks out and detonates the explosives, thus destroying the entire thread and everyone in it. *


Post
#132471
Topic
Superman Movie
Time
Originally posted by: Commander Courage
Most of you probably are not familiar with the history behind II; it's the ultimate lost superhero film, as the film we have now is NOT the way it was originally intended. If anyone's interested in in-depth detail on the subject, check out the Superman Cinema website.


Could you please post the web address of the site?
Post
#132486
Topic
Brosnan is no longer Bond, Daniel Craig is now Bond.
Time
Quote

Originally posted by: ricarleite


So what you're saying is that Bond movies should stick to the formula? Like:

• Pre-opening credits sequence with a 8 minute elaborated stunt impossible in real life.
• Small briefing of the villain and the problem he is bringing to the world.
• Bond sees his new gadgets and make humorous commments on those.
• Bond goes to a country in Europe, meets the villain in a bizarre way that envolves either a game or a dare.
• Bond finds Bondgirl. Feels the urge to have sex with her.
• Bond kills some henchmen and finds out about something, some light plot twist about the villain.
• Bond goes to another country in the world, where the villain's lair is. He takes the Bondgirl for some reason.
• Bond goes on a sequence of stunt after stunt, using his previously presented gadgets, destroying the whole thing.
• Bond gets away and makes love to the Bondgirl. The End.


exactly. That's the way every Bond movie should be.

Quote

Originally posted by: ricarleite
Yes I'm aware of that bizarre exception.


also In the Living Daylights, I don't think he ever made love to the Bondgirl. And the latest Bond movies havn't exactly lived up to the formula either(which why they have not been successful imho).