logo Sign In

Skyranger

User Group
Members
Join date
4-May-2006
Last activity
21-Feb-2008
Posts
71

Post History

Post
#211284
Topic
Describe your history with Star Wars
Time
Summer 1977: A neighbor invited me to see "Star Wars" which was all the talk. I was 9 years old, and had seen very few movies prior to this. We went to the Dickinson Glenwood theater in Overland Park, KS, a grand theater of the 60s with seating for 816. As the Fox Fanfare began, 40 ft tall curtains slowly retracted to reveal a 70 ft wide x 35 ft tall curved screen. I was so enthralled with the movie that for quite some period I was completely unaware of my environment, except for the movie itself, which was something I had never experienced before. Although I believed it to be a 70mm Six-Track presentation, and the Glenwood was equipped for 70mm presentations, current evidence suggests that the Glenwood never had a 70mm print of "Star Wars" so evidently what I saw was a 35mm Dolby Stereo print. Regardless, seeing "Star Wars" began my love for movies, for science-fiction, and my love of orchestral movie soundtracks. "Star Wars" was the first of many movie sountracks which I purchased. Over the next year, I spent many days standing in lines that completely circled the outside of the theater, often closing in on the ticket counter as it was announced that the theater was sold out. As I recall I saw "Star Wars" 7 times at the Glenwood during the first run. I saw it once or twice in smaller theaters after the Glenwood's run ended.

Summer 1980: Saw "The Empire Strikes Back" twice at the Midland theater in Kansas City, MO, in 70mm Six-Track. I was dissapointed it didn't show at the Glenwood, but the Midland had an exclusive run. (Both theaters were in the greater Kansas City area.)

Summer 1983: I received a ticket as a gift to see "Return of the Jedi" at the Dickinson Glenwood, on May 24, 1983. This was a benefit premier sponsored by the Variety Club of Kansas City, the night before the official release. It was the first showing of a brand new 70mm Six-Track print in the best theater in Kansas City. Extra ushers were on duty, all wearing white gloves, and giving extra service such as opening doors for the patrons that evening. I still have my ticket from this one, Number 700. The 70mm print was later stolen from the Glenwood, which made big news in Kansas City. Patrons for the next couple of weeks had to watch a 35mm print.

Sorry George, but I did fall in love with this inferior, substandard, incomplete, rough-cut, garbage that you forced on the public a couple of decades back.
Post
#211264
Topic
Torn.... To buy, or not to buy.
Time
I certainly don't need an additional copy of the 2004 SE DVDs. Now it certainly appears that the "bonus material" original theatrical releases will be made from 1993 LD video masters which are extremely low quality by today's standards, not a high quality transfer from original film elements.

So, do we buy this crap to convince the powers that be that we really want the original theatrical releases with the hopes that perhaps they will eventually produce a better quality transfer if there is enough interest, or do we hold out for a better transfer that certainly Lucas will claim there is no demand for, because noone bought the ones he's releasing now.

Catch 22.
Post
#210425
Topic
Why the first two are better
Time
Originally posted by: jack Spencer Jr
I tell you what, man. The prequels have been bugging me lately. I think the real problem with them is how poorly they fit with the original trilogy. There is not clear, recurring villian. Part of Star Wars's appeal was how Vader was always giving the heroes a hard time. The prequel's quasi-political web type thing was not a good substitute.

Worse, I think the prequels also weaken the narrative of the entire series. This is a sticking point for most original trilogy fans who dislike the prequels. It would have been on thing, but since these are numbered episodes, it's difficult to ignore the prequels. But they don't work very well when watched in numerical order. So we original trilogy fans are stuck with episodes 4, 5, and 6 with no hope for a 1, 2, 3 to go with them. It is a series that will never be complete. At least as far as the numbering goes.

That said, the material that appears in the prequels works best as it appeared in the original trilogy. That is, as backstory. As stuff that happened before the movies that we learn about as we watch the movies. That said, there was plenty of room to make a good movie here if lucas had done it right, but I don't think his writing skills were up to the challenge. One thing he needed to do was keep the secrets revealed in the original series a frickin' secret. I mean, finding out that Vader was Luke's father at the end of ESB is kind of lame if we'd already watched his parents fall in love and his dad go evil and become Vader and stuff in the first three movies. It seemed like Lucas was way too interested in showing us stuff to realise that sometimes things should be hidden. Like in the Ocean's Eleven remake. They had a plan and throughout the movie they were doing stuff for the plan, but the audience didn't know how it all fit together until the end of the movie after they had pulled it off. Vader's identity should have been handled like that.

The sad thing is if Lucas had just gone back to his original inspiration, the serials, he would have seen this. A villian (or hero) with a secret identity was standard fare in the serials. Take Adventures of Captain Marvel for example. This one had a group of scientists who had uncovered a powerful McGuffin in an ancient tomb. It turns out that one of them wants the McGuffin for himself, but which one? As a villian, he dons a robe and mask and his voice is dubbed over. Why? I don't know as the villian always sent henchmen to do his dirty work. In any case, the plot becomes a ten little indians as the scientist are one-by-one killed by the villian ("Whelp, I guess this one ain't the bad guy 'cause he's DEAD!") until only two are left. These two, who are roughly similar in appearance, go back to the tomb and with both their faces in shadows, one reveals to be the villian and kills the other. They tended to cheat a lot in the serials, but i think this could have been a useful device in the prequels.

Dig this: set up some guy is bumping off Jedi Knights. Maybe they know the guy's name, maybe not. Obi Wan has two pupils. Anakin Skywalker and... some other guy. We'll call him Qui-Gon Jin Qui-Gon is further along in his training and is chaffing to continue to be under his master's tutelage. Anyway, they attempt to find this jedi-killing guy, right and they go down to a planet with no/poisonous atmosphere and put on breather masks like shown here: here. This will hide their faces so we won't know what happened when one kills the other. Obi-Wan than comes upon the scene but only finds some clothing and lightsabres. Anakins lightsabre. So he thinks the bad guy killed them both until he confronts Vader on the rim of a volcano crater. Vader still keeps his face hidden but does mention to Obi-Wan that he was a former apprentice. We see the realization slowly dawn in Obi Wan's eyes and he whispers "You..."

Now, the point here is that who Vader is remains a secret to those who've never seen the original trilogy. (Don't laugh. More are born every day) And at this point we are sort of led to believe that Vader is Qui-Gon, particularly when Skywalker's son becomes center to the conflict.

This is just my own meager talent assessing and concocting solutions to the problem with writing the prequels to these movies, and how much better they could have been if lucas still had good writers taking his ideas and doing good things with them.


Excellent post. All of the mysteries that were revelealed during the course of the OT could have remained mysteries through the prequels. I've been giving this some thought and additionally, Padme could have been put into hiding by Obi-Wan. We would know only know that she was pregnant, but not that she was to have twins. Unbenownst to Anakin, Obi-Wan fakes her death to protect her and her unborn child as the Jedi are mysteriously being killed by a black cloaked figure known only as Darth Vader (perhaps it's known that he is a jedi, or maybe not). Anakin forsees Padme's death, not knowing that what he is forseeing is a deception designed to protect her. As he has relied on Obi-Wan to protect Padme, he blames Obi-Wan for her death. Anakin also does not know of her pregnancy. Also, Palpatine being a Sith Lord could have remained unclear at the end of Episode III. It appears in IV that Tarkin never knew of Palpatine being a Sith Lord by the comments he makes about the Jedi. I always believed this was because the Emperor kept his identity as a Sith Lord a guarded secret, using Vader to do his dirty work.

I just can't imagine watching the series in order from 1 to 6. The first three tell all, and leave no great revelations for the last 3.
Post
#207639
Topic
Star Wars in High Definition: OT clips from "Science of Star Wars" in HD
Time
True, there are two formats. The reason I mentioned Blu-ray, and did not mention HD-DVD is because 20th Century Fox has specifically announced their support for the Blu-ray format, and is NOT supporting the HD-DVD format.

Anyway, my reason for posting was not to start a format debate, but simply to discuss how good Star Wars looks in high definition, even though all I saw were small clips of it.
Post
#207604
Topic
Star Wars in High Definition: OT clips from "Science of Star Wars" in HD
Time

Did anyone happen to see the “Science of Star Wars” on Discovery HD Theater? The clips from the original trilogy were all in HD, and they looked great. I can only hope that eventually we’ll get the original (yes the real original) trilogy on Blu-ray, and it will look that good.

Post
#207598
Topic
The Official 2006 Discs Will Be No Better Than What We Have!
Time
I've seen several posts hoping for "Dolby Digital 5.1" for the 70mm 6-track sound.

The original release of "Star Wars" in 1977 used 6 magnetic tracks on the 70mm prints. Those six tracks were left, center, right, surround, and two low frequency effect channels (below 200hz). Since our home theater systems are designed for only one low frequecy effects channel, Dolby Digital 4.1 is the best solution. The two low frequency channels would need to be combined to the .1, and the LCRS channels would remain original. Going to 5.1 would either involve duplicating the mono surround to both left and right surround channels, which is simply redundant data (which might require additional compression, lowering the quality on the DVD), or having a sound engineer create a new mix for the surround channels, which would not be the way it was presented originally.

Dolby 70mm 6-track with stereo surrounds was first used on "Apocalypse Now," released in 1979. I'm not sure if either "The Empire Strikes Back" or "Return of the Jedi" used the stereo surround setup. If they did, then a Dolby Digital 5.1 track would be appropriate for them.

"Tora, Tora, Tora" was released on DVD in Dolby Digital 4.1.
Post
#206800
Topic
The Official 2006 Discs Will Be No Better Than What We Have!
Time
I agree Zombie. Additionally, I just can't see Lucas including the original Star Wars title crawl (without Episode IV) in a video transfer at that time. Why would he?

I also don't understand why so many seemed so convinced that a DVD from an LD master will look so superior to a laserdisc. I have a few early DVDs that were made from masters made for laserdisc, and they just don't look signifigantly different than the laserdisc of the same movie. They look horrible compared to properly mastered DVDs.
Post
#206796
Topic
Soundtrack for Star Wars OOT DVD?
Time
Ok, as far as "Star Wars", Ben Burtt confirmed there were 3 different versions of the soundtrack for the original release. "One was a Dolby Stereo, for the 40 US theatres equipped for it at that time, one was a six-track 70mm version, and another was a conventional mono. Because you had to perform the mix over again for each one, you would do things differently, just by chance, and also by design." Even though the six track magnetic, and the 2 channel matrix for the Dolby System may have been created from the same base mix, that does not necessarily mean that they were identical.

So the appropriate way of recreating this would be to have 3 soundtrack choices on the DVD. One would be a Dolby Digital 4.1 soundtrack which would recreate the six track magnetic (the six track was 4 main channels, and 2 low frequency channels). The second soundtrack would be the Dolby Digital 2.0 Surround, to recreate the Dolby System optical tracks on 35mm stereo. The third soundtrack would the Dolby Digital 1.0, to recreate the sound from the monaural 35mm prints. DVD is well capable of having all these included.

My understanding is that there were also differences between the original release 70mm and 35mm versions of "The Empire Strikes Back," and not only in the soundtrack. I don't believe there were any of these variations in "Return of the Jedi."
Post
#206619
Topic
The Official 2006 Discs Will Be No Better Than What We Have!
Time
If these DVDs are to be from a 1993 video master, I can't imagine they'll look any different than Laserdisc. However, I have two reasons to believe that Jim Ward's references to 1993 are not to a video master. I believe it's very unlikely that the original Star Wars opening crawl without "Episode IV A New Hope" was transferred to video in 1993. I also believe that it's very unlikely that any video masters made in 1993 would have been recorded in anamorphic widescreen.
Post
#206114
Topic
ORIGINAL STAR WARS TRILOGY OUT 09/2006 BY LUCASFILM
Time
Originally posted by: ocpmovie
Welllll, Star Wars wasn't out for rental back then.


That may be correct. I didn't say it was out for rental. I said it was for SALE. I don't remember for sure when they started renting video tapes, but I don't think it was until a few years later. I worked in a store that rented video tapes in 1984, so it couldn't have been too many years later.

I specifically remember the videodiscs were released in 1982, five years after the theatrical release, and the best I remember the VHS tapes were released for sale shortly before that, probably about 2 years earlier.

However I believe I am mistaken about the "Episode IV" tag. I reviewed the source where I thought I had seen it mentioned, and found that it said the VHS version missing the "Episode IV" tag was a bootleg, not a commercially available copy. So evidently that first VHS release was in 1980 or 1981, after George added the tag. My apologies.
Post
#206095
Topic
ORIGINAL STAR WARS TRILOGY OUT 09/2006 BY LUCASFILM
Time
Originally posted by: see you auntie
Just how faithful to the original theatrical prints do you guys want to see these releases?


I want to relive the experience of seeing it in summer of 1977 in the Glenwood Theater in Overland Park, KS. The Glenwood was a grand 70mm movie house (816 seat capacity) which was sadly torn down in 2000.

Star Wars was the first movie in which I became completely involved as I watched, the first I went to see twice, and the first I bought the musical soundtrack for.

So the answer is anything to make it look and sound EXACTLY like they did when they were originally released, while being as pristine as possible.
Post
#206093
Topic
ORIGINAL STAR WARS TRILOGY OUT 09/2006 BY LUCASFILM
Time
Originally posted by: ReverendBeastly
I, for one, think this is going to be something special. This is the first time ever that Star Wars has been officially released without the "Episode IV" tag.


I don't believe thats true. To the best of my knowledge, the original release of Star Wars on VHS video tape back around 1979 or 1980 did not have the "Episode IV" tag. I do remember that these VHS tapes sold for $120. I waited to buy it on CED Videodisc, which came out in 1982. I believe it cost $34.95, or $39.95 which was far cheaper than the VHS tape, but by that time the "Episode IV, A New Hope" title had been added, and the scroll altered to accomodate it.
Post
#206021
Topic
ORIGINAL STAR WARS TRILOGY OUT 09/2006 BY LUCASFILM
Time
My wish list to make it perfect.

All original release soundtrack versions, as appropriate for each movie.
Dolby 6 Track (as Dolby Digital 4.1, or 5.1 as appropriate),
Dolby Stereo (as Dolby 2.0 surround)---This is being included,
Mono (as Dolby Digital 1.0)
(These were all different in some details, such as the voice for Aunt Beru being supplied by a different actress. I think these may have had differences in The Empire Strikes Back as well.)

Release on Blu-ray.