logo Sign In

Jetrell Fo

This user has been banned.

User Group
Banned Members
Join date
12-Aug-2004
Last activity
18-May-2017
Posts
6,102

Post History

Post
#1075276
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Puggo - Jar Jar’s Yoda said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

I’m guessing some of you don’t remember this.

False equivalency.

Not so. A President is within his legal power to do it no matter which President it is.

This has nothing to do with my point, and everything to do with why it’s pointless to engage you on any topic.

Well then, explain, why do you believe it is a false equivalent?

Because Comey is not under investigation for using public funds for private use.

Because Sessions was not investigating Clinton’s possible collusion with another nation to > undermine the election.

Fair enough but I didn’t say anything about it being equivalent.

But when I said “false equivalency” you said “not so”…argh, whatever.

I’m amazed that people continue to respond to Jetrell’s posts. Every time someone does, a new rabbit hole opens up, and it’s frustration all the way down.

To be clear, I don’t think that Jetrell is a bad guy - in fact he seems like a totally nice person. Just staggeringly illogical.

Definitely on the first part and probably on the second.

I’m an imperfect person, as we all are, and one of my negative traits is my inability to ignore him. However, in my defense, it’s pretty hard to ignore someone who responds to every one of your posts and misunderstands or misrepresents everything you say.

You’re reaching here buddy … we both reside on the same forum, you are a far more prolific poster than I am so your posts are like everywhere, and don’t you feel even the tiniest bit egotistical trying to get folks to actually believe what you just said? The Fonz you’re not, and neither am I, but that really isn’t a rational defense for refusing an olive branch with such indigence.

Post
#1075273
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

Puggo - Jar Jar’s Yoda said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

I’m guessing some of you don’t remember this.

False equivalency.

Not so. A President is within his legal power to do it no matter which President it is.

This has nothing to do with my point, and everything to do with why it’s pointless to engage you on any topic.

Well then, explain, why do you believe it is a false equivalent?

Because Comey is not under investigation for using public funds for private use.

Because Sessions was not investigating Clinton’s possible collusion with another nation to > undermine the election.

Fair enough but I didn’t say anything about it being equivalent.

But when I said “false equivalency” you said “not so”…argh, whatever.

I’m amazed that people continue to respond to Jetrell’s posts. Every time someone does, a new rabbit hole opens up, and it’s frustration all the way down.

To be clear, I don’t think that Jetrell is a bad guy - in fact he seems like a totally nice person. Just staggeringly illogical.

I’m not trying to be mean to you or start anything with this.

There is no logic in saying something is a false equivalency when no equivalency was claimed when it was posted wouldn’t you agree.

Post
#1075260
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Ryan McAvoy said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

I’m guessing some of you don’t remember this.

False equivalency.

Not so. A President is within his legal power to do it no matter which President it is.

This has nothing to do with my point, and everything to do with why it’s pointless to engage you on any topic.

Well then, explain, why do you believe it is a false equivalent?

Because Comey is not under investigation for using public funds for private use.

Because Sessions was not investigating Clinton’s possible collusion with another nation to > undermine the election.

Fair enough but I didn’t say anything about it being equivalent.

Oh for goodness sake.

You posting an article about a somewhat (on the surface) similar historical case (that the Trump team has also been spinning all over the place today), during a discussion of the current case and sarcastically saying “I’m guessing some of you don’t remember this” isn’t you suggesting they are equivalent? Really. Then what was it for?

Please explain exactly what you meant by posting it, who “some of you” are, why you think those persons won’t remember it and exactly what you meant by your comment in general.

(EDIT: Frink’s comment above was posted at the same time as mine, not before. So please don’t take this as another example of the mob persecuting you. We just happened to both think your comments were baffling)

It’s just you being dickish again. I accept it is probably part of your personality. I’ve already discussed it. I see no need to drag it out just because others want the answers they believe support their opinion.

No, your trucks’ fake.

WYSHS

Post
#1075252
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

https://lieu.house.gov/federal-employees-guide-sharing-key-information

Congressman Ted W. Lieu (D | Los Angeles County) and Congressman Don Beyer (D | Virginia) released the following resource guide for federal employees who wish to break the Administration’s communications blackout on federal agencies. The guide explains how to safely and responsibly share information, and encourages employees to “Know Your Rights” and “Know Your Options.” In the “Know Your Rights” section, federal employees can learn about which federal laws apply to them. In the “Know Your Options” section, employees can learn about how to safely disseminate information to agency inspectors general and the press. The resource guide also includes links to an in-depth list of federal whistleblower statutes and information about agency inspectors general.

Pretty cool to have a legal guide for this stuff.

Post
#1075251
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

Ryan McAvoy said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

I’m guessing some of you don’t remember this.

False equivalency.

Not so. A President is within his legal power to do it no matter which President it is.

This has nothing to do with my point, and everything to do with why it’s pointless to engage you on any topic.

Well then, explain, why do you believe it is a false equivalent?

Because Comey is not under investigation for using public funds for private use.

Because Sessions was not investigating Clinton’s possible collusion with another nation to > undermine the election.

Fair enough but I didn’t say anything about it being equivalent.

Oh for goodness sake.

You posting an article about a somewhat (on the surface) similar historical case (that the Trump team has also been spinning all over the place today), during a discussion of the current case and sarcastically saying “I’m guessing some of you don’t remember this” isn’t you suggesting they are equivalent? Really. Then what was it for?

Please explain exactly what you meant by posting it, who “some of you” are, why you think those persons won’t remember it and exactly what you meant by your comment in general.

(EDIT: Frink’s comment above was posted at the same time as mine, not before. So please don’t take this as another example of the mob persecuting you. We just happened to both think your comments were baffling)

It’s just you being dickish again. I accept it is probably part of your personality. I’ve already discussed it. I see no need to drag it out just because others want the answers they believe support their opinion.

Post
#1075248
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

I’m guessing some of you don’t remember this.

False equivalency.

Not so. A President is within his legal power to do it no matter which President it is.

This has nothing to do with my point, and everything to do with why it’s pointless to engage you on any topic.

Well then, explain, why do you believe it is a false equivalent?

Because Comey is not under investigation for using public funds for private use.

Because Sessions was not investigating Clinton’s possible collusion with another nation to > undermine the election.

Fair enough but I didn’t say anything about it being equivalent.

But when I said “false equivalency” you said “not so”…argh, whatever.

I said once before that I don’t want to have a normal civil conversation with you because I don’t understand 90% of the things you say and it’s not worth the effort to try and decode everything. I stand by that.

I’m just going to leave this here so people can see for themselves the answer you gave to my olive branch. I was very sincere and you just gave me the finger. Have it your way. I don’t want to see any crying or complaining from you or the others when I question or try to discuss things you might post.

Post
#1075228
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

I’m guessing some of you don’t remember this.

False equivalency.

Not so. A President is within his legal power to do it no matter which President it is.

This has nothing to do with my point, and everything to do with why it’s pointless to engage you on any topic.

Well then, explain, why do you believe it is a false equivalent?

Because Comey is not under investigation for using public funds for private use.

Because Sessions was not investigating Clinton’s possible collusion with another nation to > undermine the election.

Fair enough but I didn’t say anything about it being equivalent.

TV’s Frink said:

and you continue to prove why it’s pointless to engage you on any topic.

No disrespect to you but it seems you caused your own issue with regards to communication.

Post
#1075217
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

I’m guessing some of you don’t remember this.

False equivalency.

Not so. A President is within his legal power to do it no matter which President it is.

This has nothing to do with my point, and everything to do with why it’s pointless to engage you on any topic.

Well then, explain, why do you believe it is a false equivalent because I never said it was equivalent?

Post
#1075209
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

SilverWook said:

Jetrell Fo said:

I’m guessing some of you don’t remember this.

Who was Sessions investigating at the time?

http://www.nytimes.com/1993/07/20/us/defiant-fbi-chief-removed-from-job-by-the-president.html

I am still looking to find info on your question if there is any. He had previously investigated Iran-Contra and we all know how that turned out.

Post
#1075180
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

There’s the proof of Russian connection … a handshake and photo-op.

Lock Him Up, Lock Him Up!!!

SilverWook said:

Jetrell Fo said:

SilverWook said:

Every cloud has it’s silver lining. 😉
https://twitter.com/SarahFoxes/status/862097068151779329

I guess she doesn’t know she’s behind the times already.

I think it’s a joke. 😉

My post was joking as well.

Post
#1075177
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

doubleofive said:

Jetrell Fo said:

I’m glad that you see it so simply and fairly because that is exactly what it is not.

He thanked the man for not investigating him while firing him for investigating something he was convinced was worth jailing Hillary over. And his opinion changed in the last week about his usefulness. If Trump is going to fire everyone who is incompetent, he’s got a lot of work to do.

Trump is not an old bureaucrat and he just put the rest of the Government on notice of it. There was a very large bipartisan support for Comey’s dismissal for a good while now. I also don’t believe, whatever the facts are, that we are getting the entire picture at present.

If you think they’re not preparing already for an interim replacement so the Russian investigation can continue and they can get back to work you’d be mistaken I think.