logo Sign In

Shimraa

User Group
Members
Join date
24-Jul-2003
Last activity
1-Aug-2007
Posts
6,563

Post History

Post
#28915
Topic
Top Ten of 2003.
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/28915/action/topic#28915
Time
Quote
Originally posted by: Rebel Scumb
you guys seriously thought PotC was the best film of the year??????? Your entitled to your opinions, and that movie was okay, but I'm really shocked to see it on a top ten list, much less as number 1

Quote
Terminator 3 Rise of the Machines = Not as good as the original but a few steps better then Terminator 2


glad someone agrees



i agree PotC was okay it was be no means great.
Post
#28912
Topic
Lord of the Rings...what's the deal?
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/28912/action/topic#28912
Time
Just a statei saw in the movie magazine at silver city. 95% (95 or 98 cant remeber) of the people that worked on Lotr were from new zealand. there where around 1200 ppl who worked on lotr

another point that you guys brought about was about the appeal the movie had.part was due to the fact that every one has heard of how good the books were, there fore every one went to see the first one however, i think the movies really took off because the emotion that was felt in the movies where so great. ( i am not the kind of person that cries when watching movies, and there were parts in the trilogy where i could bearly breath because the lump in my throut was so big. this emotion captured the viewers when they went to see the fellowship.) this emotion hooked the people. so to sum up ppl went to the movie cus they had heard of lotr and were then hooked by the emotion that the movies had.

rebel the battle of helms deep was the best of the trilogy. Question: Wasn't the battle on pelenoir feild suposed to be in what seem like an eternal night? If it had been at night it would have been just as good as the battle of pelenoir feilds.

i think that is all for now.
Post
#28618
Topic
THE LORD OF THE RINGS: Return of the King (spoilers)
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/28618/action/topic#28618
Time
Quote
Originally posted by: Rebel Scumb
Quote
Originally posted by: Shimraa
i am sorry to say that my opinion of the TTT EE was exactly opposite yours for one think i loved the deathenor scene, you may nto know this but the reason he became corrupted was because he had a palentir, so he would have known the power of the ring. i also felt that the movie flowed alot better with all of the extra footage. and i a still scratching my head on the reason they did put the trees into the TE, it was like 30 extra fottage and it showed how sarumans army was really distroyed.( i am takng about the forest that creeps up on the battle at helms deep. that forest is full of bad trees, its these tree which the ents heard, and they are the ones that kill the orcs.)



I've read the book and I know all about that stuff. As much as I was looking forwrd to the tree scene, it did kind of disrupt the ending and hte pacing, I can see why it was cut.


They had it in the extended edition, and it worked just fine. all i am talking about is just the one 2 sec part where you see the orc run into the woods and then see the woods shake.
Post
#28456
Topic
THE LORD OF THE RINGS: Return of the King (spoilers)
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/28456/action/topic#28456
Time
i am sorry to say that my opinion of the TTT EE was exactly opposite yours for one think i loved the deathenor scene, you may nto know this but the reason he became corrupted was because he had a palentir, so he would have known the power of the ring. i also felt that the movie flowed alot better with all of the extra footage. and i a still scratching my head on the reason they did put the trees into the TE, it was like 30 extra fottage and it showed how sarumans army was really distroyed.( i am takng about the forest that creeps up on the battle at helms deep. that forest is full of bad trees, its these tree which the ents heard, and they are the ones that kill the orcs.)