Jetrell Fo

Spuffure said:

Jetrell Fo said:

This life, is the flat horizon, and you are the shape on the left.

😃

???

Wang Chung - The Flat Horizon

ferris209 said:

Warbler said:

moviefreakedmind said:

my point is no one that has anything to do “reality” tv show, should be anywhere near the Oval Office. It is not a place for clowns.

LOL!

Don’t forget this little ditty.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/5348/watch-boehner-joins-obama-comedic-skit-nerdprom-robert-kraychik

Rehashing the same old Trump and his voters are rapists, sexists, xenophobes, homophobes, sexual predators, Putin lovers, America haters, and women beaters is old, washed out, unproductive, and just plain sad. Apparently some of us have learned nothing from the closing of the other politics thread and they don’t seem intent on doing so either.

😦

Warbler said:

moviefreakedmind said:

He was a reality star but his claim to fame comes from his business empire much more than his tenure on Celebrity Apprentice. It’d be like referring to Robin Williams as the star of Patch Adams. It isn’t wrong, but it is leaving out what he’s actually known for and implies that that is all that he was.

my point is no one that has anything to do “reality” tv show, should be anywhere near the Oval Office. It is not a place for clowns.

Bill Clinton was a clown and he made it in, LOL.

^^^^^^The argument is pointless. The Election was decided. The Inauguration is tomorrow. Most of what you said has either been debunked or is still unsubstantiated. The only things I see as absolute fact is that he was a reality T.V. star and he apologized for #2 numerous times. It was in poor form and he admitted as much. #1 has long since been retired. As to #7, talked about and doing are 2 different things entirely.

I am okay with how you feel. I would have you notice that I personally, haven’t said any kind of mean junk about people who voted for or believed in Hillary Clinton, and I voted for Trump. Dr. Jill Stein was a bust and Bernie Sanders had the rug pulled out from under him by his own party. It was a sad state of affairs all the way around.

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

http://www.snopes.com/2016/11/13/who-won-the-popular-vote/

Quote from the article …

While these uncounted votes may grow Clinton’s popular lead, they absolutely will not change the course of the election. That math is settled; Trump holds an insurmountable lead in swing states, which turned his popular defeat into a sizable electoral victory. All the votes in liberal-leaning New York and California will not change that.

None of what you said changes the fact the most people did not vote for Trump and more people voted for Hillary than Trump.

I didn’t say any of that, it was quoted from the article.

very well, I will edit the post to note that.

As for your other comment, I will not respond out of respect for Frink and the forum. There is no need to gaslight the conversation in to something that adds nothing to the discussion.

What Frink said was correct.

It is your right to agree with his opinion but labeling members of this forum that did vote Trump in such a manner is not good form. It has nothing to do with correct or incorrect.

Handman said:

Warbler said:
Also, I have no respect for those that voted for Trump.

That’s another reason why Trump was elected.

This and the fact that he didn’t need the popular vote to win.

😉

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

http://www.snopes.com/2016/11/13/who-won-the-popular-vote/

Quote from the article …

While these uncounted votes may grow Clinton’s popular lead, they absolutely will not change the course of the election. That math is settled; Trump holds an insurmountable lead in swing states, which turned his popular defeat into a sizable electoral victory. All the votes in liberal-leaning New York and California will not change that.

None of what you said changes the fact the most people did not vote for Trump and more people voted for Hillary than Trump.

I didn’t say any of that, it was quoted from the article. As for your other comment, I will not respond out of respect for Frink and the forum. There is no need to gaslight the conversation in to something that adds nothing to the discussion.

http://www.snopes.com/2016/11/13/who-won-the-popular-vote/

Quote from the article …

While these uncounted votes may grow Clinton’s popular lead, they absolutely will not change the course of the election. That math is settled; Trump holds an insurmountable lead in swing states, which turned his popular defeat into a sizable electoral victory. All the votes in liberal-leaning New York and California will not change that.

TV’s Frink said:

ferris209 said:

TV’s Frink said:

If there is one silver lining to Trump’s win, it’s that we don’t have to deal with another 4 to 8 years of ferris posting about Hillary Clinton.

Just need to remind you Dems what a horrid choice y’all made. Blame the Russians all you want, you can truly thank Hillary for Trump.

Anyone who assigns blame for Trump to a single factor, regardless of the factor chosen, isn’t paying attention or is trolling. She won the popular vote by a large margin and lost the three critical electoral vote states by a margin of approx. 100,000 raw votes. The blame, in no particular order, lies with

• People who voted for Trump (simplified into four groups below)
  – Racists, sexists, and xenophobes
  – Good people who believed a metric ton of lies covering a ton of different subjects
  – People who hated Hillary so badly that they pretended Trump wasn’t worse
  – People who blindly voted “R”

The above remarks are disrespectful to any forum members that have voted for Donald Trump. These “4 groups” are opinion with no basis in fact or legal print. This is not meant as a jab or to be mean. I am just pointing out that maybe you spoke your opinion without thinking it through first. We all make mistakes, myself included.

This life, is the flat horizon, and you are the shape on the left.

😃

whitecliff33 said:

I would be happy to send them to you to keep, you would have to cover shipping
(approx. 79 video-tapes). Would you also be willing to make copies on disc to send back to me?

Yes and yes.

😃

^Of course not. She plans on returning to such activity real soon. God just gave her some time off because she worked so hard for nothing.

😉

towne32 said:

Shokara said:

By the way, just to make sure, I don’t even have to extract anything from the zipped files beforehand? The three ISOs look like three WinRAR files to me after I’ve downloaded them. All I have to do is right click on each of the three “WinRARs” and click Burn?

If you’re definitely looking at .iso files and not another extension, they’re not zipped files. You’ve just got winrar configured to be the default app to open the ISO files. It can be used to pull individual files out of the disc structure, though it does seem to have trouble with some ISOs. But yes, you just need to burn the ISO. I’ve never used windows to do that (and my Win10 seems to have no such option). I use imgburn, but most ISO burning software should do the trick.

I find ImgBurn to be the most reliable for these things.

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

http://www.snopes.com/2017/01/18/texas-bill-make-abortions-felony-level-crimes/

There is no way this is constitutional.

yeah, it is clear violation of Roe v. Wade

This Bill is not law at present though it was introduced. I don’t see it finding any legs to stand on when their politicians vote on it.

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Oh boy.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/fbi/314892-fbi-other-agencies-probe-possible-russia-aid-to-trump-report

The FBI and five other intelligence and law enforcement agencies are working together on an investigation into whether Russia’s government secretly helped President-elect Donald Trump win the election, according to a new report.

The collaborative probe is partially focused on whether any covert money from the Kremlin financed hacking operations to benefit Trump’s campaign, McClatchy reported Wednesday.

Two people familiar with the matter told McClatchy the intelligence agencies involved include the FBI, the CIA, the National Security Agency (NSA) and representatives for the director of national intelligence. Two law enforcement agencies — the Justice Department and the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network — are also participating.

According to McClatchy, the interagency working group is informal and began scrutinizing possible Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential race last spring. A key mission of the six-agency team, it said, is examining who financed the email hacks of major Democratic Party sources last year.

hmmmm, who could that possibly be? It would take someone with a lot money, motive for the Dems to lose, and low morals. hmm . . . .

I’d love to agree with you on this but until they show some actual proof in black and white, that can be verified, it’s all smoke and mirrors.

Uranium One.

😉

Well I am pretty sure that if it did happen, however did had a lot money, wanted the Dems to lose and is a bad person.

Personally, IMO, it had nothing to do with Dems or Reps. It proved a weakness in the American political process from the inside out.

Clinton was a part of that as she was a politician, Trump was just a personality and he was the person running against her. If Bernie would have been running against her, it still would have happened, because the leak started well before the sides were chosen.

TESB is now up and running.

Screen shots for TESB:

FanFiltration said:

So so true.

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Oh boy.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/fbi/314892-fbi-other-agencies-probe-possible-russia-aid-to-trump-report

The FBI and five other intelligence and law enforcement agencies are working together on an investigation into whether Russia’s government secretly helped President-elect Donald Trump win the election, according to a new report.

The collaborative probe is partially focused on whether any covert money from the Kremlin financed hacking operations to benefit Trump’s campaign, McClatchy reported Wednesday.

Two people familiar with the matter told McClatchy the intelligence agencies involved include the FBI, the CIA, the National Security Agency (NSA) and representatives for the director of national intelligence. Two law enforcement agencies — the Justice Department and the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network — are also participating.

According to McClatchy, the interagency working group is informal and began scrutinizing possible Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential race last spring. A key mission of the six-agency team, it said, is examining who financed the email hacks of major Democratic Party sources last year.

hmmmm, who could that possibly be? It would take someone with a lot money, motive for the Dems to lose, and low morals. hmm . . . .

I’d love to agree with you on this but until they show some actual proof in black and white, that can be verified, it’s all smoke and mirrors.

Uranium One.

😉

DuracellEnergizer said:

This discussion is sooooooooo pre-new rules.

Wait, there are new rules, where?

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

moviefreakedmind said:

It’s a bit annoying and very melodramatic.

1. you can just ignore it and scroll past it. no big deal

Same can be said about all posts from certain people you call trolls.

which everyone kept telling me to do. But now that the shoe is on the other foot, its not?

Also there is big difference between my countdown and someone making personal attacks.

Such hipocrisy should not surprise you, even here warb, it’s the new truth don’t ya know.

😉

ferris209 said:

moviefreakedmind said:

It’s a bit annoying and very melodramatic.

But, how am I going to know when my power will go out, murder will start occurring in the streets and people will be fighting over bread scraps?!?!?

I’m sure we could get Warb to start his own thread for it. Maybe he’d let you bunk with him in Niagra once the crap flies.

I have a cat named Charlie. He rules!!!

Warbler said:

moviefreakedmind said:

It’s a bit annoying and very melodramatic.

1. you can just ignore it and scroll past it. no big deal

This works great on those whom a fair number of us consider trolls too.

^So where in Canada did you chose to move? Hopefully someplace nice with a view of the wilderness I hope?

😃

ferris209 said:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/01/16/clinton-global-initiative-to-lay-off-employees-shut-down-amid-dwindling-donations.html

Always nice to see this happening to them. It couldn’t happen to a nicer couple.