- Post
- #101797
- Topic
- A Big Debate for the New Century
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/101797/action/topic#101797
- Time
Quote
Originally posted by: Commander CourageQuote
Originally posted by: JediSage
I too am very interested in Christian Apologetics (Duh!) :-) However, I think we need to be careful when saying science MUST match up with the bible. I think there is much evidence of the bible's historical accuracy and authenticity to be sure, however it is not going to answer how an apple falls from the tree (ie: describing how/why gravity works).
I was just saying it was ridiculous for people to say, "Because of the theory of (fill-in-the-blank), the Bible is obviously inaccurate." The key word is theory, and since creation is not testable in a laboratory, theories are all we have. Therefore, I'm going to go with the one presented in the Bible, which has yet to be proven wrong by scientifc FACT. And of course the Bible isn't a textbook explaining the likes of gravity, that is for science, true testable science. The Scientific Method itself will weed-out the nonsense.
True...all we have is supposition that fits the available facts. The scientific method is a good tool to have.
Have you ever heard the idea that in order model something, or simulate it, your model needs to be as complex/large/intricate as the actual thing you're modeling? For instance, in order to model how the human body does certain things, your model needs to be a human body.