Warbler

sorry

suspiciouscoffee said:

Warbler said:

moviefreakedmind said:

Warbler said:

moviefreakedmind said:

Not really from the time that he would have lived, but this more apt for the religion thread.

I think historians agree that Jesus did exist, whether he was the son of God and could perform miracles and rise from the dead is of course debated.

Whether he existed in a form resembling the biblical narrative is debated. Him being the song of God and performing miracles is debated but not really by historians.

I don’t think anyone believes he is the song of God.

Well, if he is the Word, and the Word was God and all as John 1 says, who’s to say God didn’t sing his Word?

I suppose that is a good point.

moviefreakedmind said:

Warbler said:

moviefreakedmind said:

Warbler said:

moviefreakedmind said:

Not really from the time that he would have lived, but this more apt for the religion thread.

I think historians agree that Jesus did exist, whether he was the son of God and could perform miracles and rise from the dead is of course debated.

Whether he existed in a form resembling the biblical narrative is debated. Him being the song of God and performing miracles is debated but not really by historians.

I don’t think anyone believes he is the song of God.

From a figurative point of view he could be interpreted that way.

yhwx said:

Warbler said:

moviefreakedmind said:

Warbler said:

moviefreakedmind said:

Not really from the time that he would have lived, but this more apt for the religion thread.

I think historians agree that Jesus did exist, whether he was the son of God and could perform miracles and rise from the dead is of course debated.

Whether he existed in a form resembling the biblical narrative is debated. Him being the song of God and performing miracles is debated but not really by historians.

I don’t think anyone believes he is the song of God.

Warbler.

What? I was making a joke out his typo.

moviefreakedmind said:

Warbler said:

moviefreakedmind said:

Not really from the time that he would have lived, but this more apt for the religion thread.

I think historians agree that Jesus did exist, whether he was the son of God and could perform miracles and rise from the dead is of course debated.

Whether he existed in a form resembling the biblical narrative is debated. Him being the song of God and performing miracles is debated but not really by historians.

I don’t think anyone believes he is the song of God.

moviefreakedmind said:

Charles Mansons are people too.

agree to disagree

TV’s Frink said:

So…he didn’t die? What?

Pretty sure Manson died.

moviefreakedmind said:

Not really from the time that he would have lived, but this more apt for the religion thread.

I think historians agree that Jesus did exist, whether he was the son of God and could perform miracles and rise from the dead is of course debated.

Della Reese

http://people.com/music/della-reese-dead-at-86-touched-by-an-angel-singer/

chyron8472 said:

SilverWook said:

Charles Manson is finally dead.

http://originaltrilogy.com/topic/fill-in-the-blank-Just-Died/

That’s for when people die.

SilverWook said:

Why is one curse word considered worse than another? Not entirely sure. I’ve seldom heard the C word used in R rated movies even. Only one I can think of off the top of my head is Silence Of The Lambs.

I think I’ve heard it in more than just Silence Of The Lambs.

I didn’t realize it was considered THAT bad a word. I mean I knew it was a bad word. But it is worse than I realized.

SilverWook said:

Charles Manson is finally dead.

SilverWook said:

moviefreakedmind said:

I’ve never understood why people claim that insult is worse than others.

It’s specifically derogatory of women and we should all strive to have a little class around here.
Anyway, I consider the matter closed.

okay, but I hope you didn’t really strangle Tyrphanax to death.

Good point. I hereby drop the issue.

SilverWook said:

Tyrphanax said:

yhwx said:

This is a real statement by the President of the United States.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/932303108146892801

Now that the three basketball players are out of China and saved from years in jail, LaVar Ball, the father of LiAngelo, is unaccepting of what I did for his son and that shoplifting is no big deal. I should have left them in jail!

I got one better for you:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/932388590344196096

Sen. Jeff Flake(y), who is unelectable in the Great State of Arizona (quit race, anemic polls) was caught (purposely) on “mike” saying bad things about your favorite President. He’ll be a NO on tax cuts because his political career anyway is “toast.”

“Donald” Trump is a “cunt.”

That’s an offensive term no matter the context. I expect better from you guys.

*sigh*

Possessed said:

Warbler said:

moviefreakedmind said:

Warbler said:

yhwx said:

Warbler said:

Why are we bringing up the National Anthem protests again?

There’s no reason we should cower up about just because of one incident that happened. You should be able to have an appropriate discussion about it.

Given what has happened when we discussed it in the past, I don’t think I can. We have already made our opinions on the issue clear enough anyway. Also, I just understand why mfm decided to bring it up now, we hadn’t been talking about it at all.

I was telling a joke.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XY-WjKkkeo

To be fair you seem to feel that way about all humor.

no, sometimes I just suck at a getting the joke.

oojason said:

Warbler said:

oojason said:

Possessed said:

oojason said:

someone’s shin being seen is somehow un-TimeLordish

Coming from someone who has never seen or knows anything about doctor who, taken out of context this comment was hilarious and I don’t mean that in a malicious way.

No worries mate - I’m struggling to believe that someone’s shin being on show in a promo pic is being considered un-TimeLordish at all - or for that matter being talked about at all 😃

Did the Doctor ever show shin in any of his clothes in any of his incarnations?

 

Warbler said:

oojason said:

I think I’ll give a whole episode a watch, maybe even a few additional episodes, before commenting that someone’s shin being seen is somehow un-TimeLordish - taken from a promo picture 😃

Why do I have to wait? I know what the costume looks like from the promo pic. I’ve been watching Doctor Who since the early 80s. I think know what is and is not TimeLordish.

Did I say you have to wait? No.

not exactly, but it seemed like to me that you sort of implied that it would a be a good idea to wait.

No. I simply said that ‘I think I’ll give a whole episode a watch, maybe even a few additional episodes, before commenting that someone’s shin being seen is somehow un-TimeLordish - taken from a promo picture 😃’

How you got ‘Why do I have to wait?’ and your follow-up statements from that is beyond me. Nothing implied at all.

Seems you are searching for something that just isn’t there. I’ll leave it there, for this reason.

my misunderstanding then.

moviefreakedmind said:

Warbler said:

yhwx said:

Warbler said:

Why are we bringing up the National Anthem protests again?

There’s no reason we should cower up about just because of one incident that happened. You should be able to have an appropriate discussion about it.

Given what has happened when we discussed it in the past, I don’t think I can. We have already made our opinions on the issue clear enough anyway. Also, I just understand why mfm decided to bring it up now, we hadn’t been talking about it at all.

I was telling a joke.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XY-WjKkkeo

oojason said:

Possessed said:

oojason said:

someone’s shin being seen is somehow un-TimeLordish

Coming from someone who has never seen or knows anything about doctor who, taken out of context this comment was hilarious and I don’t mean that in a malicious way.

No worries mate - I’m struggling to believe that someone’s shin being on show in a promo pic is being considered un-TimeLordish at all - or for that matter being talked about at all 😃

Did the Doctor ever show shin in any of his clothes in any of his incarnations?

 

Warbler said:

oojason said:

I think I’ll give a whole episode a watch, maybe even a few additional episodes, before commenting that someone’s shin being seen is somehow un-TimeLordish - taken from a promo picture 😃

Why do I have to wait? I know what the costume looks like from the promo pic. I’ve been watching Doctor Who since the early 80s. I think know what is and is not TimeLordish.

Did I say you have to wait? No.

not exactly, but it seemed like to me that you sort of implied that it would a be a good idea to wait.

You want to comment on her shin being ‘un-TimeLordish/un-Doctorish’^? Go right ahead.

Me? I’ll wait and watch a few episodes before passing comment or judging anything at all re the new Doctor - if that is okay with you, Warbler? (that’s a rhetorical question - so you don’t have to answer it).

ChainsawAsh said:

Having said all that, I think Whittaker’s costume is a little bland for me, but there’s a big difference between promo pictures and seeing it in action - just look at how Capaldi’s costume(s) turned out during his run compared to the reveal promos.

It looked the same as the promos(when he was actually wearing the costume seen in the promos).

oojason said:

I think I’ll give a whole episode a watch, maybe even a few additional episodes, before commenting that someone’s shin being seen is somehow un-TimeLordish - taken from a promo picture 😃

Why do I have to wait? I know what the costume looks like from the promo pic. I’ve been watching Doctor Who since the early 80s. I think know what is and is not TimeLordish.

Anchorhead said:

Warbler said:
Don’t know what to say. I guess we had know it wasn’t exactly going look like a traditional Doctor costume…

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p01qmc9j

Traditional? The Doctor’s outfits through the 54 years have been one of the least consistent aspects (which is, I think, a great thing). Cartoonish, leather jacket, understated, fur coat, Victorian, hip - they’ve been all over the spectrum.

I don’t know, this costume seems more over the spectrum than usual.

To me, Jodie’s outfit looks fantastic. She’s a very beautiful woman and they’ve struck a great balance between mysterious time traveler and feminine style. Those high-waisted pants with a peek of shin, the partially tied boots, the long coat, all of it looks perfect to me.

I don’t like the peek of shin. Its un-TimeLordish/un-Doctorish.

links work now.

chrome

I get to facebook, but then I get this message:

"This page isn’t available

The link you followed may be broken, or the page may have been removed."

dahmage said:

yhwx said:

If you were to leave a private topic, may you join it again?

No

maybe something could be put in where new people can be added and old ones can come back if given unanimous approval from everyone currently a part of the private topic.