TheSessler

User Group: Members
Join date: 11-Aug-2004
Last activity: 23-Mar-2010
Posts: 5,239

Post History

Post: #123850
Topic: Bootleg DVD: Song of the South
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/123850/action/topic#123850
Time: 17-Jul-2005 9:46 PM

Of course, they'll have to cut out all of the un-pc parts of the movie. They said the running time of the new edit would be around 3 minutes.

Post: #123847
Topic: Will...er, I mean Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/123847/action/topic#123847
Time: 17-Jul-2005 9:43 PM

Tell me about it. The new illustrations are also "upbeat" and "fanciful" as well from their description.

I much prefer the slightly creepy and ominous drawings of the older editions.

Post: #123839
Topic: quizilla.com
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/123839/action/topic#123839
Time: 17-Jul-2005 9:22 PM

Your sig isn't showing up BTW, error in HTML i think.

Post: #123836
Topic: quizilla.com
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/123836/action/topic#123836
Time: 17-Jul-2005 9:17 PM

You just found Quizilla?

Post: #123825
Topic: Will...er, I mean Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/123825/action/topic#123825
Time: 17-Jul-2005 9:06 PM

The oompa-loompa "Black pygmies" was changed to be a little less racist(they are now a "fanciful white" or something). There are other changes in wording, but my biggest beef is with the illustrations being changed.

Post: #123744
Topic: BEAUTIFUL WOMEN NEW RULES IN FIRST POST (NSFW) UPDATED RULES
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/123744/action/topic#123744
Time: 17-Jul-2005 8:50 PM

Nonsense.

Post: #123802
Topic: Ain't it da truth!
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/123802/action/topic#123802
Time: 17-Jul-2005 8:15 PM

Either that, or there aren't any more people to find in Hollywood that are creative.

Post: #123798
Topic: Harry Potter *Spoilers* (Serious Discussions Only, No Flaming)
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/123798/action/topic#123798
Time: 17-Jul-2005 7:53 PM

Also remember that Tolkien's work was regarded as "long-winded" and "ridiculous fantasy" by most upstanding critics until the 70s. Hardly considered "classics" when they were printed compared to today.

Post: #123792
Topic: Harry Potter *Spoilers* (Serious Discussions Only, No Flaming)
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/123792/action/topic#123792
Time: 17-Jul-2005 7:24 PM

Also, you can hardly consider fans of the books to be controlled by the media.

The first time I read Harry Potter was in 2000. I had heard it mentioned by a few people, but not alot about it, and as I didn't watch the news, no media input. So you could say I had reasonably low expectations and I still came out of the experience loving the books. Only after I had read them did I realize how big a deal it was in society and with other children.

Same way with Star Wars in 1995. Never heard about it, my dad said "you might like these" and bought me the VHS set, and only after I had fallen in love with the material did I realize how big a deal it was.

Post: #123789
Topic: Will...er, I mean Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/123789/action/topic#123789
Time: 17-Jul-2005 7:17 PM

I'll see if I can track down one of the older copies of Charlie & the Chocolate Factory, the new version they have out is dreadful and I don't like the new "reimagined" illustrations.

Post: #123757
Topic: Harry Potter *Spoilers* (Serious Discussions Only, No Flaming)
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/123757/action/topic#123757
Time: 17-Jul-2005 5:34 PM

Listen, little boy, I don't want another thread to go off topic because of your incessant and rampant acts of ignorance and stupidity.

You're looking to pick a fight, or whatever you want to call what you are trying to do, in every thread by saying all kinds of stupid shit and its really getting old.

And those that are playing along and acting stupid themselves are just as guilty if not guiltier.