logo Sign In

Jay

User Group
Administrators
Join date
22-Feb-2003
Last activity
29-Jun-2025
Posts
2,437

Post History

Post
#1225158
Topic
Taking a stand against toxic fandom (and other )
Time

DominicCobb said:

Collipso said:

here’s the tweet btw, not a screenshot: https://twitter.com/DeeGoots/status/944080112869183489

Pretty easy to find her explanation of what it was all about if you’re looking through her timeline
https://twitter.com/DeeGoots/status/1017108818658930688?s=20

Don’t know why some fans are so desperate to cherrypick and take out of context and act like they’re being persecuted.

It’s a group kneejerk reaction to a group character assassination.

How many of these fans do you think have been accused of being sexist because they don’t like TLJ? We’ve seen it right here on this forum; negative criticisms of TLJ and its characters are brushed aside because the critics are possibly suffering from some latent or subconscious sexist tendencies. It’s condescending and unfounded.

As a result, anyone who appears to be mocking fans is going to have a rough time on social media, deserved or not. If you choose to publicly represent yourself as an employee of the content owner and post anything that can be perceived as mocking the fanbase, best have your guard up.

Post
#1225131
Topic
Taking a stand against toxic fandom (and other )
Time

adywan said:

Jay said:
I think he’s subtly trolling. He’s too clever to come at people directly.

The Lucasfilm employee who posted a selfie while drinking from a mug that says “fanboy tears” on it is trolling, though.

Except that Andi wasn’t trolling anything. It was a picture that was posted just after TFA was released, now the anti-TLJ/ Disney brigade got hold of it, erased the date on the original tweet and claimed it was a recent pic of her trolling the anti-TLJ crowd. The fanboy tears thing was all about the death of Han Solo, nothing more.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DhzY5gFVQAEiRHx.jpg

She created it for TFA and happily tweeted it again when the TLJ criticisms started.

Post
#1225101
Topic
Taking a stand against toxic fandom (and other )
Time

screams in the void said:

Jay said:

DominicCobb said:

Jay said:

DominicCobb said:

Jay said:

DominicCobb said:

Any comparisons to Gamergate are accurate insofar as the harrasers are concerned (though I haven’t seen these comparisons from LFL employees).

https://twitter.com/rianjohnson/status/1016392684242550784

GamerGate: another great example of using a minority of harassers to paint an entire community with that wide brush and obscure the original criticisms.

Okay, well was I wrong? I’m not seeing the part in that tweet where he says that anyone who hates his movie is a Gamergate level harraser. He’s pretty spot on in the comparison.

Did you read the preceding tweet that he was responding to? It was about ComicsGate, another supposedly hate-driven campaign that’s being used to paint many comics fans with the same brush as GamerGate, with the usual shitstirring by the usual frauds looking for attention/money like Quinn and Sarkeesian.

Maybe he’s not doing it intentionally, but by drawing the comparisons to what’s going on with Star Wars, I find it hard to believe he doesn’t know who and what he’s inviting into the discussion.

You of course have a typically cynical take on these “gates” that I have no desire to get into you with. Putting that aside, whatever you think of the people bring attacked, there is no reason whatsoever to violently harass. And it’s beyond absurd to suggest that one shouldn’t call out violent harassment just for fear that someone else entirely might come in and paint all criticism with a broad brush. I’m sorry I have more sympathy with those getting death threats than those merely getting supposedly generalized. I don’t know why Rian should have to top toe and ignore the issue completely just because of how other people may or may not respond.

Of course no one should violently harass someone else. Duh.

My point is that the result so far in these “gate” stories is that the harassment becomes the story, the broader fanbase is guilty by association (“toxic fandom”), and the original story that kicked everything off is conveniently forgotten or labeled as conspiracy, while the participants supposedly on the side of social justice go on to build massive social media followings and make money from the whole affair.

Rian can bash harassers all he wants, but drawing comparisons to GamerGate and ComicsGate is going to result in the same shitty mess. I don’t want a JediGate.

The original story that compelled me to kick this thread off was the treatment of Kelly Marie Tran , and lets not hurl insults at people such as “duh” and "panties in a bunch " aye ? seems unbecoming of a moderator imho. And speaking of making money from the whole affair , go to youtube , type in star wars and set the filter to today , on any given day and you can see it’s both sides of the fence . I also have a youtube channel but it is not monetized , nor is my star wars art

Most YouTubers make next to nothing. Even the more popular ones barely make a living from it, and that’s until they get demonitized for offending the wrong person. Only the highest view counts make real money.

I’m referring to people like Sarkeesian using crowdfunding to fleece people while providing shoddy content in return (almost $160K for the Tropes vs Women documentary that misrepresented games and gamers, $25K to start a free Discord server, another $10K to do a video conference with a high school class about feminism, etc.).

Post
#1225056
Topic
Taking a stand against toxic fandom (and other )
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Jay said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jay said:

DominicCobb said:

Any comparisons to Gamergate are accurate insofar as the harrasers are concerned (though I haven’t seen these comparisons from LFL employees).

https://twitter.com/rianjohnson/status/1016392684242550784

GamerGate: another great example of using a minority of harassers to paint an entire community with that wide brush and obscure the original criticisms.

Jay I know you’ve left the politics thread but you were doing this in regards to liberals all the time.

I’d appreciate a more detailed analysis of how my criticism of liberals in general is comparable to the allegations leveled against the gaming community in GamerGate.

That seems like a detailed waste of time.

If not for me, at least flesh out your point so everyone else understands why the situations are comparable.

It’s an opinion. I paused, then went about my business. More people should do the same.

“More people should do the same” is also an opinion.

[ric-olie.jpg]

And with that, please keep it on topic, everyone. As Frink mentioned, there’s already a ranking thread packed with bunched panties if you’d like to take it there.

Post
#1225044
Topic
Taking a stand against toxic fandom (and other )
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Jay said:

DominicCobb said:

Any comparisons to Gamergate are accurate insofar as the harrasers are concerned (though I haven’t seen these comparisons from LFL employees).

https://twitter.com/rianjohnson/status/1016392684242550784

GamerGate: another great example of using a minority of harassers to paint an entire community with that wide brush and obscure the original criticisms.

Jay I know you’ve left the politics thread but you were doing this in regards to liberals all the time.

I’d appreciate a more detailed analysis of how my criticism of liberals in general is comparable to the allegations leveled against the gaming community in GamerGate.

(caveat - have not read the tweet)

People should just start including this in their signature.

TV’s Frink said:

Jay said:

snooker said:

Collipso said:

i think it’s because people tried really hard to like it at first. i know i did, and it’s now my least favorite star wars film by a country mile.

Attack of the Clones? It’s worse than Attack of the Clones!?

I don’t like TFA and even I paused for a second at that.

Again, there’s plenty of these kinds of hot takes right here. Check out the ranking thread some time.

It’s an opinion. I paused, then went about my business. More people should do the same.

Post
#1225035
Topic
Taking a stand against toxic fandom (and other )
Time

DominicCobb said:

Jay said:

DominicCobb said:

Jay said:

DominicCobb said:

Any comparisons to Gamergate are accurate insofar as the harrasers are concerned (though I haven’t seen these comparisons from LFL employees).

https://twitter.com/rianjohnson/status/1016392684242550784

GamerGate: another great example of using a minority of harassers to paint an entire community with that wide brush and obscure the original criticisms.

Okay, well was I wrong? I’m not seeing the part in that tweet where he says that anyone who hates his movie is a Gamergate level harraser. He’s pretty spot on in the comparison.

Did you read the preceding tweet that he was responding to? It was about ComicsGate, another supposedly hate-driven campaign that’s being used to paint many comics fans with the same brush as GamerGate, with the usual shitstirring by the usual frauds looking for attention/money like Quinn and Sarkeesian.

Maybe he’s not doing it intentionally, but by drawing the comparisons to what’s going on with Star Wars, I find it hard to believe he doesn’t know who and what he’s inviting into the discussion.

You of course have a typically cynical take on these “gates” that I have no desire to get into you with. Putting that aside, whatever you think of the people bring attacked, there is no reason whatsoever to violently harass. And it’s beyond absurd to suggest that one shouldn’t call out violent harassment just for fear that someone else entirely might come in and paint all criticism with a broad brush. I’m sorry I have more sympathy with those getting death threats than those merely getting supposedly generalized. I don’t know why Rian should have to top toe and ignore the issue completely just because of how other people may or may not respond.

Of course no one should violently harass someone else. Duh.

My point is that the result so far in these “gate” stories is that the harassment becomes the story, the broader fanbase is guilty by association (“toxic fandom”), and the original story that kicked everything off is conveniently forgotten or labeled as conspiracy, while the participants supposedly on the side of social justice go on to build massive social media followings and make money from the whole affair.

Rian can bash harassers all he wants, but drawing comparisons to GamerGate and ComicsGate is going to result in the same shitty mess. I don’t want a JediGate.

Post
#1225023
Topic
Taking a stand against toxic fandom (and other )
Time

DominicCobb said:

SilverWook said:

Jay said:

SilverWook said:

There’s a big difference between merely saying This movie sucks! and taking it out on the people who made it. When Star Trek: The Motion Picture came out, Trekkers were not screaming for Robert Wise’s head. Even the late Harlan Ellison wrote a polite, but negative review in Starlog. And this is the guy who often took potshots at Gene Roddenberry the way Stephen King hates on Kubrick.

Social media is the big factor here. It’s possible rotten fans may have always been with us. I imagine there were letters even Cinefanstatique magazine declined to print back in the day. There was that one SW blogger fellow who’s been blocked by Dave Prowse and John Williams on twitter for their behavior. Seriously, what issues could anyone possibly have with them?

There are ridiculous trolls, of course. That’s not what I’m talking about here. There are legitimate criticisms being levied against TLJ that are being attributed to trolls in order to hand-wave them away.

Think about what you’re saying. “[T]hat one SW blogger fellow” isn’t representative of half the fanbase. The people who harassed Tran aren’t representative of half the fanbase. It’s become very easy to paint anyone dissatisfied with TLJ using that broad brush, though.

There are Lucasfilm employees on Twitter right now trolling Star Wars fans and comparing the situation to GamerGate. Just absurd. If Twitter had existed back when Lucas released the SEs and he posted his famous quote about the movies being his and not the fans’ (paraphrasing), what do you think the result would be? If the creators are going to participate in social media and actively berate their critics, the social media mob is going to descend upon them.

TV’s Frink said:

Jay said:

TFA receives an overwhelmingly positive response from fans and everything is cool.

Are you new here?

Are you new to the internet?

This forum doesn’t encompass the entirety of the conversation, nor is it even a microcosm representative of the entirety of Star Wars fandom. It’s a subset of a subset. The discussion here may have become contentious, but in the rest of the world, by and large, the response to TFA was overwhelmingly positive.

That blogger fellow got into the credentialed podcast area at Celebration, which indicates to me Lucasfilm doesn’t vet these people very well. I wasn’t aware of Lucasfilm employees trolling fans, or do you mean Rian Johnson?

To say that Rian Johnson is trolling fans is to have a very loose definition of the word.

I think he’s subtly trolling. He’s too clever to come at people directly.

The Lucasfilm employee who posted a selfie while drinking from a mug that says “fanboy tears” on it is trolling, though.

Post
#1225020
Topic
Taking a stand against toxic fandom (and other )
Time

DominicCobb said:

Jay said:

DominicCobb said:

Any comparisons to Gamergate are accurate insofar as the harrasers are concerned (though I haven’t seen these comparisons from LFL employees).

https://twitter.com/rianjohnson/status/1016392684242550784

GamerGate: another great example of using a minority of harassers to paint an entire community with that wide brush and obscure the original criticisms.

Okay, well was I wrong? I’m not seeing the part in that tweet where he says that anyone who hates his movie is a Gamergate level harraser. He’s pretty spot on in the comparison.

Did you read the preceding tweet that he was responding to? It was about ComicsGate, another supposedly hate-driven campaign that’s being used to paint many comics fans with the same brush as GamerGate, with the usual shitstirring by the usual frauds looking for attention/money like Quinn and Sarkeesian.

Maybe he’s not doing it intentionally, but by drawing the comparisons to what’s going on with Star Wars, I find it hard to believe he doesn’t know who and what he’s inviting into the discussion.

Post
#1225008
Topic
Taking a stand against toxic fandom (and other )
Time

DominicCobb said:

Any comparisons to Gamergate are accurate insofar as the harrasers are concerned (though I haven’t seen these comparisons from LFL employees).

https://twitter.com/rianjohnson/status/1016392684242550784

GamerGate: another great example of using a minority of harassers to paint an entire community with that wide brush and obscure the original criticisms.

Post
#1224982
Topic
Taking a stand against toxic fandom (and other )
Time

SilverWook said:

There’s a big difference between merely saying This movie sucks! and taking it out on the people who made it. When Star Trek: The Motion Picture came out, Trekkers were not screaming for Robert Wise’s head. Even the late Harlan Ellison wrote a polite, but negative review in Starlog. And this is the guy who often took potshots at Gene Roddenberry the way Stephen King hates on Kubrick.

Social media is the big factor here. It’s possible rotten fans may have always been with us. I imagine there were letters even Cinefanstatique magazine declined to print back in the day. There was that one SW blogger fellow who’s been blocked by Dave Prowse and John Williams on twitter for their behavior. Seriously, what issues could anyone possibly have with them?

There are ridiculous trolls, of course. That’s not what I’m talking about here. There are legitimate criticisms being levied against TLJ that are being attributed to trolls in order to hand-wave them away.

Think about what you’re saying. “[T]hat one SW blogger fellow” isn’t representative of half the fanbase. The people who harassed Tran aren’t representative of half the fanbase. It’s become very easy to paint anyone dissatisfied with TLJ using that broad brush, though.

There are Lucasfilm employees on Twitter right now trolling Star Wars fans and comparing the situation to GamerGate. Just absurd. If Twitter had existed back when Lucas released the SEs and he posted his famous quote about the movies being his and not the fans’ (paraphrasing), what do you think the result would be? If the creators are going to participate in social media and actively berate their critics, the social media mob is going to descend upon them.

TV’s Frink said:

Jay said:

TFA receives an overwhelmingly positive response from fans and everything is cool.

Are you new here?

Are you new to the internet?

This forum doesn’t encompass the entirety of the conversation, nor is it even a microcosm representative of the entirety of Star Wars fandom. It’s a subset of a subset. The discussion here may have become contentious, but in the rest of the world, by and large, the response to TFA was overwhelmingly positive.

Post
#1224948
Topic
Taking a stand against toxic fandom (and other )
Time

TFA receives an overwhelmingly positive response from fans and everything is cool.

TLJ receives mixed reviews and it’s because of the social media swamp and “toxic fans”.

I’m having trouble buying into this narrative. What happened in the 2 years between these films that turned a chunk of the fanbase rotten?

Nothing. Nothing at all. Star Wars fans are the same fans they’ve always been. TLJ is a divisive movie; it has a strong perspective. If it were as derivative and formulaic as TFA, we wouldn’t be debating the toxicity of the fanbase. We’d be skipping along, arm in arm, on our way to Episode IX, with some of us grumbling along the way, just like we did with TFA.

Post
#1224830
Topic
Episode VIII : The Last Jedi - Discussion * <strong><em>SPOILER THREAD</em></strong> *
Time

Collipso said:

Jay said:

Agreed that some female points of view would be refreshing.

A bit all over the place, but a passionate take:
https://youtu.be/FQTornBY4Ig

More organized:
https://youtu.be/2LXZJy0NEck

Serious rants:
https://youtu.be/0jY010oKl7c
https://youtu.be/FQTornBY4Ig

jay, you linked the same video twice. the second one under ‘serious rants’ is the same one as the ‘all over the place’ one.

Oops, thanks. Fixed. First video should be this: https://youtu.be/Kc3H9hYh6KQ

Post
#1224747
Topic
PC Specs
Time

CHEWBAKAspelledwrong said:

Jay said:

I do all my work on a 2015 MacBook Pro.

I wish I had one of those. I have a 2012 15", last model with the optical drive. Have loved it, but has been acting out lately. I don’t want one of those P.O.S. low-travel keyboards or to pay for the gimmick bar, though. Hopefully it can make it until the next-gen model is released, whenever that may finally be.

I’m not a fan of the new keyboards either, but I think we’re stuck with them. I had a 2010 previously, which probably had the same keyboard as yours. Pretty nice to type on. The 2015 keyboard is shallower than that, but still better than the latest models. Not a problem at my desk because I use an external keyboard, but when lounging on the couch or traveling, it’s annoying.

I don’t mind losing the optical drive, but Apple’s obsession with thinner/lighter is wrecking core functionality now.

Post
#1224717
Topic
Taking a stand against toxic fandom (and other )
Time

DominicCobb said:

I can’t comment on the reaction to TPM at the time, because I was a kid and only knew other kids opinions and we all liked it… but I do know, once I finally started going on the internet, the discourse about the film was overwhelmingly negative.

Honestly it still kinda is, but I feel like there’s now a pretty significant section of PT lovers out there (mostly people who saw them when they were kids too, if I had to guess).

I saw TPM with my roommate and fellow Star Wars fan in college and both of us walked out of the theater having had a good time. We loved any scene with a lightsaber in it, brushed off Jar-Jar as kid stuff that wasn’t the end of the world, and had a good laugh at the Tusken Raiders during the pod race.

It’s not perfect by any stretch, but at least I enjoyed myself.

Post
#1224549
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

moviefreakedmind said:

Jay said:

moviefreakedmind said:

The sexual harassment aspects of Title IX didn’t just protect women in college. I don’t like sharing personal stories so I’ll keep it brief, but I had to seek assistance from campus resources for help dealing with it when it happened to me. Anyway, your summary of Title IX is totally uninformed.

I never said it only affected, or was only meant for, women, or that the scope of the Obama admin’s recommendations was entirely bad. Their recommendations have, however, proven destructive for young men (and even women) accused of sexual assault by denying them due process. Placing the onus on educational institutions’ staff – who aren’t professional investigators – to conduct what should be a criminal investigation and issue punitive action is the wrong approach.

I’m sorry for what happened to you, regardless.

It’s no big deal, but the funny thing is that they did actually did very little. It took at least a month of pestering from me just to move me to a new roommate down the hall and no one was punished at all. It makes no sense to me to scrap the entire thing for no reason other than that there are some unfair and unjust cases. Wouldn’t rational reform be the proper option?

One last reply so as not to be rude…yes, revising the guidelines that weren’t working would’ve been sufficient. Unfortunately, Trump is a sledgehammer, not a scalpel. His general approach of “regulation is bad” and “erase Obama’s legacy” prevailed.

Post
#1224429
Topic
PC Specs
Time

Built this years ago when the 4790K was new and have only upgraded the video card since then (GTX 970 originally). Strictly for gaming.

Windows 10 Pro
Corsair 250D Mini-ITX case
Intel i7 4790K (OC)
Corsair H100i V2 water cooler
Asus Z97I-Plus motherboard
Asus GTX 1080 Ti Turbo
16GB RAM
480GB M.2 SSD
Asus 34" ultrawide (3440x1440)

It was a pain in the ass squeezing it all in that tiny case, though. Given all the hassles of small case builds and the costs of parts these days, I think I’m going with something prebuilt for my next gaming rig. Maybe this, with the idea that I’ll be doing all my gaming from the couch in my living room:

https://www.corsair.com/us/en/one

I do all my work on a 2015 MacBook Pro with an external Dell 27" 5K display.

Post
#1224357
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

moviefreakedmind said:

The sexual harassment aspects of Title IX didn’t just protect women in college. I don’t like sharing personal stories so I’ll keep it brief, but I had to seek assistance from campus resources for help dealing with it when it happened to me. Anyway, your summary of Title IX is totally uninformed.

I never said it only affected, or was only meant for, women, or that the scope of the Obama admin’s recommendations was entirely bad. Their recommendations have, however, proven destructive for young men (and even women) accused of sexual assault by denying them due process. Placing the onus on educational institutions’ staff – who aren’t professional investigators – to conduct what should be a criminal investigation and issue punitive action is the wrong approach.

I’m sorry for what happened to you, regardless.

Mrebo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jay said:

Title IX is trash though and universities should never have been put on the hook for investigating and punishing students for sex crimes. I’m not crying over that at all.

Of course you aren’t.

Why “of course”?

It’s cool. I don’t take his posts seriously anymore.

I’m bowing out of this thread now.

Post
#1224350
Topic
Taking a stand against toxic fandom (and other )
Time

Ahmed Best didn’t deserve the hate he got back then (he played the part he was given and gave George what he wanted) and mocking his depression is wrong. The dude dealt with insane levels of criticism, from both fans and the media.

https://twitter.com/ComicPerch/status/1015813664497065984

When you put time and energy into creating something and the world tells you it sucks, it’s devastating.

Post
#1224162
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

moviefreakedmind said:

Jay said:

moviefreakedmind said:

Jay said:

While there’s more to quality of life than just environmental threats and humans are still better off today than at any other point in history,

Do we have to make this pointless statement every single time we criticize Trump?

Do we need to pointlessly mention how terrible things are the world over every single time we criticize Trump?

I’m criticizing him and others over how they are failing to address what I think is making the world terrible for many of its inhabitants. Stop misrepresenting me. I’ve never posted in this thread and just said, “The world is terrible” and not backed up my statement with examples and evidence that I think supports my claim.

P.S. - Things aren’t terrible.

Are you ever going to bother to address any of the things that I’ve brought up to support my claim? You, more than anyone else in this thread, have consistently refused to have any kind of discussion. I don’t understand how you can claim that others in here are being unproductive when it’s you that says your opinion and refuses to actually defend it or provide any kind of rationale for why you think everyone in here is wrong. You ignore all of my points almost every time. And you do this to everyone else too.

I don’t think I’ve ignored anyone else’s points, at least not intentionally. Yours I gloss over because I don’t think you back up much at all. Most of your claims are little more than complaining based on your overwhelmingly negative perspective that has little to do with reality. Cite policy, cite laws, cite research/data, etc. and you’ll have my attention, but otherwise it mostly reads like doom and gloom. It’s damn depressing.

Feel free to push me on more fact-based, data-driven points if you feel I’m lacking.

I agree climate change is probably the most pressing issue for us as a species and it’s unfortunate that bad politics could end up wrecking the planet.

Unfortunate? It’s not just politicians. It’s primarily to blame on a willfully ignorant population that votes for people like Trump. Even Hillary, although she would’ve been better, was still incredibly weak on environmentalism. There’s also a lot of corporate propaganda in conservative-leaning media that spread outright lies about climate change. I’ve noticed lately that they’re back to spreading the lie that climate change is a total myth. I think it should be illegal to publish fraudulent studies about climate change, kind of like how it’s illegal for tobacco companies to publish fraudulent studies that cigarettes won’t destroy your lungs.

Most voters don’t vote based on a single issue and are primarily concerned with immediate results over future consequences, and I think the economy, immigration, and anti-PC culture took precedence over climate change in the last election for Trump voters (at least some of whom were Obama voters previously).

The immigration issue is something that appeals to ignorant people, willfully or otherwise, are compelled by. Immigration isn’t a problem now. It wasn’t a problem then. Illegal immigration is going down. Obama deported more people than his predecessors. It’s a manufactured issue.

If it’s manufactured, why are people on both sides so fired up about Trump’s immigration policy? There are still millions of undocumented immigrants already here. What do we do about them? As long as their status is up in the air and some people keep coming in illegally (which they are), it will be an issue voters care about.

And Trump is about as PC as you can get. He and his people have their own version of political correctness. Look at their responses to Hamilton’s cast criticizing Pence (Trump even demanded that the theater be a safe space), Samantha Bee’s comment, Kathy Griffin’s stunt, and Michelle Wolfe’s stand-up and tell me I’m wrong.

You’re wrong. Trump’s people are mostly pointing out hypocrisy on the left. Compare responses from the left regarding any insults thrown at Obama and his family versus responses from the left when insults are hurled at Trump — they don’t care about decorum at all when it’s not their guy.

Both parties only have morals when the target is on the other side.

Democrats lost because they had a mediocre platform and the wrong candidate. They need to come out with a rock star in 2020, but with the party going hard left on immigration and pretending that most Americans don’t want secure borders, they’re setting themselves up for another loss.

You actually are right that they had a mediocre platform and the wrong candidate. They tried to have a center-right, status quo platform. They aren’t pretending anything about immigration and borders. I don’t know what Steven Crowder and Candace Owens are saying these days since I don’t follow people like them anymore, but there are no major Democrats that don’t believe in secure borders. It amuses me that you claim that people like me are getting their information from insane fake news media when it’s very, very obvious that your views on the world are coming from right-wing outlets. Hillary Clinton’s platform was for secure borders and extreme vetting for people traveling here from the muslim world. Trump’s platform was ban muslims and build a wall. The side that is pretending that Americans want insane immigration policies is the right wing.

Trump is a salesman. He outsold Hillary while selling the same product. Also, I think most liberals who voted for Hillary did so despite her position on immigration, not because of it. That was her trying to reach across the aisle, though she didn’t need to extend her arm very far.

moviefreakedmind said:

Jay said:

Who has it worse now than before Trump was president?

Undocumented immigrants for sure. American citizens that are children of undocumented immigrants. Muslim Americans, or just Arab Americans regardless of their race. Public-school students thanks to Betsy DeVos. Women in college are getting Title IX protections revoked thanks to her too.

We’ve covered immigration extensively, so I’m not going back there. Other than enforcing current law, Trump’s admin isn’t doing much that’s different from prior administrations. You want to talk about a manufactured issue, it’s Trump’s war on immigrants as portrayed in the media. It’s the same shitshow it’s always been, just a different guy doing the song and dance.

What changes in law or policy have made things worse for Muslims or Arabs? Let’s talk about the “Muslim ban”. What has been the real-world effect of that policy? Not what you think might happen, or could happen. What actually happened as a result?

I don’t know much about what DeVos has done to affect public schools, so I can’t speak to that. Of course she looked like a moron during her confirmation hearings and I’m sure the position is well beyond her level of competence. Title IX is trash though and universities should never have been put on the hook for investigating and punishing students for sex crimes. I’m not crying over that at all.

Jay said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jay said:

moviefreakedmind said:

Jay said:

While there’s more to quality of life than just environmental threats and humans are still better off today than at any other point in history,

Do we have to make this pointless statement every single time we criticize Trump?

Do we need to pointlessly mention how terrible things are the world over every single time we criticize Trump?

P.S. - Things aren’t terrible.

Things are quite terrible for many people now though.

This is always true at any time. Until someone invents free energy and the Star Trek replicator, the world will be a terrible place for some people, but hopefully in ever-decreasing numbers (which has been the general trend throughout history).

Okay, so do we just do nothing? I don’t understand this notion that there will always be suffering so let’s actively do as little as possible to better the lives of our people. I genuinely don’t get it. Maybe you’d feel less complacent if you weren’t a well-to-do white guy.

Did I say do nothing? No. Not once. Not ever. I said the world is better than you make it out to be, and it is. I didn’t say it was perfect and never said we shouldn’t strive for better.

However, that doesn’t mean I’m going to focus on everything that’s broken and walk around chronically depressed waiting for the world to end like you do. If I’m so complacent, please tell me the specific things you’ve done to make the world a better place. You don’t even vote, right?

I grew up in a small town in a family that would probably fit squarely into the lower middle class category. My mommy and daddy didn’t get me into a prestigious school and they didn’t foot the bill when I did go to college (my dad wanted me to join the military, ha), though they did contribute as much as they could afford, and for that I’m grateful. I had some grants to get me started out and relied on loans for the rest. When I graduated and couldn’t find a job in my field (English, mostly looked for copywriting jobs), I taught myself how to code on a computer I bought with a credit card (banks love to throw credit cards at new grads and hook them early). Lots of places wouldn’t even talk to me — despite my supposedly overwhelming white privilege — because I didn’t have the right degree. Everyone I can recall interviewing with was a white guy, and it didn’t seem to do me any favors. I washed windows for a year and a half to pay the bills until I was offered my first “real” job. I’ve excelled at my career because I’m better than most at what I do, and I wasn’t given a free pass because I’m white and male. As tech opportunities have increased, white guys have been matched or even outnumbered by minorities at my recent places of work, and the number of women at my last job was surprising and welcome. My boss was Indian, as were many of my coworkers, and we had a decent number of female engineers and a largely female QA staff. Three out of the four designers on my team were women, none of them originally from the U.S., all of whom I hired directly.

Labeling me privileged and complacent just doesn’t fly.

As for keeping people like Trump from winning, I’d say we abolish the electoral college. The only reason people like it now is because it gives unpopular Republicans a better chance at winning the presidency without having to get the most votes.

I didn’t want Trump to win, but I think the Electoral College did exactly what it was supposed to do: give smaller communities a voice in federal government without being drowned out by major population centers. Not liking the results doesn’t mean the system is broken.

Post
#1224122
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Jay said:

moviefreakedmind said:

Jay said:

While there’s more to quality of life than just environmental threats and humans are still better off today than at any other point in history,

Do we have to make this pointless statement every single time we criticize Trump?

Do we need to pointlessly mention how terrible things are the world over every single time we criticize Trump?

P.S. - Things aren’t terrible.

Things are quite terrible for many people now though.

This is always true at any time. Until someone invents free energy and the Star Trek replicator, the world will be a terrible place for some people, but hopefully in ever-decreasing numbers (which has been the general trend throughout history). Who has it worse now than before Trump was president? The environment is definitely getting the shaft and that will have effects on people for sure, but what other policy changes have made it immediately and demonstrably worse for significant numbers of people?

Democrats lost because they had a mediocre platform and the wrong candidate.

These are only two of many other reasons, and in fact the mediocre platform (which I agree with) could have easily been overcome by the wrong candidate (which I don’t agree with) if it wasn’t a perfect storm of other things too. Trump barely won, any and all the factors were tipping points, not just the two you like to pick on.

I think as long as you believe that it was a “perfect storm” that got Trump into office – assuming the Democratic Party shares that view and continues to base policy and candidates on it – you’ll have a tough time winning future elections.