logo Sign In

Laserman

User Group
Members
Join date
11-May-2004
Last activity
6-Sep-2007
Posts
903

Post History

Post
#120408
Topic
.: The X0 Project Discussion Thread :. (* unfinished project *)
Time
Thanks for the links and kind words guys.
Unfortunately that is one of the continents none of us are on...it is a bit of a drive to chelmsford, and I'd have to pump the tyres up quite a bit to get across the oceans.
Feel free to PM us or e-mail us if you see any players around though, a couple of us travel quite a bit with work.
Importing an X0 or x9 costs around $1000 on top of the purchase price by the time insurance, shipping and duties are paid, so we probably won't be dragging any back from OS just yet.
We have enough work to do on the capture we are working on right now to keep us busy for a while...

One thing I really really really need right now is a service manual or technical manual for the pioneer CLD 2950 laserdisc player. If any of you web gurus can hunt one of those down, I'll put you in my will...
Post
#120393
Topic
.: The X0 Project Discussion Thread :. (* unfinished project *)
Time
Ahh, finally got my newsletter!

We will share the code when we get it to the point we are 100% happy with it. (Or 95% anyway)
I'm still developing it in Shake, and then the other guys are doing it in AVISynth, we will end up trying to get the two code bases synchronised to get the same effect, or at least as close as possible. At that point we will release the scripts to the masses for use in whatever.

It is fun inventing new ways of processing images for the project, it is throwing up challenges that I don't really get in my day job - restoration is a different kettle of fish to production, but the required skills are similar I guess.
So the stuff we are developing here will probably end up being useful in some form in production anyway.
The starfield thing was one of those 2am ideas that we weren't sure would fly, and it was immensely satisfying when the stars popped back into existence after the first code run!
Post
#119748
Topic
Things you never noticed before in the films
Time
The only think that really jumped out at me that I had never noticed before I started doing this , and cannot now un-notice, was the bizzaro greedo frame just before he explodes.
Although for the 'archive' version it will be left as is, on my own version I will have to replace that frame for my own sanity.

Stuff I have been noticing is mainly the horrible amount of variance in the colour grade.

The other thing I had never thought about before, then noticed, was a reaction shot from Hamill, but I don't really want mention here as it really does wreck an important part of the film, and you literally can't unsee it once you notice it.
Post
#119746
Topic
.: The X0 Project Discussion Thread :. (* unfinished project *)
Time
The X0 is noticably better than the X9 - the X9 had a more modern comb filter for the S-Video output, but it can't compete with the composite output of the X0 using one of todays comb filters.
The noise floor is better than the X0, less smearing, better SNR, better everything really except the comb filter which we don't use.
The X9 also weighs a lot less and is a lot easier and cheaper to obtain!

Both are very nice, and quite expensive players though...
Post
#119668
Topic
.: The X0 Project Discussion Thread :. (* unfinished project *)
Time
Yeah, this is something that is misunderstood, if you take the original 277 lines (of picture) from the letterbox laserdiscs, scale that up to anamorphic resolution you get a slight loss in quality due to image processing - not much but some.
If you then rely on your DVD player to turn in back into 277 lines again for display on a 4:3 TV, you lose a *LOT* of quality unless you have an exceptionally good player.
This is simply because it has to do a realtime resize, so can't use the best method.

So why go through two resizing steps (one good, one average) on a source that is resolutionally challenged to begin with, when you could display the original as is.

Now of course if you have a widescreen set or something similar you will be better off with the original 277 scaled up to animorphic, as we can do a better job than the realtime scaler in your player or TV.
Post
#119341
Topic
<strong>The Cowclops Transfers (a.k.a. the PCM audio DVD's, Row47 set) Info and Feedback Thread</strong> (Released)
Time
The biggest difference if you are encoding at a high enough rate to not get blockiness is the colour, but yep, it totally depends on your source and the encoder and the bitrate and so on, so there is no definitive answer.
In short though, if encoded properly at decent bitrates, there will be very little difference even on stills.