- Post
- #224087
- Topic
- Are you Going to buy them ?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/224087/action/topic#224087
- Time

Vigo
- User Group
- Members
- Join date
- 8-May-2006
- Last activity
- 24-Jan-2008
- Posts
- 228
Post History
- Post
- #224027
- Topic
- Great MArk Hamill Interview
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/224027/action/topic#224027
- Time
Mark Hamill Interview
He seems to be a very nice and intelligent guy. I think especially the last part when he talks about George Lucas is very comforting, and makes us feel we are not alone in our struggle for the OOT...
- Post
- #224011
- Topic
- Explaining the shoddy OOT treatment in public
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/224011/action/topic#224011
- Time
- Post
- #223649
- Topic
- Explaining the shoddy OOT treatment in public
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/223649/action/topic#223649
- Time
Originally posted by: MeBeJedi
Good post, but this last one has a problem:
"Fan preservationists however can digitize the source material, and compress it so that it takes the WHOLE place of a DVD 9,minimizing compression artifacts and retaining as much information of the analogue source as piossible."
If there are compression artifacts from putting it on DVD-5, they are going to remain there if we put it on DVD-9. We can't "undo" the artifacts simply by "recompressing" the films, because too much material has already been lost due to lossy compression.
Good post, but this last one has a problem:
"Fan preservationists however can digitize the source material, and compress it so that it takes the WHOLE place of a DVD 9,minimizing compression artifacts and retaining as much information of the analogue source as piossible."
If there are compression artifacts from putting it on DVD-5, they are going to remain there if we put it on DVD-9. We can't "undo" the artifacts simply by "recompressing" the films, because too much material has already been lost due to lossy compression.
I see, it should be more specific, and refer to the Laserdiscs as the sources to digitize. Laserdiscs or the original master tapes do not suffer from digital compression. I´m going to change this.
- Post
- #223641
- Topic
- Explaining the shoddy OOT treatment in public
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/223641/action/topic#223641
- Time
;-------------------------------------------------------------------
Claim: The Laserdisc masters is the way how the OOT looked in theatres back then.
Answer: Absolutely not. The original trilogy was released to theaters in 35mm and 70mm film formats. A standard 35mm film copy can hold as much picture information as a HDTV image. 35mm negatives or 1st generation copies can even yield 3 times the resolution. If someone would request an OOT release which matches the theatrical experience, one would have to request at least a HDTV transfer. No to mention those people, who saw the 70mm release of Star Wars back then...
;-------------------------------------------------------------------
Claim: The negatives of the OOT were destroyed, so the Laserdisc master is the only high quality source left to make a DVD.
Answer: It is true that the negatives were recut during the process of making the 1997 SE. However, several 35mm copies of the OOT still survived, from which a very good looking transfer could be made which would easily surpass the old Laserdisc transfer. Lucas himself claims that he has a Technicolor dye transfer print os STAR WARS (high qwuality prints which are very durable) which has been used as a colour reference when they restored the original faded negatives.
Proof: The Empire of Dreams documentary contains several unaltered scenes from the OOT. Like the whole documentary, those scenes are presented anamorphically and look much better than the Laserdisc masters. The actual OOT release will look worse than the extra materials on the 2004 SE. Period.
;-------------------------------------------------------------------
Claim: Every 35mm copy of Star Wars is unuseable now, since it has faded very badly.
Anwer: Film is mostly dying due to wrong storage (air humidity, temepreature). There are a lot of institutions (like the BFI) and private collectors around the world, who have dedicated themselves to the preservation of original Film elements by storing them properly, being old flammable and explosive nitrate BW films or films shot on relatively modern film stock like Star Wars. Several sources have already announced they have excellent quality 35mm copies of the OOT in their possesion. GL himself has a super durable technicolor dye transfer print of Star Wars.
;-------------------------------------------------------------------
Claim: It would cost a fortune to make a new transfer from surviving film elements.
Answer: No, It is standard procedure for every DVD studio nowadays to make fresh digital transfers from 35mm film prints. Lucasfilm and 20th Century Fox have all the equipment to make a good release. Fox has a high reputation to release film classics in excellent quality (like Alien), even those films which are nowhere as important as Star Wars.
;--------------------------------------------------------------------
Claim: But in the end, it is just about them being non-anamorphic. Luckily, as a 4:3 TV user, the non anamorphic issue does not bother me.
Answer: You forget that the 1993 masters were made using now obsolete telecine equipment (a technique to transfer film to analogue video), compared to modern digital film scanners, which yield a much better clarity, contrast and colour rendering than the equipment used in the first half of the nineties. Films are nowadays stored as high resolution digital files on workstations as a standard process, the 1993 master used for the Laserdiscs and sadly for the 2006(!) DVD´s is just an analogue NTSC resolution D1 master tape. Since this tape is more than sufficient for a VHS and laserdisc Transfer (these are also analogue formats, NOT digital), the master will show all its flaws on a modern digital video format like DVD, and introduce new flaws like compression artifatcs which are not present on the Laserdiscs. Bottom line: the master will show all its weaknesses, even on 4:3 TV´s.
;----------------------------------------------------------------------
Claim: We should be grateful that Lucas is doing his fans a favour and release the OOT, no matter what quality comes out. The Goodwill counts.
Answer: It was not Lucas Goodwill to bring us the OOT. It was the continuing protests of fans and the numerous attempts from fans to preserve the OOT on DVD´s themselves using VHS or Laserdisc sources which changed his mind. The primary aim for this DVD release is to destroy the commercial market for the fan made preservations, which were sold by bootleggers for very high prices on Ebay. Keep that in mind if you try to bring on this "George is so good, be grateful!" argument, since it is only an understandable decision made by a business man. If George would really listen to his fans, and understand their dedication and love for his films, he would have released the OOT in proper DVD quality, rather than just Laserdisc transfers which hardly surpass the fan preservations (since they come from the same source). Further he is forcing OOT fans to buy the 2004 SE with the OOT and charges a lot of money for this release.
;----------------------------------------------------------------------
Claim: But no matter what comes out, it will surely look better than the fan preservations.
Answer: It could be, but only hardly, since Laserdiscs are high quality analogue video formats, which can represnet the qualities of the original analogue video source quite accurately. However, you forget something: rumours are out that the OOT is going to be released on a DVD-5, along with other materials like game demos, which take up Space on the DVD. Fan preservationists however can digitize the Laserdisc source material, and compress it so that it takes the WHOLE place of a DVD 9,minimizing compression artifacts and retaining as much information of the analogue source as possible.
- Post
- #223633
- Topic
- Info Wanted: What is the preservation project closest to the original 1977 release?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/223633/action/topic#223633
- Time
Originally posted by: THX
Yes, I'm surprised by this, as I understood that cue was initially intentionally excluded as it was felt to undercut the tension of the scene.
That was also my first impression when i heard the english audio for the first time, and thought: "great, another change to the OT, now the sound is gonna be chopped...", unaware of the reality...
Now that's unusual, I would have expected LFL to standardize the "official" mix for all but dialogue by now.
Yes, I'm surprised by this, as I understood that cue was initially intentionally excluded as it was felt to undercut the tension of the scene.
That was also my first impression when i heard the english audio for the first time, and thought: "great, another change to the OT, now the sound is gonna be chopped...", unaware of the reality...
Now that's unusual, I would have expected LFL to standardize the "official" mix for all but dialogue by now.
No really, they are still there. They propbably kept them in because they had problems extracting the German dialogue from the 1978 stereo master. So, in fact, one could in theory use the German audio as a base to restore the original mono mix.
- Post
- #223629
- Topic
- BFI preserving OOT!!
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/223629/action/topic#223629
- Time
Better would be to inform them about the Laserdisc master situation, and get them to an official statement like: "If LFL have no original copies of the OOT anymore, we would be more than happy to provide them with film elements to make new transfers."
- Post
- #223440
- Topic
- Info Wanted: What is the preservation project closest to the original 1977 release?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/223440/action/topic#223440
- Time
Originally posted by: THX
Thanks for that, Vigo. Very strange to hear that cue there (not to mention the German dialogue). Okay, so that shows it's not the same as the mono mix (even besides the obvious dialogue difference).
Cool, apparently, we Germans got our own Sound mix, where the mono mix has been used as a base. Interesting would be if there exist other foreign language mixes with further changes.
Now, thanks to belbucus, we know Burtt continued to change the mix when preparing the foreign releases. The mono was the last to be made, so it would stand to reason that he would use that as the basis for further changes.
It would be very interesting to gather further information about this, and what the reason is why we got additional music in our sound mix and why it wasn´t included in later english sound mixes.
However, it's possible (however unlikely) that it was the other way around. Does anyone know the German release date and/or the US mono release date?
German release date was Feb. 9th 1978.
It's also possible that this mix, while substantially similar to the mono mix in content, could be in stereo. Unfortunately, the left channel from my cpu got disconnected and it's a nightmare to get to it so I can't tell from the sample. Vigo?
Thanks for that, Vigo. Very strange to hear that cue there (not to mention the German dialogue). Okay, so that shows it's not the same as the mono mix (even besides the obvious dialogue difference).
Cool, apparently, we Germans got our own Sound mix, where the mono mix has been used as a base. Interesting would be if there exist other foreign language mixes with further changes.
Now, thanks to belbucus, we know Burtt continued to change the mix when preparing the foreign releases. The mono was the last to be made, so it would stand to reason that he would use that as the basis for further changes.
It would be very interesting to gather further information about this, and what the reason is why we got additional music in our sound mix and why it wasn´t included in later english sound mixes.
However, it's possible (however unlikely) that it was the other way around. Does anyone know the German release date and/or the US mono release date?
German release date was Feb. 9th 1978.
It's also possible that this mix, while substantially similar to the mono mix in content, could be in stereo. Unfortunately, the left channel from my cpu got disconnected and it's a nightmare to get to it so I can't tell from the sample. Vigo?
The mix is definately in stereo. It is still present in the German 5.1 mix from 1997. Even the 5.1 mix from the 2004 SE keeps all the soundeffects from the mono mix, but the musical cue was removed.
- Post
- #223215
- Topic
- Info Wanted: What is the preservation project closest to the original 1977 release?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/223215/action/topic#223215
- Time
Trash Compactor
- Post
- #223040
- Topic
- Info Wanted: What is the preservation project closest to the original 1977 release?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/223040/action/topic#223040
- Time
Originally posted by: BrianM
I believe it goes like this:
Big gun battle in detention block AA-23 (lots of music)
The gang jump into the garbage masher (no music)
I have a bad feeling…” (no music)
"It's worse" (no music)
Luke grabbed and released (no music)
Masher starts moving (no music)
Luke calls 3PO “Where could he be?”
We cut to R2, 3PO and the dimwitted ST’s. (music starts)
Back at the trash masher “We’re all going to be a lot thinner” (music continues)
Cuts between 3PO and the gang (more music)
Boom the masher stops thanks to R2. (the music stops on the BOOM).
It is the same on both my 70MM version and the mono version I downloaded.
I’d love to hear a different clip???
BrianM
I believe it goes like this:
Big gun battle in detention block AA-23 (lots of music)
The gang jump into the garbage masher (no music)
I have a bad feeling…” (no music)
"It's worse" (no music)
Luke grabbed and released (no music)
Masher starts moving (no music)
Luke calls 3PO “Where could he be?”
We cut to R2, 3PO and the dimwitted ST’s. (music starts)
Back at the trash masher “We’re all going to be a lot thinner” (music continues)
Cuts between 3PO and the gang (more music)
Boom the masher stops thanks to R2. (the music stops on the BOOM).
It is the same on both my 70MM version and the mono version I downloaded.
I’d love to hear a different clip???
BrianM
On the german track it goes like this:
->They fall into the trash compactor. (no music)
->Chewie knocks at the door. (no music)
->Han fires the Laserblast. Luke and Leia are upset. (no music)
Now the audio clip comes in:
------------------------------------
-> Leia: "Es könnte schlimmer sein" ("It could be worse") (No music)
*GROWL*
*Music starts and continues*
->Han: "Es IST schlimmer!" ("It IS worse!")
* Music continues during the whole scene while Luke is struggling with the monster, makes a short pause when Luke is released, and then continues when the cmpactor is activated*
until:
-> Lukes voice coming out of the communicator lying on the table: "3PO! Wo steckt er nur???" ("3PO! Where could he be???")
The rest matches with your description of the mono/70MM audio .
- Post
- #223038
- Topic
- Info Wanted: What is the preservation project closest to the original 1977 release?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/223038/action/topic#223038
- Time
- Trash compactor scene
- The beginning which has different soundeffects than the english audio on the SE
- German "Blast It! Wedge, where are you?" dialogue
- C3PO´s tractor beam line in German
- The millenium falcon hyperspace sound
Grabbed from the 1995 German THX laserdisc. Every dialogue and soundeffect matches exactly an early 1990 German TV recording.
- Post
- #223034
- Topic
- Info Wanted: What is the preservation project closest to the original 1977 release?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/223034/action/topic#223034
- Time
Originally posted by: THX
If you could post a link to an audio clip, Vigo... (or anyone else who has the German LDs - Citizen?)
If you could post a link to an audio clip, Vigo... (or anyone else who has the German LDs - Citizen?)
I could sample it and post it to someone here on the forum.
- Post
- #222688
- Topic
- Info Wanted: What is the preservation project closest to the original 1977 release?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/222688/action/topic#222688
- Time
Originally posted by: ChainsawAsh
I don't remember music EVER appearing in this scene ...
Originally posted by: Vigo
You guys might be interested in the fact, that the German dub on my 1995 THX Laserdisc was apparently made using the original mono track, since ALL sound effects and ALL dialogue matches the mono sound examples i heard on the page.
I also noticed that in the trash compactor sequence, the complete music background was removed on the 2004 SE from the point on where they hear the roar until the point Luke is released by the monster. It is also present on the German dub. Some other guy told me that the 1993 definite edition LAserdiscs also don´t have this background music.
All German releases excluding the 2004 editions seem to match the original mono mix. That´s why i was really puzzled, when i heard the english audio on the 2004 SE that some sound effects were radically different.
You guys might be interested in the fact, that the German dub on my 1995 THX Laserdisc was apparently made using the original mono track, since ALL sound effects and ALL dialogue matches the mono sound examples i heard on the page.
I also noticed that in the trash compactor sequence, the complete music background was removed on the 2004 SE from the point on where they hear the roar until the point Luke is released by the monster. It is also present on the German dub. Some other guy told me that the 1993 definite edition LAserdiscs also don´t have this background music.
All German releases excluding the 2004 editions seem to match the original mono mix. That´s why i was really puzzled, when i heard the english audio on the 2004 SE that some sound effects were radically different.
I don't remember music EVER appearing in this scene ...
It is there on my laserdisc and was there on my 1990 taping of Star Wars on German television. No-one to this day was able to give me the answer from what mix this music comes from, since it isn´t present on the 70mm version.
- Post
- #222687
- Topic
- Info Wanted: What is the preservation project closest to the original 1977 release?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/222687/action/topic#222687
- Time
Originally posted by: THX
Originally posted by: Vigo
You guys might be interested in the fact, that the German dub on my 1995 THX Laserdisc was apparently made using the original mono track, since ALL sound effects and ALL dialogue matches the mono sound examples i heard on the page.
I'm not sure I understand this, Vigo - how can the dialogue match if it's a German dub? You guys might be interested in the fact, that the German dub on my 1995 THX Laserdisc was apparently made using the original mono track, since ALL sound effects and ALL dialogue matches the mono sound examples i heard on the page.
Because the additional english lines, which are not present in the 70mm / Stereo mix, appear in the German dub. Dubbed of course but they are there. Like C3PO´s line "the tractor beam..." or "Close the blast doors!" or "Wedge, where are you!".
- Post
- #221636
- Topic
- Preserving the "German" Original Trilogy (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/221636/action/topic#221636
- Time
Originally posted by: R2D2Yeah, thought about that, too. I got the very first Star Wars [Krieg der Sterne] on Original VHS-Tape, when I was a kid. It is the Full Screen, Silverscreen Edition from ~1990, and has Dolby Stereo Surround. To your all surprise, there is no Episode 4 in the Title, and no "A new Hope" oder "Eine neue Hoffnung", just:
Krieg der Sterne {Star Wars}
Es herrscht Bürgerkrieg... {It is a period of civil war...}
So besides, its Full Screen and maybe Time-compressed (still have to figure out, what that really means), its seams to be the original cinema version in german. Even the very first tv-broadcast in 1990 was without "Episode 4" in the title.
Yep, the version running on Sat.1 in 1990 was the first time I saw Star Wars (Krieg der Sterne). Up until the 1995 THX laserdisc/VHS release, every Krieg der Sterne release had the 1978 German textcrawl without Episode IV, like the 1977 original release. They added it using a cheap video titler on the 1995 THX release, where the whole textcrawl was replaced that way. In the 1997 SE, they included it properly, still called "Krieg der Sterne". For the 2004 SE, they omitted "Krieg der Sterne" and made a German "Star Wars" textcrawl.
Also the German audio is quite interesting. It has always been based on the english mono mix, and includes all lines and soundeffects from this mix, including the 2004 SE. They messed it up quite badly for the DD 5.1 remix. They did not have the seperate dialogue tracks anymore, so they had to extract the german voices using some propritary software, which adding a very annoying lisping in some scenes.
So in order to recreate the "original" German version, one would have to find the 1978 textcrawl in widescreen, and insert it in front of a better video source (1995 PAL THX edition). Were the 1990 German laserdiscs in widescreen?
Yesterday I read in some german forum, that the subtitle "Episode IV - Eine neue Hoffnung" was not added until 1995 in german. Seems cool to me!
Yes, this is correct. My 1995 german THX laserdisc set has it, edited in quite badly.
There will be at least an DD2.0 English Track onboard. Of course, I prefer the original audio but it seems that it was a long time ago, I watched the unaltered trilogy in german.
Krieg der Sterne {Star Wars}
Es herrscht Bürgerkrieg... {It is a period of civil war...}
So besides, its Full Screen and maybe Time-compressed (still have to figure out, what that really means), its seams to be the original cinema version in german. Even the very first tv-broadcast in 1990 was without "Episode 4" in the title.
Yep, the version running on Sat.1 in 1990 was the first time I saw Star Wars (Krieg der Sterne). Up until the 1995 THX laserdisc/VHS release, every Krieg der Sterne release had the 1978 German textcrawl without Episode IV, like the 1977 original release. They added it using a cheap video titler on the 1995 THX release, where the whole textcrawl was replaced that way. In the 1997 SE, they included it properly, still called "Krieg der Sterne". For the 2004 SE, they omitted "Krieg der Sterne" and made a German "Star Wars" textcrawl.
Also the German audio is quite interesting. It has always been based on the english mono mix, and includes all lines and soundeffects from this mix, including the 2004 SE. They messed it up quite badly for the DD 5.1 remix. They did not have the seperate dialogue tracks anymore, so they had to extract the german voices using some propritary software, which adding a very annoying lisping in some scenes.
So in order to recreate the "original" German version, one would have to find the 1978 textcrawl in widescreen, and insert it in front of a better video source (1995 PAL THX edition). Were the 1990 German laserdiscs in widescreen?
Yesterday I read in some german forum, that the subtitle "Episode IV - Eine neue Hoffnung" was not added until 1995 in german. Seems cool to me!
Yes, this is correct. My 1995 german THX laserdisc set has it, edited in quite badly.
There will be at least an DD2.0 English Track onboard. Of course, I prefer the original audio but it seems that it was a long time ago, I watched the unaltered trilogy in german.
I think it´s a worthy effort to preserve the german ( or any other foreign) language version, since these are almost as old as the movies themselves. The German dub was done in late 1977, and they put a lot of effort into it, since it is a really good dub which captures the spirit of the movies really well. And of course the original localized textcrawl made by Lucasfilm themselves.
- Post
- #220620
- Topic
- 1977 70mm soundtrack recording (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/220620/action/topic#220620
- Time
Originally posted by: BrianM
I was making a joke.
I saw the movie 20 some odd times in the theater 77-78 and that music was never there.
In 1980 during the re-release before Empire suddenly there was “A NEW HOPE” in the titles, strange music, extra lines, and Luke cursing Wedge instead if Biggs his wingman.
We thought Lucus had changed the movie when he changed it into “A New Hope” (Little did we know what was going to happen, SE) we were confused.
In fact we were just seeing the mono version for the first time. The correct version of Star Wars is personal and most feel the first version they saw is the “right one.”
If you think the 70MM/Dolby Stereo version is the “right one” you happen to be correct.
I was making a joke.
I saw the movie 20 some odd times in the theater 77-78 and that music was never there.
In 1980 during the re-release before Empire suddenly there was “A NEW HOPE” in the titles, strange music, extra lines, and Luke cursing Wedge instead if Biggs his wingman.
We thought Lucus had changed the movie when he changed it into “A New Hope” (Little did we know what was going to happen, SE) we were confused.
In fact we were just seeing the mono version for the first time. The correct version of Star Wars is personal and most feel the first version they saw is the “right one.”
If you think the 70MM/Dolby Stereo version is the “right one” you happen to be correct.

But isn´t the mono version as original as the 70MM/DS version, since it was also created back then?
I checked, and the german version also has the dubbed Wedge line. Even in the 2004 SE....
- Post
- #220608
- Topic
- 1977 70mm soundtrack recording (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/220608/action/topic#220608
- Time
Originally posted by: BrianM
It's not missing, it was never there.
It was erroneously added later...
Originally posted by: Vigo
What the hell?!?!? The musical score in the trash compactor sequence is also missing here!
What the hell?!?!? The musical score in the trash compactor sequence is also missing here!
It's not missing, it was never there.

It was erroneously added later...
I´m curious, what do you mean by saying, it was erroneausly added later? When? All german releases I have seen so far (except the 2004 SE) have this musical piece in it. The german dub was already made in late 1977. The question is now, which english version does have it? The mono track? BEcause all sound effects used in ALL german versions (even the 2004 SE) match the original mono mix, they also had always the missing lines (of course dubbed, but they are there).
- Post
- #220541
- Topic
- 1977 70mm soundtrack recording (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/220541/action/topic#220541
- Time
- Post
- #216601
- Topic
- Info Wanted: What is the preservation project closest to the original 1977 release?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/216601/action/topic#216601
- Time
I also noticed that in the trash compactor sequence, the complete music background was removed on the 2004 SE from the point on where they hear the roar until the point Luke is released by the monster. It is also present on the German dub. Some other guy told me that the 1993 definite edition LAserdiscs also don´t have this background music.
All German releases excluding the 2004 editions seem to match the original mono mix. That´s why i was really puzzled, when i heard the english audio on the 2004 SE that some sound effects were radically different.
- Post
- #213792
- Topic
- Time to accept what we are given and be grateful?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/213792/action/topic#213792
- Time
Originally posted by: Jobel
Whilst not being anamorphic and losing 30% of image resolution because of it, perhaps it's time to just accept that this is the best we are going to get and live with it?
Discuss.
Whilst not being anamorphic and losing 30% of image resolution because of it, perhaps it's time to just accept that this is the best we are going to get and live with it?
Discuss.
It´s not only the loss of resolution, it´s the fact that the transfer was done with obsolete equiment. Film scanners nowadays are much better, and yield much higher resolution, better contrast and colour reproduction. And, the fact that we PAL users most probably will get an upscaled NTSC master makes it an absolute no-nuyer for me. A big shame on the leading innovators of home video technology.

- Post
- #213355
- Topic
- The Official Lucasfilm Response
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/213355/action/topic#213355
- Time
Originally posted by: Shimraa
to vigo:
if you didnt see in her response she just told you that those will not work cause they are too damaged.[/quote]
Yes, the NEGATIVES are too damaged. However, there are lots of high quality 35mm and 70mm copies around (even serperation masters), from which could be made an excellent transfer, which easily exceeds an old VIDEO source.
as for you saying you saw something in empire of dreams, is it not possible that they just redid that one shot for the documentary. i am sure that they didnt have to redo a whole movie or one bloody shot.
Please, don´t just babble around. Inform yourself. There are several shots in the documentary which are clearly from the OOT, and ANAMORPHICALLY:
- the original titles including the pre-EPIV textcrawl
- the original death star explosion
- Han running after the guards, facing a massive backfire
- several effect shots during the death star fight which have been replaced with cgi in the SE
These shots were most probably taken from a good surviving 35mm copy of Star Wars.And even the shots which are the same as the SE are most probably taken from the same source, since they retain the original colours, which have been heavily altered for the 2004 release.
as for how many will sell, ok well this forum is world wide. we got like what 70 000 signatures. i rounded it to 50 000 and assumed that for every one person to sign the petition there were 5 others out there that wanted it and didnt sign. thats pretty resonable right.
as for the cost how much do you think it would be to digitally re-render and re-edit, and clean up 3 two and a half hour movies. thats millions of frames, with thousands of flaws on them to clean and sharpen.
to vigo:
if you didnt see in her response she just told you that those will not work cause they are too damaged.[/quote]
Yes, the NEGATIVES are too damaged. However, there are lots of high quality 35mm and 70mm copies around (even serperation masters), from which could be made an excellent transfer, which easily exceeds an old VIDEO source.
as for you saying you saw something in empire of dreams, is it not possible that they just redid that one shot for the documentary. i am sure that they didnt have to redo a whole movie or one bloody shot.
Please, don´t just babble around. Inform yourself. There are several shots in the documentary which are clearly from the OOT, and ANAMORPHICALLY:
- the original titles including the pre-EPIV textcrawl
- the original death star explosion
- Han running after the guards, facing a massive backfire
- several effect shots during the death star fight which have been replaced with cgi in the SE
These shots were most probably taken from a good surviving 35mm copy of Star Wars.And even the shots which are the same as the SE are most probably taken from the same source, since they retain the original colours, which have been heavily altered for the 2004 release.
as for how many will sell, ok well this forum is world wide. we got like what 70 000 signatures. i rounded it to 50 000 and assumed that for every one person to sign the petition there were 5 others out there that wanted it and didnt sign. thats pretty resonable right.
as for the cost how much do you think it would be to digitally re-render and re-edit, and clean up 3 two and a half hour movies. thats millions of frames, with thousands of flaws on them to clean and sharpen.
Again, you are getting it wrong. What you talk about is digitally correcting the original films. We just want a straight transfer from a good surviving 35mm print. This just involves loading the scanner with the film reels, scan them, do some basic colour correction and compress the material for DVD. THIS IS STANDARD PROCEDURE FOR EVERY MOVIE RELEASED ON DVD NOWADAYS.
- Post
- #212982
- Topic
- The Official Lucasfilm Response
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/212982/action/topic#212982
- Time
Originally posted by: iamstillhiro1112
I realize what it is but the original movie was not anamorphic.
I realize what it is but the original movie was not anamorphic.
You apparently have no clue what 2.35:1 really is. Go and play elsewhere. Or better: educate yourself. Using Google is a no-brainer nowadays.
- Post
- #212923
- Topic
- The Official Lucasfilm Response
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/212923/action/topic#212923
- Time
Originally posted by: Shimraa
its not narrow minded its practical. what is narrowminded is the fact you dont accept that as a reasonable excuse, cause it is. [/q
No it isn´t. The empire of dreams documentary (A BONUS FEATURE!) clearly shows scenes from the OOT in anamorphic quality.
you may not like it but the bottem line is that it is a reasonable excuse they dont want to spend the time and money to remake the prints for the few fans that want them, its a question of whether its worth there time.
They don´t have to remake prints, they just have to use the masters the evidently have in their vaults. It is already confirmed that quality 35mm Technicolor dye(!) prints have survived from the original trilogy.
spend millions to re do work they already have and sell maybe 250 000 of them.
1. they will sell much more than that. You are forgetting that people in europe here are also the customers.
2. you don´t have to spend millions to scan a decent film print. It´s a standard procedure nowadays. Films, which have sold much less than 250.000 have been given this treatment you think is so costly and special.
lets do some math, ok say you sell that many, and at 40 bucks a pop, thats 10 mill for each movie, 30 mill total for gross. now how much is the resoration going to cost them, i would say at the very least 5 - 10 million for each film cause there is alot of work to go from the original film to even the 93s. ok to be fair we will say 7.5 mill each, ok so thats 22.5 mill to make the things. now stores need to make money lets say and this si very generous that stores make 10 bucks on each dvd. ok so there we have what 250 000 times 10 times 3. thats 7.5 mil, add that to the 22.5 mill already to make the things, thats 30 mill right there. now what about the costs of advertising, and shipping and packaging and all of that. the bottem line is that they dont want to do it. and they have a legitmate reason. you may not like it, or think its fair, but look at it from there pov. i know they have made billions off you so what if they have a loss of a few mill on some dvd. well they care.
its not narrow minded its practical. what is narrowminded is the fact you dont accept that as a reasonable excuse, cause it is. [/q
No it isn´t. The empire of dreams documentary (A BONUS FEATURE!) clearly shows scenes from the OOT in anamorphic quality.
you may not like it but the bottem line is that it is a reasonable excuse they dont want to spend the time and money to remake the prints for the few fans that want them, its a question of whether its worth there time.
They don´t have to remake prints, they just have to use the masters the evidently have in their vaults. It is already confirmed that quality 35mm Technicolor dye(!) prints have survived from the original trilogy.
spend millions to re do work they already have and sell maybe 250 000 of them.
1. they will sell much more than that. You are forgetting that people in europe here are also the customers.

2. you don´t have to spend millions to scan a decent film print. It´s a standard procedure nowadays. Films, which have sold much less than 250.000 have been given this treatment you think is so costly and special.

lets do some math, ok say you sell that many, and at 40 bucks a pop, thats 10 mill for each movie, 30 mill total for gross. now how much is the resoration going to cost them, i would say at the very least 5 - 10 million for each film cause there is alot of work to go from the original film to even the 93s. ok to be fair we will say 7.5 mill each, ok so thats 22.5 mill to make the things. now stores need to make money lets say and this si very generous that stores make 10 bucks on each dvd. ok so there we have what 250 000 times 10 times 3. thats 7.5 mil, add that to the 22.5 mill already to make the things, thats 30 mill right there. now what about the costs of advertising, and shipping and packaging and all of that. the bottem line is that they dont want to do it. and they have a legitmate reason. you may not like it, or think its fair, but look at it from there pov. i know they have made billions off you so what if they have a loss of a few mill on some dvd. well they care.
Since you don´t know the figures, because you are no insider, and have never known how much a transfer costs, these figures you are trying to push here are worthless.
Films with much less sales figures and popularity, coming from much smaller DVD production companies, have been given a much better treatment. This already proves that you are horribly wrong here.
All they do now is trying to go the cheap way, to test our faith in this release.
- Post
- #212922
- Topic
- The Official Lucasfilm Response
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/212922/action/topic#212922
- Time
john.singh@lucasfilm.com
- Post
- #212921
- Topic
- The Official Lucasfilm Response
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/212921/action/topic#212921
- Time
Dear people at Lucasfilm,
first, I really much appreciate that you finally have taken the first step to communicate with your fan/customer base. This is a very good base now to establish a dialogue, from which both sides can benefit.
> The DVDs being released in September will contain two versions of Star
> Wars: Episodes IV, V and VI – the Special Editions (which represent
> George’s vision of the movies) and the first versions, which will be
> included as bonus material. We hoped that releasing those
> “original” movies on a bonus disc would be a way to have some
> additional fun with the debut of the movies as individual DVDs. We
> certainly did not want it to become a source of concern or frustration for
> any of our fans.
Lots of frustration could have been avoided, if you would have given more thought about the nature of this release, by asking yourself: what is the target group? You are defining the original versions as BONUS material, which is fine, since we all are supposed to like and love the Special Editions. However, by announcing the release of the original versions of these films, and clearly addressing US, in the first press releases ("numerous fans have demanded this...."), you are clearly making the supposed BONUS feature as the main feature of this set. Everyone already has either bought the 2004 SE DVD editions or the bare bones DVD´s of the SE in 2005. So this release is clearly about the original unaltered trilogy.
Did you come to notice that the original versions of the movie would be the first non-anamorphic BONUS feature you are packing with a DVD set? Even the few scenes of the original trilogy, which clearly prove the source material came from an unaltered print, which are shown in the "Empire of Dreams" documentary (e.g.: the origional pre EPIV tectcrawl with all original logos intact, the original Death Star Explosion, the original scene where Han runs after the storm trooper (...)) are, you may already guess it, SHOWN ANAMORPHICALLY!
> As you may know, an enormous amount of effort was put into digitally
> restoring the negatives for the Special Editions. In one scene alone,
> nearly 1 million pieces of dirt had to be removed, and the Special
> Editions
> were created through a frame-by-frame digital restoration. The negatives
> of the movies were permanently altered for the creation of the Special
> Editions, and existing prints of the first versions are in poor condition.
While I certainly would love to believe you, the already mentioned "Empire of Dreams" documentary proves you wrong. Here, numerous scenes from the original unaltered movies are shown there in very good quality, which proves that good film elements still exists. Perhaps let me point of a misundertsnading, which seems to have arisen from our protests:
We don´t want a FRAME by FRAME digital restauration. We just want an anamorphic transfer from a good film source. YOu can´t seriously tell us that a 13 year old video master are the best surviving elements of the trilogy. Occasional dirt and scratches, which are also on the VIDEO , master you are using, are absolutely no problem for us. What is a problem for us is that we know that better film elements for the original trilogy are available, from which could be made a really good anamorphic DVD transfer. There are much older and much less-important films than Star Wars which have gotten a quite decent transfer on DVD.
> So many fans have requested the original movies, we wanted to find a way
> to
> bring them to you. But since these movies do not represent George's
> artistic vision, we could not put the extraordinary time and resources
> into
> this project as we did with the Special Editions. The 1993 Laserdisc
> masters represented the best source for providing the original versions as
> DVD bonus material.
As I already pointed out, the "Empire of Dreams" documentary clearly proves you wrong. Shame on you if the best surviving elements from the original Star Wars trilogy would be an 13 year old D1 VIDEO TAPE, since it would clearly show the lack of care you have shown towards the most important cultural artifacts of our time. Luckily, we film fans know better.
Famous film restauration expert Robert A Harris already has offered you his service for you, and even he is absolutely sure that with some little additional time and effort, you could easily make them look much better than old VIDEOTAPE masters you are going to use for this release......
Although these are non-anamorphic versions, they do
> preserve the original widescreen composition of the movies.
We never have disputed this fact. Even the old VHS versions from 1995 retain their original aspect ratio, as do my 1995 Laserdiscs. Having them in widescreen is one more important reason to make them anamorphically, since the loss of resolution would be even more drastically evident on computer equipment and 16:9 screens. You know that the market share of 16:9 TV´s here in Europe is really high compares to the USA?
> We want you to be aware that we have no plans – now or in the future
> – to restore the earlier versions.
Then you sadly leave me, and numerous of fans, no other choice to boycott this release, as I already did with the 2004 Special Edition. Be prepared, once this release has come out, that lots of customers, which are still unaware of this whole mess you created, will turn to you and show their dissatisfaction about this release. It makes me sad that apparently, you do not much care about your fans, your reputation as a technical leader in home entertainment and most important, the movies we all love and which enabled you to be this big enterprise.
I urge you for the third time to strongly reconsider this decision.
> We hope you will understand our decision and, again, want to let you know
> how much we appreciate your interest and enthusiasm.
As much as you seem to appreciate our enthusiasm, we, the fans, would really like to see some enthusiasm form you. You can´t tell us that a decent release is impossible. You are Lucasfilm! YOu have 20th Century Fox as a capable distributor! You have every resource which enables you to make them look great. Every 2nd grade B-movie gets nowadays a decent release on DVD. It is really a shame that you still don´t see the importance that these cultural important movies repectfully get at least the same treatment.
Yours sincerely
still a disappointed fan