Originally posted by: Mr Bungle
EDIT
I have never read the novel, was Anakins turn longer and different, I know the book was much more intense than the movie
It would have been a good idea for a 3 hr Star Wars, (but would Lucas want it too run that long) as this was the most important film in the prequel maybe saga as it covered Anakins descent and turn in to evil (which was considered weak by some- people) and the other important points such as The Rebellion scenes etc
It would have been interesting to see it as an "R" (i assume your highest rating) with the scenes but would the key SW audience be unable to attend(I am not to sure on the American Rating System) and it would definatly play on Lucas/Lucasfim mind, I know they had problems with the U.K censors over AOTC they had problems with a headbutt(Jango and Obi Wan) and were offered it uncut at a higher rating, but took the slightly lower rating with the headbutt cut out
Yeah, the book sets up Anakins turn earlier and it therefore seems like he gets to think about things for a while. Palp and him have more discussions than the movie. Hell, the way those conversations went, I was almost on Palpatines side. Intense....maybe, but more believable yes.
A 3 hour star wars is OK in my book. An R-rated SW is ok with me too. He should make a directors cut (I guess he had the final say anyways but...whatever) that is catered toward older audiences just for the sake of seeing it a different way.....who knows, most of you'd like it I'm sure. Yes, R is our highest rating in the US that gets any sort of audience. NC-17 is higher but thats basically commercial suicide and rarle gets to a theater. Most theaters I know block people under 17 from going to R movies (without a parent), especially popular ones so yes, the target audience woulda been screwed.