logo Sign In

Jaiman Tuckuh

User Group
Members
Join date
20-Oct-2005
Last activity
13-Apr-2015
Posts
409

Post History

Post
#173755
Topic
DVD Brands
Time
Originally posted by: Rotten Johnny
I have Nero 6.0 , I just got off the phone with guy who put my computer together and he had the same problem with the freezin, so when Windows updates it blocks somethin in Nero and I have to download some kind of update for Nero or upgrade to 7.0, hopeful that fixes it.


I've always read that if you burn below the disc's rated speed, you can get a worse burn. The disc's dyes are designed for a certain laser strength. OTOH, some manufacturer's burners do a good job of adapting to the way the disc is responding to the burn. If the disc is rated at 4X, then it will probably burn better at 4X if you're having problems. Often, you can burn higher, without a meaningful increase in errors. You're shooting in the dark if you can't test for errors, though (which most drives can't).


"Verify data on disc after burning" is an option on the 2nd page of the burning dialog, in Nero. Other burning proggies tend to have it, too. But there are more thorough tests (see below).


If you are having technical problems, and you can't cure them, PM me, and (more importantly) Go Here: CDFreaks Forum Most of these guys bleeping experts, and those that aren't tend to get corrected. And, its a freindly place to go. (As long as you read the FAQ's first). You can find out stuff that's as technical as you want, or you can go for simple answers. The search function is fairly useless, but the faqs are excellent. (Always read the FAQ's before you ask. They get tense about that)(And try to search, so you can say you tried). Start off by testing your system with Nero.


There are two kinds of Fuji: the ones that say "Made in Japan" on the box (Excellent), and the ones that say "Made in Taiwan" (Horrible).
The same is true for all other brands, to my knowledge, except Verbatim. Verbatim owns its own plants, so the Made-In isn't important.
But many people find Verbatims to give variable results. (There might be another/other brands that have their own factories, so don't quote me on that). In many people's emphatic opinions, Verbatim makes the best Dual-Layer discs.

If you can't find good ones locally, and you live in the US, Rima is an oustanding online source (Taiyo Yuden are particularly excellent).


Also, most burners are picky about which disc-manufacturers they like. But each firmware upgrade makes them less picky.

Many burners have an issue either with +R discs, or -R discs. (It generally depends on if the maker backed -R or the development of +R ).

Keep in mind that any brand, er, manufacturer can have a bad disc or a bad batch. Quality control is by statistical sampling. (And sometimes that warehouse in Pheonix will have an air conditioning breakdown in July; or the truck will be parked in the sun too long).


Use Nero's CDSpeed's "Transfer Rate Test" (Test Disc -> F2) to test your discs. If the Transfer Rate Curve has dips in it, it will be more likely to have problems in a player.

While you are in CDSpeed, look in "Extras" - if the "Disc Quality Test" is not grayed-out, you are the lucky owner of a drive that can test for the different kind of read-errors on a disc. The "Quality Score" will tell you how good the result is. For BenQ's (aka Phillips), test at 8X speed, and for others (LiteOn, and whatever else) use 4X.

If you have an OEM Nero that forgot to put CDSpeed on the disc, you can download it from CDSpeed2000. It doesn't conflict with other burning software, it only tests.


For people considering a new burner, BenQ/Phillips is currently the best choice, for many reasons, in the majority opinion at CDFreaks (and in my own opinion). It is best used in conjunction with CDFreaks (to get the most of its benefits).

Edited: fixed a link that I wrecked by overuse of the delete key.

Belatedly edited: qualifed a media opinion I can't claim to be expert on, expanded on something, and added a caveat.
Post
#170993
Topic
Capturing PS1 audio
Time
Weird. Does the PS1 sound ok on the tv?

If yes, then maybe the PS1's audio line-level amp is going funny, but the tv tolerates it better than the recorder?

Maybe there's a malfunction causing either an impedance mismatch, or DC, or inaudibly low/high frequency noise.

Can you hook up with antenna cable (antenna-out to antenna-in), instead of the patch cord? (I don't know the various consoles's hookups).
Or run the audio through a vcr's audio inputs & outputs, as a buffer?

Another possibility is a ground-loop. Especially if the PS1 is plugged straight into an outlet, instead of a transformer or batteries.
You might try unhooking cable/satellite, or the PC, if any of those are connected (those two are the worst culprits, but any other device can contribute to ground loop problems). That would mainly cause buzzing and volume problems, but maybe other things.


And, first things last, Could you put a soundclip on Yousendit, or somewhere? That might help diagnose it.
Post
#169418
Topic
Idea & Info: star trek the motion picture - preservation
Time
The aspect ratios look weird because the matte has been opened partway, on both ST6 DVD's. They aren't the theatrical ~2.35:1.
But it has been said that Meyer supervised the opening of the matte, and the framing for the 2nd dvd (it is different).

The (letterboxed) 1st DVD is shifted upwards, for Klingon subtitles. Which looks *really* weird. And it plays as horizontally squished, for me (slightly). IMDB says they're both 2.35:1, but that's horsepiles - compare them to the movies that are...

ST VI and X were the only ones shot in Super 35 - which is matted off for theatrical, and leaves a *lot* more vertical, for home-video/dvd/HD.
Super 35 is non-anamorphic - the optical soundtrack is left off, so that there is more room for picture width. I would imagine, then, that its significantly wider than fullscreen. It's useful for extensive CGI, for some reason. The drawbacks are that it has no sound in the dailies, progress screenings for big wigs require a soundtrack be added, it demands a very fine-grain film and meticulous quality-control.
Post
#168506
Topic
Idea & Info: star trek the motion picture - preservation
Time
Originally posted by: THX-1138
Originally posted by: SammyTheBull
Another edit I am working on is called "Star Trek: The Motion Sickness". It is a joining of ALL the footage

...for a second I thought this would go to "It is a joining of all the footage from all the Star Trek films and their deleted scenes into a single film"...



Back in 1991, I went to a marathon showing of the first 5 Trek films at some big New York city movie theater. Also included was a preview of the new soon to be released Star Trek VI.

They called the event "Sit Long and Prosper", and I called it "Too much dam Star Trek in one day".

One positive thing about that marathon was that they showed a kind of shortend edit of the Special Longer Edition version of STTMP.
(Does that make sense?)

That was a treat seeing that version on the big screen, as I had seen the original cut that way in 1979.

THX-1138


So, there was a longer version in 1979? I wonder if that's the one I saw, back then. So many versions...
I could swear that the TV version had more than 10 minutes of footage added, too. Seems like there was rejected cloud footage, for one...
Still searching for most of my off-the-air tapes... a large number of them were recorded on an early-model stereo-vhs which apparently recorded the HiFi in a non-standard way. It was always serviced to factory specs, but I've never been able to get any of them to track on *any* other machine, grumble.

Anyhow, a stupid question, if I may. Would Motion Sickness have had repeated scenes, or would it have been everything spliced in sequence?
Post
#168502
Topic
Idea & Info: star trek the motion picture - preservation
Time
Originally posted by: skyjedi2005
I think it is a very good cerebral story, very reminiscent of roddenberry trek before the action film took over. Alan Dean Foster wrote the original script for the then star trek phase II t.v. series, called "in thy image". He got the idea from the classic episode with the robot called nomad. roddenberry's idea for the first star trek to be about going back in time to stop the assination of j.f.k., or his script "the man thing" where kirk meets god, never happened. But i think some of the religious overtones of the first movie, and star trek V were liberally borrowed from his ideas for the first film.

Anybody out there who does'nt know who alan dean foster is? he wrote the novelization for the first film of the star wars trilogy.


Yeah, it was a good story. But it was muddy, because everything was rushed. The studio took the attitute that it cost more & took longer than a romantic comedy, already. So why give it any more? Yeesh. Then they applied the cost, of the Phase II series's development, to the movie, fer' chrissakes. Maaaan... I'd better not get started...

They really needed more time to tweak the story. Although I imagine it would've gone faster, and turned out a lot better, if they'd taken Roddenberry's advice to use Alan Dean Foster to be the sole writer of the screenplay.
Post
#168501
Topic
Idea & Info: star trek the motion picture - preservation
Time
Originally posted by: hiphats
Originally posted by: skyjedi2005
Has anyone ever done a preservation of the theatrical or longer television cut of the film for dvd as the official release is the director's cut and not the original.

The widescreen vhs I have is much longer than the official dvd, and i'm sure someone out there has it on laserdisc.


Preservation of the original theatrical cut in widescreen has already been done, and I have it on 2 DVD-Rs. If interested, E-mail me.


Do you (or anyone) have the Wrath of Khan LD? I'm wondering if the transfer is any less-faded-looking than the DVD's...

Same question TMP, but from what I remember, it has looked faded in the TV and VHS transfers, from the start...

Anyhow, the HD version of TMP looks like the Theatrical version, to me. It's obviously not the Director's Edition, and it's "missing" just about the right amount of material vs. the Extended VHS. The soundtrack seems to match my recollection of the CD; I didn't do a direct comparison, but I've played the hell out of that CD, over the decades...
Post
#168488
Topic
Idea: Another Star Trek Phase 2 idea
Time
Originally posted by: THX-1138
I for one have far too much on my plate at this time to do any work on STTMP (I was working on a huge extra long version), but I did have a few ideas on how to make that film a bit better. One of them is that the Film should open on Vulcan with Spock and then cut to the Klingon battle with V-jer, then to Kirk on Earth.

THX-1138


And, uh, might I ask you what those other ideas, are, that you've got?

It would be a lot better if the movie opened on Spock, instead of the Klingons. The movies often start on someone else...
Spock would sense V'ger (V'ger music), cut to V'ger (V'ger music), here come the Klingons.

Right after D.C PhantomEditor posted, another fellow got inspired and started snipping away at TMP. Then he somehow got the notion that he was stepping on Jack's work and creating confusion. He apologised and quit, didn't listen to encoragagement to continue. Weird, & a shame.
I'll see about putting his 1st-rough-cuts of the teaser & Act I up, on putfile or somewhere. But I think they'd need to be shrunk to a smaller filesize, to be yousendit-ed, or whatever.

Anyway, he pointed out that the original Star Trek episodes started on the Enterprise. And that's stuck with me. But a couple of movies make that damned-near impossible. For TMP, a person would pretty much have to make an "Engineer's log" by Scotty, over clips of working-on-the bridge, and establishing shots of engineering---

Dunno if it'd be possible to paste words together without it *sounding* like the words were pasted together. There's 2 or 3 games for source.
(Anyone have the The 25th-Anniversary-Game-Special-Edition? And a way to rip the audio?). (I've got Judgement Rites to dink around with).

I've been taking notes on editing the first 9 movies (Nemesis, IMO, would best be turned into a Special-Effects Reel. ).

But consider them Vapor-Edits. To do them my way would require mastering the skills of dubbing, matteing, rendering, and...
I've got as far as ripping one to the hdd. (Thank you ADigitalMan!). And that was for an unrelated experiment.
My main 2 problems are time and hdd-space. 'Tis a possiblilty of concocting unique bits I'd share with others, to use in there's, though.

But there is a guy who's doing a TMP-edit. Dunno if he's sticking with his 48-minute goal, or if he's decided to shoot for 96. (One could always say it "includes deleted scenes" :-). He's staying anonymous. There are links to samples in these 2 threads a NewVoyages.

Thread with his obsolete sample Thread with his latest sample

It's quite dissimilar to what I'd like to do, fortunatally. Its great work. Love his theme. (Except I never liked the movie fonts).
Post
#167997
Topic
Star Trek V - Re-Edit (InThyImage) (Released)
Time
Originally posted by: tweaker
Originally posted by: Jaiman Tuckuh
(Off Topic)

Correction, I was thinking of a reference to "Planet of the Apes - The Twilight Zone Edit" or "Twilight Zone - the Planet of the Apes edit", or words to that effect, mentioned on the NewVoyages forum. Jack Marshall didn't do that one, apparently. Anyone heard of it?


Yup, just watched it a couple days ago. It can be downloaded here: http://theforbidden-zone.com/media/tzone.shtml

As far as I know, it was only released as a crummy-quality quicktime movie. But something is better than nothing

Wow! He really nailed it! Dayyyum! Yeah, the quality is super-bad...

Thanks for that link, tweaker!

(On Topic).

Well, I flubbed up. It didn't go into a.b.superman. I musta accidentally left it off when I was trying (failed) to get it to list a.b.dvd as the 2nd group. So I attached the nzb to a post in a.b.superman.

For folks who's server does .nzb, but their software doesn't - then BNR2 (freeware) can do it for ya. BNR2

I've just posted the Dvd-rom folder, by itself, for people who snagged the nrg version, earlier. This one made it to a.b.superman.

(Edit)

Blax25 is going up now.
Post
#167783
Topic
Star Trek V - Re-Edit (InThyImage) (Released)
Time
Originally posted by: Darth Mallwalker
Thank you !

You may fire when ready


You're welcome! It's my pleasure.


In Thy Image, video_ts version is finally posting.

Sorry, it took so long, D.M. And took so long again - it was a long day, yesterday, and I crashed out before I saw your reply.


"ST5 Re-Edit - Phase II - In Thy Image - Video_TS - Now with covers!" It's crossposted to a.b.dvd, a.b.multimedia.startrek, a.b.multimedia.scifi, and a.b.superman. (With the latter having the fewest headers to pull, of course).


Folks who's server doesn't carry a.b.dvd will probably not see it. I couldn't figure out a way to keep the software from listing a.b.dvd first.
But that situation shouldn't occur with premium servers. Bad luck for anyone using a low-end server in a multi-server downloader, tho'.


The first 3 groups were the ones it was originally posted to. That gives me the best chance for my requests to be seen. (Requesting the
dvd versions of other Jack Marshall edits - Phantom Remix, WNMHGB, Twilight Zone(?), and Cage(?)).


This posting will include the Dvd-rom folder.

For folks who got the .nrg, originally, I will post a rar of the Dvd-rom folder, separately.


The posting software is estimating less than a day. I may have had it set too low, last time.

Blax25 - WNMHGB, restoration edit, reauthored from the Dvd-ready-mpeg, and a VHS->VCD reference, will be next. ISO, this time.


Note to self: prepare all files beforehand, next time. Yep, I'm still editing 'em...
Post
#165645
Topic
Idea: 40 Year Old Virgin - theatrical cut?
Time
Originally posted by: ReverendBeastly
If you could possibly get the whole of Anchorman theatrical cut, I'd really love to get that. I'm sure we could work out a way of digital sending.

{Expletive}!!! The HD version has the chocolate squirrel. No red candle.


I borrowed the dvd, timed out the hangover scene, and downloaded it. They match.

Sorry for raising false hopes. :-C I'll keep them both on my search list, see if anything unreleased turns up.
Post
#165486
Topic
Idea: 40 Year Old Virgin - theatrical cut?
Time
I've found that many HDTV airings appear to be Theatrical cuts. Same should be true for the early runs on Cable/Sattelite, but those rarely get captured, it seems.

Anyhow, Anchorman has just expired from Newshosting, and my Giganews isn't unlimited. Unless it has some spectacular visuals, it probably wont make it to the repost group. So, if you don't newsgroup, or don't have Giganews, you could see if anyone could get it for you. Or, if you can give me the exact times of the scenes you need, I could try to get those. I hate, detest, and loath snail mail, so if you can get someone else...


I don't see 'Virgin posted up there. I don't recall if it has been. I'll keep my eyes open & give you a heads up if I see it.

Post
#165482
Topic
Help Wanted: Newsgroup Users... Please Help Me
Time
Originally posted by: Marty McFly
Does anyone know a good place to get fan edits on usenet??


Well, it might be the wrong forum to answer in, hope no one minds.

When Segaflip comes back from his vacation, he'll be posting lots more. His Star Wars posts go to a.b.starwars. He's been crossposting the rest to a.b.dvd, a.b.dvd5, and a.b.superman.

If you have Giganews, Easynews (their web-search goes back about 30 days, their nntp might be catching up), Newshosting, or some other server with long retention, you could still get a few. Check "~~~Segaflip's Newsgroup Posting List~~~" over in the starwars fan-edit/release forum, here. Right now you might be able to get a couple of CLP releases (he posted those under the nym of "CLP Rep"), and the Dune Fanfiltration Edit. In a.b.starwars, the latest one was A Digital Man's Musical Journey.


You could also search "fan-edit", and variations of that on nfo.ngindex Oh, goody :-p, they're down for a few weeks.

Fansubs are kind-of a fan-edit, a.b.dvd.anime looks good. There's sub-dvd quality fansubs in other a.b.*.anime.* groups. (Usually very low quality, though).

A side note about Newshosting: their retention goes back farther than their ability to send headers. You can use BNR, or some other program to get that stuff with nzb's. If nzb's weren't posted, you can tediously get an nzb for each individual file at freenzbs (nzb also works for most premium servers).

And if you can get torrents to work, MySpleen is the place to go. If you try that, and need tech help, PM me.
Post
#165478
Topic
Help Wanted: Newsgroup Users... Please Help Me
Time
Originally posted by: klokwerk
Jalman Tuckuh:
No need to worry about it. I've already got someone helping me out. If you're interested in them, maybe I could send you them in a trade once i get them.


Well, that's solved.

Hey, thanks for the offer. I probably wont need to trade, I've got the headers, and it turns out that my queue isn't as crowded as it usually is.
Post
#165195
Topic
Help Wanted: Newsgroup Users... Please Help Me
Time
Originally posted by: klokwerk
I know this is slightly better-suited to the Off-Topic forum, but I felt it would get better noticed here. I would like to PiF some Transformers DVDs to some friends of mine here in Australia for New Year's.
  • Transformers Zone
  • Transformers: Car Robots Volume 1
  • Transformers: Robot Masters Volume 3

    Zone is a brand-new release and Car Robots is now receiving a repost. I do not know if Robot Masters is available at the moment.



  • Well, now that you've posted about them, I'm curious. I can get them on my unlimited account. But that's some serious headers to pull...

    I hate mailing stuff (or waiting for mail), and Australia seems a bit far. And I've heard customs a pain(?). Did you need them by New Years's Day? I don't know when I could get them into my download queue.


    Hmmm... anyone have tips on setting up a private FTP server? Or is that a bad idea?
    (It would cut into my torrenting, and my plans to post something to usenet, but I think I could spare the bandwidth).
    Post
    #161670
    Topic
    Star War, Episode III - Backstroke Of The West (part-finished release?)
    Time
    Originally posted by: Doctor M
    Text (.srt) complete version: http://adventureclub.postrock.net/botw.srt


    Yeah, woulda been cool if A Digital Man put that in. Hope someone will. Be a lot easier to read them, without the distracting counter.


    Happyness in now, with and Completionist-sake, of gratitude The Dark One when sending from to is a.b.starwars.

    It looks pretty clean, I wonder if it's from the DVD version?


    I just noticed "Star War..." in the subject line LOL! "In the far away galaxy..."

    Heh heh... 00:09:46,766 to, well, a while later.


    When edited with seeing of stupidity way...
    Post
    #161242
    Topic
    Star Trek V - Re-Edit (InThyImage) (Released)
    Time
    Originally posted by: Darth Mallwalker
    Thanks JT for re-posting both of those, although I arrived late to the party and In_Thy_Image had already scrolled off my news provider (but I did get WNMHGB).
    Any chance you'd re-re-post In_Thy_Image in a few weeks after it scrolls off Giganews ?

    If I'm not mistaken, you'd be the Mallwalker who's posted some coolness to Usenet that I've leeched. If that's the case, Thanks dude!



    Well, its about 4 or 5 days away from expiring on Giganews and I'm merely almost-positive that I'll be reposting it.
    This time, it would be a video_ts, with the torrented-version's dvd_rom folder, thanks to Da Man, Rikter.

    (One obstacle is that I've started MySpleening, as if I didn't have enough to suck up bandwidth, and.... but you don't care about that, heh).

    And I expect the mighty Segaflip will be posting the ISO at some point, so I still have to coordinate with him.
    Yes, I should've taken care of that by now.



    Well folks, you've probably noticed by now - but just in case, (relating to the side-topic of this thread) :
    ------> Blax25 - Star Trek: The Alternate Pilot - “Where No Man Has Gone Before” (Composite & Original Versions). <------

    I only had the "DVD-ready mpeg" (which I discovered after upping the VCD). No one replied to my usenet request for the real thing.
    So Rikter put it together with Doomsday's VCD-ready that I sent him.

    He made a nifty menu, and another pair of wicked-cool covers.
    Then 'Spleened it right up there.

    Have I mentioned, Rikter, sir, that you are Teh Awesomeness!

    (Misspelling of "Teh Awesomeness" is the intellectual (?) property of anime fans, everywhere, of whom I almost qualify. Infringement is intended).



    I can't get one stupid post up without editing it... And its 5:24, not 4:24.
    Post
    #156572
    Topic
    Star Trek V - Re-Edit (InThyImage) (Released)
    Time
    Originally posted by: Darth Mallwalker
    Thanks JT for re-posting both of those, although I arrived late to the party and In_Thy_Image had already scrolled off my news provider (but I did get WNMHGB).
    Any chance you'd re-re-post In_Thy_Image in a few weeks after it scrolls off Giganews ?


    I'd be cool with that. Lemme see about a couple of things. I should be able to give you a better answer soon.
    Post
    #156188
    Topic
    Star Trek V - Re-Edit (InThyImage) (Released)
    Time
    Originally posted by: skyjedi2005
    don't you know that "In thy image" was the name of the script that was eventually made into star trek the motion picture? it was written by alan dean foster, who i credit with authorship of the film. I could care less what paramount says.


    Good rant, by the way. I was just getting into it with my own rant, when it said something about 300 Gigabytes storage, or whatever. :-)

    Yeah, I knew. DCPhantomEditor must've known that he was stealing the title "In Thy Image" from an entirely different story.
    I imagine he did it because he edited it to be his idea of the premier episode of "Phase II". And, well, the title fits.

    And did you know that "In Thy Image" was originally a detailed treatment that GR wrote as a proposed episode for "Genesis II", called
    "Robot's Return"? I've read it, it's pretty good. It had most of the major elements - and yet a very limited special effects bill.
    Dagnabbit. LincolnEnterprises->Roddenberry.com doesn't seem to carry that stuff anymore. I didn't get it all.

    Also Roddenberry wrote "The God Thing" as the first proposal for the first movie.
    It had some elements in common with Shatner's original concept for ST5 - like the ones the studio hated.
    It even had the "God" turning into Satan thing. (Although real information is extremely sparse).

    Anyway, "In They Image" was going to be a 2 "hour", 3-Mega-Buck TV movie, before it got turned into TMP. Work was paid for, to continue developing the series, so-as to keep the movie a great-big-scary-secret. (They were negotiaing contracts, and, well, that's Hollywood...).

    Foster wrote the episode treatment, Livingston wrote the first draft.
    Foster wrote the movie, as far as I can tell, then Livingston & Roddenberry wrote their many versions.
    After that, I started to go off on that rant, starting with the history of Studio vs. Roddenberry... other Trekly subjects...


    Here's a short one:
    How about all those Not-Trek various-movie moments that Roddenberry and/or the actors objected to. Turned out the fans hated 'em too.

    On one hand the studio is cool with the fans making derivitive works, and stuff, when non-profit.
    On the other hand they seem to think we're the last people they should listen to. And they charge double to quadruple for series-es DVD's.

    They slashed the budget of the TOS 3rd-season because Lucy's 2nd husband wanted to make "Love American Style".
    (Forcing the invention of the "Filler Episode"). And they cut the first 3 new series-es short at 7 Seasons, tho' every added season means several more profitable years in re-syndication. (Grossly outweighing the budget increases from actor salary increases, and all that stuff).
    They encoraged filler episodes for non-Ratings-Sweeps-periods, instead of investing for a humongous return in syndication. (Also, keeping a steady viewership means much bigger ratings in the sweeps). But, to be fair, the whole industry thinks that way, just less drasticly.

    And I don't know if they knew they were going to ditch Enterprise before or after they cut the budget & Berman handed the 4th season over to (WooHoo!) Manny Coto, (a TOS fan, and an accomplished producer-writer) but either way, truncating it sucks donk.
    Post
    #156173
    Topic
    Star Trek V - Re-Edit (InThyImage) (Released)
    Time
    Originally posted by: Rikter
    VERY SPECIAL THANKS to... Jaiman Tuckuh for the files that made the last upload possible!!!!!!!


    My pleasure. Heck, my job wasn't finished until it was torrented. So thank you for getting it up so quick.

    And those covers are awesome! Thanks for sending me a copies. :-D

    I like Type IV because it restores gold to the Insignia. I also like Type II for the way the colors work together, and because it makes the Enterprise stand out. Type I keeps that dignified British Grey, but the colour stands out a bit harshly, their way. Type III has an ominous intensity.


    I'm glad this thread happened. I wouldn't have expected this stuff would become so hard to find.
    It's the only Trek fan-edit I know of, and it's a good one. WNMHGB is the only Trek restoration project I've seen.



    {I originally did a goofy-humor version of this post. Parodying myself. Then it occurred to me that online humor is tricky.
    You never know how another person might read it. Besides, there was stuff to say.}