Jetrell Fo

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Darth Id said:

Jetrell Fo said:

I know there is at least one person in the room walking around like a proud peacock even if we never know who it is.

It’s me, right?
You’re talking about me?

#proudfeathers4evers

LOL. As easy as it might be to say it was you I have no idea. What I surmise is that sooner or later the peacock will show itself. It may not be outright but I’m sure they figured it was such a huge deal to get people who might not like me censored in a thread I created by helping to make it disappear that at some point they are going to want a little pat on the back.

I don’t know who you think victimized you, but assuming you’re referring to me, I didn’t even waste the time reporting your thread. It seemed quite obvious it would be locked or deleted without any need to report it.

You know what they say about assuming I’m sure. Everyone in the thread was censored.

Jeebus said:

generalfrevious said:

Jetrell Fo said:

generalfrevious said:

All bets are off. The entire chain of succession is contaminated with ties to Russia. We will fall into crisis. The rich will kill us all off like they have wanted to for almost a hundred years. This country will never be good again, we will become the poorest nation ever witnessed in human history.

The investigation is not over. It is moving forward as it should. Whether the American people get real answers or just the same “It’s Classified so we can’t talk about it” is what we’ll have to wait on. I said way back that Comey would probably end up paying for his mistakes and though I believe he is well intentioned the odds and incompetence were already against him before the election. It is something else I talked about a ways and got poo-poo’d for. The division in the Intelligence community was already so divided that it was polarizing to both sides. Now we are here.

The focus should be to move forward but the partisan atmosphere is dispersed for it to happen.

Were in 1933 right now; it took a year and a half for Hitler to take complete control of Germany. The exact same is going to happen to Trump.

Do you ever think that comments like these are in poor taste?

I think the comment above yours is in bad taste as well. Why agitate a situation?

generalfrevious said:

Jetrell Fo said:

generalfrevious said:

All bets are off. The entire chain of succession is contaminated with ties to Russia. We will fall into crisis. The rich will kill us all off like they have wanted to for almost a hundred years. This country will never be good again, we will become the poorest nation ever witnessed in human history.

The investigation is not over. It is moving forward as it should. Whether the American people get real answers or just the same “It’s Classified so we can’t talk about it” is what we’ll have to wait on. I said way back that Comey would probably end up paying for his mistakes and though I believe he is well intentioned the odds and incompetence were already against him before the election. It is something else I talked about a ways and got poo-poo’d for. The division in the Intelligence community was already so divided that it was polarizing to both sides. Now we are here.

The focus should be to move forward but the partisan atmosphere is dispersed for it to happen.

Were in 1933 right now; it took a year and a half for Hitler to take complete control of Germany. The exact same is going to happen to Trump.

Just so you know I am asking this politely. Where do you get your news from?

Sally Yates (lol).

generalfrevious said:

All bets are off. The entire chain of succession is contaminated with ties to Russia. We will fall into crisis. The rich will kill us all off like they have wanted to for almost a hundred years. This country will never be good again, we will become the poorest nation ever witnessed in human history.

The investigation is not over. It is moving forward as it should. Whether the American people get real answers or just the same “It’s Classified so we can’t talk about it” is what we’ll have to wait on. I said way back that Comey would probably end up paying for his mistakes and though I believe he is well intentioned the odds and incompetence were already against him before the election. It is something else I talked about a ways and got poo-poo’d for. The division in the Intelligence community was already so divided that it was polarizing to both sides. Now we are here.

The focus should be to move forward but the partisan atmosphere is dispersed for it to happen.

Darth Id said:

Jetrell Fo said:

I know there is at least one person in the room walking around like a proud peacock even if we never know who it is.

It’s me, right?
You’re talking about me?

#proudfeathers4evers

LOL. As easy as it might be to say it was you I have no idea. What I surmise is that sooner or later the peacock will show itself. It may not be outright but I’m sure they figured it was such a huge deal to get people who might not like me censored in a thread I created by helping to make it disappear that at some point they are going to want a little pat on the back.

You my friend are too eager … that is how I know it’s not you. I do appreciate your enthusiasm. If it’s any consolation, I’d proudly support #proudfeathers4evers!!!

😃

JEDIT: Thanks for the smile, it’s the only other one I’ve had all afternoon aside from seeing my daughter.

SilverWook said:

Puggo - Jar Jar’s Yoda said:

Possible replacements - Sarah Palin or Steve Bannon are the obvious choices. Sarah is perfect for the Russia investigation, what with Alaska being so close and all…

Doesn’t one have to have some sort of law enforcement background to run the FBI?

John Pistole might be a consideration as well.

CatBus said:

Well… replacements?

Trey Gowdy or Jason Chaffetz would be awesome.

NeverarGreat said:

I’m glad there isn’t an ongoing Trump/Russia investigation or this firing would look reaaaaalllly suspicious.

The FBI said if their was evidence they could not provide it to the American public because it was Classified so that is how transparency dies.

😉

DuracellEnergizer said:

Jetrell Fo said:

ITFY

Too much iron for my diet.

😉

Ryan McAvoy said:

Jetrell Fo said:

A quick google search with the term “General Flynn’s Security Clearance” brought up this and other numerous articles.

http://www.newsweek.com/how-michael-flynn-got-security-clearance-591994

I was asking for evidence on what Spicer said in those two sentences. Not a general article about the Flynn case that doesn’t appear to include any related evidence that backs up those two Spicer statements. I’ve giving up trying to find it, all I can find is evidence disproving it. Like I said… never mind.

It was not intended to answer any question. I posted it for a base of reference only. Besides, I think you two are too “Young Turk” for me.

😉

Hell, they’ve even posted the goodbye letter.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/05/09/us/politics/document-White-House-Fires-James-Comey.html

CatBus said:

Looks like the FBI investigation will wrap itself up by next week. Turns out there was no fire under all that smoke after all.

I don’t think that is what this means but I’m not in the loop there so I cannot speak for them.

Breaking News from my hometown …

http://www.tmj4.com//news/national/fbi-director-james-comey-fired-by-trump?utm_source=SilverpopMailing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2017-05-09 21:49:49.334 : FBI Director James Comey fired by Trump&utm_content=%%WA_MAILINGLEVEL_CODE%%&uref=3154079048450516927?audiencePageId=2189467851

http://www.tmj4.com/news/national/fbi-corrects-comey-testimony-on-clinton-aide

And before anyone asks me for proof … all the bigger news outlets are covering it.

https://www.google.com/search?q=Director+James+Comey&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

Spuffure said:

This one is kinda creepy.

😉

bkev said:

You really ought plead the 5th more often instead of being so snarky, Fo. There’s a good reason why people seem to disagree with you so frequently.

Do you suggest all those that speak snarky do this? Let’s be real, I’m not the first nor the last, to say something snarky.

A quick google search with the term “General Flynn’s Security Clearance” brought up this and other numerous articles.

http://www.newsweek.com/how-michael-flynn-got-security-clearance-591994

CatBus said:

A simpler conversation flowchart would go something like:

J: [Outrageous quote from non-credible source without any evidence]
R: Evidence?
J: There’s no evidence supporting this quote at all. I was just posting the quote. It’s not something I am stating myself, yeesh.

The same conclusion reached without spiraling out of control.

Apparently some are not due such simple consideration.

Ryan McAvoy said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Ryan McAvoy said:

Jetrell Fo said:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/08/us/politics/obama-flynn-trump.html

“If President Obama was truly concerned about General Flynn, why didn’t they suspend his security clearance, which they approved just months earlier?” Mr. Spicer said during his daily press briefing.

“Not only did they reaffirm it, but they took no steps to suspend it,” Mr. Spicer said. He said that decision casts doubt on how vigorous Mr. Obama’s warning to Mr. Trump was during their meeting in November.

Evidence please.

It’s in the fracking article I quoted from

Not is isn’t. You quoted two sentences by Sean Spicer that are not backed up by any evidence in his words, your words, in the article, or anywhere I can find.

Jetrell Fo said:

…read it would you, it’s not something I am stating myself, yeesh.

Better yet, if you’re too lazy to read, watch then …

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jAAvYmKkto

^ Do you not think language like that sounds a bit dickish considering you didn’t understand my post, or Sean Spicer’s words, or the article you posted. Me saying “two plus two, equals five” doesn’t become true because somebody quotes an article of me saying it. If you can find some evidence to support the two sentences you picked out then great, that’s all I asked for.

On a side note, when Spicer says “security clearance” he means the maximum possible level of clearance as Trump has tweeted. Not the minimum level of clearance that evidence seems to show.

Jetrell Fo said:

York Times wrote the fricking article, ask them, NOT me.

But you pulled out those two quotes from it. The only two quotes that don’t seem to have any supporting evidence. Which is why I was asking for it.

Don’t you think it’s a bit dickish to keep hounding on someone that said they quoted it from the article, linked to the article the quote was in, and then had to explain that if you needed more you should ask the New York Times, the folks that wrote the article?

I’m not sure how much clearer I need to be. I would guess there are other articles on the same matter elsewhere, google them instead of harassing me because you think Sean Spicer is a fool.

Crow.

I know a few people that resemble this creepy fellow.

😃

CatBus said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Ryan McAvoy said:

Jetrell Fo said:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/08/us/politics/obama-flynn-trump.html

“If President Obama was truly concerned about General Flynn, why didn’t they suspend his security clearance, which they approved just months earlier?” Mr. Spicer said during his daily press briefing.

“Not only did they reaffirm it, but they took no steps to suspend it,” Mr. Spicer said. He said that decision casts doubt on how vigorous Mr. Obama’s warning to Mr. Trump was during their meeting in November.

Evidence please.

It’s in the fracking article I quoted from … read it would you, it’s not something I am stating myself, yeesh.

Better yet, if you’re too lazy to read, watch then …

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jAAvYmKkto

A quote from Spicer is not evidence in any sense of the word. We understand you’re not stating it yourself. After all, you’re a Bernie supporter!

FFS

What is wrong with you? Just keep pounding away don’t you? Can’t fricking just stop can you? The New York Times wrote the fricking article, ask them, NOT me.

And if you want fricking proof they wrote the damn article click the link like I suggested in the first damn place.

😦

There is an anomaly among us.

😃

Blood sausage is good. Mmmmmmmmmmmm …

Ryan McAvoy said:

Jetrell Fo said:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/08/us/politics/obama-flynn-trump.html

“If President Obama was truly concerned about General Flynn, why didn’t they suspend his security clearance, which they approved just months earlier?” Mr. Spicer said during his daily press briefing.

“Not only did they reaffirm it, but they took no steps to suspend it,” Mr. Spicer said. He said that decision casts doubt on how vigorous Mr. Obama’s warning to Mr. Trump was during their meeting in November.

Evidence please.

It’s in the fracking article I quoted from … read it would you, it’s not something I am stating myself, yeesh.

Better yet, if you’re too lazy to read, watch then …

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jAAvYmKkto