logo Sign In

LeeThorogood

User Group
Members
Join date
24-May-2010
Last activity
24-Dec-2017
Posts
404

Post History

Post
#493568
Topic
.: LeeThorogood's Original Trilogy Replica Technicolor Project :. (Released)
Time

STAR_WARS LogFile said:

[General]
Total Number of PGCs in Titles=2
Total Number of PGCs in Menus=27
Total Number of VobIDs in Titles=6
Total Number of VobIDs in Menus=22
Total Number of Cells in Titles=52
Total Number of Cells in Menus=22
Demuxing Mode=by PGC
Demuxing Domain=Titles
Total Number of Frames=217822
Selected PGC=1
Number of Cells in Selected PGC=51
Selected VOBID=None
Number of Cells in Selected VOB=None
[Demux]
Number of Video Packs=3125913
Number of Audio Packs=259584
Number of Subs Packs=3290
Number of Nav Packs=14197
Number of Pad Packs=0
Number of Unkn Packs=0
[Audio Streams]
Audio_1=0x80
Audio_2=0x81
Audio_3=0x82
Audio_4=None
Audio_5=None
Audio_6=None
Audio_7=None
Audio_8=None
[Audio Delays]
Audio_1=0
Audio_2=0
Audio_3=0
[Subs Streams]
Subs_01=0x20
Subs_02=0x21
Subs_03=0x22
Subs_04=0x23
Subs_05=None
Subs_06=None
Subs_07=None
Subs_08=None
Subs_09=None
Subs_10=None
Subs_11=None
Subs_12=None
Subs_13=None
Subs_14=None
Subs_15=None
Subs_16=None
Subs_17=None
Subs_18=None
Subs_19=None
Subs_20=None
Subs_21=None
Subs_22=None
Subs_23=None
Subs_24=None
Subs_25=None
Subs_26=None
Subs_27=None
Subs_28=None
Subs_29=None
Subs_30=None
Subs_31=None
Subs_32=None


STAR_WARS CellTimes.txt said:

635
3435
8791
13451
16040
20430
27680
34760
41756
45320
49305
51916
57955
62115
65745
69686
74350
75835
79111
84535
88290
90565
92925
93160
98025
102010
109141
114705
118466
125970
128976
134405
137870
142065
148385
152036
157255
164206
169355
171956
174665
177881
180066
183647
192046
202117
206566
207811
210976
217807
217822

Post
#493566
Topic
.: LeeThorogood's Original Trilogy Replica Technicolor Project :. (Released)
Time

Darth Mallwalker said:


Using the VOBs directly would give you PGC_2 first (15 frames) followed by PGC_1 (main feature.) So I would have thought the total frame count would be higher by fifteen. Yet you say it's the same when you use the VOB method? That's very weird indeed.
Thanks for the assistance Darth Malwalker! :D First of all my apologies I forgot to mention before that the frame counts were identical after I took the 15 frames of PGC_2 into account.

Darth Mallwalker said:


Not sure you've missed anything, but emphatically I say No it's not normal, even for NTSC.
I'm glad you're asking these questions, and not simply accepting it, because it shouldn't be that way.
Hope I can help to figure out the anomally. So far I'm stumped...

Can you try turning on PGCDemux Logfile, and also "Include end time" in CellTimes.txt, then post both files here or somewhere.
I will get these files for you and post back when I have them.

Darth Mallwalker said:

This statement befuddles me because I've never seen frame counts listed whenever I run PGCDemux (except in the Logfile, but you had that turned off.)
Where in PGCDemux are you seeing the frame count?
Can you make a snapshot of PGCDemux, where "174262" is displayed on-screen? That might help to give me a sense of context.

Finally if I can be so bold to list what I believe are the correct answers for STAR WARS:
PGC_1 contains 174261 frames.
Both AviSynth and VirtualDub call the first frame 0, so the last frame will be called 174260.
(Other programs might start with 1, as Chewtobacca already mentioned.)

Skipping PGCDemux, and DGIndexing the VOB files directly ought to yield 174276 frames. That's 15 from PGC_2 + PGC_1's 174261.
Again VirtualDub and AviSynth both count from zero, so
last frame of PGC_2 is called 14
first frame of PGC_1 is called 15
last frame of PGC_1 is called 174275
PgcDemux didn't display the frame count directly, I had to convert the time code it reported for PGC_1 into frames.

So Star Wars PGC_1 = 02:01:00:22 which I calculated to be
121 mins x 60 x 24 = 174240 + 22 frames = 174262 total
Add PGC_2 and PGC_1 together and you get 174276 total

Similarly Empire PGC_1 = 02:04:46:05 which I calculated to be
124 mins x 60 + 46 secs X 24 = 179664 + 05 frames = 179669 total
Add PGC_2 and PGC_1 together and you get 179686 total

All help is greatly appreciated! :D

Post
#493438
Topic
.: LeeThorogood's Original Trilogy Replica Technicolor Project :. (Released)
Time

I ran a little experiment with regards to the frame count mismatching and here is what I got

PgcDemux read the NTSC GOUT DVD of Star Wars as 174262 frames
DGIndex read the m2v file PgcDemux created as 174261 frames
VirtualDub via AviSynth read the d2v file DGIndex created as 174258 frames

PgcDemux read the NTSC GOUT DVD of The Empire Strikes Back as 179669 frames
DGIndex read the m2v file PgcDemux created as 179671 frames
VirtualDub via AviSynth read the d2v file DGIndex created as 179668 frames

PgcDemux read the PAL GOUT DVD of Return of the Jedi as 189451 frames
DGIndex read the m2v file PgcDemux created as 189451 frames
I have yet to open the d2v file DGIndex created using VirtualDub / AviSynth.

Is the small variation in frame count normal when working with NTSC material or have I missed something?

My settings for PgcDemux are:

Input IFO: VTS_03_0.IFO from NTSC GOUT DVD Rip
Mode - by PGC
Options - Demux video stream CHECKED
Demux audio streams CHECKED
Demux subpic streams CHECKED
Create CellTimes.txt CHECKED
Include end time UNCHECKED
Create Logfile UNCHECKED
Create a PGC VOB UNCHECKED
PGC Selection: Titles
PGC # 01 --> 02:01:00:22 SELECTED

In DGIndex the only setting I have changed from the default is:

Video -> Field Operation -> Forced Film CHECKED (For the two NTSC DVDs)

In VirtualDub the only settings I have changed from the default is:

Video -> Fast Recompress CHECKED
Video -> Compression -> Huffyuv

Post
#491499
Topic
.: LeeThorogood's Original Trilogy Replica Technicolor Project :. (Released)
Time


Moth3r said:
I got the chance to scan through your SW disc the other day.

While you've made some very interesting choices wrt the colour grading, personally I wouldn't choose to watch SW this way. My main issue is the brightness; it's almost as though you've attempted to match the photos taken of the screening exactly, even those that are obviously overexposed.

Also, I was grabbing some screenshots to put up on my Custom DVD comparison page, and DGIndex complained about detecting a bad field order transition. You mentioned that you used different settings for the binary sunset scene - how did you go about encoding the different elements? I'm wondering if you used some sort of MPEG2 editor to combine the shots, and that caused this. I don't know, however, if this would cause any real issue with playback.
Thanks for the feedback Moth3r. :)

I have to say for me working in 23.976fps was a nightmare, I started off by using DGIndex with force film checked to create a D2V file from a copy of the NTSC GOUT DVD on my HDD. DGIndex reported one frame-count I then used VirtualDub to open G-Forces AviSynth script which I had modified (Removed Levels & Hue Commands as well as adjusting the NNEDI2, Crop, Spline16Resize & AddBorders Commands to upscale to 2048x1152)

This was where I started to get a headache as VirtualDub reported a different frame-count to DGIndex! I tried re-creating the D2V file but this didn't fix the problem, so I went ahead and exported the AVI using HuffYUV and Fast Re-compress. I then imported the AVI into Final Cut Pro which once again reported a different frame-count. I used Final Cut Pro to export the AVI as a QuickTime Movie using the Apple ProRes 422 (HQ) Codec.

I then imported this QuickTime Movie into a Final Cut Pro timeline put in some cuts and then used the "Send To" option to send the timeline to Apple Color which I used to apply the colour grading. I rendered the Colour Grading in Color. I then used the "Send To" option in Apple Color to send the colour corrected timeline back to Final Cut Pro. I then shared the timeline from Final Cut Pro to Compressor which I used to export a QuickTime Movie using the ApplePro Res 422 (HQ) codec and downscaling from 2048x11152 to anamorphic 720x576 (1024x576 actual). I then used Compressor to create the M2V file from this QuickTime Movie.

I have not had any of these framecount issues when using DGIndex & AviSynth/VirtualDub on several 25fps DVDs. Perhaps I have missed something in either DGIndex or VirtualDub/Avisynth any advice as always would be welcome and appreciated! :)

Post
#486657
Topic
.: LeeThorogood's Original Trilogy Replica Technicolor Project :. (Released)
Time

Update on Star Wars (ANH) The NTSC DVD9 image should have finished uploading by now. That's right I have done an NTSC version as well :D I hope to begin uploading the PAL DVD9 image in the next day or two. :)

I am currently rendering out the lossless AVIs for Empire Strikes Back, should be ready to start colour grading by the weekend :D

Post
#485607
Topic
.: LeeThorogood's Original Trilogy Replica Technicolor Project :. (Released)
Time

Once again my thanks go out to all those who took the time to watch the work print and give feedback. Based on what you've said I have decided not to make any changes, as the issues raised could only be effectively fixed with scene by scene correction which I as I have said before I am not doing. ;)

I will let you all know when I start uploading the final DVD to the newsgroup. :)

Post
#484707
Topic
.: LeeThorogood's Original Trilogy Replica Technicolor Project :. (Released)
Time

Sorry about the compression problems I did try to encode the MKV straight from my ProRes HQ master but unfortunately this was a no go and not wanting to spend too much time on it I decided to use handbrake to encode the MKV from the DL-DVD I had authored for previewing purposes. As for next time, there wont be a next time :p I only plan to release this in DVD format, the MKV was just a way of putting a work print out at 1/4 the size of a DL-DVD.

As far as the DL-DVD I authored up for previewing goes, I used the highest possible bit-rate my MPEG2 encoder supports 7.7mbps VBR with a max of 9mbps.

Post
#483651
Topic
.: LeeThorogood's Original Trilogy Replica Technicolor Project :. (Released)
Time

I think this latest grade is the one! :D Not to worry I am still going to upload the work-print MKV, but unless there's a big problem that's present throughout that I have missed, I don't plan on rendering Star Wars again! ;) The reason I say this is that I authored up a DVD earlier and I have been testing it out on my 26" LCD TV and IMHO I don't think I could make this look any better then it does now! :D

I will probably start uploading the MKV tomorrow evening. :)

Post
#483229
Topic
.: LeeThorogood's PAL LaserDisc Preservation Project :. - '97 SE Finished '95 THX Finished - '97 SE Uploaded '95 THX Uploaded to the newsgroup
Time

Not quite! I run it through Streamclip using the export to other formats option. For the frame size I choose "Other" the values you enter here depend on how much you need to crop off.

I start by working out how wide the frame should be. In the case of my '97SE LD captures there was 5 square pixels of analogue blanking on each side so you do the following:

768 (PAL resolution in square pixels rather then CCIR.601)
-5 (Left Hand Side)
-5 (Right Hand Side)
= 758 square pixels

So we have determined that the width of our frame will be 758 so to work out what the height should be we do:

758/16 = 47.375
47.375 x 9 = 426.375 (Round this down to 426)

So our final frame should be 426 square pixels heigh, to work out how much to crop off you do 576 (original height) - 426 = 150

So we need to crop of 150 pixels which is 75 off the top and 75 off the bottom. I enter the crop values in the crop section of the export window, choosing to crop the source from the drop down menu. I then enter the width and height values I have worked out and away you go.

I find trial and error using the preview button in the export window is the best way to work out how much cropping is needed on the left and right hand sides. You can also use the preview button to check the crop settings for the top/bottom edges, as the picture is not always perfectly central and so you might need to take more off the top then bottom and vice versa.

I apologise if this seems really complicated, I am the first to admit I am rubbish at explaining how to do things over the web! :(