logo Sign In

LeeThorogood

User Group
Members
Join date
24-May-2010
Last activity
24-Dec-2017
Posts
404

Post History

Post
#478700
Topic
.: LeeThorogood's PAL LaserDisc Preservation Project :. - '97 SE Finished '95 THX Finished - '97 SE Uploaded '95 THX Uploaded to the newsgroup
Time

Adywan thanks for posting the comment about the audio sync its nice to know I did something right. ;) What did you think to the video quality considering the source was LaserDisc? Furthermore how does everyone else feel about authoring these as DL DVDs being too much?

I would be more then happy to have another bash at syncing the 5.1 audio and release an audio fix like what Adywan did for his theatrical TPM DVD if someone could point me in the direction of a good guide on how to sync the 5.1 audio properly. :)

Post
#478695
Topic
.: LeeThorogood's PAL LaserDisc Preservation Project :. - '97 SE Finished '95 THX Finished - '97 SE Uploaded '95 THX Uploaded to the newsgroup
Time

Adywan thanks for checking out my release. :) dark_jedi is correct I used DarthEditous' AC3 rips from the NTSC LaserDiscs that Jetrell Fo supplied me with.

I'm sorry to hear that there are problems with the audio! To be honest audio is not really my thing I am much more of a video guy, it also doesn't help that I don't have a 5.1 set-up. I hope to get some Dolby certified 5.1 headphones in the future but for now its just not in the budget. :(

If I remember correctly the method I used to get these to sync, which is not perfect, well in fact its probably terrible and is not the one I would use knowing what I do now, was:

1. Open each AC3 file in Apple Compressor and export as a 5.1 LPCM audio only quicktime .mov using Compressor's built in retime function to go from 23.976 to 25fps duration, from what I read online Compressor's retime function is suppose to correct/compensate for the pitch shift.

2. In Final Cut Pro I had already edited together my LaserDisc captures (video & audio) so I knew the stereo (Dolby Surround) audio was in sync to the video.

3. To get the audio to sync I added 6 extra audio tracks to the timeline of each film, and imported the 5.1 LPCM .mov files I had created earlier.

4. As dark_jedi mentioned they didn't sync properly so I turned on the audio waveforms so I could see what I was doing and then using the centre channel of the 5.1 and the stereo from the LaserDiscs I lined up the start of the audio and then moved along to the end and adjusted the playback speed of the 5.1 audio in Final Cut Pro as necessary to get the ends to line up, I then scrubbed through checking the waveforms to make sure they didn't go wildly out of sync between start and finish.

5. Once I had done one audio segment I just repeated the process for the others as there was 3 for each film. With the 5.1 audio sync'd I removed the LD stereo audio from the timeline leaving just the 6 5.1 tracks in the order L,R,C,LFE,Ls,Rs

6. With the audio sync'd I sent the timelines to Compressor and used that to export the M2V and Dolby 5.1 AC3 files to author the DVDs.

The reason I never did an NTSC version of the '97SE LaserDiscs was because no matter what I did when I exported the M2V and AC3 files for NTSC the audio and video would not match up. :(

Post
#478639
Topic
.: LeeThorogood's Original Trilogy Replica Technicolor Project :. (Released)
Time


Chewtobacca said:

LeeThorogood said: 
I agree the ideal way to go would be colour correcting scene by scene, I've said this all along but at the same time I have my reasons for not doing it this way. :)

Lee, could you use a best fit setting for the film and tweak just the scenes where this setting results in undesired side effects e.g. the green on Artoo's stripes?  This way you could avoid having to correct the whole film scene-by-scene but still solve problems a best fit setting might cause.  Just a thought!
The problem is where would you draw the line? How long would it be before correcting the unwanted side effects would lead to a scene by scene correction? I appreciate the suggestion, but in this case I'm going to pass on it. ;)

Post
#478613
Topic
.: LeeThorogood's Original Trilogy Replica Technicolor Project :. (Released)
Time

LexX said:

I think you can never get a satisfying result for the whole film with one settings. It needs color correction scene by scene.
I agree the ideal way to go would be colour correcting scene by scene, I've said this all along but at the same time I have my reasons for not doing it this way. :)

For those of you wondering, although I am trying to match the Technicolor photos fairly closely, I am not trying to perfectly match them for 2 key reasons:

1. The photos themselves are imperfect, the exposure varies from photo to photo, and there is a question over the effect the white balace of the camera has on the hue of the colours.

2. The Technicolor Imbibition process does not produce 1:1 copies, because of the variations in the dyes used in the film stock. Therefore no two Technicolor IB prints are perfectly identical even when they are brand new.

I would highly recommend anyone who hasn't already checked out Zombie84's terrific page on the Technicolor IB showing at the Senator Theatre does so as it is highly informative!

I rendered out the second VTS to lossless AVI overnight so thats two down five to go. :D

Post
#478395
Topic
.: LeeThorogood's Original Trilogy Replica Technicolor Project :. (Released)
Time

Thanks for all the feedback! :D

I do wish everyone would make up their minds you ask for more contrast and I give you more contrast and then you complain the hallways are too bright geeze! :P

Only kidding, I have fixed the overly bright hallways, and I have pulled back on the saturation ever so slightly. R2D2 having a greenish/yellowish glow around his blue stripes seems to be an unintended side effect of a correction I have in place for the Death Star walls. As this is an overall correction rather than a scene by scene correction there is not a lot I can do about it.

Post
#478185
Topic
.: LeeThorogood's Original Trilogy Replica Technicolor Project :. (Released)
Time

I think I have settled on using the following code to produce a frame size of 2048 x 1152.

########## anti-alias & upscale
NNEDI2(dh=true, field=0)
NNEDI2(dh=false,field=1)
NNEDI3(dh=true).TurnLeft
NNEDI3(dh=true)
NNEDI3(dh=true).TurnRight

########## resize to 16x9 AR, remove sides, add borders
Spline16Resize(2090,940).Crop(24,32,-18,-32,align=true).AddBorders(0,138,0,138)
This does mean producing a new lossless AVI so as everything will probably take at least twice as long as before it could be another couple of weeks before Star Wars is finished. :(

Post
#478151
Topic
.: LeeThorogood's Original Trilogy Replica Technicolor Project :. (Released)
Time


G-Forces Stabilisation Script said:
########## anti-alias
NNEDI2(dh=true, field=0)
NNEDI2(dh=false,field=1)
The "dh=true" parameter is telling NNEDI2 to double the height of field0, which results in an overall increase of 1.5x the original frame height. So in actual fact the image does not get up-scaled until this point. ;) Then Spline16 scales up the horizontal slightly IIRC and scales down the vertical.

Like I said before I found when playing around the other day that the above anti-aliasing section needs to come before any up-scaling commands otherwise it doesn't work properly.

Post
#478138
Topic
.: LeeThorogood's Original Trilogy Replica Technicolor Project :. (Released)
Time

Thanks for all the advice hairy_hen! :D I had always planned to optimise the way I did the up-scaling but for now just needed something quick that would allow me to run my colour tests. :)

dark_jedi I don't know how much you plan to mess with G-Forces script but if its any help I found the anti-aliasing section of the script isn't as effective if done after up-scaling but then as this section of the script increases the vertical resolution by 1.5 I guess it would make sense to incorporate it into the up-scaling process.

Post
#478093
Topic
.: LeeThorogood's Original Trilogy Replica Technicolor Project :. (Released)
Time


dark_jedi said:
The resize, crop, addborders, is your final DVD resolution, are you sure you place that code after that line, this should be before your final sizing, not after, at least they way I am thinking, I thought you want to blow up the image, do all your shit to it, then bring it all back down, if that line is after, then you are doing all your shit to it, bringing to DVD resolution, then blowing it up.
Sorry I am not very good at explaining myself through the keyboard. :( Let me have another bash at explaining.

I know it was suggested that the clean-up G-Forces script performs could be improved by upscaling the video first then applying the clean-up. However I am not skilled or brave enough to start messing with G-Forces work any more then I already have. To be honest I am happy with the results it produces as is when finishing out to 576p (I know you would be finishing out to 480p ;)) That said I have noticed that applying my colour correction which is done to the lossless AVI AviSynth produces in third party software (Apple Color) at 576p creates some funky colour artefacts in places.

Now the colour artefacts problem may just be the GOUT being the turd that it is (Thanks George!) but I wanted to see if I could improve the results of the colour correction by adding the upscale commands which will make the video double the required size. Then I can import this double sized G-Force enhanced lossless AVI into my colour software, apply the colour correction, export this to my NLE perform any edits etc that are necessary and then scale down to 576p for export to DVD.

I suppose in a nutshell I am not looking to improve what G-Forces script already does but rather improve the end results of my colour correction. :)

Post
#478039
Topic
.: LeeThorogood's Original Trilogy Replica Technicolor Project :. (Released)
Time

dark_jedi said:



LeeThorogood said:


it was suggested in another <a href="http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/GOUT-V3-Star-Wars-Trilogy-Info/post/477883/#TopicPost477883" target="_blank" title="originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/GOUT-V3-Star-Wars-Trilogy-Info/post/477883/#TopicPost477883">thread</a> that the end result might look better if I upscale the GOUT to 2x Anamorphic PAL resolution first then apply the colour grading after which I can scale back down to Anamorphic PAL resolution.


Can you show a sample of where you placed and how you placed this in g-force's script, this double or triple upscaling before filtering?
My understanding of avisynth scripting is very limited and as my final output will be SD rather than HD I simply added the following code after the resize,crop,add borders line

########## upscaling
NNEDI3(dh=true).TurnLeft
NNEDI3(dh=true).TurnRight

For this project I am not using AviSynth to do the theatrical subtitles but if I was using AviSynth to do them then its my understanding I would need to put the above code after the subtitles section, effectively making this the last command in the script. I'm hoping that if I apply my colour grade to a larger frame size and then scale down that some of the colour artefacts I am seeing will become less apparent or disappear completely. Sorry I can't be more helpful. :(

Post
#478030
Topic
.: LeeThorogood's Original Trilogy Replica Technicolor Project :. (Released)
Time

It looks like Star Wars may take a little longer then I previously indicated. It's my fault I keep on playing and tweaking and I keep on finding ways to improve the results but of course every time I make a change it means re-rendering, re-encoding, re-authoring and re-watching the film which all takes time. ;)

I have just finished making a new round of tweaks to the colour grade which I think is about as good as its going to get. The contrast/saturation is much improved compared to the screenshots I posted. That said I am not done yet, it was suggested in another thread that the end result might look better if I upscale the GOUT to 2x Anamorphic PAL resolution first then apply the colour grading after which I can scale back down to Anamorphic PAL resolution.

I'll run some tests tomorrow and go from there. :)

Post
#477631
Topic
Star Wars OT &amp; 1997 Special Edition - Various Projects Info (Released)
Time

dark_jedi said:



LeeThorogood said:

Great work on the upscaling dark_jedi! I know you are only playing around/testing things at the moment but I am curious if you know roughly how long it would take to upscale the whole film using the latest method? One last question on the latest sample is that still just the raw GOUT upscaled or have you now moved onto upscaling the V3?


it would take about 6 hours for 720p and about 10 hours for 1080p, times 3 obviously for all movies give or take an hour or two.
WOW that's not bad at all! :)

Post
#477601
Topic
Star Wars OT &amp; 1997 Special Edition - Various Projects Info (Released)
Time

Great work on the upscaling dark_jedi! I know you are only playing around/testing things at the moment but I am curious if you know roughly how long it would take to upscale the whole film using the latest method? One last question on the latest sample is that still just the raw GOUT upscaled or have you now moved onto upscaling the V3?

Post
#477413
Topic
.: LeeThorogood's Original Trilogy Replica Technicolor Project :. (Released)
Time

So I was fiddling about while I was waiting for things to encode and what have you today and I thought I would share some of my findings. :)

First of all is saturation, now I know some here would have me boost this more then I already have, and believe me I would love to, however to keep everything broadcast legal as it were I can't not without crushing/clipping areas of high saturation i.e. the red light/LED behind Greedo in the Cantina. What I mean by crushing/clipping is that the red light would go from looking like a light bulb where you can see the glowing filament inside the main glass bulb to one big bright red mass with no detail to it.

Next is contrast, once again some here would have me boost this more then I already have, and once again I would love to, however the problem is that the GOUT has inconsistent blacks which can vary as much as 10 IRE between one scene and the next. An example of this would be if you were to adjust the black point on a waveform monitor in the scene where Vader and his pal walk down the Tantive hallway so that the bottom of the Luma wave is just touching the baseline (0 IRE for PAL) and then take the same setting and apply it to the "I find you're lack of faith disturbing" scene you would find the blacks in this second scene are being crushed with the bottom of the Luma wave at about -10 IRE. The white point on the other hand is fairly stable throughout but then this doesn't surprise me because the GOUT suffers from clipped whites. :(

Knowing this the way I see it there are two options, push things as far as you can until these secondary problems become apparent or push things to the desired levels and accept/put up with the secondary problems as a by product. Neither situation is ideal but thenI suppose you have to play the cards your dealt. ;)

Post
#477310
Topic
Save Star Wars Dot Com
Time

I don't know if they ever release these kinds of figures but it would be interesting to know how many 'casual' fans buy one of the blu-ray sets, watch them, discover how fucked up they are and return them. After all these sets aren't exactly cheap.

I would have to laugh at LFL so hard if on the first day of release they see massively impressive sales as predicted, and some news outlets get a comment from LFL about how great the set is selling and it just shows how people aren't bothered about the theatrical versions yada yada yada and then a few days later the sets start to get returned on mass because people realise just how full of shit LFL and this set really are!

As a fan of the Original and 1997 SE versions of the OT I have no interest in a blu-ray version of the 2004 release which I actively dislike. If Lucas wants me to splash out on a blu-ray set of Star Wars then he needs to do a Star Wars Theatrical Edition Blu-Ray set containing the '77 '80 & '83 theatrical releases and the 1997 theatrical releases. If I had these I would be a very happy camper! :)

Post
#476523
Topic
GOUT, Automated Theatrical Colouring, and a Reference Guide
Time

Erikstormtrooper said:


Mike Verta is very private about everything he does. I doubt his work will ever see the light of day. The projects here that tried to coordinate with him suddenly went silent. 

"The standard definition restoration of Star Wars was indeed completed, long ago. I just never got around to updating the site." Thanks! So you have possibly the holy grail of Star Wars preservations, but it slipped your mind to mention it? I don't know Mike personally, but this is pretty insensitive.

The fact that he has the DVD version completed, but is sitting on it, is more depressing than if he'd never done it in the first place.
This is exactly the feeling/sentiment I was trying to convey earlier although Erikstromtrooper did a better job of putting it into words then I did!