Tyrphanax said:
CP3S said:
captainsolo said:
xhonzi said:
theprequelsrule said:
RedFive said:
Tyrphanax said: ....
Also, J.R.R. Tolkien is an awful writer.
First of all, I like that no one even felt the need to refute this unbelievable statement. However, when I saw this I had to come here and present it as evidence to the contrary:

Meh. Robert E. Howard is far superior to Tolkien as a story teller.
I too find Tolkien to be a frustrating writer. I want to read his stories, but I struggle with his words.
Me in 6th grade: Oh, I've got to read a book on this list, why not try The Hobbit? 2 pages in: Okay, I'm good.
Whoa! I somehow missed that comment. I will refute it to hell and back, and then all over again. Unbelievable is right! Tolkien is brilliant! I love the way he writes, as have countless others, as evident by the popularity of the books since they were first published.
But it seems most people queef eloquent on the greatness of Stephen King's writing, and yet I've never managed to make it more than a few chapters into one of his books before wanted to beat my own head in with a blunt object. While unquestionably bad writing exists, once you get into the realm of decent to fantastic writing, it becomes very much subject to the reader's tastes.
Tolkien just rambles on and on a lot of the time about really boring and unnecessary detail and extrapolation. Not to mention the forty-five million three-page tuneless songs in every book. Ugh. And the grammar is lacking, as is the sentence structure. I just find myself feeling like I'm slogging through a mire of jumbled words and it hurts my brain.
The posted passage is good, but for every good passage he writes, there are ten passages that make me want to fall asleep and never wake up.
I barely finished FOTR over the span of months. I didn't get that far into TTT over the span of months. It was like pulling teeth. Any book that I'm finding excuses not to pick up again are bad in my... er... book.
I think I can see where a lot of this is coming from. Yes, he uses a lot of big words and antiquated language - he was a philologist after all. He helped write the goddam dictionary for christ's sake! But I studied English in college, and I've always been a huge nerd when it comes to history and fantasy, so to me getting through those difficult passages and words is a challenge that I enjoy. For example, most people think, "ugh, another name I have to remember!", while I can't wait to look through the genealogy tables and tale of years to figure out what's-what.
And one of the things certain people love about Tolkien is his descriptiveness. One man's "boring and unnecessary detail and extrapolation" is another man's bread and butter, so to speak. However, saying that he has "bad grammar" and sentence structure is just bone-headed. Maybe it's not for you, but bad?
RedFive said:
The man helped write the goddam dictionary for christ's sake!!