logo Sign In

Monolithium

User Group
Members
Join date
25-Dec-2010
Last activity
30-Oct-2012
Posts
376

Post History

Post
#543399
Topic
'Chemical castration' for pedophiles
Time

Bingowings said:

If death is the penalty for being caught doesn't that make murder the better option for a rapist or a child molester?

There are people who would be prone to murder their victims anyway but if the crime was opportunistic rather than part of sadistic lifestyle and death is the punishment wouldn't such a criminal want as few witnesses as possible?

On every level the Death Penalty just doesn't make sense to me, containment (possibly permanent) makes much more sense.

So if the death penalty was removed, these people wouldn't kill their victims?

Post
#543352
Topic
'Chemical castration' for pedophiles
Time

http://www.skcentral.com/articles.php?article_id=6

This is a transcript of an audio recording that serial killers Larry Bittaker & Roy Norris made of one of their victims.

Raped her.  Murdered her.  Dumped her.

These guys deserve an equal punishment for what they did.  Since it would be "wrong" to do to them what they did to her, the death penalty will have to do.

Post
#542905
Topic
Star Wars coming to Blu Ray (UPDATE: August 30 2011, No! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!)
Time

CO said:

Gaffer Tape said:

  The lengths Lucas apologists will go to.  And of course the quotes I provided from Lucas's speech to Congress were dismissed as not applying to him or his films.  Because, you know... reasons.  I just find it so amusing how threatened apologists are just because we don't share their opinion, and how they feel compelled to try to shut anyone down who doesn't toe the line.  It's just so... creepy.

 The sad thing is that a SW argument is the same as arguing with someone about politics, world affairs, sports, etc.  People don't want to hear other opinions, and it is next to impossible to convice someone of your views.

I used to argue politics years ago, and then realized that I was wasting my time.   The same goes with a SW argument, can anyone find someone on the internet say, "You know what, thats a good point, I may reconsider my stance on this."  No, every argument ends up in vulgar insults, and then some one liner like, "Get over yourself, George Lucas didn't rape your childhood!"

Its not even worth it to waste your time trying to give your side of the argument about the OOT.  If they don't want to listen, they are never going to agree with you.  Just look at the republicans and democrats in Washington, the argument is finished before the first debate even starts!

I saw a quote once and it is kind of mean, but pretty true about arguing on the internet, "Arguing on the internet is like running in the special olympics.  Even if you win, you're still a retard."

Mean spirited, but pretty true!

I'm not looking to win.  I just want someone on the other side to acknowledge that my opinion is just as valid as theirs.