logo Sign In

Moth3r

User Group
Members
Join date
26-Oct-2004
Last activity
16-Jul-2017
Posts
4,892

Post History

Post
#311075
Topic
Help Wanted: PAL/NTSC hybrid transfer query
Time
I would strongly advise you not to crop - keep the 'scope frame.
Originally posted by: Anti-Matter
... the PAL DVD is stored natively as 720x576 pixels. During playback, this information is stretched horizontally to 1024x576 resolution... This is only true in very specific cases - when you're viewing the DVD on a PC, using a media player in non-full-screen mode, using a basic AR calc instead of correcting for ITU-R, your desktop is set to a resolution with square pixels...
It's better to just say "the image is scaled to suit your display".
There is considerably more vertical detail in the PAL version...
Screenshots - or it didn't happen! However, it has been shown elsewhere that the NTSC DVDs suffer from more prominent edge-enhancement artifacts, and this is another reason to favor the PAL footage in your Star Wars project.
This is the case with TPM (see this R1 vs R2 comparison) but I thought AoTC and RoTS were much improved.
Post
#310967
Topic
GOUT image stabilization - Released
Time
Originally posted by: g-force
Moth3r,

I'm curious to hear your comments on the screencaps and comparisons to yours.

-G
The lower black level is good, but I think you've taken the contrast down too far with it. I prefer the corridor walls to look white rather than light grey.

The colour saturation boost is good, but I think the face of the rebel trooper looks too pink. As you know, I tweaked the hue slightly towards the yellow in my version.

I think your settings for fft3dfilter are too strong; the reduced grain makes the picture look a little too soft.

Bear in mind this is all subjective, comments are based on my personal opinion (and might be affected by differences in display calibration and so on...)
Post
#310354
Topic
How much longer will the format war last?
Time
Anyone who thinks size is all that matters should head over to the Doom9 forums and ask the experts why more space doesn't necessarily translate into better quality. You'll be told how quality depends on a lot more than raw bitrate, and how codecs max out above a certain level.

Being able to get content from other countries can come in quite handy, and unlike the situation we had in the early days of DVD, region-free Blu-ray standalone players are limited in number and unreasonably expensive.

I care about what I can do with movies I pay good money for (think fan edits, format shifting, creating back ups, etc.) so I will be staying away from Blu-ray.
Post
#310334
Topic
.: The XØ Project - Laserdisc on Steroids :. (SEE FIRST POST FOR UPDATES) (* unfinished project *)
Time
<3 X0 lolcats!

I expect it will be a long time before we see the OOT in HD, if indeed ever (the closest we'll get will be a fan recreation such as PaulisDead2221's Vintage Edit). And anyone who's examined the GOUT in detail, or tried to improve it, will know that some of the flaws of that DVD are irrepairable.

That is why we need a preservation that combines the best available laserdisc sources. Maybe I'll start Moth3r V2.0 this year.
Post
#310081
Topic
GOUT image stabilization - Released
Time
I've deleted the GOUT DVD files off my hard drive, and I'm too lazy to rip the DVD again to try out the scripts. Anyone want to post some screenshots? (Ideally the same frames as shown HERE so I can compare with my disc.)

I know still shots won't demonstrate the stabilization part of the script, but I'm interested to see if FFT3DFilter softens the image at all and how the levels/saturation tweaks compare.

One day I'll compare the PAL laserdiscs again. I'm sure that the weave was not as pronounced as the DC source.
Post
#310071
Topic
Burning Dual-Layer Discs For The First Time
Time
Yes, ImgBurn is the only program you need to burn dual-layer DVDs.

Initially I had about a 50% success rate, using Aone DVD+R 8X Dual Layer (RICOHJPND01). I'm too cheap to buy Verbatim, and since Verbs are more than twice the price of these discs even with 50% failed burns it works out cheaper in the long run. After flashing the firmware of the burner the success rate was 100%.

One thing to watch out for though; I've seen reports that if ImgBurn notices an error with the VTS sectors in your IFO files, it will fix them when it builds the image - without telling you. This means that the IFO/BUP files aon your disc will be slightly different to your original. While you could argue that fixing errors is good, it's bad if, for example, you want to re-seed a torrent and have deleted the original files. The files stored on the disc will have slightly different checksums so your torrent won't be 100%, and you won't be able to be a seed.

Of course if the person who originally authored the DVD did it correctly in the first place, this problem would not occur.
Post
#309910
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time
Originally posted by: ron2112
Originally posted by: Sevb32
[removed]@hotmail.com not the correct address?


You might want to edit that post and obfuscate Ady's address (like he did in his own post). Don't want the spambots coming after the poor guy.

Ron Moses
It wasn't adywan's address, it was Abigail Dywan's. And her name sounds like she's a gal not a guy...
Post
#309761
Topic
REALLY bad overscan, or a method error?
Time
I found my CRT had atrocious overscan with the factory default settings.

I recommend you get the Digital Video Essentials DVD and use one of the geometry/overscan patterns you can find on there. You will also need to search the web to find out how to get into the factory menu of your TV.

Make a note of the defaults first, in case you screw the adjustments up!

You should push the picture as far as it will go without distorting the geometry at the edges. In most cases you should be able to limit overscan to less than 2.5%.