Warbler

TV’s Frink said:

RANDOM THOUGHTS THREAD DELETION IMMINENT

lets hope not.

Possessed said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

I guess the Jay/mods had enough of the bickering. But again I find it odd the thread of deleted instead of locked.

I believe it was the subject matter, not the bickering, that got it taken without word or warning. I know there is at least one person in the room walking around like a proud peacock even if we never know who it is. No-one was dragged in to the thread. Everyone had a choice to ignore or respond. If anyone chose to respond it was their own doing, they had something to say.

Oh well, so much for discussions that matter.

I think he was referring to you mentioning him being fond of calling people names even though what little he had said so far in the thread wasn’t directed at you, or mean spirited, but at this point it doesn’t matter.

I was referring to all of the bickering in the thread. The bickering in the politics thread probably also had something to do with it.

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

I guess the Jay/mods had enough of the bickering. But again I find it odd the thread of deleted instead of locked.

I believe it was the subject matter, not the bickering, that got it taken without word or warning. I know there is at least one person in the room walking around like a proud peacock even if we never know who it is.

Believe what you wish. If you really want to complain talk to the mods.

Just so it is known, I am not the “proud peacock”.

TV’s Frink said:

I mean, maybe that’s what happened by the strictest definition of the word,

That’s all I really meant.

but the connotation of “censor” is something much more insidious than what actually happened.

probably right.

I guess the Jay/mods had enough of the bickering. But again I find it odd the thread of deleted instead of locked.

technically, we all got censored since it seems all of the posts made in the thread have been deleted. I looked at my post history and the posts I made in the thread are not there.

I will say it is weird that the thread was deleted instead of just locked.

Am I crazy or did Jetrell’s newest thread just disappear?

Possessed said:

I quoted you with the intention of only quoting the part where you explained #2 but editing quotes is a pain in the ass on my phone so I just left it. But yeah I wasn’t talking to you. “It’s unknown” who I was talking about.

It was probably neglify.

Ok then.

Possessed said:

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Dek Rollins said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Dek Rollins said:

Warbler said:

Well, you said I did the SAME THING when you were temp-banned that I did today. We both agree that today I posted a clapping gif to show agreement with a post of Darth Ender’s. Therefore you must think that when I posted the clapping gif when you were temp banned, I must have been doing so to show agreement with a post of Darth Ender’s. So again I ask, which post of Darth Ender’s do you think I was agreeing with?

it was Ender’s “victim card” post.

Piss off Dek … I was perfectly clear.

You brought up the fact that he posted a gif when you were temp banned, and that seemed to be the biggest issue of confusion in the conversation. When Warb asked for further clarification because he wasn’t fully understanding your statements, you blew him of and didn’t answer the question. And no, I won’t piss off, because I was trying to clarify it simply for Warb when you apparently refused to do so.

He got you to think he was confused. He did post the Orson Welles applauding gif when I got temp-banned because he had already stated he was looking forward to it happening so him doing it in an innocent way was a no brainer and related to his Orson Welles applauding for rule#6 in the updated rules thread. Making innocent is just a loophole.

This gif was Shia LeBouf applauding because he agreed with enders post talking shit about me being a “victim”. Something else warbler has shown approval for. He knew I would get it but he again did it in a way that wouldn’t make it look as if he was “openly” breaking rule #6.

warbler got sloppy with his little modus operandi so I said something. Making himself again looking innocent by saying he doesn’t understand … he’s not as innocent and his posting around the forum shows he’s more knowledgeable than he’s saying he is now.

It’s the last I’m saying on the matter. I hate that I let myself get bent about this stuff but finding ways to circumvent the rules innocently is still breaking the rules. I’m not trying to be a jerk to you Dek, I’m just ticked off that this shit never stops and most everyone is okay with it.

1. I posted the gif when rule 6 was announced because I was agreeing with it and nothing more, it had nothing do with looking forward to seeing you get banned.

2. I posted the gif when you got temp-banned, “for something or another”. If you can prove I was doing because you got temp-banned, prove it.

3. I posted the gif today because I agreed with Ender’s post.

4. None of the three above had anything to do with each other, except they happen to include a clapping gif. They were not part of deep plot or conspiracy to “get you”. n

5. You are completely crazy and deluded.

6. Take your persecution and victim complexes and your conspiracy theories and your tin foil hat and shove them up your ass.

I’ll admit that I sure was glad when you were banned, no bones about it. I hope it happens again too. The sad thing is I’m sure you’re a nice guy but your presence on this forum is a constant irritation. Every time I start to think you’re getting easier to tolerate you stay up with the bullshit again.

Are you talking to me or Jetrell Fo?

Jetrell Fo said:

Dek Rollins said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Dek Rollins said:

Warbler said:

Well, you said I did the SAME THING when you were temp-banned that I did today. We both agree that today I posted a clapping gif to show agreement with a post of Darth Ender’s. Therefore you must think that when I posted the clapping gif when you were temp banned, I must have been doing so to show agreement with a post of Darth Ender’s. So again I ask, which post of Darth Ender’s do you think I was agreeing with?

it was Ender’s “victim card” post.

Piss off Dek … I was perfectly clear.

You brought up the fact that he posted a gif when you were temp banned, and that seemed to be the biggest issue of confusion in the conversation. When Warb asked for further clarification because he wasn’t fully understanding your statements, you blew him of and didn’t answer the question. And no, I won’t piss off, because I was trying to clarify it simply for Warb when you apparently refused to do so.

He got you to think he was confused. He did post the Orson Welles applauding gif when I got temp-banned because he had already stated he was looking forward to it happening so him doing it in an innocent way was a no brainer and related to his Orson Welles applauding for rule#6 in the updated rules thread. Making innocent is just a loophole.

This gif was Shia LeBouf applauding because he agreed with enders post talking shit about me being a “victim”. Something else warbler has shown approval for. He knew I would get it but he again did it in a way that wouldn’t make it look as if he was “openly” breaking rule #6.

warbler got sloppy with his little modus operandi so I said something. Making himself again looking innocent by saying he doesn’t understand … he’s not as innocent and his posting around the forum shows he’s more knowledgeable than he’s saying he is now.

It’s the last I’m saying on the matter. I hate that I let myself get bent about this stuff but finding ways to circumvent the rules innocently is still breaking the rules. I’m not trying to be a jerk to you Dek, I’m just ticked off that this shit never stops and most everyone is okay with it.

1. I posted the gif when rule 6 was announced because I was agreeing with it and nothing more, it had nothing do with looking forward to seeing you get banned.

2. I posted the gif when you got temp-banned, “for something or another”. If you can prove I was doing because you got temp-banned, prove it.

3. I posted the gif today because I agreed with Ender’s post.

4. None of the three above had anything to do with each other, except they happen to include a clapping gif. They were not part of deep plot or conspiracy to “get you”. n

5. You are completely crazy and deluded.

6. Take your persecution and victim hood complexes and your conspiracy theories and your tin foil hat and shove them up your ass.

Dek Rollins said:

Warbler said:

Well, you said I did the SAME THING when you were temp-banned that I did today. We both agree that today I posted a clapping gif to show agreement with a post of Darth Ender’s. Therefore you must think that when I posted the clapping gif when you were temp banned, I must have been doing so to show agreement with a post of Darth Ender’s. So again I ask, which post of Darth Ender’s do you think I was agreeing with?

I think it was Ender’s “victim card” post. That’s what I gathered from his last couple posts anyway. He can’t just make himself clear though, he has to confuse the situation by not replying when you misunderstand his statements.

Ender’s “victim card” post is what I was agreeing with when I posted the clapping gif earlier today. What I was asking Jetrell Fo was, was what post of Darth Ender’s did he think I was agreeing with I posted the clapping gif when he was temp-banned.

Well, you said I did the SAME THING when you were temp-banned that I did today. We both agree that today I posted a clapping gif to show agreement with a post of Darth Ender’s. Therefore you must think that when I posted the clapping gif when you were temp banned, I must have been doing so to show agreement with a post of Darth Ender’s. So again I ask, which post of Darth Ender’s do you think I was agreeing with?

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

Yeah, clapping. So?

You give yourself far too much credit for being sly but it’s all good. If it helps you sleep what more can one ask for.

😃

So let me get this straight, you think when I posted the clapping gif today I was somehow trying to make reference to the clapping gif posted back when you were temp banned? Well, I wasn’t. I’d try to convince you of that, but I know that would be a waste of my time. Believe what you wish.

Let me set you straight … I fully believe you posted the clapping gif today because ender was posting the “victim card” at me and that you agreed with his post, the same thing you did when I was temp banned. You may twist words and say only half of what you mean but my experience with you is all the convincing I need.

I was agreeing with a post made by Darth Ender when I posted gif when you were temp-banned? Just what post made by Darth Ender do you think I was agreeing with?

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

Yeah, clapping. So?

You give yourself far too much credit for being sly but it’s all good. If it helps you sleep what more can one ask for.

😃

So let me get this straight, you think when I posted the clapping gif today I was somehow trying to make reference to the clapping gif posted back when you were temp banned? Well, I wasn’t. I’d try to convince you of that, but I know that would be a waste of my time. Believe what you wish.

Yeah, clapping. So?

I clapping “something or another” back then and today I was clapping Darth Ender’s post. So?

The gif you(Jetrell Fo) posted today:

The gif I posted earlier today:

The gif I posted while you(Jetrell Fo) were temp banned.

3 different gifs.

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

btw, can anyone tell me what the fine print under the “(your name)” says? I can’t seem to read it.

DOES NOT APPLY TO: Whites, Cis-Gendered, Heterosexuals, or Christians.

huh?

That is the small print on the bottom right of the card, you said you couldn’t read the small print, I typed it out so you could.

1. That wasn’t the print I was talking about. I was talking about the small print bottom center, under the place you are supposed to sign.

2. you left out this:

Warbler said:

Makes your “I wasn’t talking about you Fo” clapping post reference look pretty stupid now doesn’t it?

That is what I was going “huh?” at.

You knew what I was referring to …

[Warbler said:]

but saying “huh” is safer than answering honestly. I get that.

If you are referring to the pic I posted while you were temp banned:

1. the gif posted back then is not the one you posted today, nor is it the one I posted earlier today.

2. One has nothing do to with the other. For all that is known, the gif posted while your were temp banned, had nothing to do with you being temp banned. The gif I posted today was my reaction to Darth Ender’s post, no pretending involved.

Possessed said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

btw, can anyone tell me what the fine print under the “(your name)” says? I can’t seem to read it.

DOES NOT APPLY TO: Whites, Cis-Gendered, Heterosexuals, or Christians.

Makes your “I wasn’t talking about you Fo” clapping post reference look pretty stupid now doesn’t it?

Seems Ender was off his game too because it’s kind of inflammatory.

😉

That’s not the part he was asking about.

Whether or not pretending he wasn’t clapping in reference to this being directed at you is another thing though and I’m not getting into it.

Where did I say anything about and sort of pretending?

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

btw, can anyone tell me what the fine print under the “(your name)” says? I can’t seem to read it.

DOES NOT APPLY TO: Whites, Cis-Gendered, Heterosexuals, or Christians.

huh?

That is the small print on the bottom right of the card, you said you couldn’t read the small print, I typed it out so you could.

1. That wasn’t the print I was talking about. I was talking about the small print bottom center, under the place you are supposed to sign.

2. you left out this:

Warbler said:

Makes your “I wasn’t talking about you Fo” clapping post reference look pretty stupid now doesn’t it?

That is what I was going “huh?” at.

TV’s Frink said:

I’m 99% sure _ender’s posting of the Victim Card image had nothing to do with the small print.

But nonetheless, I curious what it says.

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

btw, can anyone tell me what the fine print under the “(your name)” says? I can’t seem to read it.

DOES NOT APPLY TO: Whites, Cis-Gendered, Heterosexuals, or Christians.

Makes your “I wasn’t talking about you Fo” clapping post reference look pretty stupid now doesn’t it?

huh?

CatBus said:

Maybe intended as satire, but too close to the way people really see things. There are plenty of people who think getting called racist is exactly the same thing as censorship, or that white people and Christians never ever play the victim card. Satire usually takes the position and tweaks it humorously. This is straight-up duplication–putting it on an actual card is the only funny tweak, so it doesn’t actually parody the belief at all.

There are also plenty of people who play the race card to avoid legit criticism and plenty more who assume something is racist until proven innocent rather than innocent until proven guilty.

dahmage said:

Ehance image. Rotate 180 degrees. Zoom in. Zoom in.

I don’t think I have any programs on my computer that can enhance images.

maybe, but I would still like to know what those words in the fine print say.